Oreocallis Explained

Oreocallis is a South American plant genus in the family Proteaceae. There is only one species, Oreocallis grandiflora, which is native to mountainous regions in Peru and Ecuador.

Previously, the genus was considered to have several species on both sides of the Pacific Ocean, however the four Australasian species were reclassified in the genus Alloxylon.[1]

The genus was originally defined by Robert Brown in 1810 to contain the Australian species now classified elsewhere, while the two recognised South American species were placed in Embothrium at the time. A reclassification by Dutch botanist Hermann Otto Sleumer in 1954 saw these species transferred into Oreocallis.[2] A second species O. mucronata, has been reclassified as conspecific with O. grandiflora. Some recent sources recognize both species.[3]

Etymology

The genus' name is derived from the Ancient Greek words or(e)os "mountain", and kalli- "beauty".

Description

The species is a tree or shrub which reaches heights of about . The leaves, which are arranged in a spiral pattern along the twigs, have a simple, entire blade. As is the case with many species in the Proteaceae, the leaves are highly variable. The shape of the leaves varies from narrow and elongate (lanceolate, or lance shaped) to broad and ellipse-shaped, or anything in between. The base of the leaf can be narrow or broad, and the leaf tip can be pointed or rounded. They usually range from 4.8to in length, occasionally reaching lengths of 21.5cm (08.5inches), and are 1.6cmto3.4cmcm (00.6inchesto01.3inchescm) wide. Young leaves are often covered with dense, reddish hairs while older leaves tend to have smooth surfaces with hairs concentrated along the main veins on the lower surface of the leaf.[4] Plants have a terminal or lateral[5] conflorescence (a type of inflorescence).[6] The inflorescences, which are usually 7cmto17.5cmcm (03inchesto06.9inchescm) long ;but occasionally as much as 38cm (15inches), bear flowers that can be white, pink, yellow or red in colour.[4] The tepals (petals and sepals) are mostly fused along their length, with only the tips of the tepals unfused. The pollen grains have three pores, a condition that is thought to be primitive in the Proteaceae.[6]

Classification

Together with Telopea, Alloxylon and Embothrium, Oreocallis makes up a small group of terminal often red-flowering showy plants scattered around the southern edges of the Pacific Rim. Known as the Embothriinae, this is an ancient group with roots in the mid Cretaceous, when Australia, Antarctica and South America were linked by land.[7] [8] Almost all these species have red terminal flowers, and hence the subtribe's origin and floral appearance must predate the splitting of Gondwana into Australia, Antarctica, and South America over 60 million years ago. The prominent position and striking colour of many species within the subtribe both in Australia and South America strongly suggest they are adapted to pollination by birds, and have been for over 60 million years.[9] Triporopollenites ambiguus is an ancient member of the proteaceae known only from pollen deposits, originally described from Eocene deposits in Victoria. The fossil pollen closely resembles that of T. truncata,[10] Alloxylon pinnatum as well as O. grandiflora.[11]

The type species, Oreocallis grandiflora, is a plant with terminal showy red, pink, yellow or whitish inflorescences found in mountainous areas in Peru and southern Ecuador. It was originally described by French naturalist Jean-Baptiste Lamarck in 1786 as Embothrium grandiflora. Robert Brown used it as the type species for the genus Oreocallis when he circumscribed the genus is 1810. As envisioned by Brown, the genus included both South American and Australian species, but in 1991 Peter Weston and Michael Crisp split the Australian species out of Oreocallis and placed them in a new genus, Alloxylon.[4]

In 1954, the Dutch botanist Hermann Sleumer split O. grandiflora into two species, placing individuals with smooth leaves and twigs and pale, white or pink flowers into a new species, O. mucronata, while leaving those with hairy leaves and twigs and darker red flowers in O. grandiflora. Pennington (2007) rejected Sleumer's split, arguing that the hairiness of the leaves and twigs often varied within individuals, and did not vary consistently with flower colour. Weston and Crisp also suggested that differences in flower colour and the angle at which the mature flowers are held may justify this split. While Pennington acknowledged that differences in these characters exist, he argued that the variation was continuous and not the sort of binary variation that would justify a split into two species. He did acknowledge, however, that this difference may be more apparent in live plants and suggested that further study is needed.[4]

In 2016, a study comparing the pollination ecology of Oreocallis grandiflora at northern and southern ends of its distribution, found evidence of divergence in style length and flower openness, nectar standing crop and secretion rate, and pollinator community among Ecuadorian and Peruvian populations. Divergences in floral traits may be related to a combination of factors, including genetic drift and isolation by distance, distinctive suites of pollinators, or heterospecific pollen competition.[12]

Habitat and ecology

Oreocallis grandiflora is a characteristic species in certain semi-deciduous forests in valleys and evergreen upper montane forest in the Andean forests of southern Ecuador[13] and evergreen sclerophyllous forests in northern Peru.[14] It grows at elevations between 1200mand3800mm (3,900feetand12,500feetm) above sea level. It tolerates habitat disturbance, and may be expanding its range in response to increased human activity.[4] Apparently, floration is constant throughout the year.

Pollinator communities vary with distribution and floral visitation occurs during day and night, albeit nocturnal visitation is reported in southern Ecuador only.[15] During the day, inflorescences are visited by birds, at least 14 hummingbird species including Metallura tyrianthina, Aglaeactis cupripennis and Coeligena iris.[4] [16] Mammals are the only nocturnal visitors, Phyllostomid bat Anoura geoffroyi, and Andean mouse Microryzomys altissimus; the role of M. altissimus as actual pollinator is yet to be confirmed, although samples taken from its fur indicate pollen removal.

Uses

The plant is used for firewood, furniture/carpentry;[3] its "pleasantly mottled cream-white, pinkish and pale brown wood" was used for inlay work and borders on chess boards.[17] It also has medicinal uses.[3] The seeds are eaten in southern Ecuador.[18]

Notes and References

  1. Book: Crisp, Michael D. . Weston, Peter H. . 1995. Alloxylon. McCarthy, Patrick. Flora of Australia: Volume 16: Eleagnaceae, Proteaceae 1. 382–386. CSIRO Publishing / Australian Biological Resources Study. 0-643-05693-9.
  2. Book: Wrigley, John . Fagg, Murray . Banksias, Waratahs and Grevilleas . 1991 . Angus & Robertson . Sydney . 0-207-17277-3. 467–68.
  3. http://efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=201&taxon_id=123101 2. Oreocallis R. Br.
  4. Book: Pennington, R.T.. Proteaceae. Ghilean T. Prance . Vanessa Plana . Katie S. Edwards . R. Toby Pennington . The New York Botanical Garden Press. New York. 2007. Flora Neotropica Monograph. 100. 31–35. Oreocallis.
  5. Both Weston (2007) and Pennington (2007) describe the inflorescence as being "terminal or lateral" for the genus, but Pennington's account for the only species in the genus simply describes it as having a terminal inflorescence.
  6. Book: Weston, P.H.. The Families and Genera of Flowering Plants: IX Flowering Plants • Eudicots . K. Kubitzki . Springer Verlag . Berlin . 2007 . 364–404 . Proteaceae . 978-3-540-32214-6 . 10.1007/978-3-540-32219-1_42.
  7. Johnson, Lawrie. A. S. . Briggs, Barbara G. . 1975 . On the Proteaceae: the evolution and classification of a southern family . Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society . 70 . 2 . 83–182 . 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1975.tb01644.x.
  8. Weston, Peter H. . Barker, Nigel P. . 2006 . A new suprageneric classification of the Proteaceae, with an annotated checklist of genera . Telopea . 11 . 3 . 314–44. 10.7751/telopea20065733 . March 30, 2010. free .
  9. Book: Nixon, Paul. The Waratah. Kangaroo Press. East Roseville, NSW. 1997. 1989. 2nd. 0-86417-878-6. 19.
  10. Dettmann, Mary E. . Jarzen, David M. . 1991. Pollen evidence for Late Cretaceous differentiation of Proteaceae in southern polar forests. Canadian Journal of Botany. 69. 4. 901–06. 10.1139/b91-116.
  11. Martin . A. R. H. . 10.1080/03115519508619096 . Palaeogene proteaceous pollen and phylogeny . Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology . 19 . 27–40 . 1995 . 1 . 1995Alch...19...27M .
  12. Hazlehurst. Jenny. Cardenas. Santiago. Tinoco. Boris. Karubian. Jordan. 2016-11-18. Pollination ecology of Oreocallis grandiflora (Proteaceae) at the northern and southern ends of its geographic range. Journal of Pollination Ecology. en. 19. 10.26786/1920-7603(2016)4 . 1920-7603.
  13. Book: Homeier . J. . Werner . F. A. . Gradstein . S. R. . Breckle . S.-W. . Richter . M. . Gradients in a Tropical Mountain Ecosystem of Ecuador . Erwin Beck . Jorg Bendix . Ingrid Kottke . Franz Maeschin . Reinhart Mosandl . Springer-Verlag . Berlin . 2008 . Ecological Studies . 198 . Potential Vegetation and Floristic Composition of Andean Forests in South Ecuador, with a Focus on the RBSF . 978-3-540-73525-0 . 10.1007/978-3-540-73526-7_10.
  14. Aragón . Susan . Deborah W. Woodcock . 2010 . Plant Community Structure and Conservation of a Northern Peru Sclerophyllous Forest . Biotropica . 42 . 2 . 262–270 . 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00578.x. 2010Biotr..42..262A .
  15. Cárdenas. Santiago. Nivelo-Villavicencio. Carlos. Cárdenas. Juan D.. P. Omar Landázuri. Tinoco. Boris A.. March 2017. First record of flower visitation by a rodent in Neotropical Proteaceae, Oreocallis grandiflora. Journal of Tropical Ecology. en. 33. 2. 174–177. 10.1017/S0266467417000025. 0266-4674.
  16. Pennington refers to the two former species as Mettalura trianthera and Aylcactis cupripennis. Pennington references collectors notes for these species. Neither of these appear to be actual hummingbird species or genera. The names given represent an attempt to correct typographic or transcriptional errors.
  17. Joyal . Elaine . 1987 . Ethnobotanical Field Notes from Ecuador: Camp, Prieto, Jørgensen, and Giler . Economic Botany . 41 . 2 . 163–189 . 4254956 . 10.1007/bf02858963.
  18. Van den Eynden . Veerle . Eduardo Cueva . Omar Cabrera . 2003 . Wild Foods from Southern Ecuador . Economic Botany . 57 . 4 . 576–603 . 10.1663/0013-0001(2003)057[0576:wffse]2.0.co;2.