Type: | Act |
Short Title: | Oxford University Act 1854[1] |
Parliament: | Parliament of the United Kingdom |
Long Title: | An Act to make further Provision for the good Government and Extension of the University of Oxford, of the Colleges therein, and of the College of Saint Mary Winchester.[2] |
Year: | 1854 |
Statute Book Chapter: | 17 & 18 Vict. c. 81 |
Royal Assent: | 7 August 1854 |
Original Text: | http://web.archive.org/web/20160913032441/http://educationengland.org.uk/documents/acts/1854-oxford-uni-act.html |
The Oxford University Act 1854 (17 & 18 Vict. c. 81), also known as the Oxford University Reform Act 1854[3] or the University Reform Act 1854,[4] is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, which regulates corporate governance at the University of Oxford, England. It established the Hebdomadal Council, the leading body in the university's administration, stating that most members of full-time academic staff were to have voting rights over it. In the year 2000, the Hebdomadal Council was replaced by the University Council, which is responsible to the Congregation of staff members.
The Oxford University Act 1854 made substantial changes to how Oxford University was administered.[5] It established the Hebdomadal Council as the university's governing body; appointed Commissioners to deal with emoluments and variations in historic endowments; and opened the university to students outside the Church of England, as there was no longer a requirement to undergo a theological test or take the Oath of Supremacy. In practice, this allowed many more Scots to attend the university.
In 1850, a parliamentary commission was set up to revise the statutes drawn up by Archbishop William Laud. The original Bill proposed by Lord John Russell was much more limited in scope, however dissenters effectively mobilised, threatening to block the bill, unless the theological tests were dropped.
The reforms curbed the power of heads of colleges, creating a more centralised university authority. Dons no longer had to be in Holy Orders.[6]
The subject of dropping the theological Test was not new as James Heywood described in the parliamentary debate: