Optional prisoner's dilemma explained

The optional prisoner's dilemma (OPD) game models a situation of conflict involving two players in game theory. It can be seen as an extension of the standard prisoner's dilemma game, where players have the option to "reject the deal", that is, to abstain from playing the game.[1] This type of game can be used as a model for a number of real world situations in which agents are afforded the third option of abstaining from a game interaction such as an election. [2]

Payoff matrix

The structure of the optional prisoner's dilemma can be generalized from the standard prisoner's dilemma game setting. In this way, suppose that the two players are represented by the colors, red and blue, and that each player chooses to "Cooperate", "Defect" or "Abstain".[3]

The payoff matrix for the game is shown below:

!scope="col" style="color: #900"
CooperateDefectAbstain
Cooperate, , ,
Defect, , ,
Abstain, , ,

The following condition must hold for the payoffs:

T > R > L > P > S

Notes and References

  1. Book: Marcos . Cardinot . Maud . Gibbons . Colm . O'Riordan . Josephine . Griffith . Simulation of an Optional Strategy in the Prisoner’s Dilemma in Spatial and Non-spatial Environments . 10.1007/978-3-319-43488-9_14 . From Animals to Animats 14 . . 9825 . 145–156 . 2016 . 978-3-319-43487-2 .
  2. John . Batali . Philip . Kitcher . 1995 . Evolution of altriusm in optional and compulsory games . . 161–171. 175 . 2 . 10.1006/jtbi.1995.0128. 35935283 . https://web.archive.org/web/20190222013444/http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3017/ceec7bd9158a0737a39d0c46dea531ddca01.pdf . dead . 2019-02-22 .
  3. Book: Marcos . Cardinot . Colm . O'Riordan . Josephine . Griffith . The Optional Prisoner's Dilemma in a Spatial Environment: Coevolving Game Strategy and Link Weights . 10.5220/0006053900860093 . ECTA . Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference on Computational Intelligence . 86–93 . 1 . 2016 . 978-989-758-201-1.