| Perko pair | |
| Arf Invariant: | 1 |
| Braid Length: | 10 |
| Braid Number: | 3 |
| Bridge Number: | 3 |
| Crosscap Number: | 2 |
| Crossing Number: | 10 |
| Genus: | 3 |
| Hyperbolic Volume: | 5.63877 |
| Unknotting Number: | 3 |
| Conway Notation: | [3:-20:-20] |
| Ab Notation: | 10161/10162 |
| Dowker Notation: | 4, 12, -16, 14, -18, 2, 8, -20, -10, -6 |
| Last Crossing: | 10 |
| Last Order: | 160 |
| Next Crossing: | 10 |
| Next Order: | 162 |
| Class: | hyperbolic |
| Fibered: | fibered |
| Prime: | prime |
| Symmetry: | reversible |
In the mathematical theory of knots, the Perko pair, named after Kenneth Perko, is a pair of entries in classical knot tables that actually represent the same knot. In Dale Rolfsen's knot table, this supposed pair of distinct knots is labeled 10161 and 10162. In 1973, while working to complete the classification by knot type of the Tait - Little knot tables of knots up to 10 crossings (dating from the late 19th century),[1] Perko found the duplication in Charles Newton Little's table.[2] This duplication had been missed by John Horton Conway several years before in his knot table and subsequently found its way into Rolfsen's table.[3] The Perko pair gives a counterexample to a "theorem" claimed by Little in 1900 that the writhe of a reduced diagram of a knot is an invariant (see Tait conjectures), as the two diagrams for the pair have different writhes.
In some later knot tables, the knots have been renumbered slightly (knots 10163 to 10166 are renumbered as 10162 to 10165) so that knots 10161 and 10162 are different. Some authors have mistaken these two renumbered knots for the Perko pair and claimed incorrectly that they are the same.[4]
The Perko pair was correctly illustrated and explained on the first page of the Science section of the July 8, 1986 New York Times.