Population Research Institute (organization) explained

Population Research Institute
Founder:Paul Marx
Type:Think tank
Vat Id:(for non-profit org) -->
Headquarters:Front Royal, Virginia
Owners:-->
Leader Title:President
Leader Name:Steven W. Mosher
Leader Title2:Chair
Leader Name2:John Delmare
Revenue:$1,462,224
Revenue Year:2018
Expenses:$1,405,812
Expenses Year:2018
Website:pop.org

The Population Research Institute (PRI) is a Catholic 501(c)3 non-profit organization and advocacy group based in Front Royal, Virginia, US.[1] The organization opposes abortion. They believe that overpopulation is a myth, and oppose hormonal birth control in females[2] and vasectomies in males.[3]

The PRI has been widely criticized for being a right-wing propaganda organization and not being neutral in its reporting.[4]

Background

The Population Research Institute was founded in 1989 by Paul Marx (1920–2010), a family sociologist, Catholic priest and Benedictine monk who had established the anti-abortion[5] group Human Life International as well. It became an independent institute in 1996.[6] The same year, the think tank got headed by Steven W. Mosher,[7] a social researcher and author who had witnessed forced abortions in China during the implementation of the one-child policy in 1980.

Activities

PRI opposes government attempts to control the population.[8] According to the Los Angeles Times, PRI's Mosher successfully helped lobby the George W. Bush administration to withhold US$34 to $40 million per year for seven years from the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), the largest international donor to family planning programs.[9] The research institute opined that UNPFA was using American money to fund Chinese compulsory sterilization and abortions, a claim denied by the population fund, noting that it does not work in areas where the one-child policy in still in force. Mosher also advocated against the Chinese two-child policy, claiming that it was "being pushed to the masses through the communist party mechanism".[10]

Fundraising

PRI obtains the vast majority of its funding from charitable contributions, gifts, and grants, with a total revenue of 1.46 million dollars in financial year 2018. Of this, 75.6% was spent on program expenses, 4.9% on administration, and 19.3% on fundraising.

The institute has received funding from The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, Inc., claimed to be in support of conferences on human rights in China.[11]

Criticism

PRI's stance on overpopulation and the arguments for "Overpopulation is a Myth" have been described as deceptive.[12] [13]

Charity Navigator classifies charities with respect to "Accountability & Transparency" and "Financial Performance". In 2020 it awarded two out of four stars to PRI for "Accountability & Transparency", and one for "Financial", which combined for an overall score of 70.46, rated as two stars.[1]

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Rating for Population Research Institute (based on 2018 financial year, the latest available at publication date). Charity Navigator. 1 February 2020. 22 March 2020.
  2. Web site: 2020-08-18. Physician's Group Warns of Serious Health Risks Associated with Hormonal Contraception, Calls for Stricter Labeling. 2020-11-23. PRI. en-US.
  3. Web site: 2001-07-01. Long-Term Complications of Male Vasectomies. 2020-11-23. PRI. en-US.
  4. Web site: 2024-08-17 . Population Research Institute - Bias and Credibility . 2024-08-17 . Media Bias/Fact Check . en-US.
  5. News: Crossette . Barbara . U.N. Agency On Population Blames U.S. For Cutbacks . 2002-04-07 . . 2020-03-22 . en-US . 0362-4331.
  6. News: Frawley Desmond . Joan . Steve Mosher: A Vision of "Hell" Brought Him to the Church . January 20, 2012 . National Catholic Register.
  7. http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Population_Research_Institute SourceWatch: Population Research Institute.
  8. News: Stanway. David. China lawmakers urge freeing up family planning as birth rates plunge. Reuters. March 12, 2019. Retrieved 19 March 2020.
  9. News: Weiss. Kenneth R.. Fertility rates fall, but global population explosion goes on. Los Angeles Times. July 22, 2012.
  10. News: Maizura Ismail. Baby-making in the name of the nation. The ASEAN Post. September 5, 2018. Retrieved 24 March 2020.
  11. Web site: Population Research Institute . . https://web.archive.org/web/20070310220856/http://www.mediatransparency.org/recipientgrants.php?recipientID=2098 . March 10, 2007 . unfit .
  12. Web site: IAP Statement on Population and Consumption. InterAcademy Panel: The Global Network of Science Academies (IAP).
  13. http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3503909.html A Response to Critics of Family Planning Programs