National Petition to the Blue House explained

Type:Government site
Romanized Name:Cheongwadae gungmincheongwon
Native Name Lang:ko
Native Name:청와대 국민청원
Location Country:South Korea
Owner:The Blue House
Key People:Moon Jae-in
Im Jong-seok
Founded:August 19, 2017
Dissolved:May 9, 2022
Successor:Gungminjean

The National Petition to the Blue House, also known as the Online Petition to the Blue House[1] or succinctly as the National Petition, was a South Korean government website that was created as part of the Moon Jae-in administration's political communication effort to address citizen concerns in South Korea. The website was first released to the public on August 19, 2017, on then-president Moon Jae-in's 100th day in office. The website's goal was to establish a platform of direct communication between the government and the people under the philosophy that "the government will answer when the public asks". The National Petition is composed of a system in which government and Blue House officials respond to every petition recommended by more than 200,000 people over a period of 30 days.

Multiple petitions on the website became topics of interest and coverage for mainstream media after gaining tens of thousands of recommendations from other users. Many of these petitions requested changes in South Korean law or a thorough investigation into previously underdocumented criminal incidents.

The website was dissolved along with the end of Moon's presidential term on May 9, 2022.[2]

History

The online platform was first proposed by Chief Presidential Secretary Im Jong-seok, who believed that just "like the White House... [the [[Blue House|presidential office]]] should also answer the people's petitions." With Moon's approval of the plan, a 'public communication platform' was first established on the Blue House's official website on August 17, 2017, to celebrate the president's 100th day in office on August 19, 2017. A new tab named "People's Communication Plaza" was first introduced, with functions such as discussion rooms, Kookmin Newspaper High School, talent recommendation, and Hyoja-dong Photography Museum. The platform was modeled after the Obama Administration's petitioning website, We the People.

As of 23 February 2018, more than 124,500 postings were posted, averaging 658 daily.

The website was decommissioned by the Blue House on May 9, 2022, at the end of Moon's term as president.[3] The Yoon Suk Yeol administration subsequently created the Gungminjean as a website to replace the National Petition on June 23, 2022.[4]

Functions

Each petition could be labeled into one of the following 17 categories:

If a petition received more than 200,000 recommendations over 30 days, official answers from government officials, including ministers and senior secretaries, were given within 30 days. In comparison, The White House's We the People answered petitions that had the approval of 100,000 people over 30 days. However, the National Petition did not require a separate subscription unlike We the People.[5]

In May 2018, an analysis of all 160,000 proposed public petitions, which were submitted until April 13, showed that the most mentioned keywords were "baby," "women" and "policy." The most popular label was "Human rights/Gender equality". Yoon Young-chan, senior secretary for public communication, said that "we(the government) had been able to examine specifically where the will of the people was," and added that the government will continue its efforts to improve the quality of people's lives.[6] [7]

Notable Petitions

Law and punishment

Answer No. 56, 58, 59 and 60. On 11 December 2018, Kim Hyung-yeon, attorney general, answered four petitions together. All of these cases had something in common: the victim had died and the sentence had been lowered as the perpetrator was recognized to be in a state of so-called feeble-minded due to drinking. While answering the question, Kim Hyung-yeon said, "We should not allow punishment just because we were drunk," adding that efforts will continue to tighten standards in the future. He also stressed that there is a low possibility that mental and physical drugs will be recognized as the courts make decisions through stricter judgment.[20]

Social Issues

News and media

Diplomatic issues

Criticism

Regarding the following side effects and criticism of the petition, New Media Secretary Jung Hye-seung said on 30 May 2018 that it could be possible as a playground for the people. Jung stressed that the principle of "when the people ask, the government answers when the people ask" is "the government's duty of course." However, he said, "We should refrain from requesting a petition for the death penalty, abusive language, slander, false information, and eminence of certain people," and expressed his intention to carefully respond to the issue so that it has more net function than reverse function.[37]

Neglect of representative democracy

The Chosun Ilbo》 cited strengthening of online publicity, including the reorganization of the presidential office's homepage and expanding video content such as Facebook, as an example of direct democracy without going through the media. It also criticized the presidential office, which has exclusive rights to information, for distributing news and videos through social media such as its website and Facebook, and for even distributing information directly. It also published critical comments from opposition parties, including Liberty Korea Party spokesman Kang Hyo-sang, People's Party spokesman Kim Yoo-jung and Bareun Party chief spokesman Park Jung-ha. The Senior Secretary for Public Communication, Yoon Young-chan sid, "It is not that we will ignore democracy, but that there is a weakness in representative democracy, so we need to communicate directly with the people in the age of one-person media." "The former president's homepage and the homepage of government ministries had all the channels for public discussion and suggestions," he said. "The current government has made it more complementary and sophisticated." "(The press) provides a lot of information, and ... "On the one hand, we have no choice but to create a platform that can unleash the people's direct needs." "In case of major messages or major policies, they will be disclosed to the media first and not to the public first," he said.[38]

Choi Jang-jip, an honorary professor at Korea University, also cited the blue house petition for the people as a side effect of direct democracy. "There are many cases in which people are asking for issues that require deep discussion," Professor Choi said. "There is a risk that (the opinion) will be driven to a cause of excitement to skip the process of calm deliberation." In addition, Choi Chang-ryul, dean of the Graduate School of Education at Yongin University, said, "There is no concern that opinions of certain classes or groups will be excessively reflected," but also said, "It is positive in terms of actively reflecting the people's opinions."[39]

Social conflict promotion

It is pointed out that the heat of the petition is causing a number of problems. 16 November, came anonymous claims is "Japanese military sexual slavery in the military for soldiers to be almost mandatory military service without pay two years when introduced". This is required "The blue hose to sex trafficking brothel owners to be alive and is not different Japanese military sexual slavery old women against the act.", and that the petitioner's punishment.Nearly 80,000 people joined petition. There are petitions that cannot be made in that the judicial system should be respected, such as a petition urging the dismissal of Shin Kwang-ryol, a senior judge who accepted former Defense Minister Kim Kwan-jin's arrest. As for a petition to make it mandatory for women to serve in the military, a fight petition was filed to transplant artificial palaces to men, turning the national petition site into a "fighting ground." Some argue that the petition should be changed to a real-name system and added a function of protest against the petition. However, the blue house said that it wanted to respect the court's judgment, saying that the court judged the real-name Internet system unconstitutional and that imposing a real-name duty on all citizens to catch the few malicious comments was to treat all citizens as potential criminals. "So far, the self-purification function is working well," he said. "If we add the function of 'I' we can turn the petition board into a discussion board."[40]

Excessive expression of opinion

Some of the more than 50,000 petitions are said to be unnecessary. They also ask for policy and institutional suggestions such as "improving English education," "revision of the law on child leave," and "abandoning the Korean age," as well as civil complaints such as where to appeal to job scams, to ask for support for dating, to re-hire Guus Hiddink as the national football coach, or to wrap up Chinese chili powder. They say that there are many practically impossible petitions for the government to come forward directly, with fan clubs supporting idol stars becoming a battleground when they criticize or complain of unfairness and petition to dissolve the main opposition Minjoo Party in response to the main opposition Liberty Korea Party's request for the disbandment of the unconstitutional party. There is a petition asking for student human rights and the right to warm up students, a petition to guarantee girls the right to wear school uniform pants, a petition to the president not to take pictures with pretty female entertainers, and a petition to educate people around the world free of Korean for free, and a Cheong Wa Dae official pointed out that the petition has degenerated into a playground, saying, "I understand that, but the president is not the king of Joseon era." Moon Jae-in president also said "Under the current legislation, acceptance is impossible to annoying sometimes.". "But I think it's a very desirable phenomenon," he said. "I think we need a place for the people to express their opinions. Any petition that we can't resolve right now will serve as a guide to improving legislation in the long run." Cheong Wa Dae also announced that it will make efforts to revive the purpose of direct democracy, supplement its counter-function and boost its net function. Academics also assessed that it has a "symbolic meaning," with Hwang Sang-min, a psychology professor at Yonsei University, stressing that the most important thing is to be given an opportunity to talk to citizens. Meanwhile, Lee Taek-kwang, a sociology professor at Kyung Hee University, said, "It is a matter for Cheong Wa Dae to ponder in the future as to how the petition will be raised and how it will be implemented into a democracy of hangover."[41] [42] [43] [44]

However, some argue that the National Assembly's petition system, another channel for petitioning, is nominal. In fact, the number of petitions in the 16th National Assembly, which opened in 2000, has decreased from 765 to 227 in the 19th National Assembly, which opened in 2012. The number of petitions adopted is also small, meaning only two were adopted by the 19th National Assembly because the petition is not properly reviewed by the subcommittee of the petition screening committee within the standing committee even if it is received. Also, unlike Cheong Wa Dae, it is cumbersome that a parliamentary petition should be accompanied by a letter of recommendation from lawmakers.[45]

Controversy over overlapping petitions

There is controversy over overlapping voting through Kakao Talk. The presidential office Cheong Wa Dae's public petition, along with Facebook and Twitter and Telegram, can participate through four different social networks, including Kakao Talk, which was registered on 6 Jan. by repeatedly cutting off its connection to the "Korea's presidential office" account in the setup menu and then re-connecting it, is suspected that it did not vote for the petition registered on 6 Jan.. The petition is under suspicion for obtaining consent from more than 100,000 people two days before the deadline. In response to the controversy, Cheong Wa Dae blocked the public petition board from pressing its consent on Kakao Talk, leaving a message on its bulletin board, "We have found inappropriate logins of some users and are temporarily suspending the Kakao Talk connection among social login services." It also said it will continue monitoring in the future.[46] [47] Controversy over the overlapping voting has been around in the past, with some community-focused postings encouraging overlapping participation, such as "I have agreed with 12 ids" and "When I turn on my personal information protection mode on my phone, I can change my account and participate in it." In addition, some pointed out that because the method of participation in a public petition utilizes four SNS accounts, one can actually agree up to four times and Twitter can create an account indefinitely, which may "have procedural problems" in which certain public opinion is excessively represented.[48]

Controversy over deletion of petition

The Jeju refugee crisis occurred in June 2018 when some 500 Yemenis applied for refugee status in the Jeju Special Self-Governing Province. As the number of asylum seekers grew more than 12 times in five months at the time, a petition was posted on the Cheong Wa Dae public petition board, claiming that the government should abolish the visa and refuse to accept refugees. However, the petition, which sought the consent of 180,000 people for four days, was deleted late Wednesday, creating another problem. In particular, the issue of transparency and procedural justification of deletion was raised without explaining the reason for deletion. The presidential office Cheong Wa Dae explained two days later that it was too late to respond as many comments were posted in the near future, but it is reported that it is practically difficult to inform all petitions that are deleted.[49] [50] However, the petition against Kim Bo-reum, Park Ji-woo and cartoonist Yoo Seo-in also failed to quell controversy in terms of equity, given that the answer was made even though it amounted to defamation against others.

In July 2018, a petition was deleted to stop selling acetaminophen at convenience stores, and in January, a petition was filed regarding the law on forced conversion, but it was also deleted.[51]

Notes and References

  1. Yoon, Hyung-seok(윤형석) "새로운 국민소통 플랫폼으로서 청와대 국민청원 - 현황과 법제도적 개선방안을 중심으로 -" 법과정책 27.2 pp.82-115 (2021) : 82.
  2. Yoon, Ki-eun(윤기은). '청와대 국민청원' 문 닫았다. Kyunghyang Shinmun. (in Korean). May 9, 2022
  3. http://webarchives.pa.go.kr/19th/www.president.go.kr/petitions/answer 세상을 바꾼 국민청원 5년
  4. [The Blue House]
  5. Web site: 백악관 '위더피플' 벤치마킹한 靑 국민청원...청출어람. Kim. Sooyoung. 2017-10-29. No Cut News. ko. Blue House benchmarked "We the People.". 2019-06-17.
  6. Web site: 靑국민청원 16만건 분석해보니‥"아기·여성 등 약자 위한 창구". Kim. Eunhui. 2018-05-14. www.fnnews.com. ko. According to the analysis of 160,000 complaints by the people, "The window for the weak, such as babies and women.". 2019-06-17.
  7. Web site: 국민청원 최다 키워드는 아기·여성·학생...그 이유는. Baek. Minkyung. 2018-05-14. JoongAng Ilbo. ko. The most keywords for a national petition are babies, women, and students...The reason is. 2019-06-17.
  8. Web site: 靑, 국민청원 중 1호 답변은 '소년법'... "법 개정보다 예방·교화에 초점". Lee. Minsoek. The Chosun Ilbo. ko. The first answer to the petition is 'Children Act'... "Focus on prevention and enlightenment rather than revision of the Act". 2019-04-12.
  9. Web site: 靑 "조두순 출소반대 청원 분노에 공감...재심 통한 무기징역 불가능"(종합). 2017-12-06. 이데일리. ko. No life imprisonment through Cho Doo-soon's retrial. 2019-04-15.
  10. Web site: [단독]조두순 출소 반대 청원 30일 넘겨 답변 대상 아니잖나?...청와대 ˝이 원칙 전 올라와 대상˝]. Lee. Seung-ryeun(이승륜). 국제신문. ko. Although the petition against Cho Doo-soon's release passed 30 days, it is subject to an answer.. 2019-04-15.
  11. Web site: 靑 '미성년자 성폭력범 처벌 강화' 청원 답변..."종신형 가능". Park. Sangki. 2018-03-02. Newsis. ko. Cheong Wa Dae's response to the petition to toughen punishment for sexual offenders of young adults..."Extended.". 2019-04-16.
  12. Web site: 靑 "통합 인권교육 방안 마련" 페미니즘 교육의무화 청원 답변. Son. Jaemin. 2018-02-27. Kyunghyang Shinmun. ko. Cheong Wa Dae is to answer 'petition to feminism, education'. "Preparing the Integrated Human Rights Education Plan". 2019-04-16.
  13. Web site: 靑 페미니즘 교육 의무화 청원에 "통합 인권교육 추진...교육부 예산 12억 활용". Kim. Hyeran. 2018-02-27. The Dong-a Ilbo. ko. Cheong Wa Dae answers the 'petition to feminism, education'. "Integrated Human Rights Education Promotion...Education Ministry Budgets of 1.2 Billion". 2019-04-16.
  14. Web site: 靑, 청원 답변 "몰카범죄, 여성이 체감하는 불공정 시정되게 노력할 것". Lee. Jiyoung. 2018-05-21. JoongAng Ilbo. ko. Blue House reply to the petition, "Molka crimes, we will make efforts to correct unfair practices felt by women.". 2019-06-17.
  15. Web site: 靑, '性학대 아동구제' 청원 답변···"中 아동음란물, 공조수사 요청". Kim. Tea-gyu. 2018-06-11. Newsis. ko. Replying to the petition for the 'Special Issue of Sexual Abuse'. Cheong Wa Dae asked for a joint investigation into Chinese child pornography.. 2019-04-19.
  16. Web site: 김상곤 "형사처벌 안 받는 미성년자 14세→13세 미만 추진". 박 . 경준. 2018-08-23. Yonhap News Agency. ko. 2019-06-13.
  17. Web site: 靑, 아동학대 처벌강화 청원 답변···"기존 규정 엄정히 적용". 2018-09-12. Newsis. ko. 2019-06-13.
  18. Web site: '디지털성범죄 특별수사' 국민청원에 대한 경찰청장의 답변. 박. 광수. 2018-09-27. JoongAng Ilbo. ko. 2019-06-13.
  19. Web site: '강서구 살인사건 청원'...진선미 "청원 계기로 가정폭력 대책 마련". 유. 호윤. KBS News. ko. 2019-06-13.
  20. Web site: 청와대 "심신미약 감경 부당하게 이뤄지지 않게 노력할 것". 손. 제민. 2018-12-11. Kyunghyang Shinmun. ko. 2019-06-13.
  21. Web site: "아동학대 위탁모 엄벌" 청원에 "공적 개입 강화" 답변한 청와대. 2019-01-30. Kukmin Ilbo. ko. 2019-05-21.
  22. Web site: 우리 아들 **이의 억울함을 풀어주세요. > 대한민국 청와대. Blue House. ko. 2020-03-29.
  23. Web site: 영광 여고생 사건 가해자들 강력 처벌해주새요 > 대한민국 청와대. Blue House. ko. 2020-04-06.
  24. Web site: 靑 '조재범 강력 처벌' 청원에 "대책 실행력 뒷받침" 답변. KBS News. ko. 2019-05-21.
  25. Web site: 靑 "임신중절 부작용 계속...사회적 논의 필요". 2017-11-27. YTN사이언스. ko. The pregnancy side effects continue...Social Discussion Needed. 2019-04-12.
  26. Web site: '낙태죄 폐지' 청원에 청와대 답했다..."8년만에 재개". 권. 지윤. mbn.mk.co.kr. 27 November 2017 . ko. Cheong Wa Dae responded to the petition for the abolition of the "abolition of abortion"...′′Reopening after 8 years. 2019-04-12.
  27. Web site: [레이더P] 낙태죄 7년만에 합헌→헌법불합치 결정]. Kang. Bo-in. Maeil Business Newspaper. 10 April 2019 . ko. Deciding on the Constitutional Unconformity after 7 Years of Abortion. 2019-04-12.
  28. Web site: 靑 "GMO 완전표시제, 물가인상·통상마찰 우려 있지만 개선방안 마련". Kim. Jihwan. 2018-05-08. Kyunghyang Shinmun. ko. Cheong Wa Dae said, "Although there are concerns over GMO's complete display system, price hikes and trade friction, there are plans for improvement.". 2019-06-17.
  29. Web site: 靑, '서울광장 퀴어 행사 반대' 청원 답변..."금지할 수 없다". 박. 정엽. The Chosun Ilbo. ko. 2019-06-13.
  30. Web site: '난민 반대' 청원에 청와대가 내놓은 답변. 이. 순. 2018-08-01. Hankook Ilbo. ko. 2019-06-13.
  31. Web site: "구금된 선교사 도와달라" 국민청원에 靑 답변..."지원에 최선". 유. 호윤. KBS News. ko. 2019-06-13.
  32. Web site: 청와대 "개, 가축서 제외 검토". 신. 소윤. 2018-08-10. The Hankyoreh. ko. 2019-06-13.
  33. Web site: "일베 사이트 폐쇄해 달라" 국민 청원에 대한 청와대의 답변은. Jeong. Eunhye. 2018-03-23. JoongAng Ilbo. ko. Cheong Wa Dae's response to the people's petition is. 2019-06-17.
  34. Web site: 청와대, "일베 폐쇄 가능... 좀 더 지켜볼 것". 2018-03-23. YTN. ko. Cheong Wa Dae said, "Japan can close ... I'll keep an eye on you.". 2019-06-17.
  35. Web site: 'https 차단' 국민청원에 방통위원장 "소통 노력 부족...불법 사이트 차단해야". shin. jin-ho. 2019-02-21. Seoul Shinmun. ko. Lack of communication...We need to block illegal sites.. 2019-05-21.
  36. Web site: 靑, '미세먼지 위험' 국민청원에 "중국 소송 어려워" 답변. Kwon. Young Hoon. 2018-05-16. news.dreamwiz.com. ko. Cheong Wa Dae answers "China's lawsuit is difficult" to the "Midiculous Danger People's petition.". 2019-06-17.
  37. Web site: 靑 "국민청원 게시판, 국민놀이터 되지 못한 이유 없다". jo. Eun-hyo. 2018-05-30. www.fnnews.com. 靑 "There is no reason why we failed to become a national petition board, a national playground.". 2019-05-21.
  38. Web site: 윤영찬 "정부 메시지, 국민에 직접 전달할 필요 있다". Jo. hyun-ho. 2017-08-22. Media Today. ko. Yoon Young-chan said, "The government message needs to be delivered directly to the people.". 2019-05-21.
  39. Web site: "폐지해주세요" 쏟아지는 국민청원에 곤혹스런 청와대. Lee. dong-hyun. 2017-11-26. Hankook Ilbo. ko. Cheong Wa Dae, troubled by the outpouring of public petitions.. 2019-05-21.
  40. Web site: 운영 100일...靑 국민청원의 명암. Kim. soo-yeong. 2017-11-27. No Cut News. Operation 100 days...靑 Illumination of the people's petition. 2019-05-21.
  41. Web site: 청와대 청원 게시판 '부작용'에 대한 문 대통령의 생각은?. Lee. seung-joon. 2017-11-20. The Hankyoreh. ko. What does Mr. Moon think about the Cheong Wa Dae petition board's "side effect"?. 2019-06-13.
  42. Web site: 참여 통로냐 vs 떼법 창구냐... 靑 국민청원 게시판 3개월, 명과 암. Han. sang-jun. 2017-11-20. The Dong-a Ilbo. ko. It's a participation channel, vs. a breakout window. 靑 3 months on the bulletin board of the people petition, people and cancer. 2019-06-13.
  43. Web site: '모발 이식비 지원' '文대통령, 여자 연예인과 사진 찍지 말라'...청와대 청원게시판에 올라온 별별 청원들. Kim. hye-ji. The Chosun Ilbo. ko. 'hair transplant support' '文 a woman president, and Don't take pictures of celebrities' ...a special petition posted on the Cheong Wa Dae bulletin board.. 2019-06-13.
  44. Web site: [ESC] 대통령님, 한국식 나이 셈법 없애주세요!]. yoo. sun-joo. 2018-02-15. The Hankyoreh. ko. [ESC] Mr. President, please get rid of the Korean age calculation law!. 2019-06-13.
  45. Web site: 청와대 청원 게시판 '부작용'에 대한 문 대통령의 생각은?. lee. seung-joon. 2017-11-20. The Hankyoreh. ko. What does Mr. Moon think about the Cheong Wa Dae petition board's "side effect"?. 2019-06-13.
  46. Web site: '중복 청원' 논란...청와대, 카카오톡 연결 중단. han. ji-yeon. 2018-02-06. news.mt.co.kr. ko. Duplicate petition controversy...Cheong Wa Dae, Kakaotalk Abortment - Moneytoday News. 2019-06-13.
  47. Web site: 靑 '카카오톡 청원' 잠정 중단...중복 논란 1달만. hong. seok-hee. 2018-02-06. biz.heraldcorp.com. ko. 靑 Temporary suspension of Kakao Talk petition...Duplicate controversy for a month.. 2019-06-13.
  48. Web site: [잠깐만요!] 20만, 30만명... 靑 청원 숫자 믿을 수 있나]. ahn. sang-hyun. The Chosun Ilbo. ko. [Wait a minute!] 200,000, 300,000... Can you believe the number of petitions?. 2019-06-13.
  49. Web site: 제주 예멘 난민 문제로 뜨거운 靑 게시판... '인도주의' 시험대 올라. jung. ju-yong. 2018-06-17. Kukmin Ilbo. ko. Jeju Yemen refugee issue hot 靑 bulletin board... You're on the humanitarian test.. 2019-06-13.
  50. Web site: 청와대 '제주 난민 거부' 청원 일방삭제 논란. Kim. yeong-heon. 2018-06-18. Hankook Ilbo. ko. Controversy over the unilateral deletion of a petition by the presidential office of Cheong Wa Dae to reject refugees from Jeju. 2019-06-13.
  51. Web site: '사라진 청원'...타이레놀 편의점 판매 중지 청원 삭제. Seo. hyun-suk. 2018-07-06. Kukmin Ilbo. ko. A lost petition...Delete petition to stop selling Tylenol convenience stores. 2019-06-13.