In mathematics, the Wallis product for , published in 1656 by John Wallis,[1] states that
\begin{align} | \pi |
2 |
&=
infty | |
\prod | |
n=1 |
4n2 | |
4n2-1 |
=
infty | ||
\prod | \left( | |
n=1 |
2n | |
2n-1 |
⋅
2n | |
2n+1 |
\right)\\[6pt] &=(
2 | |
1 |
⋅
2 | |
3 |
) ⋅ (
4 | |
3 |
⋅
4 | |
5 |
) ⋅ (
6 | |
5 |
⋅
6 | |
7 |
) ⋅ (
8 | |
7 |
⋅
8 | |
9 |
) ⋅ … \\ \end{align}
Wallis derived this infinite product using interpolation, though his method is not regarded as rigorous. A modern derivation can be found by examining
\pi | |
\int | |
0 |
\sinnxdx
n
n
n
n
I(n)=
\pi | |
\int | |
0 |
\sinnxdx.
(This is a form of Wallis' integrals.) Integrate by parts:
\begin{align} u&=\sinn-1x\\ ⇒ du&=(n-1)\sinn-2x\cosxdx\\ dv&=\sinxdx\\ ⇒ v&=-\cosx \end{align}
\begin{align} ⇒ I(n)&=
\pi | |
\int | |
0 |
\sinnxdx\\[6pt] {}&=-\sinn-1x\cosx
\pi | |
l| | |
0 |
-
\pi | |
\int | |
0 |
(-\cosx)(n-1)\sinn-2x\cosxdx\\[6pt] {}&=0+(n-1)
\pi | |
\int | |
0 |
\cos2x\sinn-2xdx, n>1\\[6pt] {}&=(n-1)
\pi | |
\int | |
0 |
(1-\sin2x)\sinn-2xdx\\[6pt] {}&=(n-1)
\pi | |
\int | |
0 |
\sinn-2xdx-(n-1)
\pi | |
\int | |
0 |
\sinnxdx\\[6pt] {}&=(n-1)I(n-2)-(n-1)I(n)\\[6pt] {}&=
n-1 | |
n |
I(n-2)\\[6pt] ⇒
I(n) | |
I(n-2) |
&=
n-1 | |
n |
\\[6pt] \end{align}
I(2n)=
2n-1 | |
2n |
I(2n-2)
I(2n+1)=
2n | |
2n+1 |
I(2n-1)
We obtain values for
I(0)
I(1)
\begin{align} I(0)&=
\pi | |
\int | |
0 |
dx=
\pi | |
xl| | |
0 |
=\pi\\[6pt] I(1)&=
\pi | |
\int | |
0 |
\sinxdx=-\cosx
\pi | |
l| | |
0 |
=(-\cos\pi)-(-\cos0)=-(-1)-(-1)=2\\[6pt] \end{align}
Now, we calculate for even values
I(2n)
I(0)
\pi | |
I(2n)=\int | |
0 |
\sin2nxdx=
2n-1 | |
2n |
I(2n-2)=
2n-1 | |
2n |
⋅
2n-3 | |
2n-2 |
I(2n-4)
= | 2n-1 |
2n |
⋅
2n-3 | |
2n-2 |
⋅
2n-5 | |
2n-4 |
⋅ … ⋅
5 | |
6 |
⋅
3 | |
4 |
⋅
1 | |
2 |
I(0)=\pi
n | |
\prod | |
k=1 |
2k-1 | |
2k |
Repeating the process for odd values
I(2n+1)
\pi | |
I(2n+1)=\int | |
0 |
\sin2n+1xdx=
2n | I(2n-1)= | |
2n+1 |
2n | |
2n+1 |
⋅
2n-2 | |
2n-1 |
I(2n-3)
= | 2n |
2n+1 |
⋅
2n-2 | |
2n-1 |
⋅
2n-4 | |
2n-3 |
⋅ … ⋅
6 | |
7 |
⋅
4 | |
5 |
⋅
2 | |
3 |
I(1)=2
n | |
\prod | |
k=1 |
2k | |
2k+1 |
We make the following observation, based on the fact that
\sin{x}\leq1
\sin2n+1x\le\sin2nx\le\sin2n-1x,0\lex\le\pi
⇒ I(2n+1)\leI(2n)\leI(2n-1)
Dividing by
I(2n+1)
⇒ 1\le
I(2n) | |
I(2n+1) |
\le
I(2n-1) | = | |
I(2n+1) |
2n+1 | |
2n |
By the squeeze theorem,
⇒ \limn → infty
I(2n) | |
I(2n+1) |
=1
\limn → infty
I(2n) | = | |
I(2n+1) |
\pi | |
2 |
\limn → infty
n | ||
\prod | \left( | |
k=1 |
2k-1 | |
2k |
⋅
2k+1 | |
2k |
\right)=1
⇒
\pi | |
2 |
infty | ||
=\prod | \left( | |
k=1 |
2k | |
2k-1 |
⋅
2k | \right)= | |
2k+1 |
2 | |
1 |
⋅
2 | |
3 |
⋅
4 | |
3 |
⋅
4 | |
5 |
⋅
6 | |
5 |
⋅
6 | |
7 |
⋅ …
See the main page on Gaussian integral.
While the proof above is typically featured in modern calculus textbooks, the Wallis product is, in retrospect, an easy corollary of the later Euler infinite product for the sine function.
\sinx | |
x |
=
infty\left(1 | |
\prod | |
n=1 |
-
x2 | |
n2\pi2 |
\right)
Let
x=
\pi | |
2 |
\begin{align} ⇒
2 | |
\pi |
&=
infty | |
\prod | |
n=1 |
\left(1-
1 | |
4n2 |
\right)\\[6pt] ⇒
\pi | |
2 |
&=
infty | ||
\prod | \left( | |
n=1 |
4n2 | |
4n2-1 |
\right)\\[6pt] &=
infty | ||
\prod | \left( | |
n=1 |
2n | ⋅ | |
2n-1 |
2n | |
2n+1 |
\right)=
2 | |
1 |
⋅
2 | |
3 |
⋅
4 | |
3 |
⋅
4 | |
5 |
⋅
6 | |
5 |
⋅
6 | |
7 |
… \end{align}
Stirling's approximation for the factorial function
n!
n!=\sqrt{2\pin}{\left(
n | |
e |
\right)}n\left[1+O\left(
1 | |
n |
\right)\right].
Consider now the finite approximations to the Wallis product, obtained by taking the first
k
pk=
k | |
\prod | |
n=1 |
2n | |
2n-1 |
2n | |
2n+1 |
,
where
pk
\begin{align} pk&={1\over{2k+1}}
k | |
\prod | |
n=1 |
(2n)4 | |
[(2n)(2n-1)]2 |
\\[6pt] &={1\over{2k+1}} ⋅ {{24k(k!)4}\over{[(2k)!]2}}. \end{align}
Substituting Stirling's approximation in this expression (both for
k!
(2k)!
pk
\pi | |
2 |
k → infty
The Riemann zeta function and the Dirichlet eta function can be defined:
\begin{align} \zeta(s)&=
infty | |
\sum | |
n=1 |
1 | |
ns |
,\Re(s)>1\\[6pt] η(s)&=(1-21-s)\zeta(s)\\[6pt] &=
infty | |
\sum | |
n=1 |
(-1)n-1 | |
ns |
,\Re(s)>0 \end{align}
Applying an Euler transform to the latter series, the following is obtained:
\begin{align} η(s)&=
1 | + | |
2 |
1 | |
2 |
infty | |
\sum | |
n=1 |
(-1)n-1\left[
1 | - | |
ns |
1 | |
(n+1)s |
\right],\Re(s)>-1\\[6pt] ⇒ η'(s)&=(1-21-s)\zeta'(s)+21-s(ln2)\zeta(s)\\[6pt] &=-
1 | |
2 |
infty | |
\sum | |
n=1 |
(-1)n-1\left[
lnn | - | |
ns |
ln(n+1) | |
(n+1)s |
\right],\Re(s)>-1 \end{align}
\begin{align} ⇒ η'(0)&=-\zeta'(0)-ln2=-
1 | |
2 |
infty | |
\sum | |
n=1 |
(-1)n-1\left[lnn-ln(n+1)\right]\\[6pt] &=-
1 | |
2 |
infty | |
\sum | |
n=1 |
(-1)n-1ln
n | |
n+1 |
\\[6pt] &=-
1 | |
2 |
\left(ln
1 | |
2 |
-ln
2 | |
3 |
+ln
3 | |
4 |
-ln
4 | |
5 |
+ln
5 | |
6 |
- … \right)\\[6pt] &=
1 | |
2 |
\left(ln
2 | |
1 |
+ln
2 | |
3 |
+ln
4 | |
3 |
+ln
4 | |
5 |
+ln
6 | |
5 |
+ … \right)\\[6pt] &=
1 | ln\left( | |
2 |
2 | ⋅ | |
1 |
2 | ⋅ | |
3 |
4 | ⋅ | |
3 |
4 | |
5 |
⋅ … \right)=
1 | ln | |
2 |
\pi | |
2 |
\\ ⇒ \zeta'(0)&=-
1 | |
2 |
ln\left(2\pi\right) \end{align}
\pi