The Pressure-Temperature-time path (P-T-t path) is a record of the pressure and temperature (P-T) conditions that a rock experienced in a metamorphic cycle from burial and heating to uplift and exhumation to the surface. Metamorphism is a dynamic process which involves the changes in minerals and textures of the pre-existing rocks (protoliths) under different P-T conditions in solid state. The changes in pressures and temperatures with time experienced by the metamorphic rocks are often investigated by petrological methods, radiometric dating techniques and thermodynamic modeling.
Metamorphic minerals are unstable upon changing P-T conditions. The original minerals are commonly destroyed during solid state metamorphism and react to grow into new minerals that are relatively stable. Water is generally involved in the reaction, either from the surroundings or generated by the reaction itself. Usually, a large amount of fluids (e.g. water vapor, gas etc.) escape under increasing P-T conditions e.g. burial. When the rock is later uplifted, due to the escape of fluids at an earlier stage, there is not enough fluids to permit all the new minerals to react back into the original minerals. Hence, the minerals are not fully in equilibrium when discovered on the surface. Therefore, the mineral assemblages in metamorphic rocks implicitly record the past P-T conditions that the rock has experienced, and investigating these minerals can supply information about the past metamorphic and tectonic history.
The P-T-t paths are generally classified into two types: clockwise P-T-t paths, which are related to collision origin, and involve high pressures followed by high temperatures;[1] and anticlockwise P-T-t paths, which are usually of intrusion origin, and involve high temperatures before high pressures. (The "clockwise" and "anticlockwise" names refer to the apparent direction of the paths in the Cartesian space, where the x-axis is temperature, and the y-axis is pressure.)
P-T-t paths often reflect various stages of the metamorphic cycle. A metamorphic cycle implies the series of processes that a rock experienced from burial, heating to uplift and erosion. The P-T conditions experienced by a rock throughout these processes can be classified into three main stages according to temperature changes:
However, retrograde metamorphism may not always be observed in metamorphic rocks. This is due to the loss of fluids (e.g. CO2, H2O) from prograde metamorphism, after which there is insufficient fluid to permit reverse reaction of the mineral assemblages. Another reason is that the rocks are of inappropriate composition to generate all the minerals that record their complete metamorphic events. On average, only one-in-twenty metamorphic rock samples display all the three stages of metamorphism.
P-T-t paths can generally be classified into two types: clockwise P-T-t paths and anticlockwise P-T-t paths.
Metamorphic rocks with clockwise P-T-t paths are commonly associated with a near-isothermal decompressional P-T trajectory.[2] [3]
Clockwise P-T-t path normally consists of three parts:
One might expect that the rock reaches its peak metamorphism at the peak temperature and pressure at similar time, and near-isothermal decompression P-T-t path is observed at its stage 1 metamorphism. However, in reality, the rocks commonly experience the peak pressure prior to the peak temperature. This is due to the relative insensitivity of rocks to thermal events, i.e. poor conductivity of rock upon external thermal changes, whereas the rocks instantaneously experience pressure changes.
Examples of metamorphic rocks that consist of clockwise P-T-t paths can be found at:
Metamorphic rocks with anticlockwise P-T-t paths are commonly associated with a near-isobaric cooling P-T trajectory.[8]
Anticlockwise P-T-t path normally consists of two parts:
It is commonly observed that the peak temperature is reached prior to the peak pressure in anticlockwise P-T-t paths, as the rocks usually experienced the heat from the heat source before being extensively pressurized.[9]
Examples of metamorphic rocks that consist of anticlockwise P-T-t paths can be found at:
The reconstruction of P-T-t paths includes two types of approaches:
See also: Petrography. Petrological reconstruction is a backward approach which utilizes mineral compositions of rocks samples to deduce the possible P-T conditions. Common techniques include optical microscopy, geothermobarometry, pseudosections, and geochronology.
See main article: Optical mineralogy and Petrographic microscope. In qualitative reconstruction of P-T conditions, geologists examine thin sections under polarized light microscope to determine the sequence of formation of the minerals. Due to incomplete replacement of the earlier formed minerals under changing P-T conditions,[13] minerals formed at various P-T environments can be found in the same rock specimen. As different minerals have different optical characteristics and textures, determination of the mineral compositions in metamorphic rocks is made possible.
Common textures at different stages of metamorphism:
| Textures at different stages of metamorphism observed under a microscope | ||
|---|---|---|
| Stages of metamorphism | Typical texture | Example of texture |
| Prograde (Pre-peak) | mineral inclusions | |
| Peak | porphyroblasts | |
| Retrograde (Post-peak) | reaction rims | |
| symplectites | ||
| cross-cutting | ||
See main article: Geothermobarometry. Geothermobarometry is a quantitative measurement of the P-T conditions, which is widely used in analyzing the P-T conditions of metamorphic and intrusive igneous rocks.
The underlying principle of geothermobarometry is by utilizing the equilibrium constants of mineral assemblages in a rock to infer the metamorphic P-T conditions.[17] An electron microprobe is usually used in geothermobarometry to measure the distribution of components in the minerals and give precise determination of the chemical equilibrium within the specimen.
Geothermobarometry is a combination of:
Geothermometers are usually represented by exchange reactions, which are sensitive to temperature but with little effect under changing pressure, such as exchange of Fe2+ and Mg2+ between garnet-biotite reaction:
Geobarometers are typically occurred as net-transfer reactions, which are sensitive to pressure but have little change with temperature, such as garnet-plagioclase-muscovite-biotite reaction that involves a significant volume reduction upon high pressure:
Since mineral assemblages at equilibrium are dependent on pressures and temperatures, by measuring the composition of the coexisting minerals, together with using suitable activity models, the P-T conditions experienced by the rock can be determined.
After one equilibrium constant is found, a line would be plotted on the P-T diagram. As different equilibrium constants of mineral assemblages would occur as lines with different slopes in the P-T diagram, therefore, by finding the intersection of at least two lines in the P-T diagram, the P-T condition of the specimen can be obtained.
Despite the usefulness of geothermobarometry, special attention should be paid to whether the mineral assemblages represent an equilibrium, any occurrence of retrograde equilibrium in the rock, and appropriateness of calibration of the results.
Garnet growth zoning is a special type of geothermobarometry that focuses on the composition variations in garnet.
Zoning is a texture in solid-solution minerals which the minerals form concentric rings from core to rim upon changing P-T conditions.[18] In a changing environment, minerals would be unstable and alter itself to reduce its Gibbs free energy to achieve stable states. However, sometimes the mineral core has not reached equilibrium upon the environmental change and zoning occurs. Zoning is also found in other minerals such as plagioclase and fluorite.
In practice, garnet is commonly used in the study of metamorphic rocks due to its refractory nature. In past studies, garnet is found to be a mineral that is stable under a wide range of P-T conditions, meanwhile chemically displays responses (e.g. ions exchange) to the P-T variations throughout its metamorphic history without reaching complete equilibrium.[19] The non-equilibriated garnet formed previously are often zoned by younger garnet. Therefore, many past P-T characteristics are preserved in the zoned areas. Electron microprobes are used to measure the composition of the garnet zones.
However, melting within garnet sometimes occurs or diffusion rate is too rapid at high temperature, some garnet zones are merged and cannot provide sufficient information about the complete metamorphic history of the rocks.
=The Gibbs method formalism is a method used to analyze pressures and temperatures of zoned minerals and textural changes in metamorphic rocks by applying differential thermodynamic equations based on Duhem's Theorem.[20] It attempts to simulate the garnet growth zoning numerically by solving a set of differential equations involving variables pressure (P), temperature (T), chemical potential (μ), mineral composition (X). Modal abundance of mineral phases (M) was later added as an extensive variable in the Gibbs method with mass balance added as a constraint. The aim of this analysis is to search for the absolute P-T condition during different zonal growth and matches the observed composition of zones in the sample.[21] The computer program GIBBS is commonly used for calculation of the equations.
See also: Phase diagram and QAPF diagram. Pseudosection is an equilibrium phase diagram which shows all the stable mineral assemblages of a rock at different P-T ranges for a single whole-rock chemical composition (bulk-rock composition).[22] The stable mineral assemblages are marked as different areas in the P-T graph.
Unlike geothermobarometry, which focuses only on single chemical equilibrium equations, pseudosections make use of multiple equilibrium equations to search for the past P-T conditions. It is widely used in metamorphic rock analysis due to its consideration of multiple reactions which resemble metamorphic processes of multiple minerals in reality.
(Pseudosection is different from petrogenetic grid. Pseudosection shows different mineral phases for a single rock chemical composition, while petrogenetic grid shows a set of reactions under different P-T conditions that would occur for a phase diagram.)
In the construction of pseudosections, the bulk-rock composition is firstly determined using geochemical techniques, then inserted into computer programs for calculations based on thermodynamics equations to generate pseudosection diagrams.
There are two geochemical methods in determining the bulk-rock composition:
Both methods have their advantages and limitations. The XRF method provides a non-biased estimation, but may neglect the proportion of existing minerals in the rock. Meanwhile, the point-counting method takes into account of mineral proportions, but is based on human judgement and may be biased.
Common computer programs for computing pseudosections:
The results from a single pseudosection is not completely reliable, since in reality the rock specimen is not always in equilibrium.[24] However, analysis can be done on fractions of the P-T-t path e.g. at boundaries of mineral inclusions, or on local bulk composition analysis would improve precision and accuracy of the P-T-t path.
See main article: Geochronology and Radiometric dating.
To figure out the age of the metamorphic events, geochronological techniques are used.[25] It utilizes the idea of radioactive decay of long-lived unstable isotopes in minerals to search for the age of events.
See main article: Monazite geochronology. In the study of metamorphic petrology, uranium–thorium–lead dating of monazite (monazite geochronology) is an effective method to determine the P-T history.[26] [27] Monazite is a phosphate mineral containing light rare-earth-elements (LREE) that occurs in a wide range of rock types. It usually incorporates radioactive thorium (Th) during its crystal formation, making age determination possible.[28]
Monazite has characteristics of high closure temperature (>1000 °C), variable composition, and robustness under a large temperature range, which help in the record of geological history in metamorphic rocks. An electron microprobe is usually used for the measurement of monazite composition.[29]
=Monazite usually occurs as inclusions in the porphyroblasts in metamorphic rocks.[30]
For instance, during the growth of garnet zones in metamorphic processes, monazite grains are included into the zones of garnets.[31] Since garnets are quite stable upon changing temperature, the included monazite grains are well preserved and prevented from the re-setting of decay system and age. Therefore, the age of the metamorphic events in each zone can be estimated.
=Apart from occurring as inclusion in garnets, monazite also display zonal growth pattern itself upon changing P-T conditions.[32]
Monazite tends to capture Th when it is formed. When monazite crystal is growing, the earlier formed monazites incorporate many Th, and leaving a Th-depleted surrounding environment. Hence, the older formed monazite has a higher concentration of Th than younger monazite. Therefore, dating zoned matrix monazites (i.e. monazites that do not form as inclusions in other minerals) of the metamorphic rock can obtain information about the age as well as their formation sequence. The dating method is usually done by using an electron microprobe to observe the compositional zones of monazite, then analyzing the U-Th-Pb age of each zone to reconstruct the time of the relevant P-T conditions. Data obtained from matrix monazites are often compared with those obtained from monazite inclusions for the metamorphic history interpretation.
See also: Uranium–lead dating.
Zircon is another suitable mineral for dating metamorphic rocks.[33] It occurs as an accessory mineral in rocks and contains trace amount of uranium (U).[34]
As zircon is resistant towards weathering and high temperature, it is a useful mineral in recording geological processes. Similar as monazite, zircon also displays zoned patterns upon varying P-T conditions, which each zone records information of the changing past environment. U-Pb dating is commonly used in dating zircon ages. Zircon geochronology gives good record of ages in cooling and exhumation processes. However it is less reactive than monazite under metamorphic events, and performs better in dating igneous rocks.[35]
See also: Thermal history modelling, Finite difference method and Computer simulation. Unlike using traditional petrological investigation methods (e.g. optical microscopy, geothermobarometry) to inversely infer the metamorphic events from rock samples, thermal modeling is a forward method that attempts to work on the geological evolution of rocks.
Thermal modeling applies numerical modeling techniques based on heat transfer equations, different tectonics models and reactions of metamorphic minerals in the simulation of the possible metamorphic events. It works on the temperature variation of the earth crust over time based on rate of heat transfer and diffusion along the disturbed geothermal gradient (normal heat distribution in the ground).
Thermal modeling does not give the actual geological time. However, it provides accurate estimation of the duration of the thermal events. An advantage of thermal modeling is that it provides a holistic estimation of the duration of different stages of metamorphism, which is somehow difficult to completely extract from geochronological methods.
The model simulation involves solving the continuous time-dependent differential heat transfer equation by its approximate discrete finite difference form using computer programs such as FORTRAN.
After the equations are set, a grid of nodes is generated for calculation of each point.[36] Boundary conditions (normally temperature of the geothermal gradients) are input into the equations to calculate the temperature at boundaries. Results are compared with petrological experimental results for validation.
By combining petrological methods and thermal modeling techniques, the understanding of metamorphic processes due to tectonic events is facilitated. Petrological results provide realistic variables to be plugged into a model simulation, while numerical modeling techniques often place constraints on the possible tectonic environments. The two methods complement the limitations of each other, and formulate a comprehensive evolutionary history of the metamorphic and tectonic events.
Areas with collision-related tectonic events or under subduction zones commonly produce metamorphic rocks with clockwise P-T-t paths with near-isothermal decompressional P-T trajectories, and the reason is as follows:
In addition, recent studies based on mechanical analysis reveal that peak pressure recorded in clockwise P-T paths does not necessarily represent the maximum depth of burial, but can also represent a change in the tectonic pattern.[37]
Intrusions such as hotspots or rifts at mid-ocean ridges commonly produce metamorphic rocks displaying anticlockwise P-T-t paths patterns with near-isobaric cooling P-T trajectories, and the reason is as follow:
See main article: Paired metamorphic belts. Both clockwise and anticlockwise metamorphic P-T-t paths are found in paired metamorphic belts at convergent plate boundaries. Paired metamorphic belts display two contrasting mineral assemblages sets:[38]
The HPLT metamorphic belt is located along subduction zones, and commonly associated with a clockwise P-T-t path.[39] [40] The HPLT condition is resulted from crustal thickening due to convergence meanwhile without being heated by magma.
The LPHT metamorphic belt is observed at volcanic arcs or back-arc basins,[41] which is attributed to magma intrusion derived from partial melting of the subducting slab, and the melt rises to the crust. This area is associated with an anticlockwise P-T-t path.
The P-T-t paths provide in-depth investigations and implications of the mechanisms in the lithosphere, and further support the plate tectonic theory[42] and the formation of supercontinents.[43] [44]
See main article: Plume tectonics. P-T-t paths play an important role in the development of plume tectonics, supported by anticlockwise P-T paths.[45]
Plume tectonics are considered to be the dominant process forming the Archean crust with evidence from the study of the Archean cratonic blocks in the North China Craton. Anticlockwise P-T paths with near-isobaric cooling after the peak are normally found in the Archean rocks, suggesting an intrusion origin.
The lack of a paired metamorphic belt as well as a paired clockwise P-T path in the Archean rocks eliminates the possibility of the volcanic arc formation. Evidenced together by a large doming structure, widespread of komatiites and bimodal volcanism, it is proposed that plume tectonics is the major crust-forming process in the Archean. This has led to further research on the beginning of plate tectonics and numerical modeling of the early Earth condition.[46] [47]
See also: Deformation (mechanics) and Structural geology. P-T-t paths can be used to estimate possible structures in the field as heat would transfer in small scale advective heat flow during thrusting and folding of metamorphic rocks.
For example, during the formation of fault-bend-fold, the rocks in the lower segment (footwall) are heated due to contact with the hotter upper thrust sheet (hanging wall), while the upper thrust sheet is cooling because of losing heat in a downward direction.[48] [49] Thus, the lower segment and the upper thrust sheet are undergoing prograde metamorphism and retrograde metamorphism respectively.
Nevertheless, special attention should be taken to the effect of multiple thrusting such as duplexes, where the initial lower plate in an earlier thrust would become the upper plate in a later thrusting event. Depending on the location of the rock, a variety of complex P-T trajectories can be found, which may make interpretation of a terrain challenging.
See main article: metamorphic facies. Metamorphic facies is a classification system first introduced by Pentti Eskola in 1920 to classify particular metamorphic mineral assemblages that are stable under a range of P-T conditions.[50] [51] Before the mid-1970s, geologists utilized the metamorphic facies classification to investigate metamorphic rocks and determined their P-T characteristics. However, little was known about the evolutionary processes of these P-T conditions and how metamorphic rocks reach the surface at that time.
The relation between metamorphism and tectonic setting was not well investigated until 1974, which Oxburgh and Turcotte suggested that the origin of the metamorphic belt is a result of the thermal effects brought by continental collision.[52] The idea was picked up by England and Richardson and further research was done in 1977, and the P-T-t path concept was fully developed by Richardson and Thompson in 1984.[53]
The thermal modeling from Richardson and Thompson (1984) reveals that in every case of thermal relaxation after the tectonic event, there is a large portion of heat equilibrium before being significantly influenced by erosion, i.e. the rate of metamorphism is found to be much slower than duration of the thermal event.[54] This infers that the rock is a poor heat conductor, which the maximum temperature experienced by the rock as well as its temperature change are insensitive to erosion rate. Therefore, both the evidence of the maximum pressures and temperatures experienced by the buried layers can be imprinted in the underlying metamorphic rocks. Hence, the buried depth as well as plausible tectonic settings can be deduced. Altogether with dating techniques, geologists can even determine the time scale of the tectonic events in respect to the metamorphic events.
Metamorphic P-T-t paths have been widely recognized as a useful tool in determining the metamorphic history and tectonic evolution of a region. Potential future research directions for P-T-t paths will be likely developed in the following areas: