Proth prime explained

Named After:François Proth
Publication Year:1878
Author:Proth, Francois
Terms Number:4304683178 below 272
Oeis:A080076
Con Number:Infinite
Parentsequence:Proth numbers, prime numbers
Formula:k × 2n + 1
First Terms:3, 5, 13, 17, 41, 97, 113
Largest Known Term:10223 × 231172165 + 1 (as of December 2019)
Oeis Name:Proth primes: primes of the form k*2^m + 1 with odd k < 2^m, m ≥ 1

A Proth number is a natural number N of the form

N=k x 2n+1

where k and n are positive integers, k is odd and

2n>k

. A Proth prime is a Proth number that is prime. They are named after the French mathematician François Proth.[1] The first few Proth primes are

3, 5, 13, 17, 41, 97, 113, 193, 241, 257, 353, 449, 577, 641, 673, 769, 929, 1153, 1217, 1409, 1601, 2113, 2689, 2753, 3137, 3329, 3457, 4481, 4993, 6529, 7297, 7681, 7937, 9473, 9601, 9857 .

It is still an open question whether an infinite number of Proth primes exist. It was shown in 2022 that the reciprocal sum of Proth primes converges to a real number near 0.747392479, substantially less than the value of 1.093322456 for the reciprocal sum of Proth numbers.

The primality of Proth numbers can be tested more easily than many other numbers of similar magnitude.

Definition

A Proth number takes the form

N=k2n+1

where k and n are positive integers,

k

is odd and

2n>k

. A Proth prime is a Proth number that is prime.[2] Without the condition that

2n>k

, all odd integers larger than 1 would be Proth numbers.[3]

Primality testing

See also: Proth's theorem. The primality of a Proth number can be tested with Proth's theorem, which states that a Proth number

p

is prime if and only if there exists an integer

a

for which
p-1
2
a

\equiv-1\pmod{p}.

This theorem can be used as a probabilistic test of primality, by checking for many random choices of

a

whether
p-1
2
a

\equiv-1\pmod{p}.

If this fails to hold for several random

a

, then it is very likely that the number

p

is composite.This test is a Las Vegas algorithm: it never returns a false positive but can return a false negative; in other words, it never reports a composite number as "probably prime" but can report a prime number as "possibly composite".

In 2008, Sze created a deterministic algorithm that runs in at most

\tilde{O}((klogk+logN)(logN)2)

time, where Õ is the soft-O notation. For typical searches for Proth primes, usually

k

is either fixed (e.g. 321 Prime Search or Sierpinski Problem) or of order

O(logN)

(e.g.&thinsp;Cullen prime search). In these cases algorithm runs in at most

\tilde{O}((logN)3)

, or

O((logN)3+\epsilon)

time for all

\epsilon>0

. There is also an algorithm that runs in

\tilde{O}((logN)24/7)

time.

Fermat numbers are a special case of Proth numbers, wherein . In such a scenario Pépin's test proves that only base need to be checked to deterministically verify or falsify the primality of a Fermat number.

Large primes

, the largest known Proth prime is

10223 x 231172165+1

. It is 9,383,761 digits long.[4] It was found by Szabolcs Peter in the PrimeGrid volunteer computing project which announced it on 6 November 2016.[5] It is also the second largest known non-Mersenne prime.[6]

The project Seventeen or Bust, searching for Proth primes with a certain

t

to prove that 78557 is the smallest Sierpinski number (Sierpinski problem), has found 11 large Proth primes by 2007. Similar resolutions to the prime Sierpiński problem and extended Sierpiński problem have yielded several more numbers.

Since divisors of Fermat numbers

Fn=

2n
2

+1

are always of the form

k x 2n+2+1

, it is customary to determine if a new Proth prime divides a Fermat number.[7]

As of July 2023, PrimeGrid is the leading computing project for searching for Proth primes. Its main projects include:

3 x 2n+1

, also called Thabit primes of the second kind)

27 x 2n+1

and

121 x 2n+1

)

n x 2n+1

)

k x 2n+1

where k is in this list:
k

As of June 2023, the largest Proth primes discovered are:[8]

rankprimedigitswhenCommentsDiscoverer (Project)References
110223 × 231172165 +&thinsp;1938376131 Oct 2016Szabolcs Péter (Sierpinski Problem)[9]
2202705 × 221320516 +&thinsp;164181211 Dec 2021Pavel Atnashev (Extended Sierpinski Problem)[10]
381 × 220498148 + 1617056013 Jul 2023Generalized Fermat F2(3 × 25124537)Ryan Propper (LLR)
47 × 220267500 + 1610112721 Jul 2022Divides F20267499(12)Ryan Propper (LLR)[11]
5168451 × 219375200 +&thinsp;1583252217 Sep 2017Ben Maloney (Prime Sierpinski Problem)[12]
67 × 218233956 +&thinsp;154889691 Oct 2020Divides Fermat F18233954 and F18233952(7)Ryan Propper[13]
713 × 216828072 +&thinsp;1506575611 Oct 2023Ryan Propper
83 × 216408818 +&thinsp;1493954728 Oct 2020Divides F16408814(3), F16408817(5), and F16408815(8)James Brown (PrimeGrid)
911 × 215502315 +&thinsp;146666638 Jan 2023Divides F15502313(10)Ryan Propper
1037 × 215474010 +&thinsp;146581438 Nov 2022Ryan Propper
11(27658613 + 1) × 27658614 + 1461094531 Jul 2020Gaussian Mersenne normRyan Propper and Serge Batalov
1213 × 215294536 + 1460411630 Sep 2023Ryan Propper
1337 × 214166940 + 1426467624 Jun 2022Ryan Propper
1499739 × 214019102 +&thinsp;1422017624 Dec 2019Brian Niegocki (Extended Sierpinski Problem)[14]
15404849 × 213764867 +&thinsp;1414364410 Mar 2021Generalized Cullen with base 131072Ryan Propper and Serge Batalov
1625 × 213719266 +&thinsp;1412991221 Sep 2022F1(5 × 26859633)Ryan Propper
1781 × 213708272 +&thinsp;1412660311 Oct 2022F2(3 × 23427068)Ryan Propper
1881 × 213470584 +&thinsp;140550529 Oct 2022F2(3 × 23367646)Ryan Propper
199 × 213334487 +&thinsp;1401408231 Mar 2020Divides F13334485(3), F13334486(7), and F13334484(8)Ryan Propper
2019249 × 213018586 +&thinsp;1391899026 Mar 2007Konstantin Agafonov (Seventeen or Bust)

Uses

Small Proth primes (less than 10200) have been used in constructing prime ladders, sequences of prime numbers such that each term is "close" (within about 1011) to the previous one. Such ladders have been used to empirically verify prime-related conjectures. For example, Goldbach's weak conjecture was verified in 2008 up to 8.875&thinsp;×&thinsp;1030 using prime ladders constructed from Proth primes.[15] (The conjecture was later proved by Harald Helfgott.[16] [17])

Also, Proth primes can optimize den Boer reduction between the Diffie–Hellman problem and the Discrete logarithm problem. The prime number 55&thinsp;×&thinsp;2286 +&thinsp;1 has been used in this way.[18]

As Proth primes have simple binary representations, they have also been used in fast modular reduction without the need for pre-computation, for example by Microsoft.[19]

Notes and References

  1. 0812.2596. Deterministic Primality Proving on Proth Numbers. Sze. Tsz-Wo. math.NT. 2008.
  2. Web site: Proth Prime. Weisstein. Eric W.. mathworld.wolfram.com. en. 2019-12-06.
  3. Web site: Proth Number. Weisstein. Eric W.. mathworld.wolfram.com. en. 2019-12-07.
  4. Web site: The Top Twenty: Proth. Caldwell. Chris. The Prime Pages.
  5. Web site: World Record Colbert Number discovered!. Van Zimmerman. 30 Nov 2016. PrimeGrid. 9 Nov 2016.
  6. Web site: The Top Twenty: Largest Known Primes. Caldwell. Chris. The Prime Pages.
  7. Web site: The Prime Glossary: Fermat divisor . primes.utm.edu . 14 November 2021.
  8. Web site: The top twenty: Proth. Caldwell. Chris K.. The Top Twenty. 6 December 2019.
  9. Web site: Seventeen or Bust. Goetz. Michael. 27 February 2018. PrimeGrid. 6 Dec 2019.
  10. Web site: PrimeGrid's Extended Sierpinski Problem Prime Search. primegrid.com. PrimeGrid. 28 December 2021.
  11. Web site: New GFN factors . www.prothsearch.com . 14 November 2021.
  12. Web site: Official discovery of the prime number 168451×219375200+1. PrimeGrid. 6 Dec 2019.
  13. Web site: Fermat factoring status . www.prothsearch.com . 14 November 2021.
  14. Web site: Official discovery of the prime number 99739×214019102+1 . PrimeGrid . 14 November 2021 . 24 December 2019.
  15. 1305.3062. Numerical Verification of the Ternary Goldbach Conjecture up to 8.875e30. Helfgott. H. A.. Platt. David J.. math.NT. 2013.
  16. 1312.7748. math.NT. Harald A.. Helfgott. The ternary Goldbach conjecture is true. 2013.
  17. News: Harald Andrés Helfgott. Alexander von Humboldt-Professur. 2019-12-08.
  18. Brown. Daniel R. L.. 24 Feb 2015. CM55: special prime-field elliptic curves almost optimizing den Boer's reduction between Diffie–Hellman and discrete logs. International Association for Cryptologic Research. 1–3.
  19. Acar. Tolga. Shumow. Dan. 2010. Modular Reduction without Pre-Computation for Special Moduli. Microsoft Research.