Oberappellationsgericht der vier Freien Städte explained

Court Name:High Court of Appeal of the Four Free Cities
Jurisdiction:
Location:Lübeck, German Confederation
Language:German

The (English: Court of Appeal of the Four Free Cities), since 1867 the (English: High Court of Appeal of the Free Hanseatic Cities), seated in Lübeck was an appeals court of the German Confederation and the North German Confederation with territorial jurisdiction for Bremen, Frankfurt, Hamburg and Lübeck. Frankfurt was removed from the court's jurisdiction in 1867 after its annexation by Prussia. In 1870 the court lost its subject-matter jurisdiction for commercial law to the and was altogether abolished in 1879.

The court was considered to be the most influential German court of its time due to its exemplary combination of theory and practice.

Establishment of the court (1806–1820)

After the disintegration of the Holy Roman Empire the was established as the third and last court of appeal in civil and criminal matters for the former free imperial cities Bremen, Frankfurt am Main, Hamburg and Lübeck, as well as Bergedorf.

The legal basis for the court was Article 12 paragraph 3 of the German Federal Act of 1815 ("The four free cities are entitled to unite among themselves on the establishment of a common supreme court.") The inclusion of this paragraph in the Federal Act was an exception in favour of the Free Cities, which even together did not have the number of 300,000 "souls" that were in principle a prerequisite for the formation of a supreme court according to Article 12, paragraph 1. Because there was initially resistance to the establishment of a higher court, especially in Hamburg and Lübeck, in particular due to the feared loss of power of the senates vis-à-vis an independent judiciary, it took 14 years from the original initiative of Bremen in 1806 to its implementation.

Workings of the court from 1820 to 1879

In 1820, the court began its operations. The court consisted of a president, normally 6 judges, a secretary and two registrars. The court initially had 8 and from 1831 six procurators. One of these procurators was Friedrich Crome from 1856.

Under its first president, Georg Arnold Heise – a co-founder of the German Historical School –, who presided over the court from 1820 until his death in Lübeck in 1851, the court gained a high reputation. With regard to him, Bernhard Windscheid expressed the view that the two highest honours for a jurist in Germany were to succeed Friedrich Carl von Savigny on his chair in Berlin or to take Heise's place in Lübeck.[1] Through in particular, the court had a considerable influence on the development of German commercial law.

Outside its jurisdiction, it was first chosen by Bavaria and Prussia and later also from time to time by other states as a court of arbitration in disputes between states. In addition, the court was responsible for examining aspiring jurists from the four cities.

The court's second president, Karl Georg von Wächter, was in office for just under a year from 1851 to 1852, until he returned to university.

Under the third and last president, Johann Friedrich Martin Kierulff, serving from 1852 until the court's dissolution in 1879, the court gained jurisdiction as the first and last instance for cases of high treason and treason against the state in the North German Confederation, but otherwise had to relinquish more and more competencies.

First of all, Frankfurt left the association on 1 January 1867 after losing its sovereignty due to the Prussian annexation, whereupon the name of the court was changed to for short. This was followed by the transfer of subject-matter jurisdiction for commercial law to the in Leipzig and finally, with the reorganisation of the court constitution by the , the court was dissolved on 30 September 1879. Proceedings were taken over by the in Hamburg or the in Leipzig, depending on subject-matter jurisdiction.

Rudolf von Jhering in 1879 paid tribute to the court in an obituary of Agathon Wunderlich – a judge of the court who died in 1878 – and described it as the "as the learned court of Germany".[2]

Successor courts and institutions

The retained jurisdiction for Lübeck within the scope of its subject-matter jurisdiction (especially in civil law matters) until the abolition of Lübeck's statehood in 1937. Afterwards, Lübeck came under the jurisdiction of the until the was formed after the Second World War. For Bremen, the Hanseatic Higher Regional Court in Hamburg retained jurisdiction responsible until the was established in 1947. For appeals against judgements of the Prussian Court of Appeal in Frankfurt, the Preußisches Obertribunal (the Prussian Supreme Tribunal) in Berlin was the court of last instance after Frankfurt left the jurisdiction of the . Since 1879, Frankfurt has also been the seat of a Higher Regional Court.

In 1890, as compensation for the loss of the, Lübeck became the seat of the Hanseatic Insurance Institution (the, later the State Insurance Institution of the Hanseatic Cities), which was responsible for the disability and old-age insurance of employees in the three Hanseatic cities of Hamburg, Bremen and Lübeck due to the efforts of Senator . This, too, went to Hamburg in 1937 with the loss of statehood through the Greater Hamburg Act.

Courthouse

The court was or a short time based in Schüsselbuden No. 15 (Lübeck), then in Königstraße No. 21 (Lübeck), the former house of the Lübeck .

After 1879 the courthouse was used by the under the first state archivist . In 1936, the state archives passed it on to the public library, which gave it to the Katharineum, among others, after completing its extension buildings in Hundestraße.

The listed building was extensively renovated and converted into an education, meeting and memorial centre for the German Chancellor and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Willy Brandt, who was born in Lübeck. On 18 December 2007, the opened the Willy Brandt House, Lübeck, a branch office of the foundation. The building was made available by the city free of charge and is used by both the foundation and the municipal office for the preservation of historical monuments. The renovation, which cost almost 2.8 million euros, was supported by the German Foundation for Monument Protection.

Collection of decisions

The decisions of the court have been published in different collections. An important collection was the one published by the court's third president,, named "Sammlung der Entscheidungen des Oberappellationsgerichts der vier freien Städte zu Lübeck". The case collection has been published in seven volumes and covers the years from 1865 to 1872.

Judges of the court

Judges of the court

References

Sources

Further reading

External links

Notes and References

  1. Book: Windscheid, Bernhard. Carl Georg von Waechter. Duncker & Humblot. 1880. Leipzig. 14–15. Ich glaube nicht zu weit zu gehen, wenn ich sage, dass es damaks für das Streben wissenschaftlicher Juristen zwei höchste Ehren gab: Nachfolger Savigny's auf seinem Pandektenstuhl und Präsident des Oberappellationsgerichts in Lübeck an Heise's Stelle zu sein. Jene Ehre war Puchta zu Theil geworden, diese fiel Waechter zu. [I do not think I go too far when I say that there were two highest honours for the aspirations of scientific jurists at that time: To be Savigny's successor on his Pandektenstuhl and to be President of the Oberappellationsgericht in Lübeck in Heise's place. The former honour had been bestowed on Puchta, the latter on Waechter.]. Bernhard Windscheid.
  2. v. Jhering. Rudolf. Rudolf von Jhering. 1879. Agathon Wunderlich. [Jherings] Jahrbücher für die Dogmatik des heutigen römischen und deutschen Privatrechts. de. 17. 145–157 [156]. So konnte man das Lübecker O.A.Gericht als den gelehrten Gerichtshof Deutschlands bezeichnen, und die deutsche Wissenschaft hat die Probe, zu der sie hier in Verbindung mit der Praxis berufen ward, mit Ruhm bestanden; die Lübecker Urteile gehörten zu denjenigen, denen der Praktiker wie der Theoretiker in gleicher Weise Anerkennung zollte, es fanden sich darunter wahre Meisterstücke, gleichmäßig nach Form und Inhalt, Leistungen die auf wenigen Seiten ganze dickleibige juristische Monographien aufwogen..