| Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith | |
| Discipline: | Science and Religion |
| Language: | English |
| Abbreviation: | Perspect. Sci. Christ. Faith |
| Editor: | James C. Peterson |
| Frequency: | quarterly |
| Website: | http://www.asa3.org/ASA/PSCF.html |
| Publisher: | American Scientific Affiliation |
| Country: | United States |
| History: | 1949 as ASA Bulletin 1950 to 1986 as Journal of the American Scientific Affiliation 1987-present as current title |
| Issn: | 0892-2675 |
| Oclc: | 61313836 |
Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith, subtitled Journal of the American Scientific Affiliation, is the academic publication of the American Scientific Affiliation.
The ASA's original constitution provided two goals for the ASA: "(1) to promote and encourage the study of the relationship between the facts of science and Holy Scriptures and (2) to promote the dissemination of the results of such studies." The establishment of the journal was seen as being in context of these goals.[1] The journal is indexed in the ATLA Religion Serials Database.[2]
Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith (PSCF) began publication in 1949 as the Journal of the American Scientific Affiliation (JASA).[3] In its first year the journal was subtitled The American Scientific Affiliation Bulletin.[1] In its first issue it announced its purpose as being:
From its beginning the journal included divergent views, and the editorial objectives of the journal, published in December 1950, were a clear indication of the ASA's non-doctrinal focus.[4]
The editors of the JASA/PSCF have been as follows:
The ASA journal published various views in the creation–evolution controversy. It carried Bernard Ramm's view that the theory of evolution had logical weakness,[5] a 1949 article on "presuppositions in evolutionary thinking" by Young Earth creationist E. Y. Monsma,[6] [7] J. Laurence Kulp's 1950 indictment of "Deluge Geology",[8] and Henry M. Morris's anonymous reply to it.[1]
Kulp's paper, Deluge Geology execrated flood geology, which he stated had "grown and infiltrated the greater portion of fundamental Christianity in America primarily due to the absence of trained Christian geologists." He asserted that the "major propositions of the theory are contraindicated by established physical and geological laws" and focused on "four basic errors":[8]
Kulp's conclusion was that a Christian was faced with two choices. Either: (1) the earth was created millions of years ago; or (2) God has apparently deceived humanity in providing data which does not support a 6,000- to 10,000-year-old Earth. He viewed "flood geology" as offering no third choice, that it was unscientific, ludicrous, and "has done and will do considerable harm to the strong propagation of the gospel among educated people". He also accused George McCready Price of ignorance and deception, including misrepresentation of geological data when defending flood geology. The paper failed to evoke the fireworks that Kulp and ASA president F. Alton Everest expected it to generate.[8] [9] In the opinion of at least one of the attendees at the annual convention where Monsma's and Kulp's papers were first presented, Monsma had lost the debate to Kulp, and Kulp was appointed that year to the executive council seat that Monsma had vacated.[10] Kulp's influence was largely responsible for isolating flood geologists within the ASA, and Deluge Geology caused them considerable discomfort for years to come.[11]
During the editorship of David O. Moberg (1962–1964), the ASA journal had a heavy emphasis on the creation–evolution controversy, with the subject being mentioned in the majority of issues, and the September 1963 issue being almost entirely devoted to it.[1]
In 1964, JASA featured a pair of hostile reviews of John C. Whitcomb's and Henry M. Morris's The Genesis Flood (introduced by book-review editor Walter R. Hearn, who stated that they had been "edited extensively ... to tone them down a bit"), and in 1969 published a highly critical commentary by J. R. van der Fliert, a Dutch Reformed geologist at the Free University of Amsterdam, who called Whitcomb and Morris "pseudo-scientific" pretenders. "To ensure that no readers missed his point," the journal "ran boldfaced sidebars by evangelical geologists applauding van de Fliert's bare-knuckled approach."[12]
In the 1970s, Richard H. Bube defended the viewpoint of theistic evolution in the journal.[13]