Negative selection (natural selection) explained

In natural selection, negative selection[1] or purifying selection is the selective removal of alleles that are deleterious. This can result in stabilising selection through the purging of deleterious genetic polymorphisms that arise through random mutations.[2] [3]

Purging of deleterious alleles can be achieved on the population genetics level, with as little as a single point mutation being the unit of selection. In such a case, carriers of the harmful point mutation have fewer offspring each generation, reducing the frequency of the mutation in the gene pool.

In the case of strong negative selection on a locus, the purging of deleterious variants will result in the occasional removal of linked variation, producing a decrease in the level of variation surrounding the locus under selection. The incidental purging of non-deleterious alleles due to such spatial proximity to deleterious alleles is called background selection.[4] This effect increases with lower mutation rate but decreases with higher recombination rate.[5]

Purifying selection can be split into purging by non-random mating (assortative mating) and purging by genetic drift. Purging by genetic drift can remove primarily deeply recessive alleles, whereas natural selection can remove any type of deleterious alleles.[6]

Negative selection in haploid compared to diploid tissue

The idea that those genes of an organism that are expressed in the haploid stage are under more efficient natural selection than those genes expressed exclusively in the diploid stage is referred to as the “masking theory”.[7] This theory implies that purifying selection is more efficient in the haploid stage of the life cycle where fitness effects are more fully expressed than in the diploid stage of the life cycle. Evidence supporting the masking theory has been reported in the single-celled yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.[8] Further evidence of strong purifying selection in haploid tissue-specific genes, in support of the masking theory, has been reported for the plant, Scots Pine.[7]

See also

Notes and References

  1. Loewe . Laurence . vanc . 2008 . Negative selection . Nature Education . 1 . 1 . 59 .
  2. Tien NS, Sabelis MW, Egas M . Inbreeding depression and purging in a haplodiploid: gender-related effects . Heredity . 114 . 3 . 327–32 . March 2015 . 25407077 . 4815584 . 10.1038/hdy.2014.106 .
  3. Gulisija D, Crow JF . Inferring purging from pedigree data . Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution . 61 . 5 . 1043–51 . May 2007 . 17492959 . 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00088.x . 24302475 .
  4. Charlesworth B, Morgan MT, Charlesworth D . The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation . Genetics . 134 . 4 . 1289–303 . August 1993 . 10.1093/genetics/134.4.1289 . 8375663 . 1205596 .
  5. Hudson RR, Kaplan NL . Deleterious background selection with recombination . Genetics . 141 . 4 . 1605–17 . December 1995 . 10.1093/genetics/141.4.1605 . 8601498 . 1206891 .
  6. Glémin S . How are deleterious mutations purged? Drift versus nonrandom mating . Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution . 57 . 12 . 2678–87 . December 2003 . 14761049 . 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb01512.x . free .
  7. Cervantes S, Kesälahti R, Kumpula TA, Mattila TM, Helanterä H, Pyhäjärvi T . Strong Purifying Selection in Haploid Tissue-Specific Genes of Scots Pine Supports the Masking Theory . Mol Biol Evol . 40 . 8 . August 2023 . 37565532 . 10457172 . 10.1093/molbev/msad183 .
  8. Gerstein AC, Cleathero LA, Mandegar MA, Otto SP . Haploids adapt faster than diploids across a range of environments . J Evol Biol . 24 . 3 . 531–40 . March 2011 . 21159002 . 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02188.x .