Omega constant explained

The omega constant is a mathematical constant defined as the unique real number that satisfies the equation

\Omegae\Omega=1.

It is the value of, where is Lambert's function. The name is derived from the alternate name for Lambert's function, the omega function. The numerical value of is given by

.

.

Properties

Fixed point representation

The defining identity can be expressed, for example, as

ln(\tfrac{1}{\Omega})=\Omega.

or

-ln(\Omega)=\Omega

as well as

e-\Omega=\Omega.

Computation

One can calculate iteratively, by starting with an initial guess, and considering the sequence

\Omegan+1

-\Omegan
=e

.

This sequence will converge to as approaches infinity. This is because is an attractive fixed point of the function .

It is much more efficient to use the iteration

\Omegan+1=

1+\Omegan
\Omegan
1+e

,

because the function

f(x)=1+x
1+ex

,

in addition to having the same fixed point, also has a derivative that vanishes there. This guarantees quadratic convergence; that is, the number of correct digits is roughly doubled with each iteration.

Using Halley's method, can be approximated with cubic convergence (the number of correct digits is roughly tripled with each iteration): (see also).

\Omegaj+1

=\Omega
j-
\Omega
\Omegaj
e
-1
j
\Omegaj
e
(\Omega
j+1)-
(\Omega
\Omegaj
je
-1)
j+2)(\Omega
2\Omegaj+2

.

Integral representations

An identity due to Victor Adamchik is given by the relationship

inftydt
(et-t)2+\pi2
\int
-infty

=

1
1+\Omega

.

Other relations due to Mező[1] [2] and Kalugin-Jeffrey-Corless[3] are:

\Omega=1
\pi
\pilog\left(
eit
e-e-it
eit
e-eit
\operatorname{Re}\int
0

\right)dt,

\Omega=1
\pi
\pilog\left(1+\sint
t
\int
0

et\cot\right)dt.

The latter two identities can be extended to other values of the function (see also).

Transcendence

The constant is transcendental. This can be seen as a direct consequence of the Lindemann–Weierstrass theorem. For a contradiction, suppose that is algebraic. By the theorem, is transcendental, but, which is a contradiction. Therefore, it must be transcendental.[4]

Notes and References

  1. Web site: István. Mező. An integral representation for the principal branch of the Lambert W function. 24 April 2022.
  2. Mező . István . An integral representation for the Lambert W function . 2020. math.CA . 2012.02480 . .
  3. German A. . Kalugin . David J. . Jeffrey . Robert M. . Corless . Stieltjes, Poisson and other integral representations for functions of Lambert W . 2011. math.CV . 1103.5640 . .
  4. Mező . István . Baricz . Árpád . On the Generalization of the Lambert W Function . Transactions of the American Mathematical Society . November 2017 . 369 . 11 . 7928 . 28 April 2023.