Pontryagin duality explained
In mathematics, Pontryagin duality is a duality between locally compact abelian groups that allows generalizing Fourier transform to all such groups, which include the circle group (the multiplicative group of complex numbers of modulus one), the finite abelian groups (with the discrete topology), and the additive group of the integers (also with the discrete topology), the real numbers, and every finite-dimensional vector space over the reals or a -adic field.
The Pontryagin dual of a locally compact abelian group is the locally compact abelian topological group formed by the continuous group homomorphisms from the group to the circle group with the operation of pointwise multiplication and the topology of uniform convergence on compact sets. The Pontryagin duality theorem establishes Pontryagin duality by stating that any locally compact abelian group is naturally isomorphic with its bidual (the dual of its dual). The Fourier inversion theorem is a special case of this theorem.
The subject is named after Lev Pontryagin who laid down the foundations for the theory of locally compact abelian groups and their duality during his early mathematical works in 1934. Pontryagin's treatment relied on the groups being second-countable and either compact or discrete. This was improved to cover the general locally compact abelian groups by Egbert van Kampen in 1935 and André Weil in 1940.
Introduction
Pontryagin duality places in a unified context a number of observations about functions on the real line or on finite abelian groups:
- Suitably regular complex-valued periodic functions on the real line have Fourier series and these functions can be recovered from their Fourier series;
- Suitably regular complex-valued functions on the real line have Fourier transforms that are also functions on the real line and, just as for periodic functions, these functions can be recovered from their Fourier transforms; and
- Complex-valued functions on a finite abelian group have discrete Fourier transforms, which are functions on the dual group, which is a (non-canonically) isomorphic group. Moreover, any function on a finite abelian group can be recovered from its discrete Fourier transform.
The theory, introduced by Lev Pontryagin and combined with the Haar measure introduced by John von Neumann, André Weil and others depends on the theory of the dual group of a locally compact abelian group.
It is analogous to the dual vector space of a vector space: a finite-dimensional vector space
and its dual vector space
are not naturally isomorphic, but the
endomorphism algebra (matrix algebra) of one is isomorphic to the
opposite of the endomorphism algebra of the other:
via the transpose. Similarly, a group
and its dual group
are not in general isomorphic, but their endomorphism rings are opposite to each other:
End(G)\congEnd(\widehat{G})op
. More categorically, this is not just an isomorphism of endomorphism algebras, but a contravariant equivalence of categories – see
.
Definition
A topological group is a locally compact group if the underlying topological space is locally compact and Hausdorff; a topological group is abelian if the underlying group is abelian.Examples of locally compact abelian groups include finite abelian groups, the integers (both for the discrete topology, which is also induced by the usual metric), the real numbers, the circle group T (both with their usual metric topology), and also the p-adic numbers (with their usual p-adic topology).
For a locally compact abelian group
, the
Pontryagin dual is the group
of continuous
group homomorphisms from
to the circle group
. That is,
The Pontryagin dual
is usually endowed with the
topology given by
uniform convergence on
compact sets (that is, the topology induced by the
compact-open topology on the space of all continuous functions from
to
).
For example,
Pontryagin duality theorem
Canonical means that there is a naturally defined map
\operatorname{ev}G\colonG\to\widehat{\widehat{G}}
; more importantly, the map should be
functorial in
. For the character
of the group
, the canonical isomorphism
is defined on
as follows:
That is,
In other words, each group element
is identified to the evaluation character on the dual. This is strongly analogous to the canonical isomorphism between a
finite-dimensional vector space and its double dual,
, and it is worth mentioning that any vector space
is an
abelian group. If
is a finite abelian group, then
but this isomorphism is not canonical. Making this statement precise (in general) requires thinking about dualizing not only on groups, but also on maps between the groups, in order to treat dualization as a
functor and prove the identity functor and the dualization functor are not naturally equivalent. Also the duality theorem implies that for any group (not necessarily finite) the dualization functor is an
exact functor.
Pontryagin duality and the Fourier transform
Haar measure
See main article: Haar measure.
One of the most remarkable facts about a locally compact group
is that it carries an essentially unique natural
measure, the
Haar measure, which allows one to consistently measure the "size" of sufficiently regular subsets of
. "Sufficiently regular subset" here means a
Borel set; that is, an element of the
σ-algebra generated by the
compact sets. More precisely, a
right Haar measure on a locally compact group
is a countably additive measure μ defined on the Borel sets of
which is
right invariant in the sense that
for
an element of
and
a Borel subset of
and also satisfies some regularity conditions (spelled out in detail in the article on
Haar measure). Except for positive scaling factors, a Haar measure on
is unique.
The Haar measure on
allows us to define the notion of
integral for (
complex-valued) Borel functions defined on the group. In particular, one may consider various
Lp spaces associated to the Haar measure
. Specifically,
Note that, since any two Haar measures on
are equal up to a scaling factor, this
-space is independent of the choice of Haar measure and thus perhaps could be written as
. However, the
-norm on this space depends on the choice of Haar measure, so if one wants to talk about isometries it is important to keep track of the Haar measure being used.
Fourier transform and Fourier inversion formula for L1-functions
The dual group of a locally compact abelian group is used as the underlying space for an abstract version of the Fourier transform. If
, then the Fourier transform is the function
on
defined by
where the integral is relative to
Haar measure
on
. This is also denoted
. Note the Fourier transform depends on the choice of Haar measure. It is not too difficult to show that the Fourier transform of an
function on
is a bounded continuous function on
which
vanishes at infinity.
The inverse Fourier transform of an integrable function on
is given by
where the integral is relative to the Haar measure
on the dual group
. The measure
on
that appears in the Fourier inversion formula is called the
dual measure to
and may be denoted
.
The various Fourier transforms can be classified in terms of their domain and transform domain (the group and dual group) as follows (note that
is
Circle group):
As an example, suppose
, so we can think about
as
by the pairing
If
is the Lebesgue measure on Euclidean space, we obtain the ordinary
Fourier transform on
and the dual measure needed for the Fourier inversion formula is
\widehat{\mu}=(2\pi)-n\mu
. If we want to get a Fourier inversion formula with the same measure on both sides (that is, since we can think about
as its own dual space we can ask for
to equal
) then we need to use
However, if we change the way we identify
with its dual group, by using the pairing
then Lebesgue measure on
is equal to its own dual measure. This convention minimizes the number of factors of
that show up in various places when computing Fourier transforms or inverse Fourier transforms on Euclidean space. (In effect it limits the
only to the exponent rather than as a pre-factor outside the integral sign.) Note that the choice of how to identify
with its dual group affects the meaning of the term "self-dual function", which is a function on
equal to its own Fourier transform: using the classical pairing
the function
is self-dual. But using the pairing, which keeps the pre-factor as unity,
makes
self-dual instead. This second definition for the Fourier transform has the advantage that it maps the multiplicative identity to the convolution identity, which is useful as
is a convolution algebra. See the next section on the group algebra. In addition, this form is also necessarily isometric on
spaces. See below at Plancherel and
L2 Fourier inversion theorems.
Group algebra
See main article: Group algebra of a locally compact group. The space of integrable functions on a locally compact abelian group
is an
algebra, where multiplication is convolution: the convolution of two integrable functions
and
is defined as
This algebra is referred to as the Group Algebra of
. By the
Fubini–Tonelli theorem, the convolution is submultiplicative with respect to the
norm, making
a
Banach algebra. The Banach algebra
has a multiplicative identity element if and only if
is a discrete group, namely the function that is 1 at the identity and zero elsewhere. In general, however, it has an
approximate identity which is a net (or generalized sequence)
indexed on a directed set
such that
The Fourier transform takes convolution to multiplication, i.e. it is a homomorphism of abelian Banach algebras
L1(G)\toC0\left(\widehat{G}\right)
(of norm ≤ 1):
In particular, to every group character on
corresponds a unique
multiplicative linear functional on the group algebra defined by
It is an important property of the group algebra that these exhaust the set of non-trivial (that is, not identically zero) multiplicative linear functionals on the group algebra; see section 34 of . This means the Fourier transform is a special case of the Gelfand transform.
Plancherel and L2 Fourier inversion theorems
As we have stated, the dual group of a locally compact abelian group is a locally compact abelian group in its own right and thus has a Haar measure, or more precisely a whole family of scale-related Haar measures.
Since the complex-valued continuous functions of compact support on
are
-dense, there is a unique extension of the Fourier transform from that space to a
unitary operatorand we have the formula
Note that for non-compact locally compact groups
the space
does not contain
, so the Fourier transform of general
-functions on
is "not" given by any kind of integration formula (or really any explicit formula). To define the
Fourier transform one has to resort to some technical trick such as starting on a dense subspace like the continuous functions with compact support and then extending the isometry by continuity to the whole space. This unitary extension of the Fourier transform is what we mean by the Fourier transform on the space of square integrable functions.
The dual group also has an inverse Fourier transform in its own right; it can be characterized as the inverse (or adjoint, since it is unitary) of the
Fourier transform. This is the content of the
Fourier inversion formula which follows.
In the case
the dual group
is naturally isomorphic to the group of integers
and the Fourier transform specializes to the computation of coefficients of
Fourier series of periodic functions.
If
is a finite group, we recover the
discrete Fourier transform. Note that this case is very easy to prove directly.
Bohr compactification and almost-periodicity
One important application of Pontryagin duality is the following characterization of compact abelian topological groups:
That
being compact implies
is discrete or that
being discrete implies that
is compact is an elementary consequence of the definition of the compact-open topology on
and does not need Pontryagin duality. One uses Pontryagin duality to prove the converses.
The Bohr compactification is defined for any topological group
, regardless of whether
is locally compact or abelian. One use made of Pontryagin duality between compact abelian groups and discrete abelian groups is to characterize the Bohr compactification of an arbitrary abelian
locally compact topological group. The
Bohr compactification
of
is
, where
H has the group structure
, but given the
discrete topology. Since the
inclusion mapis continuous and a homomorphism, the dual morphism
is a morphism into a compact group which is easily shown to satisfy the requisite
universal property.
See also: almost periodic function.
Categorical considerations
Pontryagin duality can also profitably be considered functorially. In what follows, LCA is the category of locally compact abelian groups and continuous group homomorphisms. The dual group construction of
is a contravariant functor
LCA →
LCA, represented (in the sense of
representable functors) by the circle group
as
In particular, the double dual functor
G\to\widehat{\widehat{G}}
is
covariant.A categorical formulation of Pontryagin duality then states that the
natural transformation between the identity functor on
LCA and the double dual functor is an isomorphism. Unwinding the notion of a natural transformation, this means that the maps
G\to\operatorname{Hom}(\operatorname{Hom}(G,T),T)
are isomorphisms for any locally compact abelian group
, and these isomorphisms are functorial in
. This isomorphism is analogous to the double dual of
finite-dimensional vector spaces (a special case, for real and complex vector spaces).
An immediate consequence of this formulation is another common categorical formulation of Pontryagin duality: the dual group functor is an equivalence of categories from LCA to LCAop.
The duality interchanges the subcategories of discrete groups and compact groups. If
is a
ring and
is a left
-
module, the dual group
will become a right
- module; in this way we can also see that discrete left
- modules will be Pontryagin dual to compact right
- modules. The ring
of
endomorphisms in
LCA is changed by duality into its opposite ring (change the multiplication to the other order). For example, if
is an infinite cyclic discrete group,
is a circle group: the former has
so this is true also of the latter.
Generalizations
Generalizations of Pontryagin duality are constructed in two main directions: for commutative topological groups that are not locally compact, and for noncommutative topological groups. The theories in these two cases are very different.
Dualities for commutative topological groups
When
is a Hausdorff abelian topological group, the group
with the compact-open topology is a Hausdorff abelian topological group and the natural mapping from
to its double-dual
makes sense. If this mapping is an isomorphism, it is said that
satisfies Pontryagin duality (or that
is a
reflexive group, or a
reflective group). This has been extended in a number of directions beyond the case that
is locally compact.
In particular, Samuel Kaplan showed in 1948 and 1950 that arbitrary products and countable inverse limits of locally compact (Hausdorff) abelian groups satisfy Pontryagin duality. Note that an infinite product of locally compact non-compact spaces is not locally compact.
Later, in 1975, Rangachari Venkataraman showed, among other facts, that every open subgroup of an abelian topological group which satisfies Pontryagin duality itself satisfies Pontryagin duality.
More recently, Sergio Ardanza-Trevijano and María Jesús Chasco have extended the results of Kaplan mentioned above. They showed that direct and inverse limits of sequences of abelian groups satisfying Pontryagin duality also satisfy Pontryagin duality if the groups are metrizable or
-spaces but not necessarily locally compact, provided some extra conditions are satisfied by the sequences.
However, there is a fundamental aspect that changes if we want to consider Pontryagin duality beyond the locally compact case. Elena Martín-Peinador proved in 1995 that if
is a Hausdorff abelian topological group that satisfies Pontryagin duality, and the natural evaluation pairing
is (jointly) continuous, then
is locally compact. As a corollary, all non-locally compact examples of Pontryagin duality are groups where the pairing
is not (jointly) continuous.
Another way to generalize Pontryagin duality to wider classes of commutative topological groups is to endow the dual group
with a bit different topology, namely the
topology of uniform convergence on totally bounded sets. The groups satisfying the identity
G\cong\widehat{\widehat{G}}
under this assumption are called
stereotype groups. This class is also very wide (and it contains locally compact abelian groups), but it is narrower than the class of reflective groups.
Pontryagin duality for topological vector spaces
In 1952 Marianne F. Smith noticed that Banach spaces and reflexive spaces, being considered as topological groups (with the additive group operation), satisfy Pontryagin duality. Later B. S. Brudovskiĭ, William C. Waterhouse and K. Brauner showed that this result can be extended to the class of all quasi-complete barreled spaces (in particular, to all Fréchet spaces). In the 1990s Sergei Akbarov gave a description of the class of the topological vector spaces that satisfy a stronger property than the classical Pontryagin reflexivity, namely, the identity where
means the space of all linear continuous functionals
endowed with the
topology of uniform convergence on totally bounded sets in
(and
means the dual to
in the same sense). The spaces of this class are called stereotype spaces, and the corresponding theory found a series of applications in Functional analysis and Geometry, including the generalization of Pontryagin duality for non-commutative topological groups.
Dualities for non-commutative topological groups
For non-commutative locally compact groups
the classical Pontryagin construction stops working for various reasons, in particular, because the characters don't always separate the points of
, and the irreducible representations of
are not always one-dimensional. At the same time it is not clear how to introduce multiplication on the set of irreducible unitary representations of
, and it is even not clear whether this set is a good choice for the role of the dual object for
. So the problem of constructing duality in this situation requires complete rethinking.
Theories built to date are divided into two main groups: the theories where the dual object has the same nature as the source one (like in the Pontryagin duality itself), and the theories where the source object and its dual differ from each other so radically that it is impossible to count them as objects of one class.
The second type theories were historically the first: soon after Pontryagin's work Tadao Tannaka (1938) and Mark Krein (1949) constructed a duality theory for arbitrary compact groups known now as the Tannaka–Krein duality. In this theory the dual object for a group
is not a group but a
category of its representations
.
The theories of first type appeared later and the key example for them was the duality theory for finite groups. In this theory the category of finite groups is embedded by the operation
of taking
group algebra
(over
) into the category of finite dimensional
Hopf algebras, so that the Pontryagin duality functor
turns into the operation
of taking the
dual vector space (which is a duality functor in the category of finite dimensional Hopf algebras).
In 1973 Leonid I. Vainerman, George I. Kac, Michel Enock, and Jean-Marie Schwartz built a general theory of this type for all locally compact groups. From the 1980s the research in this area was resumed after the discovery of quantum groups, to which the constructed theories began to be actively transferred. These theories are formulated in the language of C*-algebras, or Von Neumann algebras, and one of its variants is the recent theory of locally compact quantum groups.
One of the drawbacks of these general theories, however, is that in them the objects generalizing the concept of a group are not Hopf algebras in the usual algebraic sense. This deficiency can be corrected (for some classes of groups) within the framework of duality theories constructed on the basis of the notion of envelope of topological algebra.
See also
References
- Akbarov. S.S.. Pontryagin duality in the theory of topological vector spaces and in topological algebra. Journal of Mathematical Sciences. 2003. 113. 2. 179–349. 10.1023/A:1020929201133. 115297067. free.
- Akbarov. Sergei S.. Shavgulidze. Evgeniy T.. On two classes of spaces reflexive in the sense of Pontryagin. Matematicheskii Sbornik. 2003. 194 . 10. 3–26 .
- Akbarov. Sergei S.. Holomorphic functions of exponential type and duality for Stein groups with algebraic connected component of identity. Journal of Mathematical Sciences . 2009. 162 . 4. 459–586. 0806.3205. 10.1007/s10958-009-9646-1. 115153766.
- Akbarov. Sergei S.. Continuous and smooth envelopes of topological algebras. Part 1. Journal of Mathematical Sciences. 2017a. 227. 5. 531–668 . 1303.2424 . 10.1007/s10958-017-3599-6. 3790317. 126018582.
- Akbarov. Sergei S.. Continuous and smooth envelopes of topological algebras. Part 2. Journal of Mathematical Sciences. 2017b. 227. 6. 669–789 . 1303.2424 . 10.1007/s10958-017-3600-4. 3796205. 128246373.
- Brauner. Kalman. Duals of Fréchet spaces and a generalization of the Banach–Dieudonné theorem. Duke Mathematical Journal. 1973. 40. 4. 845–855 . 10.1215/S0012-7094-73-04078-7.
- Brudovskiĭ. B. S.. On k- and c-reflexivity of locally convex vector spaces . Lithuanian Mathematical Journal. 1967. 7. 1. 17–21. 10.15388/LMJ.1967.19927 . free.
- Book: Dixmier, Jacques. Jacques Dixmier. Les C*-algèbres et leurs Représentations . 1969. Gauthier-Villars. 978-2-87647-013-2.
- Book: Enock. Michel. Schwartz. Jean-Marie. Kac Algebras and Duality of Locally Compact Groups. 1992. Springer-Verlag. 978-3-540-54745-7. With a preface by Alain Connes. With a postface by Adrian Ocneanu. Berlin. 1215933. 10.1007/978-3-662-02813-1.
- Book: Hewitt. Edwin. Ross. Kenneth A.. Abstract Harmonic Analysis. Vol. I: Structure of topological groups. Integration theory, group representations . 1963. 978-0-387-94190-5. 0156915. Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. 115. Springer-Verlag . Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg.
- Book: Hewitt. Edwin. Ross. Kenneth A.. Abstract Harmonic Analysis. 1970. 2. Springer . 978-3-662-24595-8. 0262773.
- Book: Kirillov, Alexandre A. . Alexandre Kirillov. Elements of the theory of representations . 1972 . . Berlin, New York . Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften . 978-0-387-07476-4 . 0412321 . 1976 . 220.
- Book: Loomis, Lynn H.. An Introduction to Abstract Harmonic Analysis. 1953. D. van Nostrand Co. 978-0486481234.
- Book: Morris, S.A.. Pontryagin duality and the structure of locally compact Abelian groups. 1977. Cambridge University Press. 978-0521215435.
- Book: Reiter, Hans. Classical Harmonic Analysis and Locally Compact Groups. 1968. Clarendon Press . 978-0198511892.
- Book: Rudin, Walter. Walter Rudin. Fourier Analysis on Groups. 1962. D. van Nostrand Co. 978-0471523642.
- Book: Timmermann, T.. An Invitation to Quantum Groups and Duality - From Hopf Algebras to Multiplicative Unitaries and Beyond. 2008. EMS Textbooks in Mathematics, European Mathematical Society. 978-3-03719-043-2.
- Kustermans. J.. Vaes. S.. Locally Compact Quantum Groups. Annales Scientifiques de l'École Normale Supérieure. 2000. 33. 6. 837–934. 10.1016/s0012-9593(00)01055-7.
- Ardanza-Trevijano. Sergio. Chasco. María Jesús. The Pontryagin duality of sequential limits of topological Abelian groups. Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra. 2005. 202. 1–3. 11–21. 2163398. 10.1016/j.jpaa.2005.02.006. 10171/1586. free.
- Chasco. María Jesús. Dikranjan. Dikran . Martín-Peinador. Elena. A survey on reflexivity of abelian topological groups. Topology and Its Applications. 2012. 159. 9. 2290–2309. 2921819. 10.1016/j.topol.2012.04.012. free.
- Kaplan. Samuel. Extensions of the Pontrjagin duality. Part I: infinite products. Duke Mathematical Journal. 1948. 15. 649–658. 0026999. 10.1215/S0012-7094-48-01557-9.
- Kaplan. Samuel. Extensions of the Pontrjagin duality. Part II: direct and inverse limits. Duke Mathematical Journal. 1950. 17. 419–435. 0049906. 10.1215/S0012-7094-50-01737-6.
- Venkataraman. Rangachari . Extensions of Pontryagin Duality. Mathematische Zeitschrift. 1975. 143. 2. 105–112. 10.1007/BF01187051. 123627326 .
- Martín-Peinador. Elena. A reflexible admissible topological group must be locally compact. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. 1995. 123. 11 . 3563–3566 . 10.2307/2161108. 10338.dmlcz/127641. 2161108. free.
- Roeder. David W.. 1974. Pacific Journal of Mathematics. 52 . 2. 519–527. Category theory applied to Pontryagin duality. 10.2140/pjm.1974.52.519. free .
- Smith. Marianne F.. The Pontrjagin duality theorem in linear spaces. Annals of Mathematics. 1952. 56. 2. 248–253. 10.2307/1969798. 1969798. 0049479.
- Waterhouse. William C.. William C. Waterhouse. Dual groups of vector spaces. Pacific Journal of Mathematics. 1968. 26. 1. 193–196. 10.2140/pjm.1968.26.193. free.