Open reading frame explained

In molecular biology, reading frames are defined as spans of DNA sequence between the start and stop codons. Usually, this is considered within a studied region of a prokaryotic DNA sequence, where only one of the six possible reading frames will be "open" (the "reading", however, refers to the RNA produced by transcription of the DNA and its subsequent interaction with the ribosome in translation). Such an ORF may contain a start codon (usually AUG in terms of RNA) and by definition cannot extend beyond a stop codon (usually UAA, UAG or UGA in RNA).[1] That start codon (not necessarily the first) indicates where translation may start. The transcription termination site is located after the ORF, beyond the translation stop codon. If transcription were to cease before the stop codon, an incomplete protein would be made during translation.[2]

In eukaryotic genes with multiple exons, introns are removed and exons are then joined together after transcription to yield the final mRNA for protein translation. In the context of gene finding, the start-stop definition of an ORF therefore only applies to spliced mRNAs, not genomic DNA, since introns may contain stop codons and/or cause shifts between reading frames. An alternative definition says that an ORF is a sequence that has a length divisible by three and is bounded by stop codons.[3] [4] This more general definition can be useful in the context of transcriptomics and metagenomics, where a start or stop codon may not be present in the obtained sequences. Such an ORF corresponds to parts of a gene rather than the complete gene.

Biological significance

One common use of open reading frames (ORFs) is as one piece of evidence to assist in gene prediction. Long ORFs are often used, along with other evidence, to initially identify candidate protein-coding regions or functional RNA-coding regions in a DNA sequence. The presence of an ORF does not necessarily mean that the region is always translated. For example, in a randomly generated DNA sequence with an equal percentage of each nucleotide, a stop-codon would be expected once every 21 codons. A simple gene prediction algorithm for prokaryotes might look for a start codon followed by an open reading frame that is long enough to encode a typical protein, where the codon usage of that region matches the frequency characteristic for the given organism's coding regions. Therefore, some authors say that an ORF should have a minimal length, e.g. 100 codons[5] or 150 codons.[6] By itself even a long open reading frame is not conclusive evidence for the presence of a gene.

Short ORFs (sORFs)

Some short ORFs (sORFs), also named Small open reading frames,[7] usually < 100 codons in length,[8] that lack the classical hallmarks of protein-coding genes (both from ncRNAs and mRNAs) can produce functional peptides.[9] 5’-UTR of about 50% of mammal mRNAs are known to contain one or several sORFs,[10] also called upstream ORFs or uORFs. However, less than 10% of the vertebrate mRNAs surveyed in an older study contained AUG codons in front of the major ORF. Interestingly, uORFs were found in two thirds of proto-oncogenes and related proteins.[11] 64–75% of experimentally found translation initiation sites of sORFs are conserved in the genomes of human and mouse and may indicate that these elements have function.[12] However, sORFs can often be found only in the minor forms of mRNAs and avoid selection; the high conservation of initiation sites may be connected with their location inside promoters of the relevant genes. This is characteristic of SLAMF1 gene, for example.[13]

Six-frame translation

Since DNA is interpreted in groups of three nucleotides (codons), a DNA strand has three distinct reading frames.[14] The double helix of a DNA molecule has two anti-parallel strands; with the two strands having three reading frames each, there are six possible frame translations.

Software

Finder

The ORF Finder (Open Reading Frame Finder)[15] is a graphical analysis tool which finds all open reading frames of a selectable minimum size in a user's sequence or in a sequence already in the database. This tool identifies all open reading frames using the standard or alternative genetic codes. The deduced amino acid sequence can be saved in various formats and searched against the sequence database using the basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) server. The ORF Finder should be helpful in preparing complete and accurate sequence submissions. It is also packaged with the Sequin sequence submission software (sequence analyser).

Investigator

ORF Investigator[16] is a program which not only gives information about the coding and non coding sequences but also can perform pairwise global alignment of different gene/DNA regions sequences. The tool efficiently finds the ORFs for corresponding amino acid sequences and converts them into their single letter amino acid code, and provides their locations in the sequence. The pairwise global alignment between the sequences makes it convenient to detect the different mutations, including single nucleotide polymorphism. Needleman–Wunsch algorithms are used for the gene alignment. The ORF Investigator is written in the portable Perl programming language, and is therefore available to users of all common operating systems.

Predictor

OrfPredictor[17] is a web server designed for identifying protein-coding regions in expressed sequence tag (EST)-derived sequences. For query sequences with a hit in BLASTX, the program predicts the coding regions based on the translation reading frames identified in BLASTX alignments, otherwise, it predicts the most probable coding region based on the intrinsic signals of the query sequences. The output is the predicted peptide sequences in the FASTA format, and a definition line that includes the query ID, the translation reading frame and the nucleotide positions where the coding region begins and ends. OrfPredictor facilitates the annotation of EST-derived sequences, particularly, for large-scale EST projects.

ORF Predictor uses a combination of the two different ORF definitions mentioned above. It searches stretches starting with a start codon and ending at a stop codon. As an additional criterion, it searches for a stop codon in the 5' untranslated region (UTR or NTR, nontranslated region[18]).

ORFik

ORFik is a R-package in Bioconductor for finding open reading frames and using Next generation sequencing technologies for justification of ORFs.[19] [20]

orfipy

orfipy is a tool written in Python / Cython to extract ORFs in an extremely and fast and flexible manner.[21] orfipy can work with plain or gzipped FASTA and FASTQ sequences, and provides several options to fine-tune ORF searches; these include specifying the start and stop codons, reporting partial ORFs, and using custom translation tables. The results can be saved in multiple formats, including the space-efficient BED format. orfipy is particularly faster for data containing multiple smaller FASTA sequences, such as de-novo transcriptome assemblies.

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Brody LC . 2021-08-25. Stop Codon. 2021-08-25. National Human Genome Research Institute. National Institutes of Health.
  2. Book: Slonczewski J, Foster JW . Microbiology: An Evolving Science . New York . W.W. Norton & Co. . 2009 . 978-0-393-97857-5 . 185042615.
  3. Sieber P, Platzer M, Schuster S . The Definition of Open Reading Frame Revisited . Trends in Genetics . 34 . 3 . 167–170 . March 2018 . 29366605 . 10.1016/j.tig.2017.12.009 .
  4. Claverie JM . Computational methods for the identification of genes in vertebrate genomic sequences . Human Molecular Genetics . 6 . 10 . 1735–44 . 1997 . 9300666 . 10.1093/hmg/6.10.1735 . free .
  5. Claverie JM, Poirot O, Lopez F . The difficulty of identifying genes in anonymous vertebrate sequences . Computers & Chemistry . 21 . 4 . 203–14 . 1997 . 9415985 . 10.1016/s0097-8485(96)00039-3 .
  6. Book: Deonier R, Tavaré S, Waterman M . Computational Genome Analysis: an introduction . . 2005 . 978-0-387-98785-9 . 25. Simon Tavaré .
  7. 36543139 . 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111808 . De novo birth of functional microproteins in the human lineage . 2022 . Vakirlis . Nikolaos . Vance . Zoe . Duggan . Kate M. . McLysaght . Aoife . Cell Reports . 41 . 12 . 111808 . 10073203 . 254966620 .
  8. 10.3389/fgene.2021.796060 . free . Small Open Reading Frames, How to Find Them and Determine Their Function . 2022 . Kute . Preeti Madhav . Soukarieh . Omar . Tjeldnes . Håkon . Trégouët . David-Alexandre . Valen . Eivind . Frontiers in Genetics . 12 . 796060 . 35154250 . 8831751 .
  9. Zanet J, Benrabah E, Li T, Pélissier-Monier A, Chanut-Delalande H, Ronsin B, Bellen HJ, Payre F, Plaza S . 6 . Pri sORF peptides induce selective proteasome-mediated protein processing . Science . 349 . 6254 . 1356–1358 . September 2015 . 26383956 . 10.1126/science.aac5677 . 206639549 . 2015Sci...349.1356Z .
  10. Wethmar K, Barbosa-Silva A, Andrade-Navarro MA, Leutz A . uORFdb--a comprehensive literature database on eukaryotic uORF biology . Nucleic Acids Research . 42 . Database issue . D60–D67 . January 2014 . 24163100 . 3964959 . 10.1093/nar/gkt952 .
  11. Geballe. A. P.. Morris. D. R.. April 1994. Initiation codons within 5'-leaders of mRNAs as regulators of translation. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 19. 4. 159–164. 10.1016/0968-0004(94)90277-1. 0968-0004. 8016865.
  12. Lee S, Liu B, Lee S, Huang SX, Shen B, Qian SB . Global mapping of translation initiation sites in mammalian cells at single-nucleotide resolution . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America . 109 . 37 . E2424–E2432 . September 2012 . 22927429 . 3443142 . 10.1073/pnas.1207846109 . free .
  13. Schwartz AM, Putlyaeva LV, Covich M, Klepikova AV, Akulich KA, Vorontsov IE, Korneev KV, Dmitriev SE, Polanovsky OL, Sidorenko SP, Kulakovskiy IV, Kuprash DV . 6 . Early B-cell factor 1 (EBF1) is critical for transcriptional control of SLAMF1 gene in human B cells . Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms . 1859 . 10 . 1259–1268 . October 2016 . 27424222 . 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2016.07.004 .
  14. Pearson WR, Wood T, Zhang Z, Miller W . Comparison of DNA sequences with protein sequences . Genomics . 46 . 1 . 24–36 . November 1997 . 9403055 . 10.1006/geno.1997.4995 . 6413018 .
  15. Web site: ORFfinder. National Center for Biotechnology Information .
  16. Dhar DV, Kumar MS . ORF Investigator: A New ORF finding tool combining Pairwise Global Gene Alignment . Research Journal of Recent Sciences . 2012 . 1 . 11 . 32–35.
  17. Web site: OrfPredictor. bioinformatics.ysu.edu. 2015-12-17. 2015-12-22. https://web.archive.org/web/20151222082631/http://bioinformatics.ysu.edu/tools/OrfPredictor.html. dead.
  18. Carrington JC, Freed DD . Cap-independent enhancement of translation by a plant potyvirus 5' nontranslated region . Journal of Virology . 64 . 4 . 1590–7 . April 1990 . 2319646 . 249294 . 10.1128/JVI.64.4.1590-1597.1990 .
  19. ORFik - Open reading frames in genomics. bioconductor.org. 2018. 10.18129/B9.bioc.ORFik. Kornel Labun. Haakon Tjeldnes.
  20. 10.1186/s12859-021-04254-w . ORFik: A comprehensive R toolkit for the analysis of translation . 2021 . Tjeldnes . Håkon . Labun . Kornel . Torres Cleuren . Yamila . Chyżyńska . Katarzyna . Świrski . Michał . Valen . Eivind . BMC Bioinformatics . 22 . 1 . 336 . 34147079 . 8214792 . free .
  21. Singh U, Wurtele ES . orfipy: a fast and flexible tool for extracting ORFs . Bioinformatics . February 2021 . 37 . 18 . 3019–3020 . 33576786 . 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab090. 1367-4803 . 8479652 . free .