Non-place explained

Non-place or nonplace is a neologism coined by the French anthropologist Marc Augé to refer to anthropological spaces of transience where human beings remain anonymous, and that do not hold enough significance to be regarded as "places" in their anthropological definition. Examples of non-places would be motorways,[1] hotel rooms, airports and shopping malls. The term was introduced by Marc Augé in his work Non-places: introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity,[2] although it bears a strong resemblance to earlier concepts introduced by Edward Relph in Place and Placelessness and Melvin Webber in his writing on the 'nonplace urban realm'.[3]

The perception of a space like a non-place is strictly subjective: any given individual can view any given location as a non-place, or as a crossroads of human relations. For instance, a shopping mall is not a non-place for a person who works there every day.[4]

The concept of non-place is opposed, according to Augé, to the notion of "anthropological place". The place offers people a space that empowers their identity, where they can meet other people with whom they share social references. The non-places, on the contrary, are not meeting spaces and do not build common references to a group. Finally, a non-place is a place we do not live in, in which the individual remains anonymous and lonely. Augé avoids making value judgments on non-places and looks at them from the perspective of an ethnologist who has a new field of studies to explore.

From Places to Non-Places

A significant debate concerning the term and its interpretation is described in Marc Augé's writings under the title of "From Places to Non-Places". The distinction between places and non-places[5] derives from the opposition between space and place. As essential preliminary here is the analyses of the notions of place and space suggested by Michel de Certeau. Space for him is a frequented space and intersection of moving bodies: it is the pedestrians, who transform the street (geometrically defined by town planners) into a space.

Mark Fisher's notion of non-time

For Mark Fisher, whereas cyberspace-time tends towards the generation of cultural moments that are interchangeable, hauntology involves the staining of particular places with time: a time that is out of joint. A "flattening sense of time" appears to Fisher as a byproduct of Augé's non-places, which by being absent of local flavour[6] are indeterminate temporally as well as locally. He describes music created decades in the past as deprived of any sense of disjuncture with the present,[7] a clear connection with his theory of capitalist realism.

See also

Notes and References

  1. Merriman . Peter . 2004 . Driving places: Marc Augé, non-places and the geographies of England’s M1 motorway . Theory, Culture & Society . 21 . 4-5 . 145-167.
  2. Marc Augé, Non-places: introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity, Le Seuil, 1992, Verso, p. 122.
  3. Merriman . Peter . 2009 . Marc Auge on space, place, and non-places . Irish Journal of French Studies . 9 . 9-29 . Ingenta Connect.
  4. Korstanje M. 2018 Mobilities Paradox, A critical Analysis, Edward Elgar
  5. Web site: Places, non-places and supermodernity: on the issues of rooting and uprooting . 2022-09-08 . www.brown.edu.
  6. Book: Mark., Fisher. Ghosts of my life writings on depression, hauntology and lost futures.. 2014. Zero books. 978-1-78099-226-6. 936416159.
  7. Web site: Past and Present in "Strange Simultaneity": Mark Fisher Explains Hauntology at NYU. 2021-05-07. Rhizome. en.