Puzur-Inshushinak Explained

Puzur-Inshushinak
Governor of Susa
Military Governor of Elam
King of Elam
Reign:c. 2100 BCE
Predecessor:Khita
Dynasty:Kings of Elam

Puzur-Inshushinak (Linear Elamite: Puzur Sušinak, Akkadian:, puzur3-dinšušinak, also, puzur4-dinšušinak "Calling Inshushinak"), also sometimes thought to read Kutik-Inshushinak in Elamite,[1] was king of Elam, around 2100 BC,[2] and the last from the Awan dynasty according to the Susa kinglist.[3] He mentions his father's name as Šimpi-išhuk, which, being an Elamite name, suggests that Puzur-Inshuhinak himself was Elamite.[4]

In the inscription of the "Table au Lion", he appears as "Puzur-Inshushin(ak) Ensi (Governor) of Susa, Shakkanakku (Military Governor) of the country of Elam" (a title used by his predecessors Eshpum, Epirmupi and Ili-ishmani as governors of the Akkadian Empire for the territory of Elam.[5] [6] In another inscription, he calls himself the "Mighty King of Elam", suggesting an accession to independence from the weakening Akkadian Empire.[7]

Rule

His father was Shinpi-khish-khuk, the crown prince, and most likely a brother of king Khita. Kutik-Inshushinak's first position was as governor of Susa, which he may have held from a young age. About 2110 BC, his father died, and he became crown prince in his stead.

Elam had been under the domination of Akkad since the time of Sargon, and Kutik-Inshushinak accordingly campaigned in the Zagros mountains on their behalf. He was greatly successful as his conquests seem to have gone beyond the initial mission. Early on his inscriptions were in Akkadian but over time they came to be also in Linear Elamite.[8]

In 2090 BC, he asserted his independence from king Shar-Kali-Sharri of the Akkadian Empire, which had been weakening ever since the death of Naram-Sin, thus making himself king of Elam.[9] He conquered Anshan and managed to unite most of Elam into one kingdom.[9]

According to the inscriptions of Ur-Nammu, Puzur-Inshushinak conquered numerous cities in central Mesopotamia, including Eshnunna and Akkad, and probably Akshak.[10] His conquests probably encroached considerably on Gutian territory, gravely weakening them, and making them unable to withstand the Neo-Sumerian revolt of Utu-hengal.[11]

He built extensively on the citadel at Susa, and encouraged the use of the Linear Elamite script to write the Elamite language. This may be seen as a reaction against Sargon's attempt to force the use of Akkadian. Most inscriptions in Linear Elamite date from the reign of Kutik-Inshushinak.

His achievements were not long-lasting, for after his death the linear script fell into disuse, and Susa was overrun by the Third dynasty of Ur under Ur-Nammu and his son Shulgi.[9] The Ur III dynasty had held control over Susa after the demise of Puzur-Inshushinak, and they built numerous buildings and temples there. This control was continued by Shulgi as shown by his numerous dedications in the city-state.[12] He also engaged in marital alliances, by marrying his daughters to rulers of eastern territories, such as Anshan, Marhashi and Bashime.[12] Concomitantly, Elam fell under control of the Shimashki dynasty (also Elamite of origin).[13]

It is now known that his reign in Elam overlapped with that of Ur-Nammu of Ur-III,[14] although the previous lengthy estimates of the duration of the intervening Gutian dynasty and rule of Utu-hengal of Uruk had not allowed for that synchronism. Ur-Nammu, who styled himself "King of Sumer and Akkad" is probably the one who, early in his reign, reconquered the northern territories that had been occupied by Puzur-Inshushinak, before going on to conquer Susa.[15]

Statue of Puzur-Inshushinak

The bottom part of a statue, probably representing Puzur-Inshushinak himself, is visible in the Louvre Museum, Sb 55.[16] [17] The statue lists the numerous victories of Puzur-Inshushinak over neighbouring territories, and particularly mentions the submission of the king of Shimashki who "kissed his feet".[18]

Inscriptions

A possible mention of Puzur-Inshushinak appears in one of Puzer-Mama's inscriptions,[19] [20] but this is considered doubtful by Walter Sommerfeld and Piotr Steinkeller.[21]

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Sumerian Dictionary . oracc.iaas.upenn.edu.
  2. or from about 2240 to 2220 BC according to the (long chronology)
  3. Daniel T. Potts (1999). The Archaeology of Elam. Cambridge University Press. p. 122.
  4. Steinkeller . Piotr . Puzur-Inˇsuˇsinak at Susa: A Pivotal Episode of Early Elamite History Reconsidered . Susa and Elam. Archaeological, Philological, Historical and Geographical Perspectives. Mémoires de la Délégation en Perse . 293 . en.
  5. Translation into French in Book: Mémoires . 1899 . P. Geuthner . Paris . 8 .
  6. Book: Mémoires . 1899 . Paris P. Geuthner . 20–21 .
  7. Book: Shayegan . M. Rahim . Arsacids and Sasanians: Political Ideology in Post-Hellenistic and Late Antique Persia . 2011 . Cambridge University Press . 978-0-521-76641-8 . 262 . en.
  8. https://ia902908.us.archive.org/14/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.183377/2015.183377.History-Of-Early-Iran.pdf
  9. Book: Hansen . Donald P. . Leaving No Stones Unturned: Essays on the Ancient Near East and Egypt in Honor of Donald P. Hansen . 2002 . Eisenbrauns . 978-1-57506-055-2 . 233 . en.
  10. "According to one of Ur-Namma's inscriptions, which describes his conflict with Puzur-Inˇsuˇsinak, the latter occupied the cities of Awal, Kismar, and Maˇskan-ˇsarrum, and the lands of Eˇsnuna, Tutub, Zimudar, and Akkade. The prolog to Ur-Namma's code adds to list the northern Babylonian cities of Marda, GIRkal, Kazalu, and probably Ak ˇsak?, plus their rural settlements." in Steinkeller . Piotr . Puzur-Inˇsuˇsinak at Susa: A Pivotal Episode of Early Elamite History Reconsidered . Susa and Elam. Archaeological, Philological, Historical and Geographical Perspectives. Mémoires de la Délégation en Perse . 295 . en.
  11. Steinkeller . Piotr . Puzur-Inˇsuˇsinak at Susa: A Pivotal Episode of Early Elamite History Reconsidered . Susa and Elam. Archaeological, Philological, Historical and Geographical Perspectives. Mémoires de la Délégation en Perse . 298 . en.
  12. Book: Potts . Daniel T. . A Companion to the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East . 2012 . John Wiley & Sons . 978-1-4051-8988-0 . 746 . en.
  13. http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/elam-i Encyclopedia Iranica: Elam - Simashki dynasty, F. Vallat
  14. Wilcke; See Encyclopedia Iranica articles AWAN, ELAM
  15. Steinkeller . Piotr . Puzur-Inˇsuˇsinak at Susa: A Pivotal Episode of Early Elamite History Reconsidered . Susa and Elam. Archaeological, Philological, Historical and Geographical Perspectives. Mémoires de la Délégation en Perse . 298–299 . en.
  16. Web site: Site officiel du musée du Louvre . cartelfr.louvre.fr.
  17. Book: Mémoires . 1899 . Paris P. Geuthner . 7–15 .
  18. Book: Mémoires . 1899 . Paris P. Geuthner . 7–15 .
  19. Book: CDLI-Archival View .
  20. Inscription Puzur-Mama E2.12.5.1 in Book: Frayne . Douglas . Sargonic and Gutian Periods . 272. en.
  21. Sallaberger. Walther. Schrakamp. Ingo. January 2015. Philological Data for a Historical Chronology of Mesopotamia in the 3rd Millennium. en. 123.