Pacheco Reservoir Explained

Pacheco Lake
Basin Countries:United States
Outflow:North Fork Pacheco Creek[1]
Catchment:67.2sqmi
Pushpin Map:California#USA
Pushpin Map Alt:Location of Pacheco Reservoir in California, USA.

Pacheco Reservoir is a man-made reservoir in the Diablo Range in California, U.S.A. The lake is formed by a dam on the north fork of Pacheco Creek, whose waters reach Monterey Bay by way of the Pajaro River. The Pacheco Pass Water District is currently responsible for operation and maintenance of the Pacheco Reservoir. Located north of State Route 152 in eastern Santa Clara County, the lake is about an hour's drive from downtown San Jose.

North Fork Dam

North Fork Dam
Coordinates:37.0503°N -121.2914°W
Country:United States
Location:Santa Clara County, California
Owner:Pacheco Pass Water District
Dam Type:Earthen
Dam Crosses:Pacheco Creek
Res Name:Pacheco Lake

The lake's waters are impounded by the North Fork Dam, an earthen dam built in 1939. The dam is high and long and contains of material. Its crest is above mean sea level. The North Fork Dam has for years been considered a "high-hazard dam in poor condition".[2]

The reservoir dam is an impassable barrier to in-migrating steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), preventing access to the nearly 34.5miles of stream consisting of North Fork Pacheco Creek, Mississippi Creek and East Fork Pacheco Creek.[3] Resident rainbow trout (the landlocked form of steelhead) successfully rear in fast-water habitats above the dam. They grow rapidly and reach smolt size by the end of their first summer. In many years in late spring, prior to reservoir releases for agriculture, low stream flows and high-water temperatures severely impact steelhead fry and small juveniles.[4]

Pacheco Reservoir Expansion Project

In 2017, Santa Clara Valley Water District's (known as “Valley Water”) initial cost estimate for the expanded Pacheco Reservoir footprint was roughly $969 million.[5] In 2018, the Pacheco Pass Water District, and San Benito County Water District were awarded $484.5 million from California’s Water Quality, Supply and Infrastructure Improvement Act of 2014, to expand Pacheco Reservoir from its capacity of 5,500 Acre-foot to 140,000 acre-feet. In order to remain eligible for Proposition 1 funding, an estimated 75% of funding must be derived from non-state funding.[6]

In 2019, Valley Water increased the project's estimated cost to approximately $1.3 billion.[5] The new dam project involves building an earthen dam made of rock and soil upstream of the existing dam, a pump station, a pipeline, roads, miles of transmission lines and other related infrastructure. In 2020, due to a new design study, the total cost of the project rose to $2.5 billion, or about $18,000 per acre-foot.[5] Valley Water has also been invited to apply for a federal Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act loan of $1.2 billion. [7] The loan amount would be paid for by ratepayers.

Pacheco Creek's natural annual inflow volume is less than 50-acre feet in drier years. Therefore, the new reservoir would rely heavily on imported water from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and San Luis Reservoir, which is located to the east of Highway 152 and is part of the Central Valley Project (CVP) San Felipe Division in Merced and Santa Clara counties. The imported water would be supplied by the United States Bureau of Reclamation under contract to Valley Water and the San Benito County Water District. The filling of the new Pacheco Reservoir would be subject to the same limitations as its other Delta water imports. At peak capacity, the reservoir could hold 140,000 acre-feet, but only about 3,600 acre-feet would be available for Valley Water in an average year.[8]   In an average year, about 4,864 acre-feet of water would evaporate from the reservoir.[9]

Valley Water is currently exploring the project design and evaluating environmental impacts. Valley Water published the Draft Environmental Impact Report[10]  on November 17, 2021, and the public comment period ended on February 15, 2022.[6]  During the April 18, 2022 Valley Water Capital Improvement Program Committee Meeting, staff indicated that Valley Water had received roughly 180 public comments, many from state and federal agencies.[11] Several comments from state and federal agencies identify deficiencies in the draft environmental impact report. California Department of Fish and Wildlife commented that as a whole the draft report “lacks sufficient information for CDFW to fully assess the magnitude of the Proposed Project’s environmental impacts and which mitigation measure may be necessary.”[12]   Additionally, CDFW had concerns regarding changes in flow regimes, impacts to steelhead, improper water temperature analysis, harmful algal blooms and several others.

Valley Water is required to obtain Division of Safety of Dams (DSOD) approval for any dam constructed within the state.  The DSOD commented that it had written a letter on November 1, 2021, rejecting the hardfill dam included in the proposed project due to significant uncertainties and risks to public safety.  As of May 31, 2022, Valley Water has not indicated a new proposed project that may meet DSOD requirements.

Valley Water anticipates the completion of design, permit approvals, and environmental document to be completed in 2024 and construction to begin in 2025.[13]  However, the California State Water Resources Control Board's comment letter on the draft environmental impact report describes the water permits and approvals needed for the project.[14]   Calling into question Valley Water's timeline, the board's comment indicates that the water rights approval process may take several years to complete.

Several federal government agencies also provided comments on the draft report. National Marine Fisheries Service's (NMFS) commented on the lack of clarity between the potential for conflicts between project objectives, providing water reliability and increasing suitable steelhead habitat.[15]   NMFS as well as CDFW[16]   commented on the lack of analysis of construction impacts to steelhead over a 6-year plus construction period.

At a January 14, 2022 meeting, Valley Water staff provided context and answered questions regarding the draft report. During the meeting a member of the public asked when Valley Water would begin the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process. At that time, Valley Water staff stated that it is working with the United States Bureau of Reclamation, which would be the lead federal agency for the NEPA process. As of May 31, 2022, a Notice of Intent to begin the NEPA process had not been published. Additionally, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) commented that in an effort to avoid redundancy, improve efficiency, and interagency cooperation Valley Water should synchronize the NEPA and CEQA processes.  In March 2022, Valley Water asked EPA to be the NEPA lead agency for the dam.[17]

See also

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Dams Within the Jurisdiction of the State of California (N-S). California Department of Water Resources. September 29, 2012. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20121005023207/http://www.water.ca.gov/damsafety/docs/Juris%28N-S%292010.pdf. October 5, 2012.
  2. Web site: 2019-11-13 . Pacheco Dam safety issues identified . 2022-07-05 . SanBenito.com Hollister, San Juan Bautista, CA . en-US.
  3. U.S. Geological Survey. National Hydrography Dataset high-resolution flowline data. The National Map, accessed February 6, 2016
  4. Effects of Operation of Pacheco Reservoir on Steelhead . Jerry Smith . San Jose State University . 2007 . 2016-02-06 .
  5. Web site: 2021-01-11 . Update to proposed expansion of Pacheco Reservoir includes changes to dam, spillway and increased costs . 2022-07-05 . Valley Water News . en.
  6. Web site: A1: Pacheco Reservoir Expansion Project* Santa Clara Valley Water . 2022-07-05 . www.valleywater.org.
  7. Web site: 2021-12-08 . Valley Water projects invited to apply for federal WIFIA loans . 2022-07-05 . Valley Water News . en.
  8. Web site: Resource on Egnyte . 2022-07-05 . Egnyte.
  9. Web site: Resource on Egnyte . 2022-07-05 . Egnyte.
  10. Web site: Pacheco Reservoir Expansion Project Draft Environmental Impact Report . 2022-07-05 . www.valleywater.org.
  11. Web site: April 11, 2022 . Santa Clara Valley Water District Capital Improvement Program Committee Meeting Notes . June 24, 2022 . ValleyWater.org.
  12. Web site: February 11, 2022 . Government Submission . June 26, 2022 . Ca.gov.
  13. Web site: Pacheco Reservoir Expansion Project Frequently Asked Questions . valleywater.org.
  14. Web site: February 15, 2022 . Comments on Draft Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse #2017082020) for the Pacheco Reservoir Expansion Project in Santa Clara County . June 26, 2022 . stoppachecodam.org.
  15. Web site: February 14, 2022 . NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service's Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for Santa Clara Valley Water District's (Valley Water) Pacheco Reservoir Expansion Project in Santa Clara County, California . June 26, 2022 . stoppachecodam.org/.
  16. Web site: February 11, 2022 . Government Document . June 26, 2022 . ca.org.
  17. Web site: February 14, 2022 . Pacheco Reservoir Expansion Project Environmental Impact Report, Santa Clara County, California (State Clearinghouse #2027082020) . June 26, 2022 . stoppachecodam.org.