Reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada by Beverley McLachlin explained

The following is a list of Supreme Court of Canada opinions written by Beverley McLachlin during her tenure on the Court.

1989

British Columbia v Henfrey Samson Belair Ltd, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 24
R v Leaney, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 393
Falk Bros Industries Ltd v Elance Steel Fabricating Co, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 778
Scarff v Wilson, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 776
Watkins v Olafson, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 750
QNS Paper Co v Chartwell Shipping Ltd, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 683
R v L (JE), [1989] 2 S.C.R. 510
R v M (SH), [1989] 2 S.C.R. 446
Mackeigan v Hickman, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 796
Oregon Jack Creek Indian Band v Canadian National Railway Co, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 1069
R v Nygaard, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 1074
R v Buttar, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 1429

1990

R v Shubley, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 3
Rawluk v Rawluk, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 70 (dissent)
R v Van Rassel, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 225
R v A, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 995 (dissent)
R v Wallen, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 827
CCR Fishing Ltd v British Reserve Insurance Co, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 814
Nichols v American Home Assurance Co, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 801
R v B (CR), [1990] 1 S.C.R. 717
Ratych v Bloomer, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 940
R v Saunders, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 1020
R v B (G), [1990] 2 S.C.R. 57
Rocket v Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 232
R v Hebert, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 151
Bishop v Stevens, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 467
National Trust Co v Mead, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 410
R v Khan, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 531
R v Hess; R v Nguyen, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 906
R v Penno, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 865
R v Askov, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 1199
R v Zito, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 1520
R v Lachance, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 1490
R v Garofoli, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 1421 (dissent)
Dersch v Canada (AG), [1990] 2 S.C.R. 1505
Lester (WW) (1978) Ltd v United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry, Local 740, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 644
R v Scott, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 979 (dissent)
Canada (Human Rights Commission) v Taylor, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 892 (dissent in part)
R v Andrews, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 870 (dissent)
R v Keegstra, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 697 (dissent)
R v Chaulk, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1303 (dissent)

1991

Reference Re Prov Electoral Boundaries (Sask) [1991] 2 S.C.R. 158
R v Seaboyer [1991] 2 S.C.R. 577

Note: This part of the list is incomplete

1992

Norberg v Wynrib
[1992] 2 S.C.R. 224
R v Zundel
[1992] 2 S.C.R. 731

Note: This part of the list is incomplete

1993

Hall v Hebert, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 159
R v Creighton, [1993] 3 S.C.R. 3
Rodriguez v British Columbia (AG), [1993] 3 S.C.R. 519

Note: This part of the list is incomplete

1994

Dagenais v Canadian Broadcasting Corp[1994] 3 S.C.R. 835

Note: This part of the list is incomplete

1995

Note: This part of the list is incomplete

1996

Note: This part of the list is incomplete

1997

R v Leipert, [1997] 1 S.C.R. 281
R v Stillman, [1997] 1 S.C.R. 607
R v Curragh Inc, [1997] 1 S.C.R. 537
R v Noble, [1997] 1 S.C.R. 874
R v McDonnell, [1997] 1 S.C.R. 948
Soulos v Korkontzilas, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 217
Opetchesaht Indian Band v Canada, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 119
Hickman Motors Ltd v Canada, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 336
Arndt v Smith, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 539
R v G (SG), [1997] 2 S.C.R. 716
R v Esau, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 777
Pasiechnyk v Saskatchewan (Workers' Compensation Board), [1997] 2 S.C.R. 890
R v S (RD), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484
R v Ly, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 698
Wallace v United Grain Growers Ltd, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 701
Winnipeg Child and Family Services (Northwest Area) v G (DF), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 925
R v Skalbania, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 995
Lewis (Guardian ad litem of) v British Columbia, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 1145
Delgamuukw v British Columbia, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 1010
Porto Seguro Companhia De Seguros Gerais v Belcan SA, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 1278
Bow Valley Husky (Bermuda) Ltd v Saint John Shipbuilding Ltd, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 1210

1998

Westcoast Energy Inc v Canada (National Energy Board), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 322 (dissent)
R v Lucas, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 439
R v Charemski, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 679
Canada (Human Rights Commission) v Canadian Liberty Net, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 626
R v Williams, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 1128
Canada Safeway Ltd v Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, Local 454, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 1079
Battlefords and District Co-operatives Ltd v Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, Local 544, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 1118
Union of New Brunswick Indians v New Brunswick (Minister of Finance), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 1161
R v Cuerrier, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 371
Continental Bank of Canada v Canada, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 358
Continental Bank Leasing Corp v Canada, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 298
R v MacDougall, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 45
R v Gallant, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 80

1999

bgcolor=#CCCCCC

Beverley McLachlin 1999 statistics

align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px

Majority or Plurality

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE

Concurrence

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=white

Other

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=red

Dissent

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE

Concurrence/dissent

white-space: nowrap

Total =

Written opinions = ?

Oral opinions = ?

Unanimous opinions = ?

width=25px	!	width=35%	Case name !	Issue	width=15%	Co-authored by !	width=15%	Joined by
	align=left valign=top	Bracklow v Bracklow [1999] 1 S.C.R. 420	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Novak v Bond [1999] 1 S.C.R. 808	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Corbiere v Canada (Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs) [1999] 2 S.C.R. 203	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v G (B) [1999] 2 S.C.R. 475	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Winko v British Columbia (Forensic Psychiatric Institute) [1999] 2 S.C.R. 625	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v LePage [1999] 2 S.C.R. 744	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Orlowski v British Columbia (Forensic Psychiatric Institute) [1999] 2 S.C.R. 733	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Jacobi v Griffiths [1999] 2 S.C.R. 570	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Bese v British Columbia (Forensic Psychiatric Institute) [1999] 2 S.C.R. 722	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Bazley v Curry [1999] 2 S.C.R. 534	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Dobson (Litigation Guardian of) v Dobson [1999] 2 S.C.R. 753	valign=top		None	L'Heureux-Dube J.
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	British Columbia (Public Service Employee Relations Commission) v British Columbia Government Employees' Union [1999] 3 S.C.R. 3	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Marshall [1999] 3 S.C.R. 456	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Shell Canada Ltd v Canada [1999] 3 S.C.R. 622	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Royal Bank of Canada v W Got Associates Electric Ltd [1999] 3 S.C.R. 408	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v F (WJ) [1999] 3 S.C.R. 569	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Mills [1999] 3 S.C.R. 668	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles) v British Columbia (Council of Human Rights) [1999] 3 S.C.R. 868	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top

2000

bgcolor=#CCCCCC

Beverley McLachlin 2000 statistics

align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px

Majority or Plurality

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE

Concurrence

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=white

Other

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=red

Dissent

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE

Concurrence/dissent

white-space: nowrap

Total =

Written opinions = ?

Oral opinions = ?

Unanimous opinions = ?

width=25px	!	width=35%	Case name !	Issue	width=15%	Co-authored by !	width=15%	Joined by
	align=left valign=top	Kovach v British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Board) [2000] 1 S.C.R. 55; 2000 SCC 3 https://web.archive.org/web/20070316232037/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc3/2000scc3.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Lindsay v Saskatchewan (Workers' Compensation Board) [2000] 1 S.C.R. 59; 2000 SCC 4 https://web.archive.org/web/20070317115731/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc4/2000scc4.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v RNS [2000] 1 S.C.R. 149; 2000 SCC 7 https://web.archive.org/web/20101208112143/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc7/2000scc7.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Ajax (Town of) v CAW, Local 222 [2000] 1 S.C.R. 538; 2000 SCC 23 https://web.archive.org/web/20070318003629/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc23/2000scc23.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Non-Marine Underwriters, Lloyd's of London v Scalera [2000] 1 S.C.R. 551; 2000 SCC 24 https://web.archive.org/web/20070317115741/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc24/2000scc24.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Sansalone v Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Co [2000] 1 S.C.R. 627; 2000 SCC 25 https://web.archive.org/web/20070319014314/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc25/2000scc25.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v ARB [2000] 1 S.C.R. 781; 2000 SCC 30 https://web.archive.org/web/20070319014325/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc30/2000scc30.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Reference Re Gruenke [2000] 1 S.C.R. 836; 2000 SCC 32 https://web.archive.org/web/20080220215126/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc32/2000scc32.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Starr [2000] 2 S.C.R. 144; 2000 SCC 40 https://web.archive.org/web/20090301163027/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc40/2000scc40.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v DD [2000] 2 S.C.R. 275; 2000 SCC 43 https://web.archive.org/web/20070902074946/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc43/2000scc43.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v MO [2000] 2 S.C.R. 594; 2000 SCC 49 https://archive.today/20070620154231/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc49/2000scc49.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Sutton [2000] 2 S.C.R. 595; 2000 SCC 50 https://archive.today/20070620154231/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc50/2000scc50.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Musqueam Indian Band v Glass [2000] 2 S.C.R. 633; 2000 SCC 52 https://web.archive.org/web/20071114165832/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc52/2000scc52.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Simard [2000] 2 S.C.R. 911; 2000 SCC 61 https://archive.today/20070620154231/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc61/2000scc61.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top

2001

bgcolor=#CCCCCC

Beverley McLachlin 2001 statistics

align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px

Majority or Plurality

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE

Concurrence

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=white

Other

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=red

Dissent

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE

Concurrence/dissent

white-space: nowrap

Total =

Written opinions = ?

Oral opinions = ?

Unanimous opinions = ?

width=25px	!	width=35%	Case name !	Issue	width=15%	Co-authored by !	width=15%	Joined by
	align=left valign=top	R v Sharpe [2001] 1 S.C.R. 45; 2001 SCC 2 http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc8/2001scc2.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Deane [2001] 1 S.C.R. 279; 2001 SCC 5 https://web.archive.org/web/20070310221858/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc5/2001scc5.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Parent [2001] 1 S.C.R. 761; 2001 SCC 30 https://web.archive.org/web/20071021043952/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc30/2001scc30.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Find [2001] 1 S.C.R. 863; 2001 SCC 32 https://web.archive.org/web/20071013230235/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc32/2001scc32.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Mitchell v MNR [2001] 1 S.C.R. 911; 2001 SCC 33 https://web.archive.org/web/20070319014425/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc33/2001scc33.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Western Canadian Shopping Centres Inc v Dutton [2001] 2 S.C.R. 534; 2001 SCC 46 https://web.archive.org/web/20070319014425/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc33/2001scc33.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Ocean Port Hotel Ltd v British Columbia (General Manager, Liquor Control and Licensing Branch) [2001] 2 S.C.R. 781; 2001 SCC 52 https://web.archive.org/web/20060924051539/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc52/2001scc52.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Russell [2001] 2 S.C.R. 804; 2001 SCC 53 https://web.archive.org/web/20080509051812/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc53/2001scc53.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Arcuri [2001] 2 S.C.R. 828; 2001 SCC 54 https://web.archive.org/web/20060614055732/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc54/2001scc54.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Mankwe [2001] 3 S.C.R. 3; 2001 SCC 63 https://web.archive.org/web/20091002024220/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc63/2001scc63.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Hollick v Toronto (City of) [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158; 2001 SCC 68 https://web.archive.org/web/20091002024235/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc68/2001scc68.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Rumley v British Columbia [2001] 3 S.C.R. 184; 2001 SCC 69 https://web.archive.org/web/20060913023505/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc69/2001scc69.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Scott [2001] 3 S.C.R. 425; 2001 SCC 73 https://web.archive.org/web/20091002025458/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc73/2001scc73.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Cooper v Hobart [2001] 3 S.C.R. 537; 2001 SCC 79 https://web.archive.org/web/20071203171110/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc79/2001scc79.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Edwards v Law Society of Upper Canada [2001] 3 S.C.R. 562; 2001 SCC 80 https://web.archive.org/web/20091002195746/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc80/2001scc80.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v 974649 Ontario Inc [2001] 3 S.C.R. 575; 2001 SCC 81 https://web.archive.org/web/20070305215256/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc81/2001scc81.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Hynes [2001] 3 S.C.R. 623; 2001 SCC 82 https://web.archive.org/web/20090402135639/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc82/2001scc82.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top

2002

bgcolor=#CCCCCC

Beverley McLachlin 2002 statistics

align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px

Majority or Plurality

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE

Concurrence

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=white

Other

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=red

Dissent

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE

Concurrence/dissent

white-space: nowrap

Total =

Written opinions = ?

Oral opinions = ?

Unanimous opinions = ?

width=25px	!	width=35%	Case name !	Issue	width=15%	Co-authored by !	width=15%	Joined by
	align=left valign=top	Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, Local 558 v Pepsi-Cola Canada Beverages (West) Ltd [2002] 1 S.C.R. 156; 2002 SCC 8 https://web.archive.org/web/20060923043057/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc8/2002scc8.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Krangle (Guardian ad litem of) v Brisco [2002] 1 S.C.R. 205; 2002 SCC 9 https://web.archive.org/web/20060923184853/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc9/2002scc9.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Ward v Canada (AG) [2002] 1 S.C.R. 569; 2002 SCC 17 https://web.archive.org/web/20060923043234/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc17/2002scc17.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Lavoie v Canada [2002] 1 S.C.R. 769; 2002 SCC 23 https://web.archive.org/web/20060923043247/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc23/2002scc23.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Cinous [2002] 2 S.C.R. 3; 2002 SCC 29 https://web.archive.org/web/20071013230328/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc29/2002scc29.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Perciballi [2002] 2 S.C.R. 761; 2002 SCC 51 http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc51/2002scc51.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Babcock v Canada (AG) [2002] 3 S.C.R. 3; 2002 SCC 57 https://web.archive.org/web/20071017164507/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc57/2002scc57.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Canam Enterprises Inc v Coles [2002] 3 S.C.R. 307; 2002 SCC 63 https://web.archive.org/web/20071104171735/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc63/2002scc63.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Hall [2002] 3 S.C.R. 309; 2002 SCC 64 http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc64/2002sc64.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	B v Ontario (Human Rights Commission) [2002] 3 S.C.R. 403; 2002 SCC 66 https://web.archive.org/web/20060710102639/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc66/2002scc66.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Sauvé v Canada (Chief Electoral Officer) [2002] 3 S.C.R. 519; 2002 SCC 68 https://web.archive.org/web/20071107052714/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc68/2002scc68.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Quebec (AG) v Laroche [2002] 3 S.C.R. 708; 2002 SCC 72 https://web.archive.org/web/20070319014539/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc72/2002scc72.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Gosselin v Quebec (AG) [2002] 4 S.C.R. 429; 2002 SCC 84 https://web.archive.org/web/20060721001147/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc84/2002scc84.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Chamberlain v Surrey School District No 36 [2002] 4 S.C.R. 710; 2002 SCC 86 https://web.archive.org/web/20060720063032/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc86/2002scc86.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top

2003

bgcolor=#CCCCCC

Beverley McLachlin 2003 statistics

align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px

Majority or Plurality

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE

Concurrence

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=white

Other

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=red

Dissent

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE

Concurrence/dissent

white-space: nowrap

Total =

Written opinions = ?

Oral opinions = ?

Unanimous opinions = ?

width=25px	!	width=35%	Case name !	Issue	width=15%	Co-authored by !	width=15%	Joined by
	align=left valign=top	R v Wise [2003] 1 S.C.R. 3; 2003 SCC 1 https://web.archive.org/web/20070218074254/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc1/2003scc1.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Pelletier [2003] 1 S.C.R. 4; 2003 SCC 2 https://archive.today/20070620154231/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc2/2003scc2.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Harriott [2003] 1 S.C.R. 39; 2003 SCC 5 https://archive.today/20070620154231/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc5/2003scc5.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Reference Re Earth Future Lottery [2003] 1 S.C.R. 123; 2003 SCC 10 https://web.archive.org/web/20060827204918/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc10/2003scc10.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Martin v American International Assurance Life Co [2003] 1 S.C.R. 158; 2003 SCC 16 https://web.archive.org/web/20060716033432/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc16/2003scc16.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Dr Q v College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia [2003] 1 S.C.R. 226; 2003 SCC 19 https://web.archive.org/web/20060910122551/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc19/2003scc19.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	KP Pacific Holdings Ltd v Guardian Insurance Co of Canada [2003] 1 S.C.R. 433; 2003 SCC 25 https://web.archive.org/web/20070225105441/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc25/2003scc25.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Churchland v Gore Mutual Insurance Co [2003] 1 S.C.R. 445; 2003 SCC 26 https://web.archive.org/web/20070319014629/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc26/2003scc26.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Starson v Swayze [2003] 1 S.C.R. 722; 2003 SCC 32 https://web.archive.org/web/20061208222127/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc32/2003scc32.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Bell Canada v Canadian Telephone Employees Association [2003] 1 S.C.R. 884; 2003 SCC 36 https://web.archive.org/web/20070217074443/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc36/2003scc36.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Wewaykum Indian Band v Canada [2003] 2 S.C.R. 259; 2003 SCC 45 https://web.archive.org/web/20080927020711/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc45/2003scc45.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	KLB v British Columbia [2003] 2 S.C.R. 403; 2003 SCC 51 https://web.archive.org/web/20060726205318/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc51/2003scc51.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	EDG v Hammer [2003] 2 S.C.R. 459; 2003 SCC 52 https://web.archive.org/web/20060725074416/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc52/2003scc52.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	MB v British Columbia [2003] 2 S.C.R. 477; 2003 SCC 53 https://web.archive.org/web/20060725202308/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc53/2003scc53.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Phillips [2003] 2 S.C.R. 623; 2003 SCC 57 https://archive.today/20070620154231/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc57/2003scc57.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top

2004

bgcolor=#CCCCCC

Beverley McLachlin 2004 statistics

align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px

Majority or Plurality

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE

Concurrence

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=white

Other

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=red

Dissent

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE

Concurrence/dissent

white-space: nowrap

Total =

Written opinions = ?

Oral opinions = ?

Unanimous opinions = ?

width=25px	!	width=35%	Case name !	Issue	width=15%	Co-authored by !	width=15%	Joined by
	align=left valign=top	Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v Canada (AG) [2004] 1 S.C.R. 76, 2004 SCC 4 https://web.archive.org/web/20060710021317/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc4/2004scc4.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society of Upper Canada [2004] 1 S.C.R. 39, 2004 SCC 13 http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc13/2005scc13.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Cheddesingh [2004] 1 S.C.R. 433; 2004 SCC 16 https://web.archive.org/web/20070319014850/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc16/2004scc16.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	John Doe v Bennett [2004] 1 S.C.R. 436; 2004 SCC 17 https://web.archive.org/web/20070316231854/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc17/2004scc17.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Nutribec Ltée v Quebec (Commission d'appel en matière de lésions professionnelles) [2004] 1 S.C.R. 824; 2004 https://web.archive.org/web/20070316231854/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc17/2004scc17.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Harper v Canada (AG) [2004] 1 S.C.R. 827; 2004 SCC 33 https://web.archive.org/web/20061202090835/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc33/2004scc33.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Monsanto Canada Inc v Schmeiser [2004] 1 S.C.R. 902, 2004 SCC 34 https://web.archive.org/web/20070313153431/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc34/2004scc34.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Quebec (Commission des droits de la pesonne et des droits de la jeunesse) v Quebec (AG) [2004] 2 S.C.R. 185; 2004 SCC 39 https://web.archive.org/web/20070319014943/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc39/2004scc39.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Quebec (AG) v Quebec (Human Rights Tribunal) [2004] 2 S.C.R. 223; 2004 SCC 40 https://web.archive.org/web/20070319014953/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc40/2004scc40.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Rémillard [2004] 2 S.C.R. 246; 2004 SCC 41 https://web.archive.org/web/20071013171558/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc41/2004scc41.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Congrégation des témoins de Jéhovah de St-Jérôme-Lafontaine v Lafontaine (Village of) [2004] 2 S.C.R. 650; 2004 SCC 48 https://web.archive.org/web/20071013171630/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc48/2004scc48.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Raponi [2004] 3 S.C.R. 35; 2004 SCC 50 https://web.archive.org/web/20071013171644/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc50/2004scc50.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Saunders [2004] 3 S.C.R. 505; 2004 SCC 70 https://web.archive.org/web/20071013171815/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc70/2004scc70.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Smith [2004] 3 S.C.R. 507; 2004 SCC 71 https://web.archive.org/web/20071013171820/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc71/2004scc71.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Zurowski [2004] 3 S.C.R. 509; 2004 SCC 72 https://web.archive.org/web/20071013171825/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc72/2004scc72.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Haida Nation v British Columbia (Minister of Forests) [2004] 3 S.C.R. 511; 2004 SCC 73 https://web.archive.org/web/20060821204735/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc73/2004scc73.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Taku River Tlingit First Nation v British Columbia (Project Assessment Director) [2004] 3 S.C.R. 550; 2004 SCC 74 https://web.archive.org/web/20070516140830/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc74/2004scc74.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Auton (Guardian ad litem of) v British Columbia (AG) [2004] 3 S.C.R. 657; 2004 SCC 78 https://web.archive.org/web/20071013171851/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc78/2004scc78.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top

2005

bgcolor=#CCCCCC

Beverley McLachlin 2005 statistics

align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px

Majority or Plurality

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE

Concurrence

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=white

Other

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=red

Dissent

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE

Concurrence/dissent

white-space: nowrap

Total =

Written opinions = ?

Oral opinions = ?

Unanimous opinions = ?

width=25px	!	width=35%	Case name !	Issue	width=15%	Co-authored by !	width=15%	Joined by
	align=left valign=top	British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority v British Columbia (Environmental Appeal Board) [2005] 1 S.C.R. 3; 2005 SCC 1 https://web.archive.org/web/20070318221515/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc1/2005scc1.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Mapara [2005] 1 S.C.R. 358; 2005 SCC 23 https://web.archive.org/web/20071120104517/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc23/2005scc23.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Chaoulli v Quebec (AG) [2005] 1 S.C.R. 791; 2005 SCC 35 https://web.archive.org/web/20110202122636/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc35/2005scc35.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Mugesera v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) [2005] 2 S.C.R. 100; 2005 SCC 40 https://web.archive.org/web/20070311042216/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc40/2005scc40.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Marshall; R v Bernard [2005] 2 S.C.R. 220 http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc/2005scc.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Medovarski v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration); Esteban v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) [2005] 2 S.C.R. 539; 2005 SCC 51 https://web.archive.org/web/20071121041517/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc51/2005scc51.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Canada Trustco Mortgage Co v Canada [2005] 2 S.C.R. 601; 2005 SCC 54 https://web.archive.org/web/20070428050933/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc54/2005scc54.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Mathew v Canada [2005] 2 S.C.R. 643; 2005 SCC 55 https://web.archive.org/web/20071121041532/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc55/2005scc55.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Blackwater v Plint [2005] 3 S.C.R. 3; 2005 SCC 58 https://web.archive.org/web/20070222003726/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc58/2005scc58.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Montréal (City of) v 2952-1366 Québec Inc [2005] 3 S.C.R. 141; 2005 SCC 62 https://web.archive.org/web/20071017120454/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc62/2005scc62.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Escobar-Benavidez [2005] 3 S.C.R. 386; 2005 SCC 68 https://web.archive.org/web/20071013230502/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc68/2005scc68.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v MacKay [2005] 3 S.C.R. 607; 2005 SCC 75 https://web.archive.org/web/20071120112919/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc75/2005scc75.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Labaye [2005] 3 S.C.R. 728; 2005 SCC 80 https://web.archive.org/web/20070520033919/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc80/2005scc80.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Kouri [2005] 3 S.C.R. 789; 2005 SCC 81 https://web.archive.org/web/20070707071538/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc81/2005scc81.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Marche v Halifax Insurance Co [2005] 1 S.C.R. 47; 2005 SCC http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc/2005scc.html	valign=top
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top

2006

bgcolor=#CCCCCC

Beverley McLachlin 2006 statistics

align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px

Majority or Plurality

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE

Concurrence

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=white

Other

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=red

Dissent

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE

Concurrence/dissent

white-space: nowrap

Total =

Written reasons = ?

Oral reasons = ?

Unanimous reasons = ?

width=25px	!	width=35%	Case name !	Issue	width=15%	Co-authored by !	width=15%	Joined by
	align=left valign=top	Young v Bella [2006] 1 S.C.R. 108; 2006 SCC 3 https://web.archive.org/web/20060912123340/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc3/2006scc3.html	valign=top	Duty of care for reporting child abuse	Binnie J.	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Canadian Pacific Railway Co v Vancouver (City of) 1 S.C.R. _; 2006 SCC 5 https://web.archive.org/web/20070107012850/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc5/2006scc5.html	valign=top	Validity of municipal by-laws	None	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Childs v Desormeaux 2006 SCC 18 https://web.archive.org/web/20060718060655/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc18/2006scc18.html	valign=top	Social host liability	None	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Fidler v Sun Life Assurance Co of Canada 2006 SCC 30 https://web.archive.org/web/20060726085037/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc30/2006scc30.html	valign=top	Breach of contract; mental distress	Abella J.	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Boulanger 2006 SCC 32 https://web.archive.org/web/20060725202339/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc32/2006scc32.html	valign=top	Breach of trust by public officers	None	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	United States of America v Ferras; United States of America v Latty 2006 SCC 33 https://web.archive.org/web/20060831001750/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc33/2006scc33.html	valign=top	Extradition	None	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	United Mexican States v Ortega; United States of America v Fiessel 2006 SCC 34 https://web.archive.org/web/20060831201554/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc34/2006scc34.html	valign=top	Extradition	None	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Pro Swing Inc v Elta Golf Inc 2006 SCC 52 https://web.archive.org/web/20061211035714/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc52/2006scc52.html	valign=top	Conflict of laws; Enforce non-monetary judgments	None	Bastarache and Charron JJ.
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	McDiarmid Lumber Ltd v God's Lake First Nation, 2006 SCC 58 2006 SCC 58 https://web.archive.org/web/20070107031348/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc58/2006scc58.html	valign=top	Aboriginal rights; seizure	None	Bastarache, LeBel, Deschamps, Charron and Rothstein JJ.
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Morris 2006 SCC 59 https://web.archive.org/web/20070107031652/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc59/2006scc59.html	valign=top	Aboriginal treaty rights	Fish J.	Bastarache J.
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top

2007

Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium v Canada (Commissioner of Customs and Revenue), [2007] 1 S.C.R. 38, 2007 SCC 2 (concurrence)
Resurfice Corp v Hanke, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 333, 2007 SCC 7
Charkaoui v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), [2007] 1 S.C.R. 350, 2007 SCC 9
R v McKay, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 793, 2007 SCC 16
Strother v 3464920 Canada Inc, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 177, 2007 SCC 24 (dissent)
Health Services and Support – Facilities Subsector Bargaining Assn. v British Columbia, 2007 SCC 27
Canada (AG) v JTI-Macdonald Corp, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 610, 2007 SCC 30
Rogers Wireless Inc v Muroff, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 921, 2007 SCC 35 (majority)
Hill v Hamilton‑Wentworth Regional Police Services Board, [2007] 3 S.C.R. 129, 2007 SCC 41 (majority)
Jedfro Investments (USA) Ltd v Jacyk, [2007] 3 S.C.R. 679, 2007 SCC 55 (majority)

2008

R v Beatty, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 49, 2008 SCC 5 (concurrence)
R v Ferguson, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 96, 2008 SCC 6 (majority)
R v Turningrobe, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 454, 2008 SCC 17 (majority)
Mustapha v Culligan of Canada Ltd, [2008] 2 S.C.R. 114, 2008 SCC 27 (majority)
R v Kapp, [2008] 2 S.C.R. 483, 2008 SCC 41 (majority)
Holland v Saskatchewan, [2008] 2 S.C.R. 551, 2008 SCC 42 (majority)
New Brunswick (Human Rights Commission) v Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc, [2008] 2 S.C.R. 604, 2008 SCC 45 (concurrence)
Redeemer Foundation v Canada (National Revenue), [2008] 2 S.C.R. 643, 2008 SCC 46 (majority)
R v REM, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3, 2008 SCC 51 (majority)
R v HSB, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 32, 2008 SCC 52 (majority)
RBC Dominion Securities Inc v Merrill Lynch Canada Inc, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 79, 2008 SCC 54 (majority)
R v Dowe, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 109, 2008 SCC 55 (majority)
R v Mahalingan, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 316, 2008 SCC 63 (majority)
R v Caissey, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 451, 2008 SCC 65 (majority)

2009

Ravndahl v Saskatchewan, 2009 SCC 7 (majority)
Teck Cominco Metals Ltd v Lloyd's Underwriters, 2009 SCC 11 (majority)
R v Craig, 2009 SCC 23, [2009] (concurrence)
R v Ouellette, 2009 SCC 24 (dissent)
AC v Manitoba (Director of Child and Family Services), 2009 SCC 30 (concurrence)
R v Grant, 2009 SCC 32 (majority)
R v Suberu, 2009 SCC 33 (majority)
R v Harrison, 2009 SCC 34 (majority)
R v Shepherd, 2009 SCC 35 (majority)
Alberta v Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony, 2009 SCC 37 (majority)
Grant v Torstar Corp, 2009 SCC 61 (majority)
Quan v Cusson, 2009 SCC 62 (majority)

2010

bgcolor=#CCCCCC

Statistics

align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px

XXXXX

Majority or Plurality

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE

XXX

Concurrence

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=white

XXXX

Other

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=red

XXXX

Dissent

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE

XXXX

Concurrence/dissent

white-space: nowrap

Total =

XXXXXX

Written opinions = XXX

Oral opinions = XXX

Unanimous decisions = XXX

width=25px	!	width=32.5%	Case name !	Issue	width=15%	Co-authored by !	width=15%	Joined by
	align=left valign=top	R v JZS 2010 SCC 1 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7840/index.do	valign=top	XXX	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	XXX CITATIONS [URL]	valign=top	XXX	XXX	XXX

2011

bgcolor=#CCCCCC

Statistics

align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px

XXXXX

Majority or Plurality

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE

XXX

Concurrence

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=white

XXXX

Other

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=red

XXXX

Dissent

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE

XXXX

Concurrence/dissent

white-space: nowrap

Total =

XXXXXX

Written opinions = XXX

Oral opinions = XXX

Unanimous decisions = XXX

width=25px	!	width=32.5%	Case name !	Issue	width=15%	Co-authored by !	width=15%	Joined by
	align=left valign=top	Withler v Canada (AG) 2011 SCC 12 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7925/index.do	valign=top	Whether federal pension legislation, by reducing the supplementary death benefit by 10% for each year by which a plan member exceeds prescribed ages, discriminates against surviving spouses in violation of s. 15(1) of the Charter	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Ontario (AG) v Fraser 2011 SCC 20 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7934/index.do	valign=top	Whether separate labour relations legislation governing agricultural workers in Ontario infringes freedom of association under s. 2(d) of the Charter by failing to establish a meaningful process of collective bargaining	LeBel J	Binnie, Fish and Cromwell JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Alberta v Elder Advocates of Alberta Society 2011 SCC 24 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7938/index.do	valign=top	Whether disputed claims in plaintiff's statement of claim adequately disclose cause of action — Whether principles of fiduciary duty applicable to private actors also apply to governments	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v JA 2011 SCC 28 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7942/index.do	valign=top	Whether in offence of sexual assault, Criminal Code defines "consent" as requiring conscious, operating mind throughout sexual activity, or whether consent to sexual activity may be given prior to period of unconsciousness	–	Deschamps, Abella, Charron, Rothstein and Cromwell JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v EMW 2011 SCC 31 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7945/index.do	valign=top	Jurisdiction of a court of appeal to consider whether there was a miscarriage of justice — Whether there was a miscarriage of justice	–	Binnie, Deschamps, Abella, Charron and Cromwell JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Canada Trustco Mortgage Co v Canada 2011 SCC 36 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7951/index.do	valign=top	Whether a bank is liable to make payments to a tax debtor when receiving cheques payable to a tax debtor for deposit in an account held jointly by the tax debtor and a third party	–	Fish and Abella JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Alberta (Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development) v Cunningham 2011 SCC 37 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7952/index.do	valign=top	Whether the Alberta Metis Settlements Act, in providing that voluntary registration under the Indian Act precludes membership in a Métis settlement, violates the right to freedom of association and/or the right to liberty under ss. 2(d) and 7 of the Charter, respectively — Whether same is an ameliorative program under s. 15(2) of the Charter	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd 2011 SCC 42 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7957/index.do	valign=top	Tobacco manufacturers being sued by British Columbia government and consumers and issuing third-party notices to federal government claiming contribution and indemnity — Motion to strike and whether it is plain and obvious that third-party claims disclose no reasonable cause of action — Whether federal government is liable as a "manufacturer" under the Tobacco Damages and Health Care Costs Recovery Act or a "supplier" under the Business Practices and Consumer Protection Act — Tort of negligent misrepresentation	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Canada (AG) v PHS Community Services Society 2011 SCC 44 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7960/index.do	valign=top	Whether Minister of Health's decision to revoke an exemption to the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act prohibiting possession and trafficking of illegal drugs in context of a safe injection site violated claimants' rights to life, liberty and security of the person under s. 7 of the Charter — Whether division of powers exempts the safe injection site as a health facility form the application of the Act as an exercise of federal jurisdiction over criminal law	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Crookes v Newton 2011 SCC 47 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7963/index.do	valign=top	Tort of libel and slander — Whether a hyperlink to an allegedly defamatory article in itself constitutes a publication	Fish J	–
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Katigbak 2011 SCC 48 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7964/index.do	valign=top	Possession of child pornography and statutory defences	Charron J	Binnie, Deschamps, Abella, Rothstein and Cromwell JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Dorfer 2011 SCC 50 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7966/index.do	valign=top	Whether trial judge erred in his instruction to the jury about the limited use of third party suspect's criminal record and if so, whether this error constituted a miscarriage of justice	–	Rothstein and Cromwell JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Banwait 2011 SCC 55 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7973/index.do	valign=top	Whether the trial judge properly instructed the jury on the relationship between planning and deliberation and murder	–	Unanimous (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Public Service Alliance of Canada v Canada Post Corp 2011 SCC 57 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7975/index.do	valign=top	Whether the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal committed a reviewable error in finding that a largely female group of employees were being paid less for work of equal value	–	Unanimous (oral)

2012

bgcolor=#CCCCCC

Statistics

align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px

Majority or Plurality

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE

Concurrence

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=white

Other

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=red

Dissent

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE

Concurrence/dissent

white-space: nowrap

Total =

Written opinions = 11

Oral opinions = 3

Unanimous decisions = 8

width=25px	!	width=30%	Case name !	Issue	width=15%	Co-authored by !	width=15%	Joined by
	align=left valign=top	Catalyst Paper Corp v North Cowichan (District of) 2012 SCC 2 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7987/index.do	valign=top	Standard of review applicable to municipal taxation bylaw	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v DAI 2012 SCC 5 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7990/index.do	valign=top	Whether adult witnesses with mental disabilities must demonstrate understanding of nature of obligation to tell truth in order to be deemed competent to testify	–	Deschamps, Abella, Charron, Rothstein and Cromwell JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Eastgaard 2012 SCC 11 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7997/index.do	valign=top	Offence of possession of prohibited or restricted firearm with ammunition and the reasonableness of trial judge's inference from circumstantial evidence mens rea was satisfied	–	Unanimous (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Kociuk 2012 SCC 15 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/8003/index.do	valign=top	Appropriateness of trial judge's charge to jury	–	Unanimous (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Clements v Clements 2012 SCC 32 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/9992/index.do	valign=top	Tort of negligence and appropriate test for factual causation	–	Deschamps, Fish, Abella, Cromwell, Moldaver and Karakatsanis JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Mabior 2012 SCC 47 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/10008/index.do	valign=top	Offence of aggravated assault and whether non-disclosure of HIV status in circumstances where no realistic possibility of transmission exists can constitute fraud vitiating consent to sexual relations	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v DC 2012 SCC 48 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/10010/index.do	valign=top	Offence of sexual assault and aggravated assault and non-disclosure of HIV statute; Whether trial judge could rely on doctor's note as confirmatory evidence of complainant's testimony that no condom had been used	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Southcott Estates Inc v Toronto Catholic District School Board 2012 SCC 51 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/12612/index.do	valign=top	Contracts – Whether plaintiff seeking specific performance has obligation to mitigate losses	–	–
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Opitz v Wrzesnewskyj 2012 SCC 55 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/12635/index.do	valign=top	Application to have federal election result annulled on the basis of "irregularities... that affected the result of the election" under s. 531(2) of the Canada Elections Act	–	LeBel and Fish JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v PDT 2012 SCC 62 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/12681/index.do	valign=top	Whether the trial verdict was unreasonable	–	Unanimous (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Newfoundland and Labrador v AbitibiBowater Inc 2012 SCC 67 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/12749/index.do	valign=top	Bankruptcy and insolvency and whether the federal Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act is ultra vires by permitting courts to determine whether an environmental order is a monetary claim	–	–
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Sriskandarajah v United States of America 2012 SCC 70 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/12769/index.do	valign=top	Whether extradition violates the right to remain in Canada even when foreign state's claim of jurisdiction is weak or when prosecution in Canada is feasible	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Khawaja 2012 SCC 69 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/12768/index.do	valign=top	Whether provisions under the terrorism offences under Part II.1 of the Criminal Code violate the right to free expression under s. 2(b) of the Charter; Whether offence of terrorism provision is broader than necessary to achieve its purpose or whether its impact is disproportionate, contrary to the principles of fundamental justice under s. 7 of the Charter; Sentencing and the totality principle	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v NS 2012 SCC 72 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/12779/index.do	valign=top	Whether requiring witness to remove niqab while testifying would interfere with her religious freedom under s. 2(a) of the Charter; Whether permitting witness to wear niqab while testifying would create a serious risk to trial fairness under s. 11(d) of the Charter	–	Deschamps, Fish and Cromwell JJ

2013

bgcolor=#CCCCCC

Statistics

align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px

Majority or Plurality

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE

Concurrence

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=white

Other

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=red

Dissent

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE

Concurrence/dissent

white-space: nowrap

Total =

Written opinions = 10

Oral opinions = 3

Unanimous decisions = 7

width=25px	!	width=30%	Case name !	Issue	width=15%	Co-authored by !	width=15%	Joined by
	align=left valign=top	Quebec (AG) v A 2013 SCC 5 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/10536/index.do	valign=top	Discrimination based on marital status under s. 15(1) of the Charter	–	–
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Blacklaws 2013 SCC 8 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/12856/index.do	valign=top	Criminal law procedure and applications to sever counts	–	Unanimous (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Manitoba Metis Federation Inc v Canada (AG) 2013 SCC 14 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/12888/index.do	valign=top	Aboriginal law and the honour of the Crown	Karakatsanis J	LeBel, Fish, Abella and Cromwell JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v MacIntosh 2013 SCC 23 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/12994/index.do	valign=top	Right to be tried within a reasonable time under s. 11(b) of the Charter	–	Unanimous (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v GM 2013 SCC 24 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/12995/index.do	valign=top	Fresh evidence of ineffective assistance from counsel at trial	–	Unanimous (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Cojocaru v British Columbia Women's Hospital and Health Centre 2013 SCC 30 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13072/index.do	valign=top	Tort of negligence, consent to healthcare and failure to inform	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Canadian National Railway Co v McKercher LLP 2013 SCC 39 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13154/index.do	valign=top	Legal ethics – the duty of loyalty and avoiding conflicts of interest	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Régie des rentes du Québec v Canada Bread Company Ltd 2013 SCC 46 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13232/index.do	valign=top	Judicial review of Régie des rentes du Québec's decision under the Supplemental Pensions Plan Act partially terminating the pension plans of two divisions closed by the employer	–	Fish J
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Cuthbertson v Rasouli 2013 SCC 53 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13290/index.do	valign=top	Health law – Consent to withdrawal of treatment; whether withdrawal constitutes "treatment" under Ontario Health Care Consent Act	–	LeBel, Fish, Rothstein and Cromwell JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Pappas 2013 SCC 56 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13309/index.do	valign=top	Defence of provocation	–	Abella, Rothstein, Cromwell, Moldaver and Wagner JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Cairney 2013 SCC 55 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13308/index.do	valign=top	Defence of provocation	–	Rothstein, Cromwell, Moldaver and Wagner JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Canada (AG) v Bedford 2013 SCC 72 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13389/index.do	valign=top	Constitutionality of prohibitions on bawdy-houses, living on avails of prostitution and communicating in public for purposes of prostitution under the Criminal Code under s. 7 of the Charter	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Cinar Corp v Robinson 2013 SCC 73 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13390/index.do	valign=top	Intellectual property and copyright infringement	–	Unanimous

2014

bgcolor=#CCCCCC

2014 statistics

align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px

Majority or Plurality

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE

Concurrence

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=white

Other

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=red

Dissent

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE

Concurrence/dissent

white-space: nowrap

Total =

Written opinions = 9

Oral opinions = 7

Unanimous decisions = 9

width=25px	!	width=30%	Case name !	Issue	width=15%	Co-authored by !	width=15%	Joined by
	align=left valign=top	R v Auclair 2014 SCC 6 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13426/index.do	valign=top	Trial management	–	Unanimous (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Koczab 2014 SCC 9 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13430/index.do	valign=top	Right to counsel and the right to be informed of the offence charged	–	Unanimous (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Yelle 2014 SCC 10 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13429/index.do	valign=top	Reasonableness of trial verdict	–	Unanimous (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Waite 2014 SCC 17 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13504/index.do	valign=top	Appropriateness of charge to jury	–	Unanimous (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Hogg 2014 SCC 18 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13503/index.do	valign=top	Evidence and burden of proof in a criminal trial	–	Unanimous (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Hutchinson 2014 SCC 19 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13511/index.do	valign=top	Offence of sexual assault and consent	Cromwell J	Rothstein and Wagner JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Reference Re Supreme Court Act, ss 5 and 6 2014 SCC 21 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13544/index.do	valign=top	Eligibility requirements to the Supreme Court of Canada	LeBel, Abella, Cromwell, Karakatsanis and Wagner JJ	–
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Harkat 2014 SCC 37 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13643/index.do	valign=top	Constitutionality of the security certificate scheme of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act under s. 7 of the Charter	–	LeBel, Rothstein, Moldaver, Karakatsanis and Wagner JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Tsilhqot'in Nation v British Columbia 2014 SCC 44 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/14246/index.do	valign=top	Aboriginal title and land claims	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Grassy Narrows First Nation v Ontario (Natural Resources) 2014 SCC 48 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/14274/index.do	valign=top	Aboriginal treaty rights	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia v British Columbia (AG) 2014 SCC 59 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/14375/index.do	valign=top	Access to justice and the constitutionality of hearing fees under ss. 92(14) and 96 of the Constitution Act, 1867	–	LeBel, Abella, Moldaver and Karakatsanis JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Imperial Oil v Jacques 2014 SCC 66 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/14399/index.do	valign=top	Whether a party to a civil proceeding can request disclosure of recordings of private communications intercepted by the state in the course of a criminal investigation	–	–
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Febles v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) 2014 SCC 68 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/14419/index.do	valign=top	Convention refugees and exclusion based on commission of serious crime prior to admission to country of refuge	–	LeBel, Rothstein, Moldaver and Wagner JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Dunn 2014 SCC 69 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/14429/index.do	valign=top	Definition of "firearm" and "weapon" under the Criminal Code	–	Unanimous (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Wakeling v United States of America 2014 SCC 72 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/14439/index.do	valign=top	Unreasonable search and seizure under s. 8 of the Charter and the disclosure of intercepted private communications without consent	–	–
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Day 2014 SCC 74 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/14500/index.do	valign=top	Arbitrary detention and unreasonable search and seizure under the Charter	–	Unanimous (oral)

2015

bgcolor=#CCCCCC

Statistics

align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px

Majority or Plurality

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE

Concurrence

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=white

Other

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=red

Dissent

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE

Concurrence/dissent

white-space: nowrap

Total =

Written opinions = 9

Oral opinions = 6

Unanimous decisions = 7

width=25px	!	width=32.5%	Case name !	Issue	width=15%	Co-authored by !	width=15%	Joined by
	align=left valign=top	Mounted Police Association of Ontario v Canada (AG) 2015 SCC 1 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/14577/index.do	valign=top	Right to collective bargaining under s. 2(d) of the Charter; Whether impugned legislation excluding RCMP members from public services labour relations regime substantially interferes with the right to a meaningful process of collective bargaining	LeBel J	Abella, Cromwell, Karakatsanis and Wagner JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Meredith v Canada (AG) 2015 SCC 2 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/14576/index.do	valign=top	Whether the statutory limit on wages increases in the public sector under the Expenditure Restraint Act infringes claimants' rights to a meaningful process of collective bargaining under s. 2(d) of the Charter	LeBel J	Cromwell, Karakatsanis and Wagner JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Canada (AG) v Federation of Law Societies of Canada 2015 SCC 7 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/14639/index.do	valign=top	Whether Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act, as it applies to the legal profession, infringes the right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure and the right not to be deprived of liberty otherwise in accordance with principles of fundamental justice under ss. 8 and 7 of the Charter, respectively	Moldaver J	–
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Perrone 2015 SCC 8 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/14645/index.do	valign=top	Whether the trial judge appropriately considered the credibility and reliability of a witness' testimony	–	Unanimous (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Loyola High School v Quebec (AG) 2015 SCC 12 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/14703/index.do	valign=top	Proper approach to judicial review of discretionary administrative decisions engaging Charter protections; Whether decision of Minister of Education, Recreation and Sports requiring a proposed alternative program being entirely secular in approach is reasonable given the statutory objectives of the program and s. 2(a) of the Charter, and whether the decision limits freedom of religion under s. 3 of the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms	Moldaver J	Rothstein J
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Sanghera 2015 SCC 13 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/14705/index.do	valign=top	Right to be tried within a reasonable time under s. 11(b) of the Charter in light of a five-month delay caused by direct indictment	–	Abella, Rothstein, Moldaver and Gascon JJ (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Nur 2015 SCC 15 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/15272/index.do	valign=top	Constitutionality of mandatory minimum sentences on grounds of cruel and unusual punishment under s. 12 of the Charter	–	LeBel, Abella, Cromwell, Karakatsanis and Gascon JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Sanofi-Aventis v Apotex Inc 2015 SCC 20 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/15304/index.do	valign=top	Intellectual property and patents	–	Unanimous (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Henry v British Columbia (AG) 2015 SCC 24 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/15329/index.do	valign=top	Wrongful conviction of claimant; Civil action alleging breach of Charter rights resulting from Crown counsel's wrongful non-disclose of relevant information; Whether s. 24(1) authorizes courts to award damages against Crown for wrongful non-disclosure, and the level of fault claimant must establish to meet liability threshold for awarding s. 24(1) damages	Karakatsanis J	–
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Bowden Institution v Khadr 2015 SCC 26 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/15359/index.do	valign=top	Application for habeas corpus for placement in provincial correctional facility under International Transfer of Offenders Act	–	Unanimous (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Goodwin v British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles) 2015 SCC 46 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/15550/index.do	valign=top	Whether an automatic roadside prohibition scheme enacted under s. 92(13) of the Constitution Act, 1867 is ultra vires provincial authority as being exclusively within federal government's criminal law power under s. 91(27) of the Constitution Act, 1867; Whether same automatic roadside prohibition regime creates an offence within the meaning of s. 11 of the Charter and infringes the presumption of innocence under s. 11(d) of same; Whether same automatic roadside prohibition scheme infringes the right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure under s. 8 of the Charter	–	–
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Neville 2015 SCC 49 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/15604/index.do	valign=top	Whether trial judge's failure to clarify intent question raised by jury resulted in an error of law	–	Unanimous (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Singh Riar 2015 SCC 50 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/15621/index.do	valign=top	Whether trial judge errors in mischaracterizing the accused's defence and in assessing the accused's evidence and credibility deprived the accused of a fair trial and caused a miscarriage of justice	–	Unanimous (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Appulonappa 2015 SCC 59 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/15648/index.do	valign=top	Whether the offence of organizing, inducing aiding or abetting persons coming into Canada without valid documentation is overbroad under s. 7 of the Charter	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	B010 v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) 2015 SCC 58 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/15647/index.do	valign=top	Requisite grounds to render a person inadmissible to apply for refugee status for having engaged in people smuggling; What limits may be inferred from provision under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act rendering persons inadmissible on grounds of organized criminality	–	Unanimous

2016

bgcolor=#CCCCCC

2016 statistics

align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px

Majority or Plurality

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE

Concurrence

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=white

Other

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=red

Dissent

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE

Concurrence/dissent

white-space: nowrap

Total =

Written opinions = 7

Oral opinions = 5

Unanimous decisions = 6

width=25px	!	width=30%	Case name !	Issue	width=15%	Co-authored by !	width=15%	Joined by
	align=left valign=top	Carter v Canada (AG) 2016 SCC 4 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/15696/index.do	valign=top	Motion seeking an order extending the suspension of the declaration of constitutional invalidity issued in Carter v Canada (AG), 2015 SCC 5	Cromwell, Moldaver and Brown JJ	–
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Meer 2016 SCC 5 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/15714/index.do	valign=top	Accused challenging competence of trial lawyer	–	Unanimous (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Knapczyk 2016 SCC 10 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/15825/index.do	valign=top	Aiding and abetting offence of trafficking through distribution	–	Unanimous (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Safarzadeh-Markhali 2016 SCC 14 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/15860/index.do	valign=top	Whether denial of enhanced credit for pre-sentence custody to offenders who are denied bail primarily because of prior conviction is overboard in violation of s. 7 of the Charter	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Lloyd 2016 SCC 13 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/15859/index.do	valign=top	Cruel and unusual treatment or punishment in violation of s. 12 of the Charter	–	Abella, Cromwell, Moldaver, Karakatsanis and Côté JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Shaoulle 2016 SCC 16 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/15916/index.do	valign=top	Whether verdict of trial judge was reasonable	–	Unanimous (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Williamson 2016 SCC 28 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16060/index.do	valign=top	Right to be tried within a reasonable time under s. 11 of the Charter	–	–
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Wilson v Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd 2016 SCC 29 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16062/index.do	valign=top	Unjust dismissal of non-unionized employees under the Canada Labour Code	Karakatsanis, Wagner and Gascon JJ	–
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Cawthorne 2016 SCC 32 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16070/index.do	valign=top	Whether provisions of the National Defence Act infringe ss. 7 and 11(d) of the Charter	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Urban Communications Inc v BCNET Networking Society 2016 SCC 45 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16212/index.do	valign=top	Judicial review of commercial arbitration decisions	–	Unanimous (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	British Columbia Teachers' Federation v British Columbia 2016 SCC 49 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16241/index.do	valign=top	Freedom of association under s. 2(d) of the Charter and the right to collective bargaining	–	Abella, Moldaver, Karakatsanis, Wagner, Gascon and Rowe JJ (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Mennillo v Intramodal inc 2016 SCC 51 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16247/index.do	valign=top	Reasonable expectations of shareholders	–	Moldaver J

2017

bgcolor=#CCCCCC

2017 statistics

align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px

Majority or Plurality

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE

Concurrence

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=white

Other

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=red

Dissent

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE

Concurrence/dissent

white-space: nowrap

Total =

Written opinions = 10

Oral opinions = 4

Unanimous decisions = 5

width=25px	!	width=30%	Case name !	Issue	width=15%	Co-authored by !	width=15%	Joined by
	align=left valign=top	Ernst v Alberta Energy Regulator 2017 SCC 1 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16325/index.do	valign=top	Freedom of expression and Charter damages	Moldaver and Brown JJ	Côté J
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Clark 2017 SCC 3 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16345/index.do	valign=top	Constitutional law – Search and seizure	–	Unanimous (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Bédard 2017 SCC 4 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16346/index.do	valign=top	Criminal law – Defence of officially induced error	–	Unanimous (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Natewayes 2017 SCC 5 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16347/index.do	valign=top	Offence of breaking and entering and manslaughter	–	Unanimous (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	British Columbia Freedom of Information and Privacy Association v British Columbia (AG) 2017 SCC 6 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16348/index.do	valign=top	Constitutional law – Freedom of expression	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Bingley 2017 SCC 12 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16417/index.do	valign=top	Expert opinion evidence	–	Abella, Moldaver, Côté and Brown JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v SB 2017 SCC 16 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16485/index.do	valign=top	Powers of appellate courts	–	Unanimous (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Stewart v Elk Valley Coal Corp 2017 SCC 30 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16679/index.do	valign=top	Discrimination based on mental and physical disability	–	Abella, Karakatsanis, Côté, Brown and Rowe JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Douez v Facebook, Inc 2017 SCC 33 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16700/index.do	valign=top	Private intentional law – Jurisdiction	Côté J	Moldaver J
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Ktunaxa Nation v British Columbia (Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations) 2017 SCC 54 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16816/index.do	valign=top	Freedom of religion	Rowe J	Abella, Karakatsanis, Wagner, Gascon and Brown JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Marakah 2017 SCC 59 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16896/index.do	valign=top	Constitutional law – Admissibility of evidence derived from unreasonable search and seizure	–	Abella, Karakatsanis and Gascon JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Cowper-Smith v Morgan 2017 SCC 61 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16898/index.do	valign=top	Wills and estates and defence of proprietary estoppel	–	Abella, Moldaver, Karakatsanis, Wagner, Gascon and Rowe JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	British Columbia (Human Rights Tribunal) v Schrenk 2017 SCC 62 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16919/index.do	valign=top	Discrimination on basis of employment	–	Côté and Brown JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Deloitte & Touche v Livent Inc (Receiver of) 2017 SCC 63 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16920/index.do	valign=top	Tort of negligence; duty of care and negligent misrepresentation by auditor	–	Wagner and Côté JJ