Reactions on surfaces are reactions in which at least one of the steps of the reaction mechanism is the adsorption of one or more reactants. The mechanisms for these reactions, and the rate equations are of extreme importance for heterogeneous catalysis. Via scanning tunneling microscopy, it is possible to observe reactions at the solid gas interface in real space, if the time scale of the reaction is in the correct range.[1] [2] Reactions at the solid–gas interface are in some cases related to catalysis.
If a reaction occurs through these steps:
A + S ⇌ AS → Products
where A is the reactant and S is an adsorption site on the surface and the respective rate constants for the adsorption, desorption and reaction are k1, k−1 and k2, then the global reaction rate is:
r=k2CAS=k2\thetaCS
where:
CA
CAS
CS
\theta
CAS/CS
t
k2
k1
k-1
CS
If we apply the steady state approximation to AS, then:
dCAS | |
dt |
=0=k1CACS(1-\theta)-k2\thetaCS-k-1\thetaCS
\theta=
k1CA | |
k1CA+k-1+k2 |
and
r= | k1k2CACS |
k1CA+k-1+k2 |
.
The result is equivalent to the Michaelis–Menten kinetics of reactions catalyzed at a site on an enzyme. The rate equation is complex, and the reaction order is not clear. In experimental work, usually two extreme cases are looked for in order to prove the mechanism. In them, the rate-determining step can be:
k2\gg k1CA,k-1,sor ≈ k1CACS.
The order respect to A is 1. Examples of this mechanism are N2O on gold and HI on platinum
k2\ll k1CA,k-1so\theta=
k1CA | = | |
k1CA+k-1 |
K1CA | |
K1CA+1 |
K | ||||
|
k-1
r=
K1k2CACS | |
K1CA+1 |
Depending on the concentration of the reactant the rate changes:
r=K1k2CACS
r=k2CS
In this mechanism, suggested by Irving Langmuir in 1921 and further developed by Cyril Hinshelwood in 1926, two molecules adsorb on neighboring sites and the adsorbed molecules undergo a bimolecular reaction:[3]
A + S ⇌ AS
B + S ⇌ BS
AS + BS → Products
The rate constants are now
k1
k-1
k2
k-2
k
r=k\thetaA\thetaB
2 | |
C | |
S |
Proceeding as before we get
\theta | ||||
|
\thetaE
\thetaA+\thetaB+\thetaE=1
\thetaA=K1CA\thetaE
Ki=ki/k-i
K1
K2
\thetaE
\thetaA
\thetaB
r=k
2 | |
C | |
S |
K1K2CACB | ||||||||||||
|
The rate law is complex and there is no clear order with respect to either reactant, but we can consider different values of the constants, for which it is easy to measure integer orders:
That means that
1\ggK1CA,K2CB
r=k
2 | |
C | |
S |
K1K2CACB
In this case
K1CA,1\ggK2CB
r=k
2 | |
C | |
S |
K1K2CACB | ||||||||||||
|
r=k
2 | |
C | |
S |
K1K2CACB
r=k
2 | |
C | |
S |
K2CB | |
K1CA |
One of the reactants has very high adsorption and the other one doesn't adsorb strongly.
K1CA\gg1,K2CB
r=k
2 | |
C | |
S |
K2CB | |
K1CA |
The following reactions follow a Langmuir–Hinshelwood mechanism:[4]
In this mechanism, proposed in 1938 by D. D. Eley and E. K. Rideal, only one of the molecules adsorbs and the other one reacts with it directly from the gas phase, without adsorbing ("nonthermal surface reaction"):
A(g) + S(s) ⇌ AS(s)
AS(s) + B(g) → Products
Constants are
k1,k-1
k
r=kCS\thetaACB
r=kCS
C | ||||
|
r=kCSK1CACB
r=kCSCB
The following reactions follow an Eley–Rideal mechanism: