In mathematics, a proof without words (or visual proof) is an illustration of an identity or mathematical statement which can be demonstrated as self-evident by a diagram without any accompanying explanatory text. Such proofs can be considered more elegant than formal or mathematically rigorous proofs due to their self-evident nature. When the diagram demonstrates a particular case of a general statement, to be a proof, it must be generalisable.[1]
A proof without words is not the same as a mathematical proof, because it omits the details of the logical argument it illustrates. However, it can provide valuable intuitions to the viewer that can help them formulate or better understand a true proof.
The statement that the sum of all positive odd numbers up to 2n - 1 is a perfect square - more specifically, the perfect square n2 - can be demonstrated by a proof without words.
In one corner of a grid, a single block represents 1, the first square. That can be wrapped on two sides by a strip of three blocks (the next odd number) to make a 2 × 2 block: 4, the second square. Adding a further five blocks makes a 3 × 3 block: 9, the third square. This process can be continued indefinitely.
The Pythagorean theorem that
a2+b2=c2
One method of doing so is to visualise a larger square of sides
a+b
a
b
c
c2
a2
b2
Jensen's inequality can also be proven graphically. A dashed curve along the X axis is the hypothetical distribution of X, while a dashed curve along the Y axis is the corresponding distribution of Y values. The convex mapping Y(X) increasingly "stretches" the distribution for increasing values of X.
Mathematics Magazine and The College Mathematics Journal run a regular feature titled "Proof without words" containing, as the title suggests, proofs without words. The Art of Problem Solving and USAMTS websites run Java applets illustrating proofs without words.
For a proof to be accepted by the mathematical community, it must logically show how the statement it aims to prove follows totally and inevitably from a set of assumptions.[3] A proof without words might imply such an argument, but it does not make one directly, so it cannot take the place of a formal proof where one is required.[4] [5] Rather, mathematicians use proofs without words as illustrations and teaching aids for ideas that have already been proven formally.[6] [7]