Onsager reciprocal relations explained

In thermodynamics, the Onsager reciprocal relations express the equality of certain ratios between flows and forces in thermodynamic systems out of equilibrium, but where a notion of local equilibrium exists.

"Reciprocal relations" occur between different pairs of forces and flows in a variety of physical systems. For example, consider fluid systems described in terms of temperature, matter density, and pressure. In this class of systems, it is known that temperature differences lead to heat flows from the warmer to the colder parts of the system; similarly, pressure differences will lead to matter flow from high-pressure to low-pressure regions. What is remarkable is the observation that, when both pressure and temperature vary, temperature differences at constant pressure can cause matter flow (as in convection) and pressure differences at constant temperature can cause heat flow. Perhaps surprisingly, the heat flow per unit of pressure difference and the density (matter) flow per unit of temperature difference are equal. This equality was shown to be necessary by Lars Onsager using statistical mechanics as a consequence of the time reversibility of microscopic dynamics (microscopic reversibility). The theory developed by Onsager is much more general than this example and capable of treating more than two thermodynamic forces at once, with the limitation that "the principle of dynamical reversibility does not apply when (external) magnetic fields or Coriolis forces are present", in which case "the reciprocal relations break down".^[1]

Though the fluid system is perhaps described most intuitively, the high precision of electrical measurements makes experimental realisations of Onsager's reciprocity easier in systems involving electrical phenomena. In fact, Onsager's 1931 paper refers to thermoelectricity and transport phenomena in electrolytes as well known from the 19th century, including "quasi-thermodynamic" theories by Thomson and Helmholtz respectively. Onsager's reciprocity in the thermoelectric effect manifests itself in the equality of the Peltier (heat flow caused by a voltage difference) and Seebeck (electric current caused by a temperature difference) coefficients of a thermoelectric material. Similarly, the so-called "direct piezoelectric" (electric current produced by mechanical stress) and "reverse piezoelectric" (deformation produced by a voltage difference) coefficients are equal. For many kinetic systems, like the Boltzmann equation or chemical kinetics, the Onsager relations are closely connected to the principle of detailed balance and follow from them in the linear approximation near equilibrium.

Experimental verifications of the Onsager reciprocal relations were collected and analyzed by D. G. Miller^[2] for many classes of irreversible processes, namely for thermoelectricity, electrokinetics, transference in electrolytic solutions, diffusion, conduction of heat and electricity in anisotropic solids, thermomagnetism and galvanomagnetism. In this classical review, chemical reactions are considered as "cases with meager" and inconclusive evidence. Further theoretical analysis and experiments support the reciprocal relations for chemical kinetics with transport.^[3] Kirchhoff's law of thermal radiation is another special case of the Onsager reciprocal relations applied to the wavelength-specific radiative emission and absorption by a material body in thermodynamic equilibrium.

For his discovery of these reciprocal relations, Lars Onsager was awarded the 1968 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. The presentation speech referred to the three laws of thermodynamics and then added "It can be said that Onsager's reciprocal relations represent a further law making a thermodynamic study of irreversible processes possible."^[4] Some authors have even described Onsager's relations as the "Fourth law of thermodynamics".^[5]

Heat	Electric	Diffusion	Deformation
Temperature	Thermal conduction	Seebeck effect	Soret effect (thermophoresis)	Thermoelasticity
Voltage	Peltier effect	Ohm's law	Electromigration	Piezoelectricity
Chemical potential	Dufour effect	Galvaniccell	Fick's law	Osmosis
Stress	Thermoelasticity	Piezoelectricity	Osmosis	Hooke's law

Example: Fluid system

The fundamental equation

The basic thermodynamic potential is internal energy. In a simple fluid system, neglecting the effects of viscosity the fundamental thermodynamic equation is written:$$\backslash mathrmU\; =\; T\; \backslash ,\; \backslash mathrmS\; -\; P\; \backslash ,\; \backslash mathrmV\; +\; \backslash mu\; \backslash ,\; \backslash mathrmM$$where U is the internal energy, T is temperature, S is entropy, P is the hydrostatic pressure, V is the volume,

\mu is the chemical potential, and M mass. In terms of the internal energy density, u, entropy density s, and mass density \rho , the fundamental equation at fixed volume is written:$$\backslash mathrmu\; =\; T\; \backslash ,\; \backslash mathrms\; +\; \backslash mu\; \backslash ,\; \backslash mathrm\backslash rho$$

For non-fluid or more complex systems there will be a different collection of variables describing the work term, but the principle is the same. The above equation may be solved for the entropy density:$$\backslash mathrms\; =\; \backslash frac\; 1\; T\; \backslash ,\; \backslash mathrmu\; +\; \backslash frac\; T\; \backslash ,\; \backslash mathrm\backslash rho$$

The above expression of the first law in terms of entropy change defines the entropic conjugate variables of

u and \rho , which are 1 / T and - \mu / T and are intensive quantities analogous to potential energies; their gradients are called thermodynamic forces as they cause flows of the corresponding extensive variables as expressed in the following equations.

The continuity equations

The conservation of mass is expressed locally by the fact that the flow of mass density

\rho satisfies the continuity equation:$$\backslash frac\; +\; \backslash nabla\; \backslash cdot\; \backslash mathbf\_\backslash rho\; =\; 0,$$where J _{\rho} is the mass flux vector. The formulation of energy conservation is generally not in the form of a continuity equation because it includes contributions both from the macroscopic mechanical energy of the fluid flow and of the microscopic internal energy. However, if we assume that the macroscopic velocity of the fluid is negligible, we obtain energy conservation in the following form:$$\backslash frac\; +\; \backslash nabla\; \backslash cdot\; \backslash mathbf\_u\; =\; 0,$$where u is the internal energy density and J _{u} is the internal energy flux.

Since we are interested in a general imperfect fluid, entropy is locally not conserved and its local evolution can be given in the form of entropy density

s as$$\backslash frac\; +\; \backslash nabla\; \backslash cdot\; \backslash mathbf\_s\; =\; \backslash frac$$where $/$ is the rate of increase in entropy density due to the irreversible processes of equilibration occurring in the fluid and J _{s} is the entropy flux.

The phenomenological equations

In the absence of matter flows, Fourier's law is usually written:$$\backslash mathbf\_\; =\; -k\backslash ,\backslash nabla\; T;$$where

k is the thermal conductivity. However, this law is just a linear approximation, and holds only for the case where \nabla T \ll T , with the thermal conductivity possibly being a function of the thermodynamic state variables, but not their gradients or time rate of change. Assuming that this is the case, Fourier's law may just as well be written:$$\backslash mathbf\_u\; =\; k\; T^2\; \backslash nabla\; \backslash frac\; 1\; T;$$

In the absence of heat flows, Fick's law of diffusion is usually written:$$\backslash mathbf\_\; =\; -D\backslash ,\backslash nabla\backslash rho,$$where D is the coefficient of diffusion. Since this is also a linear approximation and since the chemical potential is monotonically increasing with density at a fixed temperature, Fick's law may just as well be written:$$\backslash mathbf\_\; =\; D\text{'}\backslash ,\backslash nabla\; \backslash frac\; T$$where, again,

D' is a function of thermodynamic state parameters, but not their gradients or time rate of change. For the general case in which there are both mass and energy fluxes, the phenomenological equations may be written as:$$\backslash mathbf\_\; =\; L\_\; \backslash ,\; \backslash nabla\; \backslash frac\; 1\; T\; +\; L\_\; \backslash ,\; \backslash nabla\; \backslash frac\; T$$$$\backslash mathbf\_\; =\; L\_\; \backslash ,\; \backslash nabla\; \backslash frac\; 1\; T\; +\; L\_\; \backslash ,\; \backslash nabla\; \backslash frac\; T$$or, more concisely,$$\backslash mathbf\_\backslash alpha\; =\; \backslash sum\_\backslash beta\; L\_\backslash ,\backslash nabla\; f\_\backslash beta$$

where the entropic "thermodynamic forces" conjugate to the "displacements"

u and \rho are $\backslash nabla\; f\_u\; =\; \backslash nabla\; \backslash frac\; 1\; T$ and $\backslash nabla\; f\_\backslash rho\; =\; \backslash nabla\; \backslash frac\; T$ and L _{\alpha} is the Onsager matrix of transport coefficients.

The rate of entropy production

From the fundamental equation, it follows that:$$\backslash frac\; =\; \backslash frac\; 1\; T\; \backslash frac\; +\; \backslash frac\; T\; \backslash frac$$and$$\backslash mathbf\_s\; =\; \backslash frac\; 1\; T\; \backslash mathbf\_u\; +\; \backslash frac\; T\; \backslash mathbf\_\backslash rho\; =\; \backslash sum\_\backslash alpha\; \backslash mathbf\_\backslash alpha\; f\_\backslash alpha$$

Using the continuity equations, the rate of entropy production may now be written:$$\backslash frac\; =\; \backslash mathbf\_u\; \backslash cdot\; \backslash nabla\; \backslash frac\; 1\; T\; +\; \backslash mathbf\_\backslash rho\; \backslash cdot\; \backslash nabla\; \backslash frac\; T\; =\; \backslash sum\_\backslash alpha\; \backslash mathbf\_\backslash alpha\; \backslash cdot\; \backslash nabla\; f\_\backslash alpha$$and, incorporating the phenomenological equations:$$\backslash frac\; =\; \backslash sum\_\backslash alpha\backslash sum\_\backslash beta\; L\_(\backslash nabla\; f\_\backslash alpha)\; \backslash cdot\; (\backslash nabla\; f\_\backslash beta)$$

It can be seen that, since the entropy production must be non-negative, the Onsager matrix of phenomenological coefficients

L _{\alpha} is a positive semi-definite matrix.

The Onsager reciprocal relations

Onsager's contribution was to demonstrate that not only is

L _{\alpha} positive semi-definite, it is also symmetric, except in cases where time-reversal symmetry is broken. In other words, the cross-coefficients L _{u\rho} and L _{\rho} are equal. The fact that they are at least proportional is suggested by simple dimensional analysis (i.e., both coefficients are measured in the same units of temperature times mass density).

The rate of entropy production for the above simple example uses only two entropic forces, and a 2×2 Onsager phenomenological matrix. The expression for the linear approximation to the fluxes and the rate of entropy production can very often be expressed in an analogous way for many more general and complicated systems.

Abstract formulation

Let

x _{1,x} _{2,\ldots,x} _{n} denote fluctuations from equilibrium values in several thermodynamic quantities, and let S(x _{1,x} _{2,\ldots,x} _{n)} be the entropy. Then, Boltzmann's entropy formula gives for the probability distribution function w = A\exp(S/k) , where A is a constant, since the probability of a given set of fluctuations {x _{1,x} _{2,\ldots,x} _{n}} is proportional to the number of microstates with that fluctuation. Assuming the fluctuations are small, the probability distribution function can be expressed through the second differential of the entropy^[6] $$w\; =\; \backslash tilde\; e^\backslash ,\; ;\; \backslash quad\; \backslash beta\_\; =\; \backslash beta\_=\; -\backslash frac\; \backslash frac\backslash ,,$$where we are using Einstein summation convention and \beta _{ik} is a positive definite symmetric matrix.

Using the quasi-stationary equilibrium approximation, that is, assuming that the system is only slightly non-equilibrium, we have^[6]

• x _{i} = -λ _{ik} x _{k}

Suppose we define thermodynamic conjugate quantities as $X\_i\; =\; -\backslash frac\backslash frac$, which can also be expressed as linear functions (for small fluctuations):

X _{i=} \beta _{ik} x _{k}

Thus, we can write

• x _{i=-\gamma} _{ik} X _{k} where \gamma _{ik} =λ _{il} \beta ^{-1} _{lk} are called kinetic coefficients

The principle of symmetry of kinetic coefficients or the Onsager's principle states that

\gamma is a symmetric matrix, that is \gamma _{ik} = \gamma _{ki} ^[6]

Proof

Define mean values

\xi _{i(t)} and \Xi _{i(t)} of fluctuating quantities x _{i} and X _{i} respectively such that they take given values x _{1,x} _{2,\ldots,} X _{1,X} _{2,\ldots} at t =0 . Note that $$\backslash dot\_i(t)\; =\; -\backslash gamma\_\backslash Xi\_k(t).$$

Symmetry of fluctuations under time reversal implies that $$\backslash langle\; x\_i(t)\; x\_k(0)\backslash rangle\; =\; \backslash langle\; x\_i(-t)\; x\_k(0)\; \backslash rangle\; =\; \backslash langle\; x\_i(0)\; x\_k(t)\; \backslash rangle.$$

or, with

\xi _{i(t)} , we have $$\backslash langle\; \backslash xi\_i(t)\; x\_k\; \backslash rangle=\backslash langle\; x\_i\; \backslash xi\_k(t)\; \backslash rangle.$$

Differentiating with respect to

t and substituting, we get $$\backslash gamma\_\; \backslash langle\backslash Xi\_l(t)x\_k\backslash rangle\; =\; \backslash gamma\_\; \backslash langle\; x\_i\; \backslash Xi\_l(t)\; \backslash rangle.$$

Putting

t = 0 in the above equation, $$\backslash gamma\_\; \backslash langle\; X\_l\; x\_k\backslash rangle\; =\; \backslash gamma\_\; \backslash langle\; X\_l\; x\_i\; \backslash rangle.$$

It can be easily shown from the definition that

\langle X _{ix} _{k\rangle=\delta} _{ik} , and hence, we have the required result.

See also

• Lars Onsager
• Langevin equation

Notes and References

1. Onsager . Lars . Reciprocal Relations in Irreversible Processes. I. . Physical Review . American Physical Society (APS) . 37 . 4 . 1931-02-15 . 0031-899X . 10.1103/physrev.37.405 . 405–426. free.
2. Miller . Donald G. . Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes. The Experimental Verification of the Onsager Reciprocal Relations. . Chemical Reviews . American Chemical Society (ACS) . 60 . 1 . 1960 . 0009-2665 . 10.1021/cr60203a003 . 15–37.
3. Yablonsky . G. S. . Grigoriy Yablonsky. Gorban . A. N. . Alexander Nikolaevich Gorban. Constales . D. . Galvita . V. V. . Marin . G. B. . Reciprocal relations between kinetic curves . EPL (Europhysics Letters) . IOP Publishing . 93 . 2 . 2011-01-01 . 0295-5075 . 10.1209/0295-5075/93/20004 . 20004. 1008.1056. 17060474 .
4. http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1968/press.html The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1968. Presentation Speech.
5. Wendt . Richard P. . Simplified transport theory for electrolyte solutions . Journal of Chemical Education . American Chemical Society (ACS) . 51 . 10 . 1974 . 0021-9584 . 10.1021/ed051p646 . 646.
6. Book: Statistical Physics, Part 1. Landau . L. D.. Lifshitz . E.M. . 1975 . . Oxford, UK . 978-81-8147-790-3.