| British Nutrition Foundation | |
| Abbreviation: | BNF |
| Formation: | 1967 |
| Status: | Registered charity |
| Purpose: | Self-stated: provision of information on nutrition science; independently described as a food-industry interest group |
| Location: | New Derwent House, 69-73 Theobalds Road, London |
| Region Served: | UK |
| Leader Title: | CEO |
| Leader Name: | Elaine Hindal |
| Main Organ: | BNF Council |
The British Nutrition Foundation is a British lobby group mainly funded by the food industry. It has been widely criticised for conflicts of interest, and for downplaying them. It presents itself to journalists, the public, and the government as a independent, impartial, disinterested, and scientifically-rigorous; its industry funders also promote this image.
In 2023, the BNF had an income of £1.5million, with an expenditure of £1.6million. £0.113million were spent on fundraising.
The BNF is open about its intention to shape UK Government policy on food,[2] thus serving as a special-interest lobbying group for the food industry, which largely funds the foundation.
Derek Shrimpton, a former director general, said: "In the period I was there the foundation was solely taken up with defence actions for the industry." He also said that BNF had constantly fought against reductions in sugar, salt, and fat consumption, by constantly frustrating government committees aiming to recommend reductions.[3] [4]
In 2005, 26 UK MPs signed an Early Day Motion in Parliament expressing concern over BNF activities, and requesting more transparency. They noted that the BNF was "primarily industry-supported" and was advising the government on
They also noted that members included "McDonalds, Coca Cola, Northern Foods, Nutrasweet, Kraft, Cadbury-Schweppes, Kelloggs, Nestle, Sainsbury, Asda and Procter and Gamble".[6]
The UK government has paid the BNF to develop educational materials on nutrition. Tim Lobstein, a director at the International Association for the Study of Obesity-International Obesity Task Force (now the World Obesity Federation), said that the BNF has produced educational materials seem to support industry messages. For instance, he said, it "did a big piece of work for the Food Standards Agency reviewing ‘influences on consumer food choices’ which conveniently left out any review of the influence of marketing and advertising techniques". The Campaign Against Trans Fats in Food said that some BFN materials opposed regulation of xenobiotic trans fats.[7] [8]
The BNF was lobbying against action on ultra-processed foods in 2023, saying there should be no policies on them.[9]
The BNF presents itself to the media as a disinterested commentator. It focusses on providing swift and expert advice to journalists who are not specialist medical reporters.[7]
It is often treated by the media as a source of impartial nutritional information. When it is quoted in the media, it is usually just as the "British Nutritional Foundation"; a 2010 search found that only 2/128 media mentions of the BNF mentioned that it has industry funding.[7]
Member-funders may have significant conflicts of interest; for instance, the BNF offered a conference on sweeteners without conspicuously disclosing that its funders include then-sugar-manufacturers Tate & Lyle and British Sugar, and artificial sweetener manufacturers Ajinomoto (Aminosweet-brand aspartame) and McNeil Consumer Nutritionals (Splenda), and sweet-drinks manfacturers Coca-cola and Pepsi. It presented itself as objective and evidence-based.[7]
The BNF also contributed to a controversial industry-funded panel that generated more positive media coverage of ultra-processed foods. Such foods are manufactured or retailed by many BNF members.[10]
See main article: Direct-to-consumer advertising. The BNF contributes extensively to materials aimed at the general public. It describes itself as a supporter of informed consumer choice. For instance, it contributed to the PhunkyFoods campaign, aimed at under-11-year-olds and funded by Nestlé, Northern Foods, and Cargill. It has also channeled industry funding for government programs such as "License to Cook" (www.licencetocook.org.uk), a school cookbook for 11-to-12-year-olds.[7]
The BNF argues that "There is no such thing as a bad food, only a bad diet", and presents itself as a champion of individual choice, opposing government regulation.[7] These are both standard food-industry messages, based on those used by the tobacco industry. They are used to shift blame for the public health harms cause by unhealthy food from producers and regulators onto the consumer.[9]
See also: Conflicts of interest in academic publishing. The official journal of the BNF, Nutrition Bulletin, describes itself as an international, peer-reviewed journal. It is published quarterly by Wiley.[11] It says that its coverage has included review articles and news items on nutrition, but that since acquisition of an impact factor and MEDLINE coverage, an increasing number of papers reporting original research have been included;[12] many articles are open-access.
Articles in the Nutrition Review may be publicized in press releases put out by the BNF, and garner substantial media coverage. The quality of the scholarship and peer review in the journal has been questioned.[13]
Many members of the British Nutrition Foundation's staff, including the board of trustees and oversight committees, are or have been employees of the food industry. It is common for staff to move back and forth between the BNF and industry jobs. For instance, Paul Hebblethwaite, a member of the BNF board of trustees and its former chairman, has had "a distinguished career in the food industry working for a number of major companies including Cadbury-Schweppes and Chivers-Hartley", and was simultaneously chairman of the Biscuit, Cake, Chocolate and Confectionery Trade Association.[7]
Under its Memorandum and Articles of Association, the BNF Board has no more than 12 Trustees. Two are allowed to be currently working in the food industry; there are no restrictions on past and future employment.[7] The BNF website says that trustees are appointed by the Board and serve for a term of three years, with each Trustee able to serve for a maximum of nine years, and that the BNF also has an Editorial Advisory Board, educational working groups, and a "register of interests" for Board members and senior managers.