Tubulinea Explained

The Tubulinea are a major grouping of Amoebozoa, including most of the more familiar amoebae genera like Amoeba, Arcella, Difflugia and Hartmannella.

Characteristics

During locomotion most Tubulinea have a roughly cylindrical form or produce numerous cylindrical pseudopods. Each cylinder advances by a single central stream of cytoplasm, granular in appearance, and has no subpseudopodia. This distinguishes them from other amoeboid groups, although in some members this is not the normal type of locomotion.

Classification

This class was anticipated by some biologists such as Jahn, who grouped all amoebae with granular pseudopodia together,[1] but most split the lobose amoebae into testate Testacealobosia and naked Gymnamoebia. These latter are polyphyletic, but molecular trees by Bolivar et al.[2] identified a core monophyletic subgroup. Subsequent studies showed the testate lobose amoebae belong to the same group, which was thus renamed Lobosea sensu stricto[3] or Tubulinea.[4]

Taxonomy

The class Tubulinea, as of 2022, is classified into three major groups: Corycida, Echinamoebida and Elardia. The most taxonomically abundant group is Elardia, which contains the testate amoebae of Arcellinida and the naked amoebae of orders Leptomyxida and Euamoebida.[5] [6] [7] [8]

Notes and References

  1. Book: Jahn. Bovee. Jahn. How to know the protozoa. registration. 1979. Wm. C. Brown Company Publishers. 0-697-04759-8.
  2. Bolivar, I.. Fahrni, J.F.. Smirnov, A.. Pawlowski, J.. amp. SSU rRNA-based Phylogenetic Position of the Genera Amoeba and Chaos (Lobosea, Gymnamoebia): The Origin of Gymnamoebae Revisited. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2001. 18. 2306–2314. 11719580. 12. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003777. free.
  3. Cavalier-Smith, T.. Chao, E.-Y. Oates, B.. Molecular phylogeny of the Amoebozoa and evolutionary significance of the unikont Phalansterium. European Journal of Protistology. 2004 . 40 . 21–48. 10.1016/j.ejop.2003.10.001.
  4. Smirnov, A.V.. Nassonova, E.S.. Berney, C.. Fahrni, J.. Bolivar, I.. Pawlowski, J.. amp. Molecular phylogeny and classification of the lobose amoebae. Protist. 2005 . 156 . 129–142. 10.1016/j.protis.2005.06.002 . 16171181 . 2.
  5. Kang S, Tice AK, Spiegel FW, Silberman JD, Pánek T, Cepicka I, Kostka M, Kosakyan A, Alcântara DM, Roger AJ, Shadwick LL, Smirnov A, Kudryavtsev A, Lahr DJ, Brown MW . 6 . Between a Pod and a Hard Test: The Deep Evolution of Amoebae . Molecular Biology and Evolution . 34 . 9 . 2258–2270 . September 2017 . 28505375 . 5850466 . 10.1093/molbev/msx162 .
  6. Adl . Sina M. . Bass . David . Lane. Christopher E. . Lukeš . Julius . Schoch . Conrad L. . Smirnov . Alexey . Agatha . Sabine . Berney . Cedric . Brown . Matthew W. . 2018-09-26 . Revisions to the Classification, Nomenclature, and Diversity of Eukaryotes. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology . 66 . 1 . 4–119 . 10.1111/jeu.12691. 30257078 . 6492006 .
  7. Lahr . Daniel J.G. . Kosakyan . Anush . Lara . Enrique . Mitchell . Edward A.D. . Morais . Luana . Porfirio-Sousa . Alfredo L. . Ribeiro . Giulia M. . Pánek . Tomáš . Kang . Seungho . Brown . Matthew W. . 2019 . Phylogenomics and Morphological Reconstruction of Arcellinida Testate Amoebae Highlight Diversity of Microbial Eukaryotes in the Neoproterozoic . Current Biology . 29 . 6 . 991–1001 . 10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.078. free . 11380/1301486 . free .
  8. Rubén . González-Miguéns. Milcho . Todorov. Quentin . Blandenier. Clément . Duckert. Alfredo L. . Porfirio-Sousa. Giulia M. . Ribeiro. Diana . Ramos. Daniel J.G.. Lahr. David. Buckley. Enrique. Lara. Deconstructing Difflugia: The tangled evolution of lobose testate amoebae shells (Amoebozoa: Arcellinida) illustrates the importance of convergent evolution in protist phylogeny. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 175. 2022. 107557. 1055-7903. 10.1016/j.ympev.2022.107557. 35777650 . free. 10261/281619. free.