In general topology, the pseudo-arc is the simplest nondegenerate hereditarily indecomposable continuum. The pseudo-arc is an arc-like homogeneous continuum, and played a central role in the classification of homogeneous planar continua. R. H. Bing proved that, in a certain well-defined sense, most continua in Rn, n ≥ 2, are homeomorphic to the pseudo-arc.
In 1920, Bronisław Knaster and Kazimierz Kuratowski asked whether a nondegenerate homogeneous continuum in the Euclidean plane R2 must be a Jordan curve. In 1921, Stefan Mazurkiewicz asked whether a nondegenerate continuum in R2 that is homeomorphic to each of its nondegenerate subcontinua must be an arc. In 1922, Knaster discovered the first example of a hereditarily indecomposable continuum K, later named the pseudo-arc, giving a negative answer to a Mazurkiewicz question. In 1948, R. H. Bing proved that Knaster's continuum is homogeneous, i.e. for any two of its points there is a homeomorphism taking one to the other. Yet also in 1948, Edwin Moise showed that Knaster's continuum is homeomorphic to each of its non-degenerate subcontinua. Due to its resemblance to the fundamental property of the arc, namely, being homeomorphic to all its nondegenerate subcontinua, Moise called his example M a pseudo-arc. Bing's construction is a modification of Moise's construction of M, which he had first heard described in a lecture. In 1951, Bing proved that all hereditarily indecomposable arc-like continua are homeomorphic — this implies that Knaster's K, Moise's M, and Bing's B are all homeomorphic. Bing also proved that the pseudo-arc is typical among the continua in a Euclidean space of dimension at least 2 or an infinite-dimensional separable Hilbert space. Bing and F. Burton Jones constructed a decomposable planar continuum that admits an open map onto the circle, with each point preimage homeomorphic to the pseudo-arc, called the circle of pseudo-arcs. Bing and Jones also showed that it is homogeneous. In 2016 Logan Hoehn and Lex Oversteegen classified all planar homogeneous continua, up to a homeomorphism, as the circle, pseudo-arc and circle of pseudo-arcs. In 2019 Hoehn and Oversteegen showed that the pseudo-arc is topologically the only, other than the arc, hereditarily equivalent planar continuum, thus providing a complete solution to the planar case of Mazurkiewicz's problem from 1921.
The following construction of the pseudo-arc follows .
At the heart of the definition of the pseudo-arc is the concept of a chain, which is defined as follows:
A chain is a finite collection of open sets
l{C}=\{C1,C2,\ldots,Cn\}
Ci\capCj\ne\emptyset
|i-j|\le1.
While being the simplest of the type of spaces listed above, the pseudo-arc is actually very complex. The concept of a chain being crooked (defined below) is what endows the pseudo-arc with its complexity. Informally, it requires a chain to follow a certain recursive zig-zag pattern in another chain. To 'move' from the mth link of the larger chain to the nth, the smaller chain must first move in a crooked manner from the mth link to the (n − 1)th link, then in a crooked manner to the (m + 1)th link, and then finally to the nth link.
More formally:
Let
l{C}
l{D}
l{D}
l{C}
Di\capCm\ne\emptyset
Dj\capCn\ne\emptyset
m<n-2
k
\ell
i<k<\ell<j
i>k>\ell>j
Dk\subseteqCn-1
D\ell\subseteqCm+1.
Then
l{D}
l{C}.
For any collection C of sets, let
C*
*=cup | |
C | |
S\inC |
S.
The pseudo-arc is defined as follows:
Let p and q be distinct points in the plane and
\left\{l{C}i\right\}i\inN
l{C}i
l{C}i
1/2i
l{C}i+1
l{C}i
l{C}i+1
l{C}i
Let
P=capi\inN\left(l{C}i\right)*.
Then P is a pseudo-arc.