Pig farming explained

Pig farming, pork farming, or hog farming is the raising and breeding of domestic pigs as livestock, and is a branch of animal husbandry. Pigs are farmed principally for food (e.g. pork: bacon, ham, gammon) and skins.

Pigs are amenable to many different styles of farming: intensive commercial units, commercial free range enterprises, or extensive farming (being allowed to wander around a village, town or city, or tethered in a simple shelter or kept in a pen outside the owner's house). Historically, farm pigs were kept in small numbers and were closely associated with the residence of the owner, or in the same village or town.[1] They were valued as a source of meat and fat, and for their ability to convert inedible food into meat and manure, and were often fed household food waste when kept on a homestead.[2] Pigs have been farmed to dispose of municipal garbage on a large scale.[3]

All these forms of pig farm are in use today, though intensive farms are by far the most popular, due to their potential to raise a large amount of pigs in a very cost-efficient manner.[4] In developed nations, commercial farms house thousands of pigs in climate-controlled buildings.[5] Pigs are a popular form of livestock, with more than one billion pigs butchered each year worldwide, 100 million in the United States. The majority of pigs are used for human food, but also supply skin, fat and other materials for use in clothing, ingredients for processed foods,[6] cosmetics,[7] and medical use.[8]

Production and trade

Year:2019
Amount1:310.4
Amount10:12.7
Amount9:14.1
Amount8:18.4
Amount7:19.6
Amount6:21.6
Amount5:23.7
Amount4:40.6
Amount3:78.7
Amount2:143.1
Animal:Pig
Country1: (Mainland)
Country2: (UK not included)
World:850.3

Pigs are farmed in many countries, though the main consuming countries are in Asia, meaning there is a significant international and even intercontinental trade in live and slaughtered pigs. Despite having the world's largest herd, China is a net importer of pigs as China consumes about 50% of global pork production.[9] The total amount of pork consumed in China is 57 million tons (as of 2021) and pork accounted for 60 percent of total meat consumption within the country.[10] China has been increasing its imports during its economic development; many within China's population of 1.2 billion people prioritize eating pork as their main consumption of meat, unlike other countries where most people would prioritize having poultry. In addition, since 2007, China possesses a strategic pork reserve with a government mandate to "stabilize live hog prices, prevent excessive hog price drops, which damage the interests of farmers and to ease the negative effects of the cyclical nature of hog production and market prices." In China, the government actively intervened in the pork market during periods of instability by releasing pork reserves into the market whenever hogs get too expensive in China, in order to hold down prices for consumers. Conversely when prices of pork are deemed too low and unsustainable for farmers, the reserve buys up pigs to ensure farmers remain profitable.[11]

The largest exporters of pigs are the United States, the European Union, and Canada. As an example, more than half of Canadian production (22.8 million pigs) in 2008 was exported, going to 143 countries.[12]

Among meat animals, pigs have a lower feed conversion ratio than cattle, which can provide an advantage in lower unit price of meat because the cost of animal feed per kilogram or pound of resultant meat is lower. However, there are also many other economic variables in meat production and distribution, so the price differential of pork and beef at the point of retail sale does not always correspond closely to the differential in feed conversion ratios. Nonetheless, the favorable ratio often tends to make pork affordable relative to beef.[13] [14]

Relationship between handlers and pigs

The way in which a stockperson interacts with pigs affects animal welfare which in some circumstances can correlate with production measures. Many routine interactions can cause fear, which can result in stress and decreased production.

There are various methods of handling pigs which can be separated into those which lead to positive or negative reactions by the animals. These reactions are based on how the pigs interpret a handler's behavior.

Negative interactions

Many negative interactions with pigs arise from stock-people dealing with large numbers of pigs. Because of this, many handlers can become complacent about animal welfare and fail to ensure positive interactions with pigs. Negative interactions include overly heavy tactile interactions (slaps, punches, kicks, and bites), the use of electric goads and fast movements. It can also include killing them. However, it is not a commonly held view that death is a negative interaction. These interactions can result in fear in the animals, which can develop into stress. Overly heavy tactile interactions can cause increased basal cortisol levels (a "stress" hormone).[15] Negative interactions that cause fear mean the escape reactions of the pigs can be extremely vigorous, thereby risking injury to both stock and handlers. Stress can result in immunosuppression,[16] leading to an increased susceptibility to disease. Studies have shown that these negative handling techniques result in an overall reduction in growth rates of pigs.

"In Canada the Federal government does not regulate the treatment on farms and most provinces have animal cruelty legislation but they typically contain expectations for general agricultural practices." Due to this lack of legislation, this perpetuates to the cruel treatment of swine.[17] "The NFACC codes of practice are developed larger by the industry and are not enforced with third party oversight."

Positive interactions

Various interactions can be considered either positive or neutral. Neutral interactions are considered positive because, in conjunction with positive interactions, they contribute to an overall non-negative relationship between a stock-person and the stock. Pigs are often fearful of fast movements. When entering a pen, it is good practice for a stock-person to enter with slow and deliberate movements. These minimize fear and therefore reduce stress. Pigs are very curious animals. Allowing the pigs to approach and smell whilst patting or resting a hand on the pig's back are examples of positive behavior. Pigs also respond positively to verbal interaction. Minimizing fear of humans allow handlers to perform husbandry practices in a safer and more efficient manner. By reducing stress, stock are made more comfortable to feed when near handlers, resulting in increased productivity.[18]

Impacts on sow breeding

Hogs raised in confinement systems tend to produce 23.5 piglets per year. Between 2013 and 2016, sow death rates nearly doubled in the United States, from 5.8 to 10.2 percent. 25 to 50 percent of deaths were caused by prolapse.[19]

Other probable causes of death include vitamin deficiency, mycotoxins in feed, high density diets or abdominal issues.[20] Iowa's Pork Industry Center collects mortality data in collaboration with the National Pork Board to collect data from over 400,000 sows from 16 U.S. states. The farms range in size and facility types. Increasing death rates are a profit concern to the industry, so money is invested into research to find solutions.[21]

Genetic manipulation

Pigs were originally bred to rapidly gain weight and backfat in the late 1980s. In a more fat-conscious modern day America, pigs are now being bred to have less back fat and produce more offspring, which pushes the sow's body too far and is deemed one of the causes of the current prolapse epidemic. Researchers and veterinarians are seeking ways to positively impact the health of the hogs and benefit the hog business without taking much from the economy.[22]

Terminology

Pigs are extensively farmed, and therefore the terminology is well developed:

Pigs for slaughter

Groups

Pig parts

Biology

Housing

Environmental and health impacts

See main article: Environmental impacts of pig farming.

Feces and waste often spread to surrounding neighborhoods, polluting air and water with toxic waste particles.[25] Waste from swine on these farms carry a host of pathogens and bacteria as well as heavy metals. These toxins can leach down through the soil into groundwater, polluting local drinking water supplies. Pathogens can also become airborne, polluting the air and harming individuals when ingested.[26] Contents from waste have been shown to cause detrimental health implications, as well as harmful algal blooms in surrounding bodies of water.[27] Due to Concentrated Animal Feed Operations (CAFOs), those who live in the surrounding areas of pig farms tend to experience health complications. Symptoms included headaches, nausea, and weakness due to the fumes that are emitted from these farms. Those who work directly inside these farms often experience these symptoms more intensely. Typically, workers of these farms experience respiratory issues such as wheezing, coughing, and tightness of the chest as well as eye and nasal irritation.[28] This is in part due to the air quality being poor because of the air particles being contaminated with hog feces.

Little to no regulation has been written by the EPA and federal legislators surrounding CAFOs to protect the welfare of both the environment and humans from their impacts.[29] The only permit required by federal law on wastewater runoff by CAFOs is the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. NPDES are authorized under the Clean Water Act and aim to reduce dumping of pollutants in water systems.[30] However, one of the most detrimental waste management practices used at swine farms, manure lagoons, have little to no regulations surrounding waste management, as they are not connected to a moving water source and therefore is not seen as an imminent threat to human or environmental health.[31]

Occupational Hazards

Common occupational hazards faced by pig farmers include but are not limited to exposure to toxic gases and particulate matter.[32] [33] [34] The Occupational Safety and Health Administration or OSHA sets health and safety standards for hazardous substances in the workplace called permissible exposure limits or PELs.[35] Specific PELs exist for toxic gases and particulate matter and these standards are legally enforced by OSHA to ensure that the safety and health of workers are protected.

Toxic Gas and Particulate Matter ExposureToxic gases including hydrogen sulfide, ammonia, methane and carbon dioxide are produced as a result of the decomposition of pig feces and these gases become highly concentrated in enclosed spaces of pig barns which can be hazardous to health when inhaled.[36] Carbon monoxide is another commonly associated toxic gas that can accumulate in pig barns as a result of the trapping of combustion byproducts such as malfunctioning furnaces or gas heat sources in the absence of adequate ventilation.[37]

Hydrogen sulfide gas has a foul, "rotten eggs" smell at low concentrations but paralyzes the olfactory nerve at higher concentrations so that no smell is sensed.[38] Exposure to high levels, well beyond the OSHA PEL, of hydrogen sulfide can cause fatal respiratory paralysis. The common source of hydrogen sulfide are covered manure pits below the pig barns that act as feces reservoirs. These manure pits require regular emptying and during this process, high levels of hydrogen sulfide is released and seeps into pig barns. Pig barns must be void of any human or animal inhabitants during this emptying process and require a several hour "waiting period" until occupants can safely reenter the barn.

Ammonia gas has a strong odor that can be smelled at low levels, below the OSA PEL, but does not have any negative health effects.[39] At higher levels, ammonia is irritating to the body's mucous membranes such as the eyes, nose, mouth, throat and lungs. Particulate matter in pig barns often absorbs ammonia as it floats through the air.[40] These particles are then inhaled and increase the irritating effect of ammonia.

Methane and carbon dioxide are combustible gases meaning that they can burn, catch fire or explode easily.[41] They are also known as chemical asphyxiants and at high level can cause suffocation by displacing oxygen from the air.

Particulate matter is produced when small fragments of pig hair or skin, dried feces, or feed can detach and become suspended in the air in pig barns. The increased concentration of particulate matter in the air, especially in confined spaces, can lead to respiratory tract irritation and other health effects when inhaled. Bacteria and viruses, such as influenza, can travel through the air on particulate matter and increase the risk of transmission of disease.

OSHA requires that toxic gas and particulate matter be measured at least twice yearly preferably in the autumn months and again in the winter when natural ventilation is the most reduced.[42] Workers are also advised to wear N-95 respirators and eye protection when inside of pig barns to prevent the inhalation of toxic gases and particulate matter as well as irritation to the of eyes.[43]

Geopolitical issues

As with other commodities, pork presents challenges in the politics of international trade as national interests compete and seek economic modus vivendi. Changes to policy can upset the existing balances, prompting economic anxiety. For example, in 2020, the hog farming sector in Taiwan was upset by a decision to allow imports from the United States without labeling of ractopamine use.[44] Farmers' views varied on how negative the effects might be.[44] Issues of pride and degree of autarky also figure into such debates; people understandably wonder whether trade competition changes will deeply damage domestic production capability, while accurate quantitative answers are often difficult to find amid the mass of debate.[44]

Drugs

Growth promoters

Ractopamine

Most pigs in the US receive ractopamine which promotes muscle instead of fat, quicker weight gain, and reduced costs and pollutants in the environment. Such pigs consume less feed to reach finishing weight and produce less manure. Ractopamine has not been approved for use by the European Union, China, Russia, and several other countries.[45]

Colistin

China once used colistin (an antibiotic) as growth promoter (subtherapeutic antibiotic use) but discovered a colistin-resistant form of E. coli bacteria in a pig from a Shanghai farm in 2013. Investigations then led to the identification of "a gene called MCR-1 that allowed bacteria to survive colistin treatment in animals and humans." In 2016, these findings led China to ban colistin as growth promoter.[46] [47]

Antibiotics

A systematic review found that penicillins and tetracyclines were the most commonly used antibiotics in pigs.[48]

Parasites

Toxoplasmosis is a constant pressure on pig farming. Worldwide, the percentage of pigs harboring viable Toxoplasma gondii parasites has been measured to be 3% to 71.43%.[49] Surveys of seroprevalence (T. gondii antibodies in blood) are more common, and such measurements are indicative of the high relative seroprevalence in pigs across the world.[50] Neonatal piglets have been found to suffer the entire range of severity, including progression to stillbirth.[50] [51] This was especially demonstrated in the foundational Thiptara et al. 2006, reporting a litter birth of three stillborns and six live in Thailand. This observation has been relevant not only to that country but to toxoplasmosis control in porciculture around the world.[51] [49]

Hygiene

Excessively hygienic raising conditions were found to prevent proper gut microbiota development by Schmidt et al. 2011.[52] Moore et al. 1995 describes the pathology of Cryptosporidium infection, a common difficulty in piglet production.[53]

In an attempt to curb diseases such as African swine fever,[54] a number of Chinese companies have built condominium-style mega complexes multiple stories high to house thousands of pigs. The buildings have been dubbed "hog hotels" and come with strict protocols and advanced cleaning, veterinary, and disposal systems.[55] However, doubt has been raised by policy specialists and animal scientists over the facilities' efficacy in preventing outbreaks. The welfare of the animals has also been a source of concern, and it has been suggested that the poor welfare of the pigs may cause a decline in their immunity.[56]

See also

Further reading

Notes and References

  1. Flisser . Ana . Ganaba . Rasmané . Praet . Nicolas . Carabin . Hélène . Millogo . Athanase . Tarnagda . Zékiba . Dorny . Pierre . Hounton . Sennen . Sow . Adama . Nitiéma . Pascal . Cowan . Linda D. . Factors Associated with the Prevalence of Circulating Antigens to Porcine Cysticercosis in Three Villages of Burkina Faso . PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases . 5 . 1 . e927 . 2011 . 21245913 . 3014946 . 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000927 . free .
  2. Lander . Brian . Schneider . Mindi . Brunson . Katherine . A History of Pigs in China: From Curious Omnivores to Industrial Pork . The Journal of Asian Studies . 2020 . 79 . 4 . 865–889. 10.1017/S0021911820000054 . 225700922 .
  3. Web site: Full text of "The collection and disposal of municipal waste" . New York, The Municipal Journal and Engineer . 6 October 2018.
  4. Web site: Where have all the pig farmers gone . ABC Rural . 5 May 2014 .
  5. Web site: Swine Extension - Programs | MU Extension. extension.missouri.edu.
  6. Web site: The Lost Art of Cooking With Lard . Mother Earth News . 30 October 2012 . 6 October 2018.
  7. Web site: Ingredient: Lard . cosmeticsinfo.org . 6 October 2018 . 26 December 2017 . https://web.archive.org/web/20171226211746/http://www.cosmeticsinfo.org/ingredient/lard . dead .
  8. Web site: Material from pig intestine is remedy for deep sores, incontinence . Purdue.edu . 6 October 2018.
  9. Web site: China's plan to cut meat consumption by 50% cheered by climate campaigners China The Guardian . 2023-03-23 . amp.theguardian.com.
  10. Web site: Five new trends in China's meat consumption McKinsey . 2023-03-23 . www.mckinsey.com.
  11. Web site: Kemp . Ted . 2013-06-06 . Hog Stock: Inside China's Strategic Pork Reserve . 2023-03-23 . CNBC . en.
  12. Web site: Canadian Pork Exports . Canadapork.com . 6 October 2018 . 8 December 2017 . https://web.archive.org/web/20171208024240/http://www.canadapork.com/en/industry-information/canadian-pork-exports . dead .
  13. Web site: Ciuraru . Ioana . 2021-03-31 . Why Is Pork So Cheap ? 3 Reasons Pork Is Cheaper Than Beef And Any Other Meat . 2023-03-23 . Foodiosity . en-US.
  14. Web site: 2022-06-08 . Why Is Pork Cheaper Than Beef? (5 Main Reasons Explained) . 2023-03-23 . en-US.
  15. Hemsworth . P.H . Human–animal interactions in livestock production . Applied Animal Behaviour Science . 81 . 3 . 2003 . 185–98 . 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00280-0.
  16. Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ, Barnett JL, Borg S . Relationships between human-animal interactions and productivity of commercial dairy cows . Journal of Animal Science . 78 . 11 . 2821–31 . 2000 . 11063304 . 10.2527/2000.78112821x .
  17. Web site: 2020-11-12 . Humane Society International/Canada demands pork industry quit stalling on phasing out cruel crates for mother pigs . 2022-03-03 . Humane Society International . en-US.
  18. Hemsworth . P.H. . Price . E.O. . Borgwardt . R. . Behavioural responses of domestic pigs and cattle to humans and novel stimuli . Applied Animal Behaviour Science . 50 . 1 . 1996 . 43–56 . 10.1016/0168-1591(96)01067-2.
  19. Web site: 'We've bred them to their limit': death rates surge for female pigs in the US. Greenaway. Twilight. 2018-10-01. the Guardian. en. 2018-11-17.
  20. News: Considering the porcine future. 2018-10-02. Big Think. 2018-11-17. en.
  21. Web site: Iowa Pork Industry Center - Iowa State University. ipic.iastate.edu. en-us. 2018-11-17.
  22. News: Genetic manipulation for more salable pork or more pigs. 2018-10-02. Big Think. 2018-11-17. en.
  23. Web site: What's a shoat?. Resor. Cynthia. October 2018. teachingwiththemes.com/.
  24. http://ucce.ucdavis.edu/files/filelibrary/1385/2027.PDF Swine Study Guide
  25. Nicole . Wendee . 21 April 2017 . CAFOs and Environmental Justice: The Case of North Carolina . Environmental Health Perspectives . 121 . 6 . a182–a189 . 10.1289/ehp.121-a182 . 3672924 . 23732659.
  26. Thorne. Peter S. . 21 April 2017 . Environmental Health Impacts of Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations: Anticipating Hazards—Searching for Solutions . Environmental Health Perspectives . 115 . 2 . 296–297 . 10.1289/ehp.8831 . 1817701 . 17384781.
  27. News: It's not just Ohio—poisonous algae blooms now plague 20 US states . Guilford . Gwynn . Quartz. 21 April 2017.
  28. Crook. B.. Robertson. J.F.. Glass. S.A. Travers. Botheroyd. E.M.. Lacey. J.. Topping. M.D.. 1991-07-01. Airborne Dust, Ammonia, Microorganisms, and Antigens in Pig Confinement Houses and the Respiratory Health of Exposed Farm Workers. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal. 52. 7. 271–279. 10.1080/15298669191364721. 0002-8894. 1951065.
  29. Web site: US EPA. OLEM. 2017-09-05. CERCLA and EPCRA Reporting Requirements for Air Releases of Hazardous Substances from Animal Waste at Farms. 2021-11-23. www.epa.gov. en.
  30. Harvard Environmental Law Review. 31. 2. 1555771. Generally Illegal: NPDES General Permits Under the Clean Water Act . 25 March 2007 . Gaba . Jeffrey M.. 2021-11-23.
  31. Constructed Wetlands for Treatment of Swine Wastewater from an Anaerobic Lagoon . 2021-11-23. Transactions of the ASAE. 10.13031/2013.8827 . en-us. 2002 . p. g. Hunt . a. a. Szögi . f. j. Humenik . j. m. Rice . t. a. Matheny . k. c. Stone . 45 . 3 .
  32. Web site: Archibald . Joy . 2015-07-21 . Upper Midwest Agricultural Safety and Health CenterOccupational Hazards in Pork Production Associated with Production Practices - Upper Midwest Agricultural Safety and Health Center . 2024-03-10 . en-US.
  33. Web site: Board . National Pork . Noise . 2024-03-10 . Pork Information Gateway.
  34. Web site: NASD - Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Injuries in Agriculture . 2024-03-10 . nasdonline.org.
  35. Web site: 2022-12-14 . 1988 OSHA PEL Project Documentation NIOSH CDC . 2024-03-11 . www.cdc.gov . en-us.
  36. Web site: Toxicities Caused by Gases Iowa State University . 2024-03-11 . vetmed.iastate.edu.
  37. Web site: Carbon Monoxide Toxicity Iowa State University . 2024-03-11 . vetmed.iastate.edu.
  38. Web site: Safety in Swine Production Systems – Hogs, Pigs, and Pork . 2024-03-11 . swine.extension.org.
  39. Web site: Ammonia Toxicity Iowa State University . 2024-03-22 . vetmed.iastate.edu.
  40. Yang . Xufei . Haleem . Noor . Osabutey . Augustina . Cen . Zhisheng . Albert . Karlee L. . Autenrieth . Daniel . March 2022 . Particulate Matter in Swine Barns: A Comprehensive Review . Atmosphere . en . 13 . 3 . 490 . 10.3390/atmos13030490 . free . 2022Atmos..13..490Y . 2073-4433.
  41. Web site: Donham . Kelley . Aherin . Robert . Baker . David . Hetzel . Glen . 2006 . Baker . James . Bodman . Gerald . Kerig . Ken . Sweeten . John . Safety in Swine Production Systems . March 22, 2024 . Fact Sheet: Pork Information Gateway.
  42. Web site: Board . National Pork . Safety in Swine Production Systems . 2024-03-24 . Pork Information Gateway.
  43. Web site: Safety in Swine Production Systems – Hogs, Pigs, and Pork . 2024-03-11 . swine.extension.org.
  44. News: Wang . Ann . In Taiwan pig country, U.S. pork decision rankles, divides families . 2020-12-16 . Reuters.com . Reuters wire service . 2020-12-15.
  45. Web site: Ractopamine — a beta-agonist growth promotant; from google (pig drug accumulate fat) result 3. NPR.
  46. Web site: UK-China collaboration informs animal feed antibiotic ban . Medical Research Council . https://web.archive.org/web/20170327080933/https://www.mrc.ac.uk/news/browse/uk%2Dchina%2Dcollaboration%2Dinforms%2Danimal%2Dfeed%2Dantibiotic%2Dban/. 27 March 2017. dead.
  47. Web site: McKenna . Maryn . Apocalypse Pig: The Last Antibiotic Begins to Fail . https://web.archive.org/web/20181007040042/https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/phenomena/2015/11/21/mcr-gene-colistin/ . dead . 7 October 2018 . 21 November 2015 . National Geographic.
  48. 2019-06-01. Patterns of antibiotic use in global pig production: A systematic review. Veterinary and Animal Science. en. 7. 100058. 10.1016/j.vas.2019.100058. 2451-943X. 7386699. 32734079. Lekagul. Angkana. Tangcharoensathien. Viroj. Yeung. Shunmay.
  49. Book: Lim . Yvonne Ai Lian . Vythilingam . Indra . Nissapatorn . Veeranoot . Lau . Yee-Ling . Fong . Mun-Yik . Parasites and their vectors . Toxoplasma gondii: The Parasite in Trend . . . 2013 . 978-3-7091-1553-4 . 155–175.
  50. Book: Dubey, J. P. . Toxoplasmosis of animals and humans . . . 2016 . 978-1-4200-9236-3 . 423572366 . xvii+313.
  51. Dubey . J. P. . Toxoplasmosis in pigs—The last 20 years . . . 164 . 2–4 . 2009 . 0304-4017 . 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.05.018 . 89–103. 19559531 .
  52. Yeoman . Carl J. . White . Bryan A. . Gastrointestinal Tract Microbiota and Probiotics in Production Animals . . . 2 . 1 . 2014-02-01 . 2165-8102 . 10.1146/annurev-animal-022513-114149 . 469–486. 25384152 .
  53. Book: Uzal . Francisco A. . Plattner . Brandon L. . Hostetter . Jesse M. . Jubb, Kennedy & Palmer's Pathology of Domestic Animals: Volume 2 . 1 Alimentary System . . 2016 . 978-0-7020-5318-4 . 1–257.e2.
  54. Web site: 2021-08-02 . China is using 13-storey 'hog hotels' to keep pigs safe from disease . 2022-11-18 . The Independent . en.
  55. Web site: Hog heaven: China builds pig hotels for better biosecurity . 2022-11-18 . www.aljazeera.com . en.
  56. Web site: 2020-09-18 . A 12-storey pig farm: has China found the way to tackle animal disease? . 2022-11-18 . the Guardian . en.