R v Williams explained

Williams (Gladstone) [1987]
Court:Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Date Decided:28 November 1983
Full Name:R v Williams (Gladstone)
Citations:[1987] 3 All ER 411; (1987) 78 Cr App R 276
Opinions:Lord Lane Justice Skinner and Mr. Justice McCowan
Keywords:Mistake of Fact, Reasonableness

Williams (Gladstone) was a case heard in the English Court of Appeal in 1983 and established that a mistake of fact can be a successful defence regardless of whether the belief is reasonable or not.

Facts

The defendant saw a youth being dragged along the street by the victim while the youth shouted for help. The victim had seen the youth mug a lady, and had grabbed the youth. The defendant intervened, believing that the young boy was being assaulted. The victim claimed to be a policeman, which was not true, and could not produce a warrant card when asked. A fight followed, and the victim "sustained injuries to his face, loosened teeth and bleeding gums". At the trial the jury were told that mistake can only be a defence if the mistake was reasonable. The jury returned a verdict of guilty.

Judgment

On appeal, Lord Lane gave the leading judgement and stated that:

See also

External links