Litigants: | Pasadena City Board of Education v. Spangler |
Arguedatea: | April 27 |
Arguedateb: | 28 |
Argueyear: | 1976 |
Decidedate: | June 28 |
Decideyear: | 1976 |
Fullname: | Pasadena City Board of Education, et al. v. Spangler, et al. |
Usvol: | 427 |
Uspage: | 424 |
Parallelcitations: | 96 S. Ct. 2697; 49 L. Ed. 2d 599; 1976 U.S. LEXIS 77 |
Holding: | The District Court exceeded the limits of its power and authority in refusing to modify a desegregation order. |
Majority: | Rehnquist |
Joinmajority: | Burger, Stewart, White, Blackmun, Powell |
Dissent: | Marshall |
Joindissent: | Brennan |
Notparticipating: | Stevens |
Pasadena City Board of Education v. Spangler, 427 U.S. 424 (1976), was a United States Supreme Court case.
Phil C. Neal argued the cause for petitioners; with him on the briefs were Lee G. Paul, Peter D., Robert G. Lane, Philip B. Kurland, and Alan L. Unikel.
Fred Okrand argued the cause and filed a brief for respondents Spangler et al. Solicitor General Bork argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Pottinger, Deputy Solicitor General Wallace, and Brian K. Landsberg.[1]
Raymond B. Witt, Jr., filed a brief for the Board of Education of Chattanooga, Tenn., as amicus curiae. [427 U.S. 424, 427]