Brandenburg–Pomeranian conflict explained

Starting in the 12th century, the Margraviate, later Electorate, of Brandenburg was in conflict with the neighboring Duchy of Pomerania over frontier territories claimed by them both, and over the status of the Pomeranian duchy, which Brandenburg claimed as a fief, whereas Pomerania claimed Imperial immediacy. The conflict frequently turned into open war, and despite occasional success, none of the parties prevailed permanently until the House of Pomerania died out in 1637. Brandenburg would by then have naturally have prevailed, but this was hindered by the contemporary Swedish occupation of Pomerania, and the conflict continued between Sweden and Brandenburg-Prussia until 1815, when Prussia incorporated Swedish Pomerania into her Province of Pomerania.

Early medieval prelude

In the 10th century, the area of the future Brandenburg and Pomerania was inhabited by West Slavic tribes, collectively known as Wends. Roughly, the tribes east of the Oder and north of the Warta (Warthe) rivers constituted the Pomeranians and the tribes west of the Oder the Luticians. The classification is uncertain for the tribes living close to the lower Oder, that is the Velunzani on the islands in the Oder estuary, the Prissani on the eastern bank of the lower Oder, and the Ukrani and Recani on the western bank of the lower Oder, which became known as the Uckermark.[1]

The tribes west of the Oder were organized in marches of the Ottonian (Liudolfing) realm, which became the Holy Roman Empire with the coronation of Otto I, Holy Roman Emperor in 962. The marches set up in the area of the future Brandenburg and Pomerania were the Billung March in the north, and the Saxon Eastern March in the south; the boundary was the Peene river. The Saxon Eastern March was soon partitioned, with the area of future northern Brandenburg and southwestern Pomerania re-organized in the Northern March. A rebellion of the Liuticians overthrew the margraves' rule in most of the Northern and Billung marches between 983 and 995.[2] In the 11th century, the Liutician confederation collapsed due to internal struggles, leaving its territory vulnerable to its neighbors' campaigns,[3] including expeditions of the margraves of the Northern March.[4]

House of Ascania vs House of Pomerania

Wartislaw I, Duke of Pomerania and first verified member of the House of Pomerania, conquered the Peene and Tollense areas west of the lower Oder from the Luticians during the 1120s.[3] Albert (Albrecht) the Bear, invested with the March of Lusatia in 1123, was ready to succeed deceased Henry, Count of Stade as margrave of the Northern March in 1128,[5] and was invested with the march by Holy Roman Emperor Lothair of Supplinburg in 1134, after he had already secured his succession of Pribislaw of the Hevelli in 1129.[6] In 1128, Albert participated in the organization of the mission of Otto of Bamberg in the Lutician areas held by Wartislaw I of Pomerania,[3] and supplied him with an escort.[7] When in 1136 Emperor Lothair gave lands in the Peene area to Otto's bishopric of Bamberg, Albert was asked to approve first.[7]

Focused on the Northern March, Albert renounced his post as the margrave of Lusatia in 1136, which was then fused into the March of Meißen and became the basis of the state of the House of Wettin.[8] In 1138, Conrad III of Germany also invested Albert the Bear with the Duchy of Saxony, but Albert resigned in 1142 due to the opposition of the Saxon nobility, who had favoured and eventually installed then minor Henry the Lion as their duke.[6] [9]

In 1147, Albert participated in the Wendish Crusade to the Pomeranian strongholds of Demmin and Stettin, which however did not result in the acquisition of territories — the size of the Northern March actually controlled by Albert differed significantly from what Emperor Lothair had originally promised.[7] Instead, as a result of the crusade, several Saxon nobles had established petty realms in the march, and the Pomeranians still held vast areas south of the Peene river as well as the Uckermark.[7] Albert however succeeded Pribislaw in the Hevellian territories in 1150,[6] and when he defeated Jaxa of Köpenick and incorporated the latter's territory into his march in 1157, the term Margraviate of Brandenburg replaced the designation Northern March.[10] Albert upheld his claims to Western Pomerania,[7] and campaigned in the Pomeranian-held Uckermark since 1157.[11]

Albert the Bear's successor in Saxony, Henry the Lion, had by then established himself as one of the most powerful nobles in Germany.[12] In pursuit of his own interests in the Wendish territories[13] and with Danish support, Henry defeated his rebellious Obodrite subjects and their Pomeranian allies in the Battle of Verchen near the Pomeranian stronghold of Demmin in 1164.[14] As a consequence, the Pomeranian dukes became Henry's vassals,[15] and supported Henry in subsequent campaigns against the margraves of Brandenburg.[16] However, Henry finally lost the struggle he was engaged in with Holy Roman Emperor Barbarossa, and in 1180 was deprived of his ducal titles.[17] The Pomeranian duke then pledged allegiance to Barbarossa in 1181,[18] thwarting Ascanian ambitions.[11]

Constant Danish military pressure resulted in Danish vassalage of Pomerania in 1184/85.[11] [18] The Ascanian margraves launched several expeditions into Danish Pomerania between 1198 and 1199, and between 1211 and 1214.[11] Despite a temporary sack of Stettin in 1214[19] and more permanent territorial gains in the Finow area,[20] they were unable to establish themselves in Pomerania, and Danish superiority even led Frederick II, Holy Roman Emperor to renounce all German claims to the area in favour of Denmark in 1214.[11] By then, the margraves restricted themselves to guard the contemporary Brandenburg-Pomeranian frontier by erecting the Oderberg fortress "contra Sclavos" in 1214.[11] Only after the utter defeat of the Danish forces in the Battle of Bornhöved in 1227, was the area reclaimed by the empire.[11] The Brandenburgian margraves then re-enforced their claims on Pomerania,[11] and were invested with the duchy by Frederick II in 1231 in Ravenna.[21] [22]

In the 1230s, the Margraviate of Brandenburg was ruled in common by two brothers of the House of Ascania, John I and Otto III, while the Duchy of Pomerania was partially divided and ruled by two cousins of the House of Pomerania, Wartislaw III of Pomerania-Demmin and Barnim I of Pomerania-Stettin.[22] Johann I of Brandenburg married a daughter of Valdemar Sejr, king of Denmark, and therewith came into possession of half of the terra Wolgast in Pomerania.[22] He then forced Wartislaw III into the Treaty of Kremmen in 1236: Wartislaw III had to recognize Brandenburgian overlordship and succession in Pomerania-Demmin, and cede his territories south of Demmin to Brandenburg.[22]

Also in the 1230s, Barnim I had sold the southern Uckermark between Templin and Angermünde to the margraves, and renounced his claims on the Barnim and Teltow areas.[23] In the subsequent Treaty of Landin (Hohenlandin) in 1250, Barnim I formally accepted Brandenburgian overlordship and ceded the northern Uckermark to Brandenburg, but in turn received Johann's part of Wolgast and managed to rescind the succession clause of Kremmen.[22] Barnim I had to make further territorial concessions when Brandenburg established her Neumark ("New March") along the Warthe (Warta) river in the second half of the 13th century, and in 1267 married Mechthild, daughter of Otto III of Brandenburg.[22]

Barnim I had inherited Pomerania-Demmin after Wartislaw III died without issue in 1264, but the duchy was again internally divided in 1295 – this time into a northern part, Pomerania-Wolgast, and a southern part, Pomerania-Stettin. In 1302, Otto I of Pomerania-Stettin, grandson of Brandenburgian margrave Otto III, made peace with Brandenburg.[24] Tensions with Pomerania-Wolgast eased when Waldemar became the Brandenburgian margrave in 1309, and Brandenburg pawned Schlawe-Stolp to Pomerania in the Treaty of Templin, concluded in 1317.[25] With Waldemar's death without issue, the House of Ascania died out.[26]

Timeline of the Ascanian-Pomeranian conflict
DateEvent
1120sWartislaw I, Duke of Pomerania subdues Liutician areas west of the Oder, including the Peene area.[27] [28]
1134Albrecht von Ballenstein ("The Bear") receives the Northern March (up to the Peene river) as a fief from Lothair III, Holy Roman Emperor[29] [30]
1147Wendish Crusade[31]
1157Margraviate of Brandenburg established, successor of the Northern March
1164Battle of Verchen, Western Pomerania becomes fief of Henry the Lion (Duchy of Saxony)[32]
1177After several Danish campaigns into Pomeranian territory and protection by Henry the Lion absent, Bogislaw I, Duke of Pomerania travels to Poland in the spring to ask the Polish duke for support. Waldemar of Denmark and Henry the Lion meet and agree on a combined Danish-German expedition; Otto I, Margrave of Brandenburg supports Henry with troops. Siege of Demmin, Henry's control re-established.[33]
1178-80Pomeranian forces participate in campaigns against the Bishopric of Magdeburg and in Brandenburgian territories as far south as Jüterbog and Lusatia. Casimir I, Duke of Pomerania is killed in battle when supporting Henry the Lion against Otto I, Margrave of Brandenburg. Pomerania temporarily expands south as far as the Spree river.[34]
1181Emperor Frederick Barbarossa confirms Bogislaw I as duke of Pomerania.[35]
1180s-1227Pomerania is subject of Denmark's[36] [37] Brandenburgian campaigns; short-lived capture of Stettin in 1214
December 1231Frederick II, Holy Roman Emperor gives the Duchy of Pomerania as a fief to the Margraviate of Brandenburg.[38] [39]
June 1236Treaty of Kremmen

Wartislaw III, Duke of Pomerania hands over large parts of Pomerania-Demmin to Brandenburg and takes the remainder as a fief from the margraves.[40]

1250Treaty of Landin

Barnim I, Duke of Pomerania hands over the Uckermark to Brandenburg in return for Brandenburg's renunciation of its succession claims in Pomerania. Barnim I and Wartislaw I take the remainder of the Duchy of Pomerania as a fief from Brandenburg.[41]

1250sBrandenburg expands eastward; Neumark established partially with gains from Pomerania[42]
1255War between Barnim I, Duke of Pomerania and John I, Margrave of Brandenburg[43]
After 1261Brandenburg gains the Soldin and Zehden areas from Pomerania.
1266Barnim I, Duke of Pomerania occupies Schlawe-Stolp.
March 1273Brandenburgian forces raid the Stettin and Pyritz areas in Central Pomerania.
1269Brandenburg gains the Arnswalde area from Pomerania.[44]
1277The Brandenburgian margraves purchase the Schlawe area from Wizlaw II, Prince of Rügen; Pomeranians withdraw.[45] [46]
1 June 1278Barnim I, Duke of Pomerania receives the Pomeranian-Brandenburgian frontier area between the Ihna river branches as a fief from Brandenburg in return for a promise to aid Brandenburg against the bishop of Magdeburg
1280Brandenburg gains the Bernstein, Arnhausen and Schivelbein areas from Pomerania.
1283–1284Warfare with Brandenburg, primarily for the towns of Stargard, Greifenhagen and Gartz (Oder)[47]
13 June 1283In Rostock the Pomeranian nobility allies against Brandenburg; the Pomeranian towns of Stralsund, Greifswald, Anklam and Demmin are free to conclude alliances as they wish
4 July 1283The Pomeranian dukes ask Lübeck for support against Brandenburg. Lübeck aids the dukes, and so does the Principality of Rügen
28 October 1283Brandenburg conquers the Stargard area; parts of the local nobility side with Brandenburg
13 August 1284Treaty of Vierraden

Emperor Rudolf mediates a peace. Pomerania pays war reparations to Brandenburg; Brandenburg returns occupied castles to Pomerania; an arbitration panel is set up.

1290Brandenburg renounces her claims to the secular territory of the Bishopric of Cammin
5 November 1292Wizlaw and Jaromar, princes of Rügen, sign a treaty with Brandenburg concerning the border between Pomerelia and the Bishopric of Cammin; five knights are appointed arbitrators.
1298Bogislaw IV, Duke of Pomerania with Polish support attacks the Brandenburgian New March, devastating the Arnswalde and Bernstein areas.
14 February 1302Alliance between Brandenburg and Otto I of Pomerania-Stettin; border fortifications deconstructed[48]
1306Bogislaw IV, Duke of Pomerania supports Poland in her war against Brandenburg.
17 July 1307Peter von Neuenburg of the Swenzones receives Schlawe-Stolp, Pollnow, Tuchel and Neuenburg as Brandenburgian fiefs
1308Kammin destroyed by Brandenburgian forces
9 December 1314Brandenburg renounces claims to the Loitz area in favour of the Principality of Rügen in return for a payment.
1314Brandenburg, Stralsund and the Pomeranian dukes ally and fight against a Danish-led coalition.[49]
24/25 November 1317Treaty of Templin

Pomerania gains Schlawe-Stolp from Brandenburg.

14 August 1319With the death of Waldemar, Margrave of Brandenburg, the Brandenburg branch of the House of Ascania dies out. Otto I of Pomerania-Stettin, who had fled to Waldemar from internal conflicts in Pomerania, is reconciled with Wartislaw IV of Pomerania-Wolgast

House of Pomerania vs House of Wittelsbach

The House of Wittelsbach (also House of Bavaria)[50] did not immediately succeed the House of Ascania as margraves of Brandenburg: Since the electors of the Holy Roman Emperor disagreed in 1314, a war ensued between the two candidates Louis of Wittelsbach and Frederick of Habsburg[26] that lasted until 1322, when Louis prevailed in the Battle of Mühldorf.[51] Thus, the death of Ascanian margrave Waldemar was not followed by a proper investiture of another noble with the Margraviate of Brandenburg due to the lack of an established emperor.[26]

The closest relative of deceased Waldemar was his ten-year-old cousin Henry, who is unlikely to have had valid claims on the margraviate.[26] Henry was the son of Waldermar's uncle Henry of Landsberg, a distant relative of both Wartislaw IV, Duke of Pomerania-Wolgast and Rudolf I, Duke of Saxe-Wittenberg from another line of the House of Ascania,[26] who was married to a daughter of former Ascanian margrave Otto V.[51] Wartislaw IV quickly advanced into eastern Brandenburg, took the boy into custody, had the local nobility formally declare him Henry's custodian, and acted as the de facto ruler of the margraviate.[26]

Rudolf I on the other hand declared himself custodian of Waldemar's widow and temporarily took over her possessions in western and central Brandenburg (Havelland, Teltow and Barnim).[26] Rudolf I's plans were thwarted when Waldemar's widow married Otto of Brunswick in late 1319.[26] Yet, he continued his occupation of Brandenburgian territories and by 1320 controlled Havelland, Teltow, Barnim, Zauche and Lower Lusatia.[51] Like Wartislaw IV, Rudolf I tried to take young Henry into custody, and probably managed to do so in early 1320.[26] Henry died in the summer of 1320.[26] In anticipation of a possible take-over of Brandenburg by a rival who then could claim Pomerania as a Brandenburgian fief, the Pomeranian dukes took their duchy as a fief from the bishops of Cammin the same year.[52]

Meanwhile, other neighbors of Brandenburg also annexed frontier areas of the seemingly vacated margraviate – Silesia took the Görlitz area, Bohemia the Bautzen area, and Mecklenburgian forces occupied the Prignitz and advanced into the Uckermark.[51] Pomeranian forces had also advanced into the Uckermark, halted the Mecklenburgian campaign and occupied the Prenzlau and Pasewalk areas.[51] In addition, the Pomeranian dukes as well as Rudolf I of Saxe-Wittenberg claimed the Lebus area.[51]

After Louis of the House of Wittelsbach, later crowned Louis IV, Holy Roman Emperor, had decided the war against the House of Habsburg in his favour in September 1322, he gave the Margraviate of Brandenburg to his seven-year-old son, Louis V "the Brandenburger" in 1323.[51] The formal investiture was issued in 1324, and included the Duchy of Pomerania as a Brandenburgian fief.[51] Rudolf I in late 1324 withdrew from Brandenburgian areas in turn for a compensation,[53] The House of Wittelsbach subsequently gained control over the margraviate until they were in full charge in 1343.[54] During this process, the Pomeranians had to withdraw from the Uckermark[54] after a series of battles throughout the late 1320s and early 1330s.[55] In 1330, they took their duchy as a papal fief to circumvent Brandenburg's claims.[52] In 1338, they concluded a peace with Brandenburg, who renounced her claims on overlordship but maintained the right of succession.[56]

In 1348 the conman "Falscher Waldemar" pretended to be Waldemar, Margrave of Brandenburg, claiming he had been declared dead erroneously while on a pilgrimage to the Holy Land.[57] Probably a strawman of Charles IV, Holy Roman Emperor of the House of Luxembourg, and/or the Anhaltine and Saxon branches of the House of Ascania, he was invested with the margraviate between 1148 and 1150, and took on his position as a margrave with military support of Charles IV and the Ascanians.[58] The House of Wittelsbach was expelled from most of Brandenburg and only controlled the Neumark and some adjacent areas.[57] Together with Denmark, the Pomeranian dukes sided with the Wittelsbachs, and the alliance had already gained ground in 1350 when Charles IV re-invested the House of Wittelsbach with Brandenburg.[58] Louis VI the Roman, margrave between 1351 and 1365, had to re-establish his rule against the opposition of the Ascanians, which he accomplished by 1355.[59] During this process, the Brandenburg-Pomeranian border in the Uckermark was settled in 1354.[59] [60]

When war broke out again in the beginning of the 1370s between the Pomeranian dukes and Louis VI' successor Otto V "the lazy", Pomerania was allied to Charles IV:[61] Following a policy of territorial expansion and economical consolidation of his Kingdom of Bohemia,[59] [62] Charles IV of the House of Luxembourg had already before Louis IV the Roman's death in 1365 concluded a treaty with both Louis IV and his brother, Otto V, for succession of Charles IV's son Wenzel (Wenceslaus) IV in Brandenburg.[62] Furthermore, Otto V had laid Brandenburg's administration in Charles IV's hands for six years in 1365.[62] In 1373, Charles IV forced Otto V to sign the Treaty of Fürstenwalde: Otto V renounced his claims to Brandenburg (since the Golden Bull of 1356 an electorate) in favour of the House of Luxembourg in return for a compensation with 300,000 gulden, paid by pawning to him parts of New Bohemia (Charles IV's designation for his gains in the Upper Palatinate).[63]

Timeline of the Pomerania-Wittelsbach conflict
DateEvent
1320Wartislaw IV acts as the custodian for minor Waldemar's cousin Henry (Heinrich) until Henry's death on 18 June.[64]
1320Pomeranian dukes take their duchy as a fief from the bishops of Cammin to avoid it becoming a fief of the next Brandenburgian margrave
24 June 1324Louis IV ("the Bavarian") gives Pomerania as a fief to his son, Louis V, Duke of Bavaria ("the Brandenburger"). Louis IV was banned by the pope on 23 March.[65]
18 November 1324in Templin, Brandenburg allies with the Bishopric of Cammin
10 August 1325Pope John XXII calls the Pomeranian dukes to oppose the Brandenburgian margrave with all means.
5 September 1327Treaty of Ueckermünde

The Pomeranian dukes and the Brandenburgian margrave agree on a formal peace. The question of fiefdom is spared. Barnim III, Duke of Pomerania agrees to marry Mechthild (also Mathilda), daughter of Rudolf I, Duke of Bavaria, yet the marriage never takes place.[66]

1328Louis IV becomes emperor on 27 January, and orders the Pomeranian dukes to take their duchy as a fief from Brandenburg. Brandenburg and Pomerania, who were negotiating in Naulin near Pyritz, terminate these negotiations when the order arrives on 24 February[67]
29 January 1330truce between Brandenburg and Pomerania[68]
1330Pomeranian dukes take their duchy as a fief from the pope John XXII to avoid it became a fief of Brandenburg
12 February and 18 August 1331the pope orders the Pomeranian dukes to oppose the Brandenburgian margraves
13 March 1331the Pomeranian dukes receive the Duchy of Pomerania as a papal fief
1 August 1332Battle of Kremmer Damm

Barnim III, Duke of Pomerania defeats the Brandenburgian army

28 June 1333Treaty of Lippehne

three-year peace between Brandenburg and Pomerania, the question of fiefdom is spared. A formal alliance is concluded on 3 December 1334.

1334Brandenburg renounces her claims on Pomerania-Wolgast
1338Louis IV, Holy Roman Emperor renounces Brandenburgian claims on Pomerania-Stettin except for the right of succession.[69] Pomerania and Brandenburg conclude a formal peace.
12 June 1348Charles IV, Holy Roman Emperor grants the Pomeranian dukes the Duchy of Pomerania and the Principality of Rügen as an imperial fief, Brandenburg's claims are neglected.[70]
4 April 1354Barnim III, Duke of Pomerania and Louis VI the Roman partition the Uckermark: Pomerania receives the eastern parts with Schwedt, Angermünde, Gramzow and Brüssow. Pasewalk refuses to become a part of Brandenburg and pledges allegiance to the dukes of Pomerania-Wolgast. In 1359, Louis pawns Pasewalk and additional areas to Pomerania-Wolgast.
1370alliance between the emperor and the Pomeranian dukes against Brandenburg. Imperial confirmation of the Pomeranian possessions in the Uckermark.[71]
1371Valdemar IV of Denmark mediates a peace between Pomerania and Brandenburg confirming the previous partition of the Uckermark.
1372war between Brandenburg and Pomerania for the Uckermark, Bishopric of Cammin sides with Brandenburg
24 August 1372Battle of Königsberg (Neumark)

Casimir III (IV), Duke of Pomerania killed in battle.[72]

October/November 1372peace between Pomerania and Brandenburg, Uckermark confirmed as part of Pomerania
18 August 1373Treaty of Fürstenwalde

Otto V of the House of Wittelsbach abdicates

House of Luxembourg vs House of Pomerania

The Pomeranian dukes were on good terms[61] with Charles IV, who gained the Electorate of Brandenburg for his House of Luxembourg de facto from 1365 to 1371, and de jure in 1373.[62] Charles IV had granted the House of Pomerania their Duchy of Pomerania as an imperial fief,[70] and border disputes were settled or suspended.[71]

Charles IV's heirs did not continue his policy of territorial integration and economical consolidation in Brandenburg: instead, the electorate faced internal partitions and economical decay.[73] The Pomeranian dukes discontinued the formerly good relations with the Luxembourgians and successfully campaigned in the Uckermark on their own initiative[72] or as allies of Brandenburg's opponents, shifting the border with Brandenburg southwards beyond Prenzlau.[74] In 1411, the Luxembourgians resigned from the electorate, and transferred their title to Frederick IV, Burgrave of Nuremberg of the House of Hohenzollern (also House of Zollern),[50] who started his reign in Brandenburg as Frederick I.[73]

Timeline of the Luxembourg-Pomeranian conflict
DateEvent
1373/1374House of Luxembourg gains Brandenburg on 2 October 1373, stable peace with Pomerania in 1374. Pomeranian dukes hold positions in the Brandenburgian administration.
1388ducal forces of Pomerania-Stettin invade the Uckermark
1393ducal forces of Pomerania-Stettin invade the Uckermark
25 November 1399Battle of Neuensund am Karrenberg

Pomerania and Mecklenburg defeat Brandenburg and acquire Brandenburg-held territory in the Uckermark, including Prenzlau

House of Hohenzollern vs House of Pomerania

When Frederick I of the House of Hohenzollern took over the Electorate of Brandenburg in 1411, he and his successors restricted the influence of the local nobles, towns and clergy, and followed a policy of territorial expansion.[73] Since the eastern frontier with Pomerania, the Neumark, was pawned to the Teutonic Order state from 1402 to 1455,[75] the western frontier (Uckermark) was in the focus of the Brandenburg–Pomeranian conflict: The first major battle between the Pomeranian and Hohenzollern armies took place in 1412 at Kremmer Damm, only one year after Frederick I had taken over the electorate.[74]

The Duchy of Pomerania was at that time internally divided into petty realms, each such Teilherzogtum was ruled by a distinct member of the House of Pomerania.[76] The first series of wars was primarily fought between Frederick I and the dukes of Pomerania-Stettin, allied to the powerful Brandenburgian noble family von Quitzow,[77] and resulted in some Brandenburgian gains,[78] the expulsion of the von Quiltzows,[79] the imperial ban of the dukes and towns of Pomerania-Stettin,[79] and finally a temporary peace between Brandenburg and Pomerania concluded in Eberswalde in 1415.[78] The Pomeranian dukes allied with the dukes of Mecklenburg in 1418 and renewed their attacks, but were decisively defeated by Brandenburgian forces in the streets of Angermünde in 1420 and had to hand over the Uckermark in the subsequent Treaty of Perleberg.[80] In 1425, the anti-Brandenburgian alliance launched a more successful campaign, after which the Uckermark was divided between Brandenburg and Pomerania in a second treaty of Eberswalde in 1427.[81]

In 1444, war about the border in the Uckermark broke out anew. After four years of fighting, Brandenburg and Pomerania in the Peace of Prenzlau (1448) settled for a division of the Uckermark that only slightly differed from the division of 1427.[82] In 1459, Brandenburg gained a few strongholds in the Uckermark for aiding several Pomeranian dukes in an internal struggle with their relative Eric II.[83]

With the death of Otto III of Pomerania-Stettin in 1464, a series of wars was fought for Otto III's succession, claimed by both the House of Pomerania and the House of Hohenzollern.[83] The battlefields were the Pomerania-Stettin, Uckermark and Neumark areas, and the war was halted only for short periods by the Treaty of Soldin (1466) and Treaty of Prenzlau (1472).[84] The Treaty of Prenzlau (1479) finally ended the war, largely confirming the terms of the previous treaties: Pomerania-Stettin remained under the rule of the House of Pomerania, who in turn became vassals of the electors of Brandenburg.[85]

The Peace of Prenzlau was followed by a series of negotiations, which led to the conclusion of the preliminary Treaty of Pyritz in 1493, and the final Treaty of Grimnitz in 1529:[86] The Duchy of Pomerania became an imperial immediate fief, but the members of the House of Pomerania had to receive it in the presence of Brandenburgian representatives, and Brandenburg was granted the right of succession in the Pomeranian duchy in case the House of Pomerania became extinct.[87]

Timeline of the Hohenzollern-Pomeranian conflict
DateEvent
11 January 1411House of Hohenzollern gains Brandenburg[88]
24 October 1412Second Battle of Kremmer Damm: Forces of Frederick I, Elector of Brandenburg face forces of Otto II and Casimir VI of Pomerania-Stettin, outcome undecided
19 November 1413alliance between Brandenburg and Pomerania-Wolgast, renewed and expanded with Mecklenburg in the summer of 1414. Brandenburg gains Strasburg and Prenzlau in the Uckermark.
late 1414Pomerania-Stettin invades Brandenburg
10 May 1415Frederick I, Elector of Brandenburg successfully sues the dukes of Pomerania-Stettin at the imperial court, resulting in an Imperial ban
5 November 1415Magdalena, daughter of Frederick I, Elector of Brandenburg, promised to Wartislaw IX, Duke of Pomerania. Marriage never takes place.
16 December 1415Treaty of Eberswalde

peace between Pomerania-Stettin and Brandenburg, questions of Uckermark and fiefdom remain unsettled

21 November 1418Treaty of Ueckermünde

the dukes of Pomerania, Mecklenburg-Schwerin, Mecklenburg-Werle and Mecklenburg-Stargard ally against the Hohenzollern of Brandenburg, Poland and Eric of Pomerania promise support.[89]

spring of 1419allies go to war against Brandenburg, battles in the Strasburg area
March 1420Battle of Angermünde

allies defeated by Brandenburg[90]

August 1420Treaty of Perleberg

peace treaty, Brandenburg gains the Uckermark

1425allies go to war against Brandenburg: Brandenburgian defeat near Vierraden, Prenzlau sacked by Pomeranian forces[91] [92]
22 May 1427Treaty of Eberswalde

peace treaty, Brandenburg receives Angermünde, Pomerania keeps Greifenberg, the emperor is to decide the dispute concerning the fiefdom status

1440Brandenburg-Pomeranian alliance against Mecklenburg-Stargard in April, peace treaty on 8 May 1442. Pomerania-Wolgast does not sign the peace
1444–1448Pomerania and Brandenburg go to war when Brandenburg demands the pursuit of an imperial order regarding territorial claims in the Uckermark. Battles primarily in the Pasewalk, Angermünde and Oderberg areas
3 May 1448Treaty of Prenzlau

truce, Brandenburg renounces claims to Pasewalk, but retains the right of succession for the town

6 September 1459Internal struggle in the House of Pomerania for the heritage of deceased Eric of Pomerania. Wartislaw X and Otto III of Pomerania ally with Brandenburg against Eric II, Duke of Pomerania. Brandenburg gains Pasewalk, Alttorgelow and Neutorgelow as a pawn.
1464Otto III, Duke of Pomerania dies without issue on 10 September, leaving Pomerania-Stettin vacant. Pomerania-Wolgast and Brandenburg both claim succession in Pomerania-Stettin.[93] Negotiations throughout 1465.[94]
21 January 1466Treaty of Soldin

Dukes of Pomerania-Wolgast become dukes in Pomerania-Stettin as Brandenburgian vassals.[95]

14 October 1466Treaty of Soldin declared void by the imperial court.[96]
July 1468-May 1472war between Pomerania and Brandenburg[97]
30 May 1472Treaty of Prenzlau

Brandenburg keeps her territorial gains in the Uckermark and the Pomeranian ducal title, Pomerania-Wolgast becomes a Brandenburgian fief[98] [99]

1477–1478war between Pomerania and Brandenburg. Pomeranian forces attack Brandenburgian forces in Gartz, Brandenburg withstands in 1477, but loses Gartz on 6 April 1478, and Löcknitz on 20 May 1478. Brandenburgian counter-attack launched on 3 July 1478, sack of Bahn on 24 July, devastation of the Pyritz area, storm and sack of Bernstein, Saatzig and Vierraden.
28 September 1478Poland mediates a truce
26 June 1479Treaty of Prenzlau

Bogislaw X, only remaining Pomeranian duke, takes the Duchy of Pomerania as a Brandenburgian fief. Brandenburg keeps her territorial gains (14 castles), Gartz stays with Pomerania.[100] [101]

26 March 1493Treaty of Pyritz between Johann, Elector of Brandenburg and Bogislaw X. The members of the House of Pomerania do not need to take the duchy as a fief from Brandenburg, nor do they need to pledge allegiance to the elector, Brandenburg retains the right of succession in the duchy.[102]
15 July 1495Holy Roman Emperor approves of the treaty of Pyritz, but includes the Duchy of Pomerania with the Brandenburgian possessions.
1500Bogislaw X re-negotiates the treaty of Pyritz with Johann's successor, Joachim I, Elector of Brandenburg, with the result that Pomerania is a Brandenburgian fief free to serve the emperor.
1518–1519conflict between Brandenburg and Pomerania regarding the Oder trade.[103]
28 May 1521Holy Roman Emperor issues a document making Pomerania an immediate imperial fief. Delivery hindered by Brandenburg.
1522negotiations about the status of the Duchy of Pomerania in Nuremberg (spring) and Prenzlau (September), no result.[104]
23 August 1526 and 12 April 1529negotiations about the status of Pomerania at the Imperial Diets in Speyer initiated by George I, Duke of Pomerania, no result.
August 1529Pomeranian and Brandenburgian nobles negotiate the status of Pomerania in Gartz mediated by Erich von Braunschweig and Heinrich von Braunschweig, no result. Mediator Vivigenz von Eickstedt initiates a meeting of George I, Duke of Pomerania and Joachim I, Elector of Brandenburg in Grimnitz Palace, preliminary treaty signed on 26 August.
25 October 1529Treaty of Grimnitz

Treaty of Pyritz confirmed and amended: Duchy of Pomerania becomes an imperial fief, which the dukes of Pomerania have to receive in the presence of Brandenburgian representatives, Brandenburgian succession in Pomerania when the House of Pomerania dies out, Brandenburg retains the title of a Pomeranian duke and merges the Pomeranian coat of arms into the Brandenburgian one.

23 December 1529Brandenburg-Pomeranian alliance concluded: mutual assistance against third parties and disobeying subjects, Brandenburg-Pomeranian arbitration court, mutual custodianship for minor members of the ruling houses, trade alliance[105]

House of Hohenzollern vs House of Sweden

Seven years before the last duke of the House of Pomerania died, which would have led to Brandenburgian succession in the Duchy of Pomerania, Swedish forces had occupied Pomerania in the course of the Thirty Years' War. By the death of Bogislaw XIV, Duke of Pomerania in 1637, Sweden refused to hand over the duchy to Brandenburg.[106] When the war ended, Sweden and Brandenburg agreed in the Peace of Westphalia (1648) and the subsequent Treaty of Stettin (1653) to partition Pomerania by a divide just east of the Oder: Western Pomerania became Swedish Pomerania, while Farther Pomerania became Brandenburgian Pomerania.

Brandenburg, later Brandenburg-Prussia, gained Swedish Pomerania step by step in the following centuries: most of the Swedish strip east of the Oder in the Peace of Saint-Germain-en-Laye that ended the Scanian War in 1679, Swedish Pomerania south of the Peene and east of the Peenestrom rivers with Stettin in the Treaty of Frederiksborg and Treaty of Stockholm that ended the Great Northern War in 1720, and the remainder with Rügen, Stralsund and Greifswald in the Congress of Vienna that ended the Napoleonic Wars in 1815. The former Swedish part was then merged with the former Brandenburgian part and to become the Prussian Province of Pomerania.

Timeline of the Hohenzollern-Sweden conflict
DateEvent
1627Capitulation of Franzburg

Thirty Years' War reaches the Duchy of Pomerania

1630Treaty of Stettin

Sweden occupies Pomerania

1637death of Bogislaw XIV, Duke of Pomerania, House of Pomerania extinct
1648Thirty Years' War ends with the Peace of Westphalia: Brandenburg and Sweden agree to partition Pomerania
1653Treaty of Stettin

Sweden and Brandenburg agree on a frontier between Swedish Pomerania and Brandenburgian Pomerania

1659Brandenburg and Sweden battle each other in Swedish Pomerania during the Northern Wars[107]
1660Peace of Oliva[108]
1675–1678Scanian War

Swedish campaign into Brandenburg and defeat at Fehrbellin in 1675. Brandenburgian counteroffensive with Danish support, capture of all of Swedish Pomerania between 1675 and 8 November 1678.[109]

28 June 1679Peace of Saint-Germain-en-Laye

most of Swedish Pomerania restored to Sweden, Brandenburg gains a frontier strip east of the Oder[110]

1713–1715Brandenburg-Prussia and Denmark occupy Swedish Pomerania during the Great Northern War. Last Swedish defense collapses in 1715 during the Battle of Stralsund[111]
1720Treaty of Frederiksborg and Treaty of Stockholm: Swedish Pomerania north of the Peene and west of the Peenestrom rivers restored to Sweden, Brandenburg-Prussia gains the southern part with Stettin and pays 2,000,000 Talers[112]
1757Swedish invasion of Brandenburg-Prussian Pomerania, Brandenburg-Prussian invasion of Swedish Pomerania during the Seven Years' War[113]
1806–1815Napoleonic Wars

Prussia defeated at Auerstedt in 1806, subsequent seizure of Brandenburg and Pomerania by French forces[114]

1814Treaty of Kiel

Sweden cedes Swedish Pomerania to Denmark[115]

1815Congress of Vienna

Denmark cedes Swedish Pomerania to Prussia. Province of Pomerania constituted primarily from former Brandenburg-Prussian Pomerania and Swedish Pomerania[116]

Sources

Bibliography

. Kyra T. Inachin. Die Geschichte Pommerns. Hinstorff. Rostock. 2008. 978-3-356-01044-2. German.

Notes and References

  1. Kirsch (2004), pp. 73, 74
  2. Kirsch (2004), p. 74
  3. Kirsch (2004), p. 75
  4. Robinson (2003), pp. 3–4, 24
  5. Fuhrmann (1986), p. 122
  6. Materna (1995), p. 86
  7. Kirsch (2004), p. 76
  8. Fuhrmann (1986), p. 123
  9. Barber (2004), p. 188
  10. Materna (1995), p. 87
  11. Kirsch (2004), p. 77
  12. Barber (2004), p. 191
  13. Riis (1995), p. 23ff
  14. Riis (1995), p. 25
  15. Piskorski (1999), p. 43
  16. Heitz (1995), p. 167
  17. Fuhrmann (1986), pp. 169, 175
  18. Piskorski (1999), p. 44
  19. Piskorski (1999), p. 45
  20. Materna (1995), p. 93
  21. Buske (1997), p. 18
  22. Materna (1995), p. 94
  23. Zientara (2002), p. 339
  24. Heitz (1995), p. 176
  25. Heitz (1995), p. 177
  26. Materna (1995), p. 134
  27. Heitz (1995), p. 161
  28. Piskorski (1999), pp. 40, 41
  29. Inachim (2008), p. 17
  30. Heitz (1995), p. 162
  31. Heitz (1995), p. 163
  32. Heitz (1995), p. 164
  33. Riis (1995), pp. 40–41
  34. Riis (1995), pp. 41–43
  35. Buchholz (1999), p. 34
  36. Heitz (1995), pp. 167–170
  37. Buchholz (1999), pp. 34, 35
  38. Heitz (1995), p. 170
  39. Inachim (2008), pp. 18–19
  40. Heitz (1995), p. 171
  41. Heitz (1995), p. 172
  42. Buchholz (1999), p. 89
  43. Heitz (1995), p. 173
  44. Buchholz (1999), p. 90
  45. Heitz (1995), p. 174
  46. Buchholz (1999), p. 87
  47. Heitz (1995), p. 175
  48. Heitz (1995), p. 176
  49. Buchholz (1999), p. 107
  50. Arnold (2004), p. 245)
  51. Materna (1995), p. 135
  52. Willoweit (2006), p. 257
  53. Materna (1995), p. 136
  54. Materna (1995), p. 139
  55. Heitz (1995), pp. 180–183
  56. Heitz (1995), p. 184
  57. Materna (1995), p. 142
  58. Materna (1995), pp. 142, 143
  59. Materna (1995), p. 143
  60. Heitz (1995), p. 185
  61. Heitz (1995), p. 186
  62. Spindler and Kraus (1995), p. 66
  63. Kraus (2004), p. 164
  64. Heitz (1995), p. 178
  65. Heitz (1995), p. 180
  66. Heitz (1995), p. 181
  67. Heitz (1995), p. 182
  68. Heitz (1995), p. 183
  69. Buchholz (1999), p. 109
  70. Buchholz (1999), pp. 110–111
  71. Buchholz (1999), p. 161
  72. Heitz (1995), p. 187
  73. Krause, Balz, Müller (1993), p. 105
  74. Heitz (1995), p. 188
  75. Büsch (1992), p. 404
  76. Inachim (2008), p. 31
  77. Materna (1995), pp. 172–173
  78. Heitz (1995), p. 189
  79. Materna (1995), p. 173
  80. Heitz (1995), p. 190
  81. Heitz (1995), p. 191
  82. Heitz (1995), p. 192
  83. Heitz (1995), p. 193
  84. Heitz (1995), pp. 193–200
  85. Materna (1995), p. 205
  86. Heitz (1995), pp. 202–205
  87. Heitz (1995), p. 205
  88. Buchholz (1999), p. 162
  89. Heitz (1995), p. 190
  90. Buchholz (1999), p. 166
  91. Heitz (1995), p. 191
  92. Buchholz (1999), p. 180ff
  93. Buchholz (1999), p. 183
  94. Heitz (1995), pp. 193–194
  95. Heitz (1995), p. 194
  96. Heitz (1995), p. 195
  97. Heitz (1995), pp. 197–200
  98. Heitz (1995), p. 200
  99. Buchholz (1999), pp. 186, 189
  100. Heitz (1995), p. 201
  101. Buchholz (1999), p. 190
  102. Heitz (1995), p. 202
  103. Heitz (1995), p. 203
  104. Heitz (1995), p. 204
  105. Heitz (1995), pp. 205–206
  106. Heitz (1995), p. 224
  107. Buchholz (1999), p. 273ff
  108. Buchholz (1999), p. 318
  109. Buchholz (1999), pp. 318, 319
  110. Buchholz (1999), p. 319
  111. Buchholz (1999), pp. 341–343
  112. Buchholz (1999), p. 343
  113. Buchholz (1999), p. 352
  114. Buchholz (1999), pp. 360–363
  115. Buchholz (1999), p. 363
  116. Buchholz (1999), p. 364