Reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada by Justice Binnie explained

This is a list of all the opinions written by Ian Binnie during his tenure as puisne justice of the Supreme Court of Canada.

1998

width=25px !width=35% Case name !Issue width=15% Co-authored by !width=15% Joined by
align=left valign=topUnion of New Brunswick Indians v New Brunswick (Minister of Finance), [1998] 1 SCR 1161 https://web.archive.org/web/20070319021112/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1998/1998rcs1-1161/1998rcs1-1161.htmlvalign=top Taxation of aboriginals None Gonthier J.
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topEurig Estate (Re)
[1998] 2 SCR 565https://web.archive.org/web/20070209024158/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1998/1998rcs2-565/1998rcs2-565.html		valign=top Constitutional law, estates None McLachlin J.
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topConsortium Developments (Clearwater) Ltd v Sarnia (City of)
[1998] 3 SCR 3 https://web.archive.org/web/20071104195028/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1998/1998rcs3-3/1998rcs3-3.html		valign=top Federalism, municipal law None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v Rose
[1998] 3 SCR 262 https://web.archive.org/web/20080605234510/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1998/1998rcs3-262/1998rcs3-262.html		valign=top Charter; right to full answer and defence; jury instruction None Lamer CJ and McLachlin, Major JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top

1999

bgcolor=#CCCCCC Ian Binnie 1999 statistics
align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px ?
Majority or Pluralitywidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE ?
Concurrencewidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=white ?
Other
width=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=red ?
Dissentwidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE ?
Concurrence/dissentwhite-space: nowrap Total = ?
Written opinions = ?Oral opinions = ?Unanimous opinions = ?
width=25px !width=35% Case name !Issue width=15% Co-authored by !width=15% Joined by
align=left valign=topCadbury Schweppes Inc v FBI Foods Ltd
[1999] 1 SCR 142 https://web.archive.org/web/20060721004654/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1999/1999rcs1-142/1999rcs1-142.html		valign=top Breach of confidence None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topSail Labrador Ltd v Challenge One (The)
[1999] 1 SCR 265 https://web.archive.org/web/20070325023103/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1999/1999rcs1-265/1999rcs1-265.html		valign=top Contract law, substantial performance None None
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v Campbell
[1999] 1 SCR 565 https://web.archive.org/web/20070315153949/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1999/1999rcs1-565/1999rcs1-565.html		valign=top Abuse of process; solicitor-client privilege None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v Beaulac
[1999] 1 SCR 768 https://web.archive.org/web/20070325070040/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1999/1999rcs1-768/1999rcs1-768.html		valign=top Language of accused Lamer C.J. None
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v Stone
[1999] 2 SCR 290 http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1999/1999rcs1-290/1999rcs2-290.html		valign=top Defence of automatism; sentencing NoneLamer CJ, Iacobucci and Major JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topJacobi v Griffiths
[1999] 2 SCR 570 https://web.archive.org/web/20070325022939/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1999/1999rcs2-570/1999rcs2-570.html		valign=top Vicarious liability of employer None Cory, Iacobucci and Major JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topM & D Farm Ltd v Manitoba Agricultural Credit Corp
[1999] 2 SCR 961 https://web.archive.org/web/20070225105402/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1999/1999rcs2-961/1999rcs2-961.html		valign=top Paramountcy doctrine; federalism None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topWinters v Legal Services Society
[1999] 3 SCR 160 https://web.archive.org/web/20070325070101/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1999/1999rcs3-160/1999rcs3-160.html		valign=top Legal services in prison None Lamer CJ and L'Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier, McLachlin, Iacobucci, Major and Bastarache JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v Marshall
[1999] 3 SCR 456 https://web.archive.org/web/20060915100254/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1999/1999rcs3-456/1999rcs3-456.html		valign=top aboriginal fishing rightsNone Lamer CJ and L'Heureux-Dubé, Cory and Iacobucci JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topDes Champs v Conseil des écoles séparées catholiques de langue française de Prescott-Russell
[1999] 3 SCR 281 https://web.archive.org/web/20070325070221/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1999/1999rcs3-281/1999rcs3-281.html		valign=top Public authorities None L'Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin and Iacobucci JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topAbouchar v Ottawa-Carleton French-language School BoardPublic Sector
[1999] 3 SCR 343 https://web.archive.org/web/20070220101412/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1999/1999rcs3-343/1999rcs3-343.html		valign=top Public Authorities None L'Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin and Iacobucci JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top

2000

bgcolor=#CCCCCC Ian Binnie 2000 statistics
align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px ?
Majority or Pluralitywidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE ?
Concurrencewidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=white ?
Other
width=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=red ?
Dissentwidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE ?
Concurrence/dissentwhite-space: nowrap Total = ?
Written opinions = ?Oral opinions = ?Unanimous opinions = ?
width=25px !width=35% Case name !Issue width=15% Co-authored by !width=15% Joined by
align=left valign=topR v Brooks
[2000] 1 SCR 237; 2000 SCC 11 https://web.archive.org/web/20101110084712/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc11/2000scc11.html		valign=top jailhouse informant evidenceNone None
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topGranovsky v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration)
[2000] 1 SCR 703; 2000 SCC 28 https://web.archive.org/web/20070318003712/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc28/2000scc28.html		valign=top equality rights the disabled None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v Jolivet
[2000] 1 SCR 751; 2000 SCC 29 https://web.archive.org/web/20101208112127/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc29/2000scc29.html		valign=top evidence None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topFN (Re)
[2000] 1 SCR 880; 2000 SCC 35 https://web.archive.org/web/20070316232147/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc35/2000scc35.html		valign=top non-disclosure of young offenders information None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topWill-Kare Paving & Contracting Ltd v Canada
[2000] 1 SCR 915; 2000 SCC 36 https://web.archive.org/web/20070317115821/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc36/2000scc36.html		valign=top taxation None Gonthier and McLachlin JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v J-LJ
[2000] 2 SCR 600; 2000 SCC 51 https://web.archive.org/web/20060716152935/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc51/2000scc51.html		valign=top Expert evidence; R. v. Mohan test None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topFree World Trust v Électro Santé Inc
[2000] 2 SCR 1024; 2000 SCC 66 https://web.archive.org/web/20071222075127/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc66/2000scc66.html		valign=top Patent infringementNone Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topWhirlpool Corp v Camco Inc
[2000] 2 SCR 1067; 2000 SCC 67 https://web.archive.org/web/20060725202230/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc67/2000scc67.html		valign=top Patent construction None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topWhirlpool Corp v Maytag Corp
[2000] 2 SCR 1116; 2000 SCC 68 https://web.archive.org/web/20090324041627/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc68/2000scc68.html		valign=top Patent construction None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topLittle Sisters Book and Art Emporium v Canada (Minister of Justice)
[2000] 2 SCR 1120, 2000 SCC 69 https://web.archive.org/web/20061229121728/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc69/2000scc69.html		valign=top Freedom of expression None McLachlin CJ and L'Heureux‑Dubé, Gonthier, Major and Bastarache JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top

2001

bgcolor=#CCCCCC Ian Binnie 2001 statistics
align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px ?
Majority or Pluralitywidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE ?
Concurrencewidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=white ?
Other
width=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=red ?
Dissentwidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE ?
Concurrence/dissentwhite-space: nowrap Total = ?
Written reasons = ?Oral reasons = ?Unanimous reasons = ?
width=25px !width=35% Case name !Issue width=15% Co-authored by !width=15% Joined by
align=left valign=topR v Parrott
[2001] 1 SCR 178; 2001 SCC 3 https://web.archive.org/web/20060726084855/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc3/2001scc3.html		valign=top Hearsay exception None Major, Bastarache and Arbour JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topEllis-Don Ltd v Ontario (Labour Relations Board)
[2001] 1 SCR 221; 2001 SCC 4 https://web.archive.org/web/20070214063308/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc4/2001scc4.html		valign=top natural justice; judicial review None Major J
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topMitchell v MNR
[2001] 1 SCR 911; 2001 SCC 33 https://web.archive.org/web/20070319014425/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc33/2001scc33.html		valign=top Aboriginal rights None Major J
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topMount Sinai Hospital Center v Quebec (Minister of Health and Social Services)
[2001] 2 SCR 281; 2001 SCC 41 https://web.archive.org/web/20080419172505/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc41/2001scc41.html		valign=top judicial review; ministerial discretion None Major J
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topDanyluk v Ainsworth Technologies Inc
[2001] 2 SCR 460; 2001 SCC 44 https://web.archive.org/web/20071017155526/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc44/2001scc44.html		valign=top employment law; issue estoppel None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topSaint-Romuald (City of) v Olivier
[2001] 2 SCR 898; 2001 SCC 57 https://web.archive.org/web/20090921005727/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc57/2001scc57.html		valign=top Zoning by-laws None McLachlin CJ and Major and Arbour JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topNaylor Group Inc v Ellis-Don Construction Ltd
[2001] 2 SCR 943; 2001 SCC 58 https://web.archive.org/web/20080714053433/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc58/2001scc58.html		valign=top Contracts None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topProulx v Quebec (AG)
[2001] 3 SCR 9; 2001 SCC 66 https://web.archive.org/web/20080602130320/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc66/2001scc66.html		valign=top Malicious prosecution Iacobucci J McLachlin CJ and Major J
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topHolt Cargo Systems Inc v ABC Containerline NV (Trustees of)
[2001] 3 SCR 907; 2001 SCC 90 https://web.archive.org/web/20060823163648/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc90/2001scc90.html		valign=top Maritime law None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topAntwerp Bulkcarriers, NV (Re)
[2001] 3 SCR 951; 2001 SCC 91 https://web.archive.org/web/20071104223324/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc91/2001scc91.html		valign=top Bankruptcy None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topSam Lévy & Associés Inc v Azco Mining Inc
[2001] 3 SCR 978; 2001 SCC 92 https://web.archive.org/web/20090213012015/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc92/2001scc92.html		valign=top Bankruptcy None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top

2002

bgcolor=#CCCCCC Ian Binnie 2002 statistics
align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px ?
Majority or Pluralitywidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE ?
Concurrencewidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=white ?
Other
width=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=red ?
Dissentwidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE ?
Concurrence/dissentwhite-space: nowrap Total = ?
Written opinions = ?Oral opinions = ?Unanimous opinions = ?
width=25px !width=35% Case name !Issue width=15% Co-authored by !width=15% Joined by
align=left valign=topR v Regan
[2002] 1 SCR 297; 2002 SCC 12 https://web.archive.org/web/20060923043223/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc12/2002scc12.html		valign=top abuse of process None Iacobucci, Major and Arbour JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topMackin v New Brunswick (Minister of Finance); Rice v New Brunswick
[2002] 1 SCR 405; 2002 SCC 13 https://web.archive.org/web/20060923184942/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc13/2002scc13.html		valign=top judicial independence; constitutional remedies None LeBel J
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v Fliss
[2002] 1 SCR 535; 2002 SCC 16 https://web.archive.org/web/20060925060253/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc16/2002scc16.html		valign=top Charter, search and seizure None Iacobucci, Major and Bastarache JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topWhiten v Pilot Insurance Co
[2002] 1 SCR 595; 2002 SCC 18 https://web.archive.org/web/20060923184954/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc18/2002scc18.html		valign=top Insurance, damages None McLachlin CJ and L'Heureux‑Dubé, Gonthier, Major and Arbour JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topPerformance Industries Ltd v Sylvan Lake Golf & Tennis Club Ltd
[2002] 1 SCR 678; 2002 SCC 19 https://web.archive.org/web/20060924052017/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc19/2002scc19.html		valign=top Equitable remedies in contract None McLachlin CJ and L'Heureux‑Dubé, Gonthier, Major and Arbour JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v Sheppard
[2002] 1 SCR 869; 2002 SCC 26 https://web.archive.org/web/20060924184132/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc26/2002scc26.html		valign=top Duty to give reasons in criminal trials None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v Braich
[2002] 1 SCR 903; 2002 SCC 27 https://web.archive.org/web/20060925054436/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc27/2002scc27.html		valign=top Duty to give reason for judgment None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topThéberge v Galerie d'Art du Petit Champlain Inc
[2002] 2 SCR 336, 2002 SCC 34 https://web.archive.org/web/20080430131913/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc34/2002scc34.html		valign=top Copyright, fixation None McLachlin CJ and Iacobucci and Major JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v Handy
[2002] 2 SCR 908, 2002 SCC 56 https://web.archive.org/web/20060710102625/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc56/2002scc56.html		valign=top Similar fact evidence None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v Shearing
[2002] 3 SCR 33; 2002 SCC 58 https://archive.today/20070620154231/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc58/2002scc58.html		valign=top Similar fact evidence None McLachlin CJ and Iacobucci, Major, Bastarache, Arbour and LeBel JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topSomersall v Friedman
[2002] 3 SCR 109; 2002 SCC 59 https://web.archive.org/web/20090921055044/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc59/2002scc59.html		valign=top Insurance, subrogation None Major J
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v Neil
[2002] 3 SCR 631; 2002 SCC 70 https://web.archive.org/web/20060725074401/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc70/2002scc70.html		valign=top Conflict of interest, lawyers None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topHarvard College v Canada (Commissioner of Patents)
[2002] 4 SCR 45; 2002 SCC 76 https://web.archive.org/web/20060710102704/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc76/2002scc76.html		valign=top patent of higher lifeforms None McLachlin CJ and Major and Arbour JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topApotex Inc v Wellcome Foundation Ltd
[2002] 4 SCR 153; 2002 SCC 77 https://web.archive.org/web/20101231060210/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc77/2002scc77.html		valign=top Patent validity None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topWewaykum Indian Band v Canada
[2002] 4 SCR 245; 2002 SCC 79 https://web.archive.org/web/20090311012033/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc79/2002scc79.html		valign=top Crown’s fiduciary duty to aboriginals None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top

2003

bgcolor=#CCCCCC Ian Binnie 2003 statistics
align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px ?
Majority or Pluralitywidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE ?
Concurrencewidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=white ?
Other
width=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=red ?
Dissentwidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE ?
Concurrence/dissentwhite-space: nowrap Total = ?
Written opinions = ?Oral opinions = ?Unanimous opinions = ?
width=25px !width=35% Case name !Issue width=15% Co-authored by !width=15% Joined by
align=left valign=topGoudie v Ottawa (City of)
[2003] 1 SCR 141; 2003 SCC 14 https://web.archive.org/web/20070317115912/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc14/2003scc14.html		valign=top Labour relations None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topCanadian Union of Public Employees v Ontario (Minister of Labour)
[2003] 1 SCR 539; 2003 SCC 29 https://web.archive.org/web/20060913023318/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc29/2003scc29.html		valign=top Labour relations, judicial review, appointment of arbitrators None Gonthier, Iacobucci, Arbour, LeBel and Deschamps JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v Owen
[2003] 1 SCR 779; 2003 SCC 33 https://web.archive.org/web/20060721001244/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc33/2003scc33.html		valign=top Mental disorder None McLachlin CJ and Gonthier, Iacobucci, Major, Bastarache, LeBel and Deschamps JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v Asante-Mensah
[2003] 2 SCR 3; 2003 SCC 38 https://web.archive.org/web/20060726084958/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc38/2003scc38.html		valign=top citizen's arrest; use of force None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topUnifund Assurance Co v Insurance Corp of British Columbia
[2003] 2 SCR 63; 2003 SCC 40 https://web.archive.org/web/20060831164300/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc40/2003scc40.html		valign=top Interprovincial jurisdiction None McLachlin CJ and Iacobucci and LeBel JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v Williams
[2003] 2 SCR 134; 2003 SCC 41 https://web.archive.org/web/20080220215147/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc41/2003scc41.html		valign=top Assault, Non‑disclosure of HIV status None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topBeals v Saldanha
[2003] 3 SCR 416; 2003 SCC 72 https://web.archive.org/web/20070715111527/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc72/2003scc72.html		valign=top conflict of laws; enforcement of judgment None Iacobucci J
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v Wu
[2003] 3 SCR 530; 2003 SCC 73 https://web.archive.org/web/20071117111951/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc73/2003scc73.html		valign=top Conditional sentencing None McLachlin CJ and Gonthier, Iacobucci, Major, Bastarache, Arbour and LeBel JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v Malmo-Levine; R v Caine
[2003] 3 SCR 571; 2003 SCC 74 https://web.archive.org/web/20060721001331/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc74/2003scc74.html		valign=top Charter of Rights, division of powers, prohibition of marijuana Gonthier J McLachlin CJ and Iacobucci, Major and Bastarache JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v Clay
[2003] 3 SCR 735; 2003 SCC 75 https://web.archive.org/web/20060918232320/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc75/2003scc75.html		valign=top Charter, section 7 Gonthier J McLachlin CJ and Iacobucci, Major and Bastarache JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top

2004

bgcolor=#CCCCCC Ian Binnie 2004 statistics
align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px ?
Majority or Pluralitywidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE ?
Concurrencewidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=white ?
Other
width=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=red ?
Dissentwidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE ?
Concurrence/dissentwhite-space: nowrap Total = ?
Written opinions = ?Oral opinions = ?Unanimous opinions = ?
width=25px !width=35% Case name !Issue width=15% Co-authored by !width=15% Joined by
align=left valign=topCanadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v Canada (AG)
[2004] 1 SCR 76; 2004 SCC 4 https://web.archive.org/web/20060710021317/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc4/2004scc4.html		valign=top Charter, spanking None None
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v Smith
[2004] 1 SCR 385; 2004 SCC 14 https://web.archive.org/web/20071013171339/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc14/2004scc14.html		valign=top Death of appellant None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topPenetanguishene Mental Health Centre v Ontario (AG)
[2004] 1 SCR 498; 2004 SCC 20 https://web.archive.org/web/20070318221455/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc20/2004scc20.html		valign=top Mental disorder defence None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topPinet v St Thomas Psychiatric Hospital
[2004] 1 SCR 528; 2004 SCC 21 https://web.archive.org/web/20070318221644/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc21/2004scc21.html		valign=top Mental disorder defence None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topBritish Columbia v Canadian Forest Products Ltd
[2004] 2 SCR 74; 2004 SCC 38 https://web.archive.org/web/20071013171538/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc38/2004scc38.html		valign=top Damage to public lands None McLachlin CJ and Iacobucci, Major, Arbour and Deschamps JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topQuebec (AG) v Quebec (Human Rights Tribunal)
[2004] 2 SCR 223; 2004 SCC 40 https://web.archive.org/web/20070319014953/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc40/2004scc40.html		valign=top Jurisdiction of human rights tribunals None Fish J
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topApplication under s 83.28 of the Criminal Code (Re)
[2004] 2 SCR 248; 2004 SCC 42 https://web.archive.org/web/20071013171606/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc42/2004scc42.html		valign=top Charter, terrorism None None
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v Kerr
[2004] 2 SCR 371; 2004 SCC 44 https://web.archive.org/web/20071013171617/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc44/2004scc44.html		valign=top Weapons offences None None
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topSociety of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada v Canadian Assn of Internet Providers
[2004] 2 SCR 427; 2004 SCC 45 https://web.archive.org/web/20071013171621/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc45/2004scc45.html		valign=top Copyright infringement None McLachlin CJ and Iacobucci, Major, Bastarache, Arbour, Deschamps and Fish JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topSyndicat Northcrest v Amselem
[2004] 2 SCR 551; 2004 SCC 47 https://web.archive.org/web/20071013171625/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc47/2004scc47.html		valign=top Freedom of religion None None
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topGilles E Néron Communication Marketing Inc v Chambre des notaires du Québec
[2004] 3 SCR 95; 2004 SCC 53 https://web.archive.org/web/20070311042401/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc53/2004scc53.html		valign=top Defamation, television broadcasts None None
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topHodge v Canada (Minister of Human Resources Development)
[2004] 3 SCR 357; 2004 SCC 65 https://web.archive.org/web/20060710102958/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc65/2004scc65.html		valign=top Charter equality rights, marriage None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topNewfoundland (Treasury Board) v Newfoundland and Labrador Association of Public and Private Employees
[2004] 3 SCR 381; 2004 SCC 66 https://web.archive.org/web/20071013010116/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc66/2004scc66.html		valign=top Charter equality rights, gender, reasonable limits None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v Tessling
[2004] 3 SCR 432; 2004 SCC 67 https://web.archive.org/web/20060710023845/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc67/2004scc67.html		valign=top Charter, search and seizure None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topPacific National Investments Ltd v Victoria (City of)
[2004] 3 SCR 575; 2004 SCC 75 https://web.archive.org/web/20071013171841/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc75/2004scc75.html		valign=top Zoning, unjust enrichment None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v Lohrer
[2004] 3 SCR 732; 2004 SCC 80 https://web.archive.org/web/20071013171905/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc80/2004scc80.html		valign=top Misapprehension of evidence None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top

2005

bgcolor=#CCCCCC Ian Binnie 2005 statistics
align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px ?
Majority or Pluralitywidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE ?
Concurrencewidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=white ?
Other
width=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=red ?
Dissentwidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE ?
Concurrence/dissentwhite-space: nowrap Total = ?
Written opinions = ?Oral opinions = ?Unanimous opinions = ?
width=25px !width=35% Case name !Issue width=15% Co-authored by !width=15% Joined by
align=left valign=topVaughan v Canada
[2005] 1 SCR 146; 2005 SCC 11 https://web.archive.org/web/20070317120032/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc11/2005scc11.html		valign=top Labour law; early retirement None Major, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Abella and Charron JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topBristol-Myers Squibb Co v Canada (AG)
[2005] 1 SCR 533; 2005 SCC 26 https://web.archive.org/web/20070319015054/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc26/2005scc26.html		valign=top Patents, Notice of complianceNone McLachlin CJ and LeBel, Deschamps, Fish and Abella JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topCanada (House of Commons) v Vaid
[2005] 1 SCR 667, 2005 SCC 30 https://web.archive.org/web/20070319015115/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc30/2005scc30.html		valign=top Parliamentary privilege None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topChaoulli v Quebec (AG)
[2005] 1 SCR 791; 2005 SCC 35 https://web.archive.org/web/20110202122636/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc35/2005scc35.html		valign=top Charter, section 7; prohibition on medical insurance LeBel J Fish J
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topMugesera v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
[2005] 2 SCR 100; 2005 SCC 40 https://web.archive.org/web/20070311042216/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc40/2005scc40.html		valign=top Administrative law; crimes against humanity; deportation orders Unanimous None
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v GR
[2005] 2 SCR 371; 2005 SCC 45 https://web.archive.org/web/20070312215358/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc45/2005scc45.html		valign=top Incest None McLachlin CJ and Major, Fish and Charron JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topEB v Order of the Oblates of Mary Immaculate in the Province of British Columbia
[2005] 3 SCR 45; 2005 SCC 60 https://web.archive.org/web/20070312215408/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc60/2005scc60.html		valign=top Vicarious liability None McLachlin CJ and Major, Bastarache, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish and Charron JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topMontréal (City of) v 2952-1366 Québec Inc
[2005] 3 SCR 141; 2005 SCC 62 https://web.archive.org/web/20071017120454/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc62/2005scc62.html		valign=top Freedom of expression; public property None None
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topMikisew Cree First Nation v Canada (Minister of Canadian Heritage)
[2005] 3 SCR 388; 2005 SCC 69 https://web.archive.org/web/20070606024606/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc69/2005scc69.html		valign=top Aboriginal treaty rights; duty to consult None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topMerk v International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers, Local 771
[2005] 3 SCR 425; 2005 SCC 70 https://web.archive.org/web/20071121014106/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc70/2005scc70.html		valign=top Whistleblowers None McLachlin CJ and Major, LeBel, Abella and Charron JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v Spence
[2005] 3 SCR 458; 2005 SCC 71 https://web.archive.org/web/20071120112915/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc71/2005scc71.html		valign=top Jury selection; judicial notice None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v Henry
[2005] 3 SCR 609; 2005 SCC 76 https://web.archive.org/web/20071120112924/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc76/2005scc76.html		valign=top Right against self-incrimination; obiter dicta None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top

2006

bgcolor=#CCCCCC Ian Binnie 2006 statistics
align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px 7
Majority or Pluralitywidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE 1
Concurrencewidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=white 0
Other
width=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=red 3
Dissentwidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE 0
Concurrence/dissentwhite-space: nowrap Total = 11
Written reasons= ?Oral reasons= ?Unanimous reasons= ?
width=25px !width=35% Case name !Issue width=15% Co-authored by !width=15% Joined by
align=left valign=topYoung v Bella
[2006] 1 SCR 108; 2006 SCC 3 https://web.archive.org/web/20060912123340/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc3/2006scc3.html		valign=top Duty of care McLachlin CJ Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topATCO Gas & Pipelines Ltd v Alberta (Energy & Utilities Board)
[2006] 1 SCR 140; 2006 SCC 4 https://web.archive.org/web/20060913023425/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc4/2006scc4.html		valign=top Judicial review None McLachlin CJ and Fish J
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topMattel, Inc v 3894207 Canada Inc
[2006] 1 SCR 772; 2006 SCC 22 https://web.archive.org/web/20060711033522/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc22/2006scc22.html		valign=top Trade-marks None McLachlin CJ and Bastarache, Deschamps, Fish, Abella and Charron JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topVeuve Clicquot Ponsardin v Boutiques Cliquot Ltée
[2006] 1 SCR 824; 2006 SCC 23 https://web.archive.org/web/20060726085024/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc23/2006scc23.html		valign=top Trade-marks, confusion, goodwill None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topCanada 3000 Inc, Re; Inter‑Canadian (1991) Inc (Trustee of)
[2006] 1 SCR 865; 2006 SCC 24 https://web.archive.org/web/20060725074504/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc24/2006scc24.html		valign=top Seizure of property, airplanes; statutory interpretation None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topLeskun v Leskun
[2006] 1 SCR 920; 2006 SCC 25 https://web.archive.org/web/20060722061819/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc25/2006scc25.html		valign=top Misconduct in spousal support None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topCelanese Canada Inc v Murray Demolition Corp
2006 SCC 36 https://web.archive.org/web/20070313211040/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc36/2006scc36.html		valign=top Anton Piller orders; solicitor-client privilege None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topImperial Oil Ltd v Canada; Inco Ltd v Canada
2006 SCC 46 https://web.archive.org/web/20070318003928/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc46/2006scc46.html		valign=top Taxation, business income None Fish and Charron JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topAstraZeneca Canada Inc v Canada (Minister of Health)
2006 SCC 49 https://web.archive.org/web/20070221023256/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc49/2006scc49.html		valign=top Patents; notice of compliance None Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v Sappier; R v Gray
2006 SCC 54 https://web.archive.org/web/20070107031453/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc54/2006scc54.html		valign=top Logging rights None None
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topMcDiarmid Lumber Ltd v God's Lake First Nation
2006 SCC 58 https://web.archive.org/web/20070107031348/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc58/2006scc58.html		valign=top Aboriginal law, property rights None Fish and Abella JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top

2007

width=25px !width=35% Case name !Issue width=15% Co-authored by !width=15% Joined by
align=left valign=topLittle Sisters Book and Art Emporium v Canada (Commissioner of Customs and Revenue)
2007 SCC 2		valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v Beaudry
2007 SCC 5		valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topCanadian Western Bank v Alberta
2007 SCC 22		valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topBritish Columbia (AG) v Lafarge Canada Inc
2007 SCC 23		valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topStrother v 3464920 Canada Inc
2007 SCC 24		valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v Hape
2007 SCC 26		valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v Clayton
2007 SCC 32		valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topKerr v Danier Leather Inc
2007 SCC 45		valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topCitadel General Assurance Co v Vytlingam
2007 SCC 46		valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topLumbermens Mutual Casualty Co v Herbison
2007 SCC 47		valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top

2010

bgcolor=#CCCCCC Statistics
align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px XXXXX
Majority or Pluralitywidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE XXX
Concurrencewidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=white XXXX
Other
width=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=red XXXX
Dissentwidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE XXXX
Concurrence/dissentwhite-space: nowrap Total = XXXXXX
Written opinions = XXXOral opinions = XXX Unanimous decisions = XXX
width=25px !width=32.5% Case name !Issue width=15% Co-authored by !width=15% Joined by
align=left valign=topXXX
CITATIONS [URL]		valign=top XXX XXX XXX
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topXXX
CITATIONS [URL]		valign=top XXX XXX XXX

2011

bgcolor=#CCCCCC Statistics
align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px XXXXX
Majority or Pluralitywidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE XXX
Concurrencewidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=white XXXX
Other
width=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=red XXXX
Dissentwidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE XXXX
Concurrence/dissentwhite-space: nowrap Total = XXXXXX
Written opinions = XXXOral opinions = XXX Unanimous decisions = XXX
width=25px !width=32.5% Case name !Issue width=15% Co-authored by !width=15% Joined by
align=left valign=topR v Carron
2011 SCC 5 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7917/index.do		valign=top Whether a superior court has inherent jurisdiction to grant interim costs in litigation taking place in the provincial court – McLachlin CJ and LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Charron, Rothstein and Cromwell JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v White
2011 SCC 13 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7926/index.do		valign=top Whether the trial judge's failure to state to the jury that post-offence conduct has no probative value constituted an error of law – McLachlin CJ and Fish J
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v SD
2011 SCC 14 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7928/index.do		valign=top Whether the fact the accused was convicted of an offence on a date other than the one referred to in the indictment affected trial fairness – LeBel, Deschamps, Charron, Rothstein and Cromwell JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topSeidel v TELUS Communications Inc
2011 SCC 15 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7927/index.do		valign=top Whether provincial legislation, stating that contractual agreements to waive or release rights, benefits or protects under the legislation area void, renders an arbitration clause in a standard form cell phone contract void – McLachlin CJ and Fish, Rothstein and Cromwell JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topBritish Columbia (AG) v Malik
2011 SCC 18 [URL]		valign=top Whether a prior decision is admissible only where respondents are precluded by issue estoppel or abuse of process from relitigating the facts adduced — Whether a superior court judge hearing an ex parte application for an interlocutory order may admit findings and conclusions of prior judicial decision into evidence — Whether there was sufficient admissible evidence adduced to justify an Anton Piller order – Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v O'Brien
2011 SCC 29 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7943/index.do		valign=top Whether trial judge's error in not excluding bad character evidence and in not specifically addressing that evidence in his reasons caused a substantial wrong or a miscarriage of justice – LeBel J
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topCanada (AG) v Mavi
2011 SCC 30 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7944/index.do		valign=top Whether Immigration and Refugee Protection Act provides discretion to enforce immigration sponsorship debt — Whether Ontario debt recovery policy improperly fettering exercise of statutory discretion – Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v Barros
2011 SCC 51 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7967/index.do		valign=top Whether investigator hired by the defence is bound by informer privilege — Whether trial judge committed errors of law allowing appellate review of acquittals for offences of obstructing justice and extortion – McLachlin CJ and LeBel, Deschamps, Abella, Charron and Rothstein JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topR v Sarrazin
2011 SCC 54 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7970/index.do		valign=top Whether the potential verdict of attempted murder should have been left with the jury by the trial judge – McLachlin CJ and LeBel, Fish, Abella and Charron JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topLax Kw'alaams Indian Band v Canada (AG)
2011 SCC 56 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7972/index.do		valign=top First Nations claiming rights to commercial harvesting and sale of all species of fish within their traditional waters, and whether pre-contact trade in fish product could evolve into modern commercial fishery — Whether historical record supported existence of fiduciary duty to grant claimants right to modern commercial fishery – Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
align=left valign=topAlberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner) v Alberta Teachers' Association
2011 SCC 61 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7979/index.do		valign=top Whether a matter that was not raised at a tribunal may be judicially reviewed — Whether a tribunal's decision relating to the interpretation of its home statute or statutes closely connected to its functions is reviewable on a standard of reasonableness or correctness – Deschamps J

2012

bgcolor=#CCCCCC Statistics
align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px 0
Majority or Pluralitywidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE 0
Concurrencewidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=white 0
Other
width=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=red 1
Dissentwidth=25px
align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE 0
Concurrence/dissentwhite-space: nowrap Total = 1
Written opinions = 1Oral opinions = 0 Unanimous decisions = 0
width=25px !width=45% Case name !Issue width=15% Co-authored by !width=15% Joined by
align=left valign=topR v DAI
2012 SCC 5 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7990/index.do		valign=top Whether adult witnesses with mental disabilities must demonstrate understanding of nature of obligation to tell truth in order to be deemed competent to testify – LeBel and Fish JJ

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada by Justice Binnie".

Except where otherwise indicated, Everything.Explained.Today is © Copyright 2009-2024, A B Cryer, All Rights Reserved. Cookie policy.