Presentment Clause Explained

The Presentment Clause (Article I, Section 7, Clauses 2 and 3) of the United States Constitution outlines federal legislative procedure by which bills originating in Congress become federal law in the United States.

Text

The Presentment Clause, which is contained in Article I, Section 7, Clauses 2 and 3, provides:

Summary

Veto issues

Line-item veto

The Supreme Court decision in Clinton v. City of New York, 524 U.S. 417 (1998), struck down as unconstitutional the Line Item Veto Act of 1996, holding that the line-item veto violated the Presentment Clause.

Legislative veto

The Supreme Court also found the legislative veto unconstitutional in Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983), as violating the Presentment Clause and bicameralism.

Exclusion of Sundays

The ten-day period for the presidential review of legislation excludes Sundays. Some scholars believe this exclusion was not for religious reasons, but intended to support a deliberative process in which the President would consult and seek advice regarding the merits of the proposed law. For instance, Jaynie Randall has stated that because the blue laws of various states restricted travel on Sundays, to allow a full ten days of consideration between the President and his advisors, the drafters of the Constitution excluded Sundays from the review period.[2] However, Justice Brewer, speaking for a unanimous Supreme Court in Church of the Holy Trinity v. United States, 143 U.S. 457 (1892), cited the Presentment Clause as a clear example of why "no purpose of action against religion can be imputed to any legislation, state or national, because this is a religious people."[3] Specifically, the Court stated:

Constitutional amendments

Article Five of the Constitution, which prescribes the process whereby the Constitution may be altered, contains no requirement that a joint resolution proposing a constitutional amendment be presented to the president for approval or veto before it goes out to the states. In Hollingsworth v. Virginia, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 378 (1798), the Supreme Court affirmed that doing so is not necessary. Consequently, the president has no official function in the process.[4]

National Archives

provides that whenever a bill becomes law or takes effect, it will be received by the Archivist of the United States from the President. This allows the National Archives and Records Administration to maintain records of and publish the enacted laws.

See also

References

  1. Web site: Democrats say Bush can't pocket veto defense bill . January 2, 2008 . . 2012-07-31.
  2. Randall . Jaynie . Sundays Excepted . Alabama Law Review . 59 . 2 . 507, 514–23 . 2008 . 2009-06-05.
  3. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United States, 143 U.S. 457, 465 (1892)http://supreme.justia.com/us/143/457/case.html
  4. Web site: The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation, Centennial Edition, Interim Edition: Analysis of Cases Decided by the Supreme Court of the United States to June 26, 2013. 989. 2013. U.S. Government Printing Office. Washington, D.C.. June 29, 2018.