Opium Wars Explained

Partof:the century of humiliation
Conflict:Opium Wars
Place:China
Combatant1:First Opium War

Second Opium War

Combatant2:Qing China

The Opium Wars were two conflicts waged between China and Western powers during the mid-19th century.

The First Opium War was fought from 1839 to 1842 between China and Britain. It was triggered by the Chinese government's campaign to enforce its prohibition of opium, which included destroying opium stocks owned by British merchants and the British East India Company. The British government responded by sending a naval expedition to force the Chinese government to pay reparations and allow the opium trade.[1] The Second Opium War was waged by Britain and France against China from 1856 to 1860, and consequently resulted in China being forced to legalise opium.[2]

In each war, the superior military advantages enjoyed by European forces led to several easy victories over the Chinese military, with the consequence that China was compelled to sign the unequal treaties to grant favourable tariffs, trade concessions, reparations and territory to Western powers. The two conflicts, along with the various treaties imposed during the century of humiliation, weakened the Chinese government's authority and forced China to open specified treaty ports (including Shanghai) to Western merchants.[3] [4] In addition, China ceded sovereignty over Hong Kong to the British Empire, which maintained control over the region until 1997. During this period, the Chinese economy also contracted slightly as a result of the wars, though the Taiping Rebellion and Dungan Revolt had a much larger economic effect.[5]

History

First Opium War

See main article: First Opium War.

The First Opium War broke out in 1839 between China and Britain and was fought over trading rights (including the right of free trade) and Britain's diplomatic status among Chinese officials. In the eighteenth century, China enjoyed a trade surplus with Europe, trading porcelain, silk, and tea in exchange for silver. By the late 18th century, the British East India Company (EIC) expanded the cultivation of opium in the Bengal Presidency, selling it to private merchants who transported it to China and covertly sold it on to Chinese smugglers.[6] By 1797, the EIC was selling 4,000 chests of opium (each weighing 77 kg) to private merchants per annum.[7]

In earlier centuries, opium was utilised as a medicine with anesthetic qualities, but new Chinese practices of smoking opium recreationally increased demand tremendously and often led to smokers developing addictions. Successive Chinese emperors issued edicts making opium illegal in 1729, 1799, 1814, and 1831, but imports grew as smugglers and colluding officials in China sought profit.[8] Some American merchants entered the trade by smuggling opium from Turkey into China, including Warren Delano Jr., the grandfather of twentieth-century American President Franklin D. Roosevelt, and Francis Blackwell Forbes; in American historiography this is sometimes referred to as the Old China Trade.[9] By 1833, the Chinese opium trade soared to 30,000 chests. British and American merchants sent opium to warehouses in the free-trade port of Canton, and sold it to Chinese smugglers.[10]

In 1834, the EIC's monopoly on British trade with China ceased, and the opium trade burgeoned. Partly concerned with moral issues over the consumption of opium and partly with the outflow of silver, the Daoguang Emperor charged Governor General Lin Zexu with ending the trade. In 1839, Lin published in Canton an open letter to Queen Victoria requesting her cooperation in halting the opium trade. The letter never reached the Queen. It was later published in The Times as a direct appeal to the British public for their cooperation. An edict from the Daoguang Emperor followed on 18March, emphasising the serious penalties for opium smuggling that would now apply henceforth. Lin ordered the seizure of all opium in Canton, including that held by foreign governments and trading companies (called factories),[11] and the companies prepared to hand over a token amount to placate him.[12] Charles Elliot, Chief Superintendent of British Trade in China, arrived 3 days after the expiry of Lin's deadline, as Chinese troops enforced a shutdown and blockade of the factories. The standoff ended after Elliot paid for all the opium on credit from the British government (despite lacking official authority to make the purchase) and handed the 20,000 chests (1,300 metric tons) over to Lin, who had them destroyed at Humen.[13]

Elliott then wrote to London advising the use of military force to resolve the dispute with the Chinese government. A small skirmish occurred between British and Chinese warships in the Kowloon Estuary on 4 September 1839. After almost a year, the British government decided, in May 1840, to send a military expedition to impose reparations for the financial losses experienced by opium traders in Canton and to guarantee future security for the trade. On 21 June 1840, a British naval force arrived off Macao and moved to bombard the port of Dinghai. In the ensuing conflict, the Royal Navy used its superior ships and guns to inflict a series of decisive defeats on Chinese forces.[14]

The war was concluded by the Treaty of Nanking (Nanjing) in 1842, the first of the Unequal treaties between China and Western powers.[15] The treaty ceded the Hong Kong Island and surrounding smaller islands to Britain, and established five cities as treaty ports open to Western traders: Shanghai, Canton, Ningbo, Fuzhou, and Xiamen (Amoy).[16] The treaty also stipulated that China would pay a twenty-one million dollar payment to Britain as reparations for the destroyed opium, with six million to be paid immediately, and the rest through specified installments thereafter.[17] Another treaty the following year gave most favoured nation status to Britain and added provisions for British extraterritoriality, making Britain exempt from Chinese law. France secured several of the same concessions from China in the Treaty of Whampoa in 1844.[18]

Second Opium War

See main article: Second Opium War.

In 1853, northern China was convulsed by the Taiping Rebellion, which established its capital at Nanjing. In spite of this, a new Imperial Commissioner, Ye Mingchen, was appointed at Canton, determined to stamp out the opium trade, which was still technically illegal. In October 1856, he seized the Arrow, a ship claiming British registration, and threw its crew into chains. Sir John Bowring, Governor of British Hong Kong, called up Rear Admiral Sir Michael Seymour's East Indies and China Station fleet, which, on 23 October, bombarded and captured the Pearl River forts on the approach to Canton and proceeded to bombard Canton itself, but had insufficient forces to take and hold the city. On 15 December, during a riot in Canton, European commercial properties were set on fire and Bowring appealed for military intervention. The execution of a French missionary inspired support from France.[19] The United States and Russia also intervened in the war.

Britain and France now sought greater concessions from China, including the legalization of the opium trade, expanding of the transportation of coolies to European colonies, opening all of China to British and French citizens and exempting foreign imports from internal transit duties.[20] The war resulted in the 1858 Treaty of Tientsin (Tianjin), in which the Chinese government agreed to pay war reparations for the expenses of the recent conflict, open a second group of ten ports to European commerce, legalize the opium trade, and grant foreign traders and missionaries rights to travel within China.This also included China being required to bend to Western diplomatic behaviors instead of their normal way of conducting business through a tribute system. This treaty led to the era in Chinese history known as the "Century of Humiliation", this term referring to how China lost control of many territories to its enemies after being forced into treaties which were unfair in their own regard. After a second phase of fighting which included the sack of the Old Summer Palace and the occupation of the Forbidden City palace complex in Beijing, the treaty was confirmed by the Convention of Peking in 1860.

The impact of the Opium War on cultural relics

In February 1860, the British and French imperialist authorities again appointed Elgin and Grotto as plenipotentiaries respectively, leading more than 15,000 British troops and about 7,000 French troops to expand the war against China. The British and French forces invaded Beijing, and the Qing emperor fled to Chengde. The British and French forces broke into the Old Summer Palace, looted jewelry, and burned it. Among the cultural relics that were looted were the well-known Old Summer Palace bronze heads.On the morning of October 7, the French army broke into the Old Summer Palace and began to rob it.[21] British soldiers who arrived in the afternoon also joined the robbery, and the most precious things in the Old Summer Palace were looted. All twelve bronze statues of animal heads began to be lost overseas.[22] On October 18, the Old Summer Palace was burned down by British soldiers, and France refused to provide aid. The fire burned for three days and nights, razing the buildings of the Old Summer Palace to the ground and destroying nearby royal properties.

As of December 2020, seven of the twelve bronze statues have been found and returned to China. The whereabouts of the remaining five are still unknown. [23]

See also

Cited references and further reading

External links

Notes and References

  1. Book: Chen, Song-Chuan . Merchants of War and Peace . 2017-05-01 . Hong Kong University Press . 10.5790/hongkong/9789888390564.001.0001 . 978-988-8390-56-4.
  2. Feige. Miron . Chris1. Jeffrey . 2008 . The opium wars, opium legalization and opium consumption in China . Applied Economics Letters . 15 . 12 . 911–913 . 10.1080/13504850600972295 . Scopus.
  3. Web site: A Short History of the Opium Wars . Civilizations Past And Present . Chapter 29: "South And East Asia, 1815–1914" . Schaffer Library of Drug Policy . Taylor Wallbank . Bailkey . Jewsbury . Lewis . Hackett . 1992.
  4. Encyclopedia: Chinese history: Opium Wars . Kenneth Pletcher . Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 16 April 2024 .
  5. Web site: Over 2000 years of economic history, in one chart . 15 September 2017 . Jeff . Desjardins . World Economic Forum . 28 November 2021.
  6. News: Opium trade – History & Facts. Encyclopedia Britannica. 2018-07-03. en.
  7. Book: The Opium Wars: The Addiction of One Empire and the Corruption of Another. Hanes . Wiliam Travis III . Sanello. Frank. Sourcebooks. 2004. 978-1402201493. United States. 21, 24, 25.
  8. Web site: A Century of International Drug Control. UNODC.org.
  9. News: The Opium War's Secret History. Meyer. Karl E.. . 28 June 1997 . 2018-07-03. en.
  10. Haythornthwaite, Philip J., The Colonial Wars Source Book, London, 2000, p.237.
  11. Haythornthwaite, 2000, p.237.
  12. Book: Opium Wars: The Addiction of One Empire and the Corruption of Another. Hanes. W. Travis. Sanello. Frank. Frank Sanello. 9781402201493. registration. 2002. Sourcebooks.
  13. Web site: China Commemorates Anti-opium Hero . 4 June 2009 . 18 March 2014 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20131114033733/http://news.cultural-china.com/20090604103010.html . 14 November 2013 . dmy-all .
  14. Tsang, Steve (2007). A Modern History of Hong Kong. I. B. Tauris. pp. 3–13, 29. .
  15. https://www.britannica.com/event/Treaty-of-Nanjing Treaty of Nanjing
  16. Haythornthwaite 2000, p. 239.
  17. https://china.usc.edu/treaty-nanjing-nanking-1842 Treaty Of Nanjing (Nanking), 1842
  18. Book: Xiaobing Li. China at War: An Encyclopedia. 2012. ABC-CLIO. 468. 9781598844160.
  19. Web site: MIT Visualizing Cultures . 2023-09-09 . visualizingcultures.mit.edu.
  20. Book: Zhihong Shi. Central Government Silver Treasury: Revenue, Expenditure and Inventory Statistics, ca. 1667–1899. 2016. BRILL. 978-90-04-30733-9. 33.
  21. July 2018 . Internationale Studienergebnisse . Physiopraxis . 16 . 7/08 . 16–20 . 10.1055/a-0603-1331 . 1439-023X.
  22. May 2006 . Health Canada has warned consumers against using Nasutra because it has been found to contain sildenafil. . Inpharma Weekly . en . 1537 . 21 . 10.2165/00128413-200615370-00054 . 1173-8324.
  23. News: 2020-12-02 . China: Looted horse head returns to Beijing's Old Summer Palace . 2024-05-07 . en-GB.