Prokaryote Explained

A prokaryote (; less commonly spelled procaryote)[1] is a single-celled organism whose cell lacks a nucleus and other membrane-bound organelles.[2] The word prokaryote comes from the Ancient Greek, meaning 'before', and, meaning 'nut' or 'kernel'. In the earlier two-empire system arising from the work of Édouard Chatton, prokaryotes were classified within the empire Prokaryota. However, in the three-domain system, based upon molecular phylogenetics, prokaryotes are divided into two domains: Bacteria and Archaea. A third domain, Eukaryota, consists of organisms with nuclei.

Prokaryotes evolved before eukaryotes, and lack nuclei, mitochondria, and most of the other distinct organelles that characterize the eukaryotic cell. Some unicellular prokaryotes, such as cyanobacteria, form colonies held together by biofilms, and large colonies can create multilayered microbial mats. Prokaryotes are asexual, reproducing via binary fission, although horizontal gene transfer is common.

Molecular phylogenetics has provided insight into the evolution and interrelationships of the three domains of life. The division between prokaryotes and eukaryotes reflects two very different levels of cellular organization; only eukaryotic cells have an enclosed nucleus that contains its DNA, and other membrane-bound organelles including mitochondria. More recently, the primary division has been seen as that between Archaea and Bacteria, since the eukaryotes are part of the archaean clade and have multiple homologies with other Archaea.

Structure

See also: Bacterial cell structure.

The cellular components of prokaryotes are not enclosed in membranes within the cytoplasm, like eukaryotic organelles. Bacteria have microcompartments, quasi-organelles enclosed in protein shells such as encapsulin protein cages,[3] [4] while both bacteria and some archaea have gas vesicles.[5]

Prokaryotes have simple cell skeletons. These are highly diverse, and contain homologues of the eukaryote proteins actin and tubulin. The cytoskeleton provides the capability for movement within the cell.[6]

Most prokaryotes are between 1 and 10 μm, but they vary in size from 0.2 μm in Thermodiscus spp. and Mycoplasma genitalium to 750 μm in Thiomargarita namibiensis.[7] [8]

Bacterial cells have various shapes, including spherical or ovoid cocci, e.g., Streptococcus; cylindrical bacilli, e.g., Lactobacillus; spiral bacteria, e.g., Helicobacter; or comma-shaped, e.g., Vibrio.[9] Archaea are mainly simple ovoids, but Haloquadratum is flat and square.[10]

+ Parts of the prokaryote cell[11]
ElementDescription
Flagellum (not always present)Long, whip-like protrusion that moves the cell.
Cell membraneSurrounds the cell's cytoplasm, regulates flow of substances in and out.
Cell wall (except in Mollicutes, Thermoplasma)Outer covering that protects the cell and gives it shape.
CytoplasmA watery gel that contains enzymes, salts, and organic molecules.
RibosomeStructure that produces proteins as specified by DNA.
NucleoidRegion that contains the prokaryote's single DNA molecule.
Capsule (only in some groups)Glycoprotein covering outside the cell membrane.

Reproduction and DNA transfer

Bacteria and archaea reproduce through asexual reproduction, usually by binary fission. Genetic exchange and recombination occur by horizontal gene transfer, not involving replication.[12] DNA transfer between prokaryotic cells occurs in bacteria and archaea.

Gene transfer in bacteria

In bacteria, gene transfer occurs by three processes. These are virus-mediated transduction; conjugation; and natural transformation.

Transduction of bacterial genes by bacteriophage viruses appears to reflect occasional errors during intracellular assembly of virus particles, rather than an adaptation of the host bacteria. There are at least three ways that it can occur, all involving the incorporation of some bacterial DNA in the virus, and from there to another bacterium.[13]

Conjugation involves plasmids, allowing plasmid DNA to be transferred from one bacterium to another. Infrequently, a plasmid may integrate into the host bacterial chromosome, and subsequently transfer part of the host bacterial DNA to another bacterium.[14]

Natural bacterial transformation involves the transfer of DNA from one bacterium to another through the water around them. This is a bacterial adaptation for DNA transfer, because it depends on the interaction of numerous bacterial gene products.[15]

The bacterium must first enter the physiological state called competence; in Bacillus subtilis, the process involves 40 genes.[16] The amount of DNA transferred during transformation can be as much as a third of the whole chromosome.[17] [18] Transformation is common, occurring in at least 67 species of bacteria.[19]

Gene transfer in archaea

Among archaea, Haloferax volcanii forms cytoplasmic bridges between cells that transfer DNA between cells,[20] while Sulfolobus solfataricus transfers DNA between cells by direct contact. Exposure of S. solfataricus to agents that damage DNA induces cellular aggregation, perhaps enhancing homologous recombination to increase the repair of damaged DNA.[21]

Colonies and biofilms

Prokaryotes are strictly unicellular, but most can form stable aggregate communities in biofilms.[22] Bacterial biofilms are formed by the secretion of extracellular polymeric substance (EPS).[23] Myxobacteria have multicellular stages in their life cycles.[24] Biofilms may be structurally complex and may attach to solid surfaces, or exist at liquid-air interfaces. Bacterial biofilms are often made up of microcolonies (dome-shaped masses of bacteria and matrix) separated by channels through which water may flow easily.

Microcolonies may join together above the substratum to form a continuous layer. This structure functions as a simple circulatory system by moving water through the biofilm, helping to provide cells with oxygen which is often in short supply.[25] The result approaches a multicellular organisation.[26] Differential cell expression, collective behavior, signaling (quorum sensing), programmed cell death, and discrete biological dispersal events all seem to point in this direction.[27] [28] Bacterial biofilms may be 100 times more resistant to antibiotics than free-living unicells, making them difficult to remove from surfaces they have colonized.[29]

Environment

Prokaryotes have diversified greatly throughout their long existence. Their metabolism is far more varied than that of eukaryotes, leading to many highly distinct types. For example, prokaryotes may obtain energy by chemosynthesis.[30] Prokaryotes live nearly everywhere on Earth, including in environments as cold as soils in Antarctica,[31] or as hot as undersea hydrothermal vents and land-based hot springs.[32] Some archaea and bacteria are extremophiles, thriving in harsh conditions, such as high temperatures (thermophiles) or high salinity (halophiles).[33] Some archaeans are methanogens, living in anoxic environments and releasing methane.[2] Many archaea grow as plankton in the oceans. Symbiotic prokaryotes live in or on the bodies of other organisms, including humans. Prokaryotes have high populations in the soil, in the sea, and in undersea sediments. Soil prokaryotes are still heavily undercharacterized despite their easy proximity to humans and their tremendous economic importance to agriculture.[34]

Evolution

The first organisms

A widespread current model of the origin of life is that the first organisms were prokaryotes. These may have evolved out of protocells, while the eukaryotes evolved later in the history of life.[35] An alternative model is that extant prokaryotes evolved from more complex eukaryotic ancestors through a process of simplification.[36] [37] [38]

Another view is that the three domains of life arose simultaneously, from a set of varied cells that formed a single gene pool.[39] [40]

The oldest known fossilized prokaryotes were laid down approximately 3.5 billion years ago, only about 1 billion years after the formation of the Earth's crust. Eukaryotes only appear in the fossil record later, and may have formed from endosymbiosis of multiple prokaryote ancestors. The oldest known fossil eukaryotes are about 1.7 billion years old. However, some genetic evidence suggests eukaryotes appeared as early as 3 billion years ago.[41]

Phylogeny

According to the 2016 phylogenetic analysis of Laura Hug and colleagues, using genomic data on over 1,000 organisms, the relationships among prokaryotes are as shown in the tree diagram.[42]

Classification

Taxonomic history

The distinction between prokaryotes and eukaryotes was established by the microbiologists Roger Stanier and C. B. van Niel in their 1962 paper The concept of a bacterium (though spelled procaryote and eucaryote there).[43] That paper cites Édouard Chatton's 1937 book Titres et Travaux Scientifiques[44] for using those terms and recognizing the distinction.[45] One reason for this classification was so that the group then often called blue-green algae (now cyanobacteria) would not be classified as plants but grouped with bacteria.[43]

In 1977, Carl Woese proposed dividing prokaryotes into the Bacteria and Archaea (originally Eubacteria and Archaebacteria) because of the major differences in the structure and genetics between the two groups of organisms. Archaea were originally thought to be extremophiles, living only in inhospitable conditions such as extremes of temperature, pH, and radiation but have since been found in all types of habitats. The resulting arrangement of Eukaryota (also called "Eucarya"), Bacteria, and Archaea is called the three-domain system, replacing the traditional two-empire system.[46] [47]

As distinct from eukaryotes

The division between prokaryotes and eukaryotes has been considered the most important distinction or difference among organisms. The distinction is that eukaryotic cells have a "true" nucleus containing their DNA, whereas prokaryotic cells do not have a nucleus.[48]

Both eukaryotes and prokaryotes contain ribosomes which produce proteins as specified by the cell's DNA. Prokaryote ribosomes are smaller than those in eukaryote cytoplasm, but similar to those inside mitochondria and chloroplasts, one of several lines of evidence that those organelles derive from bacteria incorporated by symbiogenesis.[49] [50]

The genome in a prokaryote is held within a DNA/protein complex in the cytosol called the nucleoid, which lacks a nuclear envelope. The complex contains a single circular chromosome, a cyclic, double-stranded molecule of stable chromosomal DNA, in contrast to the multiple linear, compact, highly organized chromosomes found in eukaryotic cells.[51] In addition, many important genes of prokaryotes are stored in separate circular DNA structures called plasmids.[52] Like eukaryotes, prokaryotes may partially duplicate genetic material, and can have a haploid chromosomal composition that is partially replicated.[53]

Prokaryotes vs Eukaryotes
Domain Organelles Reproduction
Prokaryotes None, DNA is free in cytoplasm Few Asexual, with horizontal gene transfer
Eukaryotes DNA in nucleus Membrane-bound organelles, inc. endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria, chloroplasts Sexual reproduction with haploid gametes

Prokaryotes lack mitochondria and chloroplasts. Instead, processes such as oxidative phosphorylation and photosynthesis take place across the prokaryotic cell membrane.[54] However, prokaryotes do possess some internal structures, such as prokaryotic cytoskeletons.[55] [56] It has been suggested that the bacterial phylum Planctomycetota has a membrane around the nucleoid and contains other membrane-bound cellular structures.[57] However, further investigation revealed that Planctomycetota cells are not compartmentalized or nucleated and, like other bacterial membrane systems, are interconnected.[58]

Prokaryotic cells are usually much smaller than eukaryotic cells. Therefore, prokaryotes have a larger surface-area-to-volume ratio, giving them a higher metabolic rate, a higher growth rate, and as a consequence, a shorter generation time than eukaryotes.[59]

Eukaryotes as Archaea

There is increasing evidence that the roots of the eukaryotes are to be found in the archaean Asgard group, perhaps Heimdallarchaeota. For example, histones which usually package DNA in eukaryotic nuclei, are found in several archaean groups, giving evidence for homology.[60] The non-bacterial group comprising Archaea and Eukaryota was called Neomura by Thomas Cavalier-Smith in 2002, on the view that these form a clade.[61]

Eukaryotes as Archaea
Domain Histone proteins DNA replication
Archaea, inc. EukaryotaAll are similar in these two groups, implying homology and relatedness
Bacteria(missing) Present in a very different form

Unlike the above assumption of a fundamental split between prokaryotes and eukaryotes, the most important difference between biota may be the division between Bacteria and the rest (Archaea and Eukaryota). DNA replication differs fundamentally between the Bacteria and Archaea (including that in eukaryotic nuclei), and it may not be homologous between these two groups.[62]

Further, ATP synthase, though homologous in all organisms, differs greatly between bacteria (including eukaryotic organelles such as mitochondria and chloroplasts) and the archaea/eukaryote nucleus group. The last common ancestor of all life (called LUCA) should have possessed an early version of this protein complex. As ATP synthase is obligate membrane bound, this supports the assumption that LUCA was a cellular organism. The RNA world hypothesis might clarify this scenario, as LUCA might have lacked DNA, but had an RNA genome built by ribosomes as suggested by Woese.[63]

A ribonucleoprotein world has been proposed based on the idea that oligopeptides may have been built together with primordial nucleic acids at the same time, which supports the concept of a ribocyte as LUCA. The feature of DNA as the material base of the genome might have then been adopted separately in bacteria and in archaea (and later eukaryote nuclei), presumably with the help of some viruses (possibly retroviruses as they could reverse transcribe RNA to DNA).[64]

External links

Notes and References

  1. 2023-12-30.
  2. Web site: Prokaryotes: Single-celled Organisms . North Carolina State University.
  3. Kerfeld CA, Sawaya MR, Tanaka S, Nguyen CV, Phillips M, Beeby M, Yeates TO . Protein structures forming the shell of primitive bacterial organelles . . 309 . 5736 . 936–8 . August 2005 . 16081736 . 10.1126/science.1113397 . 2005Sci...309..936K . 10.1.1.1026.896 . 24561197.
  4. Murat D, Byrne M, Komeili A . Cell biology of prokaryotic organelles . Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology . 2 . 10 . a000422 . October 2010 . 20739411 . 2944366 . 10.1101/cshperspect.a000422.
  5. Murat . Dorothee . Byrne . Meghan . Komeili . Arash . 2010-10-01 . Cell Biology of Prokaryotic Organelles . Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology . 2 . 10 . a000422 . 10.1101/cshperspect.a000422 . 2944366 . 20739411.
  6. Wickstead B, Gull K . The evolution of the cytoskeleton . The Journal of Cell Biology . 194 . 4 . 513–25 . August 2011 . 21859859 . 3160578 . 10.1083/jcb.201102065 .
  7. Web site: Size scale of prokaryotic cells, from the largest to the smallest . Bionumbers . 20 December 2024.
  8. Schulz . H. N. . Jorgensen . B. B. . Big bacteria . Annual Review of Microbiology . 55 . 2001 . 11544351 . 10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.105 . 105–137.
  9. Book: Bauman RW, Tizard IR, Machunis-Masouka E . Microbiology . Pearson Benjamin Cummings . 2006 . 978-0-8053-7693-7 . registration .
  10. Stoeckenius W . Walsby's square bacterium: fine structure of an orthogonal procaryote . . 148 . 1 . 352–60 . October 1981 . 7287626 . 216199 . 10.1128/JB.148.1.352-360.1981.
  11. Book: Raven . Peter . Singer . Susan . Mason . Kenneth . Losos . Jonathan . Johnson . George . Biology . 2013 . 4. Cell structure: Prokaryotic cells . 63 . McGraw-Hill Education . 978-0073383071.
  12. Book: Bobay, Louis-Marie . The pangenome: Diversity, dynamics and evolution of genomes . 2020 . Springer . 253, 282 . 978-3-030-38280-3.
  13. Chiang . Yin Ning . Penadés . José R. . Chen . John . Genetic transduction by phages and chromosomal islands: The new and noncanonical . PLOS Pathogens . 15 . 8 . 2019 . 31393945 . 6687093 . 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007878 . free . e1007878.
  14. Cabezón . Elena . Ripoll-Rozada . Jorge . Peña . Alejandro . de la Cruz . Fernando . Arechaga . Ignacio . Towards an integrated model of bacterial conjugation . FEMS Microbiology Reviews . 2014 . 39 . 1 . 81–95 . 10.1111/1574-6976.12085 . free . 25154632 .
  15. Chen I, Dubnau D . DNA uptake during bacterial transformation . . 2 . 3 . 241–9 . March 2004 . 15083159 . 10.1038/nrmicro844 . 205499369.
  16. Solomon JM, Grossman AD . Who's competent and when: regulation of natural genetic competence in bacteria . . 12 . 4 . 150–155 . April 1996 . 8901420 . 10.1016/0168-9525(96)10014-7 .
  17. Akamatsu T, Taguchi H . Incorporation of the whole chromosomal DNA in protoplast lysates into competent cells of Bacillus subtilis . . 65 . 4 . 823–9 . April 2001 . 11388459 . 10.1271/bbb.65.823 . 30118947 . free .
  18. Saito Y, Taguchi H, Akamatsu T . Fate of transforming bacterial genome following incorporation into competent cells of Bacillus subtilis: a continuous length of incorporated DNA . . 101 . 3 . 257–62 . March 2006 . 16716928 . 10.1263/jbb.101.257.
  19. Johnsborg O, Eldholm V, Håvarstein LS . Natural genetic transformation: prevalence, mechanisms and function . . 158 . 10 . 767–78 . December 2007 . 17997281 . 10.1016/j.resmic.2007.09.004 . free .
  20. Rosenshine I, Tchelet R, Mevarech M . The mechanism of DNA transfer in the mating system of an archaebacterium . . 245 . 4924 . 1387–9 . September 1989 . 2818746 . 10.1126/science.2818746 . 1989Sci...245.1387R.
  21. Fröls S, Ajon M, Wagner M, Teichmann D, Zolghadr B, Folea M, Boekema EJ, Driessen AJ, Schleper C, Albers SV . UV-inducible cellular aggregation of the hyperthermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus is mediated by pili formation . . 70 . 4 . 938–52 . November 2008 . 18990182 . 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06459.x . 12797510 . free.
  22. Book: 13th . Benjamin Cummings . 9780321649638 . Madigan T . Brock biology of microorganisms . San Francisco . 2012.
  23. Book: 10.1007/978-3-540-68022-2_2 . Direct Observations . The Biofilm Primer . Springer Series on Biofilms . 1 . 3–4 . 2007 . 978-3-540-68021-5 . Costerton . J. William . Springer . Berlin, Heidelberg . vanc.
  24. Kaiser D . Coupling cell movement to multicellular development in myxobacteria . Nature Reviews. Microbiology . 1 . 1 . 45–54 . October 2003 . 15040179 . 10.1038/nrmicro733 . 9486133.
  25. Costerton JW, Lewandowski Z, Caldwell DE, Korber DR, Lappin-Scott HM . Microbial biofilms . . 49 . 711–745 . October 1995 . 1 . 8561477 . 10.1146/annurev.mi.49.100195.003431.
  26. Shapiro JA . Thinking about bacterial populations as multicellular organisms . . 52 . 81–104 . 1998 . 1 . 9891794 . 10.1146/annurev.micro.52.1.81 . James A. Shapiro . https://web.archive.org/web/20110717183759/http://www.sci.uidaho.edu/newton/math501/Sp05/Shapiro.pdf . dead . 2011-07-17 .
  27. Chua SL, Liu Y, Yam JK, Chen Y, Vejborg RM, Tan BG, Kjelleberg S, Tolker-Nielsen T, Givskov M, Yang L . Dispersed cells represent a distinct stage in the transition from bacterial biofilm to planktonic lifestyles . . 5 . 4462 . July 2014 . 1 . 25042103 . 10.1038/ncomms5462 . 2014NatCo...5.4462C . free.
  28. Book: Balaban N, Ren D, Givskov M, Rasmussen TB . Introduction . 10.1007/7142_2007_006 . Control of Biofilm Infections by Signal Manipulation . Springer Series on Biofilms . 2 . 1–11 . 2008 . Springer . Berlin, Heidelberg . 978-3-540-73852-7.
  29. Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP . Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections . . 284 . 5418 . 1318–22 . May 1999 . 10334980 . 10.1126/science.284.5418.1318 . 1999Sci...284.1318C . 27364291 .
  30. Cavenaugh . Colleen M. . Stephen L. . Gardiner . Meredith L. . Jones . Holger W. . Jannasch . John B. . Waterbury . Prokaryotic Cells in the Hydrothermal Vent Tube Worms Riftia Jones: Possible Chemoautotrophic Symbionts . . 213 . 4505 . 1981 . 340–342 . 10.1126/science.213.4505.340 . 17819907 .
  31. Tribelli . Paula . López . Nancy . Reporting Key Features in Cold-Adapted Bacteria . Life . 8 . 1 . 2018-03-13 . 29534000 . 5871940 . 10.3390/life8010008 . free . 8 . 2018Life....8....8T .
  32. Web site: Brock . Thomas D. . Thomas D. Brock . Colorful Yellowstone . Life at High Temperature . https://web.archive.org/web/20051125213458/http://www.bact.wisc.edu/bact303/b4 . November 25, 2005 .
  33. Book: Hogan CM . 2010 . http://www.eoearth.org/article/Extremophile?topic=49540 . Extremophile . Encyclopedia of Earth . National Council of Science & the Environment . Monosson E, Cleveland C.
  34. Cobián Güemes . Ana Georgina . Youle . Merry . Cantú . Vito Adrian . Felts . Ben . Nulton . James . Rohwer . Forest . Viruses as Winners in the Game of Life . . . 3 . 1 . 2016-09-29 . 10.1146/annurev-virology-100114-054952 . 197–214 . 27741409 . 36517589.
  35. Zimmer C . Origins. On the origin of eukaryotes . . 325 . 5941 . 666–8 . August 2009 . 19661396 . 10.1126/science.325_666.
  36. Brown JR . Ancient horizontal gene transfer . Nature Reviews. Genetics . 4 . 2 . 121–32 . February 2003 . 12560809 . 10.1038/nrg1000 . 22294114.
  37. Forterre P, Philippe H . Where is the root of the universal tree of life? . . 21 . 10 . 871–9 . October 1999 . 10497338 . 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199910)21:10<871::AID-BIES10>3.0.CO;2-Q.
  38. Poole A, Jeffares D, Penny D . Early evolution: prokaryotes, the new kids on the block . . 21 . 10 . 880–9 . October 1999 . 10497339 . 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199910)21:10<880::AID-BIES11>3.0.CO;2-P . 45607498 .
  39. Woese C . The universal ancestor . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America . 95 . 12 . 6854–9 . June 1998 . 9618502 . 22660 . 10.1073/pnas.95.12.6854 . 1998PNAS...95.6854W . free.
  40. Book: Martin WF . William F. Martin . Woe is the Tree of Life . Microbial Phylogeny and Evolution: Concepts and Controversies . Jan . Sapp . Oxford . . 2005 . 139.
  41. [Carl Woese]
  42. Hug . Laura A. . Baker . Brett J. . Anantharaman . Karthik . Brown . Christopher T. . Probst . Alexander J. . Castelle . Cindy J. . Butterfield . Cristina N. . Hernsdorf . Alex W. . Amano . Yuki . Ise . Kotaro . Suzuki . Yohey . Dudek . Natasha . Relman . David A. . Finstad . Kari M. . Amundson . Ronald . 5 . 2016-04-11 . A new view of the tree of life . Nature Microbiology . 1 . 5 . 16048 . 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.48 . free . 27572647 .
  43. Stanier RY, Van Niel CB . The concept of a bacterium . . 42 . 17–35 . 1962 . 1 . 13916221 . 10.1007/BF00425185 . 1962ArMic..42...17S . 29859498 . Roger Stanier . C. B. van Niel.
  44. Book: Chatton . Édouard . vanc . Titres Et Travaux Scientifiques (1906-1937) De Edouard Chatton . 1937 . Impr. E. Sottano . Sète.
  45. Sapp . Jan . Jan Sapp . The Prokaryote-Eukaryote Dichotomy: Meanings and Mythology . 10.1128/MMBR.69.2.292-305.2005 . . 69 . 2 . 292–305 . 2005 . 15944457 . 1197417.
  46. Woese CR . There must be a prokaryote somewhere: microbiology's search for itself . . 58 . 1 . 1–9 . March 1994 . 8177167 . 372949 . 10.1128/MMBR.58.1.1-9.1994.
  47. Sapp J . The prokaryote-eukaryote dichotomy: meanings and mythology . . 69 . 2 . 292–305 . June 2005 . 15944457 . 1197417 . 10.1128/MMBR.69.2.292-305.2005.
  48. Coté . Gary . De Tullio . Mario . vanc . 2010 . Beyond Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes: Planctomycetes and Cell Organization . Nature.
  49. Book: The Molecular Biology of the Cell . registration . fourth . Bruce Alberts . etal . Garland Science . 2002 . 808 . 0-8153-3218-1 .
  50. Book: Latorre . A. . Durban . A. . Moya . A. . Pereto . J. . https://books.google.com/books?id=m3oFebknu1cC&pg=PA326 . The role of symbiosis in eukaryotic evolution . Origins and Evolution of Life: An astrobiological perspective . Gargaud, M. . López-Garcìa, P. . Martin, H. . 2011 . Cambridge . Cambridge University Press . 326–339 . 978-0-521-76131-4 . 27 August 2017 . 24 March 2019 . https://web.archive.org/web/20190324055723/https://books.google.com/books?id=m3oFebknu1cC&pg=PA326 . live .
  51. Thanbichler M, Wang SC, Shapiro L . The bacterial nucleoid: a highly organized and dynamic structure . . 96 . 3 . 506–21 . October 2005 . 15988757 . 10.1002/jcb.20519 . 25355087 . free.
  52. Helinski DR . A Brief History of Plasmids . EcoSal Plus . 10 . 1 . eESP00282021 . December 2022 . 35373578 . 10729939 . 10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0028-2021 . Kaper JB .
  53. Johnston C, Caymaris S, Zomer A, Bootsma HJ, Prudhomme M, Granadel C, Hermans PW, Polard P, Martin B, Claverys JP . Natural genetic transformation generates a population of merodiploids in Streptococcus pneumoniae . . 9 . 9 . e1003819 . 2013 . 24086154 . 3784515 . 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003819 . free .
  54. Harold FM . Conservation and transformation of energy by bacterial membranes . . 36 . 2 . 172–230 . June 1972 . 4261111 . 408323 . 10.1128/MMBR.36.2.172-230.1972 .
  55. Shih YL, Rothfield L . The bacterial cytoskeleton . . 70 . 3 . 729–754 . September 2006 . 16959967 . 1594594 . 10.1128/MMBR.00017-06.
  56. Michie KA, Löwe J . Dynamic filaments of the bacterial cytoskeleton . . 75 . 467–92 . 2006 . 1 . 16756499 . 10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.103004.142452 . https://web.archive.org/web/20061117183040/http://www2.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/SS/Lowe_J/group/PDF/annrev2006.pdf . dead . November 17, 2006.
  57. Fuerst JA . Intracellular compartmentation in planctomycetes . . 59 . 299–328 . 2005 . 1 . 15910279 . 10.1146/annurev.micro.59.030804.121258 .
  58. Santarella-Mellwig R, Pruggnaller S, Roos N, Mattaj IW, Devos DP . Three-dimensional reconstruction of bacteria with a complex endomembrane system . . 11 . 5 . e1001565 . 2013 . 23700385 . 3660258 . 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001565 . free .
  59. Kempes . Christopher P. . Dutkiewicz . Stephanie . Follows . Michael J. . Growth, metabolic partitioning, and the size of microorganisms . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 109 . 2 . 10 January 2012 . 22203990 . 3258615 . 10.1073/pnas.1115585109 . free . 495–500 . 2012PNAS..109..495K .
  60. Mattiroli F, Bhattacharyya S, Dyer PN, White AE, Sandman K, Burkhart BW, Byrne KR, Lee T, Ahn NG, Santangelo TJ, Reeve JN, Luger K . Structure of histone-based chromatin in Archaea . Science . 357 . 6351 . 609–612 . August 2017 . 28798133 . 5747315 . 10.1126/science.aaj1849 . 2017Sci...357..609M .
  61. Cavalier-Smith T . Tom Cavalier-Smith . The phagotrophic origin of eukaryotes and phylogenetic classification of Protozoa . . 52 . Pt 2 . 297–354 . March 2002 . 11931142 . 10.1099/00207713-52-2-297 . 2017-07-29 . 2019-03-21 . https://web.archive.org/web/20170729113756/http://ijs.microbiologyresearch.org/content/journal/ijsem . dead .
  62. Barry ER, Bell SD . DNA replication in the archaea . . 70 . 4 . 876–887 . December 2006 . 17158702 . 1698513 . 10.1128/MMBR.00029-06.
  63. Book: Lane N . Nick Lane . Energy, Evolution, and the Origins of Complex Life . The Vital Question . registration . 77 . . 2015 . 978-0-393-08881-6.
  64. 10.1073/pnas.0510333103 . Forterre . Patrick . vanc . 2006 . Three RNA cells for ribosomal lineages and three DNA viruses to replicate their genomes: A hypothesis for the origin of cellular domain . . 103 . 10 . 3669–3674 . 16505372 . 1450140 . 2006PNAS..103.3669F . free.