Prime Directive Explained

In the fictional universe of Star Trek, the Prime Directive (also known as "Starfleet General Order 1", and the "non-interference directive") is a guiding principle of Starfleet that prohibits its members from interfering with the natural development of alien civilizations. Its stated aim is to protect unprepared civilizations from the danger of starship crews introducing advanced technology, knowledge, and values before they are ready.[1] Since its introduction in the first season of the original Star Trek series, the directive has featured in many Star Trek episodes as part of a moral question over how best to establish diplomatic relations with new alien worlds.

The Prime Directive

The Prime Directive is one of many guidelines for Starfleet's mandate to explore the galaxy and "seek out new life and new civilizations." Although the concept of the Prime Directive has been alluded to and paraphrased by many Star Trek characters during the television series and feature films, the text of the directive was only revealed to viewers in 2021 during the episode "First Con-Tact" set in 2383. Two sections of the text were shown, and are as follows:

Section 1:Starfleet crew will obey the following with any civilization that has not achieved a commensurate level of technological and/or societal development as described in Appendix 1.

a) No identification of self or mission.

b) No interference with the social, cultural, or technological development of said planet.

c) No reference to space, other worlds, or advanced civilizations.

d) The exception to this is if said society has already been exposed to the concepts listed herein. However, in that instance, section 2 applies.

Section 2:If said species has achieved the commensurate level of technological and/or societal development as described in Appendix 1, or has been exposed to the concepts listed in section 1, no Starfleet crew person will engage with said society or species without first gathering extensive information on the specific traditions, laws, and culture of that species civilization. Then Starfleet crew will obey the following.

a) If engaged with diplomatic relations with said culture, will stay within the confines of said culture's restrictions.

b) No interference with the social development of said planet.

The Prime Directive was frequently applied to less developed planets which had not yet discovered warp travel or subspace communication technology. The Prime Directive was also sometimes applied to advanced civilizations that already knew of life on other worlds but were protected by empires outside the Federation's jurisdiction. First contact could be made by the Federation with alien worlds that had either discovered warp or were on the verge of it, or with highly advanced civilizations that simply hadn't ventured into space yet. In those cases, the Prime Directive was used as a general policy to not disrupt or interfere with their culture when establishing peaceful diplomatic relations.[2]

Consequences for violating the Prime Directive could range from a stern reprimand to a demotion, depending on the severity of the infraction. However, enforcement of these rules -- and interpretations of the Prime Directive itself -- varied greatly and were at the discretion of the commanding officer. In many instances, prominent Starfleet personnel like captains James T. Kirk, Jean-Luc Picard, Kathryn Janeway and Benjamin Sisko willingly broke the Prime Directive but faced no real punishment or consequence for doing so.[3]

However, the Prime Directive is not absolute. Starship captains have been known to violate it to protect their ships and crews, and certain Starfleet regulations such as The Omega Directive can even render it null and void in certain circumstances.

Creation and evolution

Creation of the Prime Directive is generally credited to Original Series producer Gene L. Coon.[4] [5] Later writers have suggested that the Prime Directive was influenced by the Vietnam War or designed to show a civilization that had evolved beyond colonialism.[6] [7] This would have been consistent with Coon and Roddenberry's political outlooks, but the notion of science fictional first contact and its possible harms already had a decades-long history by 1966.

Notable on-screen references

The Original Series

The Next Generation

Deep Space Nine

Voyager

Enterprise

Discovery

Prodigy

Strange New Worlds

Picard

Films

Criticism

The Prime Directive has been criticized in-universe because of the inconsistencies in which it is applied. In the TOS episodes "Friday's Child," "For the World Is Hollow and I Have Touched the Sky," "The Cloud Minders," "The Apple," "The Return of the Archons," "Space Seed" and "A Taste of Armageddon," the crew of the Enterprise either interferes with laws or customs of alien worlds or outright colonizes an alien planet to achieve a Federation objective, to save the lives of the crew, or to better the lives of the inhabitants.[9]

Out-of-universe criticisms focus on the above problems; that the Prime Directive is simply a plot device and is manipulated by the writers. Janet D. Stemwedel points out a potential conflict between the anti-colonialist intentions of the Federation and the "ethical project of sharing a universe" which would require "a kind of reciprocity — even if your technological attainment is quite different, it means recognizing you are owed the same moral consideration."[10] Stemwedel writes, "If your concern is not to change the natural behavior or development of alien citizens at any cost, your best bet is to stay at home rather than to explore new worlds."[10] Ars Technica asked lawyers to comment on the Prime Directive and other Star Trek legal issues. Criticism included interpreting the Prime Directive as a product of the Cold War environment in which Roddenberry wrote, as well as indicating that enforcement would be lacking.[11]

Temporal Prime Directive

The "Temporal Prime Directive" is a fictional guideline for time travelers (from the past or future) from interfering in the natural development of a timeline.

In the TNG episode "A Matter of Time", Picard compares the Prime Directive to a possible Temporal Prime Directive:

"Of course, you know of the Prime Directive, which tells us that we have no right to interfere with the natural evolution of alien worlds. Now I have sworn to uphold it, but nevertheless I have disregarded that directive on more than one occasion because I thought it was the right thing to do. Now, if you are holding on to some temporal equivalent of that directive, then isn't it possible that you have an occasion here to make an exception, to help me to choose, because it's the right thing to do?"

As 31st-century time traveler Daniels revealed to Captain Jonathan Archer in the episode "Cold Front", as time travel technology became practical, the Temporal Accords were established sometime before the 31st century, to allow the use of time travel for the purposes of studying history, while prohibiting the use of it to alter history.

As revealed in the Star Trek: Discovery episode "Face the Strange," the Temporal Prime Directive is still in effect in the late 32nd century.

See also

Notes and References

  1. Peltz. Richard J.. March 2003. On a Wagon Train to Afghanistan: Limitations on Star Trek's Prime Directive. University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review. 25.
  2. Web site: Porto . Chad . 10 Weirdest Laws In The Star Trek Universe . Redshirts Always Die . 30 May 2021 . 1 December 2021.
  3. Web site: Beauvais . Julian . Star Trek: The Worst Violations Of The Prime Directive, Ranked . ScreenRant . 4 March 2021 . 1 December 2021.
  4. A quote from David Gerrold on page 129 of "The Fifty Year Mission"
  5. Web site: Shatner: Creator Gene Roddenberry 'Had Little to Do with Star Trek' After First 13 Episodes. Scott. Collura. 21 August 2017.
  6. Star Trek in the Vietnam Era . H. Bruce . Franklin . Science Fiction Studies . DePauw University . 2014-02-21 . https://web.archive.org/web/20130728193747/http://www.depauw.edu/sfs/backissues/62/franklin62art.htm# . 2013-07-28 . dead .
  7. McCormick. Patrick. March 1996. Final frontier covers old ground. U.S. Catholic. 61, 3. 46, 48. Ebsco.
  8. Book: The Ultimate Star Trek and Philosophy: The Search for Socrates. John Wiley and Sons. 2016. 978-1-119-14602-5. Decker. Kevin S.. Hoboken, NJ. Eberl. Jason T..
  9. Book: Farrand, Phil . Phil Farrand . The Nitpicker's Guide for Classic Trekkers . registration . Dell Publishing . 1994 . 84, 85, 148, 186, 192–193, 209, 215, & 235. 9780440506836 .
  10. Web site: The Philosophy Of Star Trek: Is The Prime Directive Ethical?. Janet D.. Stemwedel. Forbes.
  11. Web site: Why Star Trek's Prime Directive could never be enforced. Cyrus. Farivar. 6 September 2016. Ars Technica.