Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 explained

Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989
Acronym:FIRREA of 1989
Enacted By:101st
Effective Date:1989
Leghisturl:http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d101:HR01278:@@@S
Introducedin:House
Introducedbill:"Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989"
Introducedby:Henry B. Gonzalez (D-TX)
Introduceddate:March 6, 1989
Committees:House Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs, House Government Operations, House Judiciary, House Rules, House Ways and Means
Passedbody1:House
Passeddate1:June 15, 1989
Passedvote1:320–97
Passedbody2:Senate
Passeddate2:June 21, 1989
Passedvote2:Voice vote (in lieu of, passed 91–8)
Conferencedate:August 1, 1989
Passedbody3:House
Passeddate3:August 3 and 5, 1989
Passedvote3:221–199 and 201–175
Passedbody4:Senate
Passeddate4:August 4, 1989
Signedpresident:George H. W. Bush
Signeddate:August 9, 1989
Amendments:Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act

The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA), is a United States federal law enacted in the wake of the savings and loan crisis of the 1980s.

It established the Resolution Trust Corporation to close hundreds of insolvent thrifts and provided funds to pay out insurance to their depositors. It transferred thrift regulatory authority from the Federal Home Loan Bank Board to the Office of Thrift Supervision. It dramatically changed the savings and loan industry and its federal regulation, encouraging loan origination.

Overview

FIRREA dramatically changed the savings and loan industry and its federal regulation, including deposit insurance. The "Paulson Blueprint" summarized it in the following:[1]

  1. The Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLBB) was abolished.
  2. The Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC) was abolished, and all assets and liabilities were assumed by the FSLIC Resolution Fund administered by the FDIC and funded by the Financing Corporation (FICO).
  3. The Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS), a bureau of the U.S. Treasury Department, was created to charter, regulate, examine, and supervise savings institutions.
  4. The Federal Housing Finance Board (FHFB) was created as an independent agency to take the place of the FHLBB, i.e. to oversee the 12 Federal Home Loan Banks (also called district banks) that represent the largest collective source of home mortgage and community credit in the United States.
  5. The Savings Association Insurance Fund (SAIF) took the place of the FSLIC as an ongoing insurance fund for thrift institutions (like the FDIC, the FSLIC was a permanent corporation that insured savings and loan accounts up to $100,000). SAIF is administered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
  6. The Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) was established to dispose of failed thrift institutions taken over by regulators after January 1, 1989. The RTC will make insured deposits at those institutions available to their customers.

Other regulations

In addition, FIRREA gives both Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae additional responsibility to support mortgages for low- and moderate-income families (12 U.S.C §1441a–2(b). Authorization for State housing finance agencies and nonprofit entities to purchase mortgage-related assets - Investment requirement).

It also created the Bank Insurance Fund (BIF). Both of these funds were to be administered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. This section of FIRREA was amended by the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005, which consolidated the two funds.

FIRREA allowed bank holding companies to acquire thrifts. It established new regulations for real estate appraisals. In addition, the Act established Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC) within the Examination Council of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council. It also established new capital reserve requirements.

It increased public oversight of the process. It required the agencies to issue Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) ratings publicly and do written performance evaluations using facts and data to support the agencies' conclusions. It also required a four-tiered CRA examination rating system with performance levels of "Outstanding," "Satisfactory," "Needs to Improve," or "Substantial Noncompliance."[2] These rules increased pressure on banks to make mortgage home loans to inner-city and rural areas.[3]

Savings and loans were no longer allowed to acquire "junk bonds" (aka High-yield debt) and were required to dispose of their holdings of these bonds by 1994. They were also required to mark them to the lower of cost or market value.[4]

The amount of "supervisory goodwill" that was allowed to be counted in core capital requirements was phased out through, and then eliminated, by January 1, 1995.[5] (However, the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Winstar Corp. found that the United States had breached its contract with the thrifts by disallowing the "supervisory goodwill" in the core capital calculations.)[6]

Appraisal standards

Title XI of FIRREA created the Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC) of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) to oversee and monitor appraisal standards. It does not regulate appraisers themselves, but does so indirectly such that if the ASC finds that a particular state’s appraiser regulation and certification program is inadequate, then under the banking agencies’ regulations all appraisers in that state are no longer eligible to do appraisals for depository institutions. To accomplish this, the ASC monitors the activities of the state regulatory agencies and the Appraisal Foundation, which promulgates the generally accepted appraisal standards and qualification standards for state-certified and licensed appraisers. Through the Appraisal Standards Board (ASB) and the minimum standards for appraisal licensure through the Appraiser Qualifications Board (AQB), the Appraisal Foundation publishes the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice.[7]

Use with respect to the subprime mortgage crisis

The Act, which gives the government broad authority to bring civil claims and has less stringent requirements to establish liability than commercial fraud statutes, was used after the subprime mortgage crisis to attempt to establish the liability of banks that allegedly misrepresented the quality of loans to the Federal Housing Administration, which, relying on the representations of the banks, insured them and subsequently suffered losses.[8]

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. Book: The Department of the Treasury Blueprint for a Modernized Financial Regulatory Structure . . 2008 . 92 . 978-016080645-2 . .
  2. Sandra F. Braunstein, Director, Division of Consumer and Community Affairs, The Community Reinvestment Act, Testimony Before the Committee on Financial Services, U.S. House of Representatives, 13 February 2008.
  3. [Howard Husock]
  4. Money, Banking and Financial Markets by Lloyd Thomas. Cengage Learning. 2005. https://books.google.com/books?id=jgWz1DK1TmkC&dq=Financial+Institutions+Reform%2C+Recovery%2C+and+Enforcement+Act+of+1989+junk+bond&pg=PA268
  5. Playing with FIRREA, Not Getting Burned: Statutory Overview of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 by Anthony C. Providenti, Jr. Fordham Law Review 1991http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2930&context=flr
  6. United States v. Winstar Corp. 518 U.S. 839 (1996)https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/518/839/case.html
  7. Web site: The Appraisal Foundation . 2019-12-16 . https://web.archive.org/web/20170609210700/https://www.appraisalfoundation.org/ . 2017-06-09 . dead .
  8. News: U.S. Sues Wells Fargo, Accusing It of Lying About Mortgages. January 24, 2013. The New York Times. October 9, 2012. Peter Lattman. blog by expert reporter.