Patola Shahis Explained

Common Name:Patola Shahis
Native Name:Patola Shahis
Status:Kingdom
Era:Early Middle Ages
Capital:Gilgit
Year Start:6th century
Year End:8th century
P2:Kidarites
P3:Alchon Huns
P1:Kushan Empire
S1:Trakhan dynasty
Religion:Buddhism
Today:Pakistan

The Patola Shahis, or Palola Shahis, also Gilgit Shahis, were a dynasty of Buddhist kings of the Kingdom of Gilgit ("Lesser Bolü"), located in the northern tip of the Indian subcontinent in the 6th-8th century CE. The Kingdom was located on a strategic trans-Himalyan trade route, now known as the Karakoram Highway, which branched off the Grand Trunk Road. It followed the important stops of Shatial and Chilas.

Early records

See also: Buddhism in Kashmir. Between 399 and 414, the Chinese Buddhist pilgrim Faxian visited Gilgit-Baltistan.[1] Between 627 and 645, the Chinese Buddhist pilgrim Xuanzang travelled through this region on his pilgrimage to India.

According to Chinese records from the Tang dynasty, between the 600s and the 700s, the region was governed by a Buddhist dynasty referred to as Bolü, also transliterated as Palola, Patola, Balur.[2] They are believed to be the Patola Sāhi dynasty mentioned in a Brahmi inscription,[3] and are devout adherents of Vajrayana Buddhism.[4] At the time, Little Palola was used to refer to Gilgit, while Great Palola was used to refer to Baltistan. However, the records do not consistently disambiguate the two. The first known Palola Shahi, as recorded by the Tang annals, was King Somana in the 6th century CE.

A Sanskrit inscription on a gilded statue of the Buddha, mentions that it was commissioned by Queen Mangalahamsika, known as a senior queen to King Vajraditayanandi (reigned 585-605 CE) by Gilgit manuscripts. The Sanskrit inscription reads: “Om. This is a pious gift. This pious gift was ordered to be made by the Shri Paramadevi [Highest Queen] Mangalahamsika”.[5]

A few Buddhist paintings from the cover of manuscripts in the Sharada script are also known from this period in Gilgit. These were the first texts known to mentions the "Patola Shahis" as participants to the donation of the painted manuscripts.

Gilgit and Kashmir in this period were the seat of a major school of Buddhist art, producing ornate early medieval bronze icons, which also greatly influenced the production of metallic statues in the Swat Valley. These statues borrow their physiognomy and drapery from the earlier Art of Gandhara.[6]

Tang suzerainty

Circa 650 CE, Gilgit came under Tang suzerainty at the time the fall of Western Turkic Khaganate due to Tang military campaigns in the region.

As early as 656 the Tibetan Empire attacked the Patola Shahis southwest of the Tang protectorate. In the late 600s CE, the rising Tibetan Empire wrestled control of the region from the Tang dynasty. Faced with growing influence of the Umayyad Caliphate and then the Abbasid Caliphate to the west, the Tibetan Empire was forced to ally themselves with the Islamic caliphates. The region was then contested by Tang and Tibetan forces, and their respective vassal states, until the mid-700s.[7]

Rulers of Gilgit formed an alliance with the Tang dynasty and held back the Arabs with their help.[8]

Between 644 and 655, Navasurendrāditya-nandin became king of Palola Sāhi dynasty in Gilgit.[9] Numerous Sanskrit inscriptions, including the Danyor Rock Inscriptions, were discovered to be from his reign.[10] In the late 600s and early 700s, Jayamaṅgalavikramāditya-nandin was king of Gilgit.

According to Tang court records, in 717 and 719 respectively, delegations of a ruler of Great Palola (Baltistan) named Su-fu-she-li-ji-li-ni reached the Tang imperial court.[11] [12] By at least 719/720, Ladakh (Mard) became part of the Tibetan Empire. By that time, Buddhism was practiced in Baltistan, and Sanskrit was the written language. Buddhism became firmly established in the region. Great monasteries were established, with education in Sanskrit language regarding Indian religions and philosophy. Trade expanded between Ladakh and Gilgit-Baltistan. The rulers of Leh in Ladakh became increasingly influential in Balti culture and customs, and the chiefs of the region became vassals to the Ladakhis and Tibetan paramountcy.[13]

In 720, the delegation of Surendrāditya reached the Tang imperial court. He was referred to by Tang records as the king of Great Palola; however, it is unknown if Baltistan was under Gilgit rule at the time.[14] The Tang emperor also granted the ruler of Cashmere, Chandrāpīḍa ("Tchen-fo-lo-pi-li"), the title of "King of Cashmere". By 721/722, Baltistan had come under the influence of the Tibetan Empire.[15]

In 721–722, the Tibetan army attempted but failed to capture Gilgit or Bruzha (Yasin valley). By this time, according to Tang records, the king of Little Palola was Mo-ching-mang . He had visited Tang court requesting military assistance against the Tibetans.[14] Between 723 and 728, the Korean Buddhist pilgrim Hyecho passed through this area. He wrote:

Of Greater Bolor, which has customs similar to Lesser Bolor, Hyecho said that they followed the Three Jewels and believed in Buddhism: "There are also monasteries and monks. People respect and believe in the Three Jewels. Eastward from here is Tibet, where there are no monasteries, and people don't believe in Buddhism. Because the people in Greater Bolor are "Hu" (native/ barbarian) people, they believe in Buddhism".[16] [17]

Numerous ornate gilded Buddhas, often wearing elaborate crowns, are known from Gilgit at this period, which were often dedicated by local rulers.[18] Among the dignitaries which have been recorded in these inscriptions are: Shri Surabi in 678 CE, Princess Devasri in 714 CE, King Nandivikramadityanandi in 715 CE.[18] The figures of the kings frequently appear as donors at the base of these statues, together with identifying inscriptions.

Tibetan suzerainty

In 737/738, Tibetan troops under the leadership of Minister Bel Kyesang Dongtsab of Emperor Me Agtsom took control of Little Palola. By 747, the Tang army under the leadership of Gao Xianzhi had recaptured Little Palola.[19] The Patola Shahis were then restored on the throne for some undetermined time.[20]

Great Palola was subsequently captured by the Tang army in 753 under the military governor Feng Changqing. However, by 755, due to the An Lushan rebellion, the Tang forces withdrew and was no longer able to exert influence in Central Asia and in the regions around Gilgit-Baltistan.[21] The control of the region was left to the Tibetan Empire. They referred to the region as Bruzha, a toponym that is consistent with the ethnonym "Burusho" used today. Tibetan control of the region lasted until late-800s CE.[22]

Rulers

Aftermath

Ahmad Hasan Dani noted Gilgit traditions to mention of a Trakhan Dynasty succeeding to the Patola Shahis, and ruling continuously until the 19th century. Historical evidence—coins, inscriptions etc.—corroborating the narrative was absent during Dani's time and those which have been since discovered, reject such claims.[25] [26]

Notes and References

  1. Book: By Rafi U. Samad. The Grandeur of Gandhara: The Ancient Buddhist Civilization of the Swat .... 9780875868592. 2011. Algora .
  2. Book: Sen , Tansen . Buddhism, Diplomacy, and Trade: The Realignment of India–China Relations, 600–1400. Rowman & Littlefield. 2015. 2017-02-19. 9781442254732.
  3. Book: A Grammar of the Shina Language of Indus Kohistan. Ruth Laila. Schmidt. Razwal. Kohistani. 2008. Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. 2018-01-23. 978-3447056762.
  4. Book: Twist , Rebecca L. . Patronage, Devotion and Politics: A Buddhological Study of the Patola Sahi Dynasty's Visual Record. Ohio State University. 2007. 9783639151718. 2017-02-19.
  5. Web site: Metropolitan Museum of Art . www.metmuseum.org.
  6. Web site: Gilgit and Swat statues . www.metmuseum.org.
  7. Book: Stein , Mark Aurel . Aurel Stein. Ancient Khotan: Detailed Report of Archaeological Explorations in Chinese Turkestan. Clarendon Press. 1907. Oxford, UK. 1. 4–18.
  8. Book: Bradnock, Robert W.. South Asian Handbook. 1994. Trade & Travel Publications. 1168.
  9. Book: Neelis , Jason . Early Buddhist Transmission and Trade Networks. 2011. 2018-02-21. 177. BRILL. 9789004181595.
  10. Stein. Aurel. Archæological Notes form the Hindukush Region. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain & Ireland. 76. 1–2. 2011. 5–24. 0035-869X. 10.1017/S0035869X00098713. 163127705 . Sri-Nava-Surendraditya-Nandideva.
  11. Web site: Baltistan . tibetan incyclopedia.
  12. 全唐文 . Complete collection of Tang prose . 0039 . 卷0039#冊勃律國王文 . 全唐文 . 董誥 . zh.
  13. Book: Francke, August Hermann. Antiquities of Indian Tibet. Asian Educational Services. 1992. 978-81-206-0769-9.
  14. 新唐書 . . 221 . 卷221下 . 新唐書 . zh.
  15. Book: Francke, August Hermann . Antiquities of Indian Tibet, Part 1 . 9788120607699 . 1992 . Asian Educational Services .
  16. 亦有寺有僧。敬信三寶。若是已東吐蕃。總無寺舍。不識佛法。當土是胡。所以信也。 in Web site: [0977a05] ]. tripitaka.cbeta.org.
  17. Book: Ch'o . Hye . Ch'ao . Hui . Yang . Han-sŭng . The Hye Ch'o Diary: Memoir of the Pilgrimage to the Five Regions of India . 1984 . Jain Publishing Company . 978-0-89581-024-3 . 47 . en.
  18. Twist . Rebecca L. . Images of the Crowned Buddha along the Silk Road: Iconography and Ideology . Humanities . 2018 . 7, 92 .
  19. Book: Grousset, René. The Rise and Splendour of the Chinese Empire. 1952. 160.
  20. Book: History of Civilizations of Central Asia. January 1998. UNESCO. 978-92-3-103467-1. 216. en.
  21. Book: By Angela Falco Howard. Chinese Sculpture. 313. 978-0300100655. 2006. Yale University Press .
  22. A Tibetan Toponym from Afghanistan. Mock. John. Revue d'Études Tibétaines. 27. 5–9. October 2013. 2018-01-22. 1768-2959.
  23. von Hinüber . Oskar, Professor Emeritus, University of Freiburg . Bronzes of the Ancient Buddhist Kingdom of Gilgit . Metropolitan Museum of Art.
  24. Web site: Metropolitan Museum of Art . www.metmuseum.org.
  25. Book: Dani, Ahmad Hasan. History of Northern Areas of Pakistan. 1991. National Institute of Historical and Cultural Research. Islamabad. Historical Studies (Pakistan). 2. 978-969-415-016-1. en. 163.
  26. Vohra, Rohit. Early History of Ladakh: Mythic Lore and Fabulation in ed: Henry Osmaston, Philip Denwood (1995) Recent Research on Ladakh 4 & 5: Proceedings of the Fourth and Fifth, Motilal Banarsidass, p. 231