Seven remaining petitioners on Al Halmandy v. Bush| ISN | name | Kadidal's notes |
|---|
| 78 | | - Factual return filed on 30 October 2008.[5] As of early December 2008 his attorneys had still not been able to meet with him.
|
| 510 | | - Factual return filed on 29 October 2008. As of early December 2008 his attorneys had still not been able to meet with him. A thirty-day protective order was filed on his behalf.
|
| 570 | | - Factual return filed on 30 October 2008. As of early December 2008 his attorneys had still not been able to meet with him.
|
| 574 | Hamound Abdullah Hamoud Hassan Al Wady | - On 21 November 2008 Carlton F. Gunn filed a "NOTICE OF APPEARANCE" with regard to Hamound Abdullah Hamoud Hassan Al Wady (ISN 574) in Civil Action No. 05-cv-2385 (RMC).[6]
- A Joint Status Report, filed on 8 December 2008, states:
"The Government filed a return containing allegations against Petitioner Al Wady on October 31, 2008. Following entry of the CMO on November 6, 2008, Mr. Al Wady submitted a written request for discovery pursuant to Part I.E.1 of the CMO on November 15, 2008, which discovery the Government has not yet provided. On November 26, 2008, Mr. Al Wady filed a response to the Government's Motion for Clarification and Reconsideration or, in the Alternative, Motion for Certification for Appeal."
| |
|
| 743 | | - Madni had a duplicate petition in Civil Action No. 06-CV-1674 (RMC), filed September 29, 2006 under the name Qari Saad Iqbal, which he withdrew voluntarily on February 12, 2007. Judge Collyer dismissed that case without prejudice on February 12, 2007.
- Pursuant to the Detainee Treatment Act (DTA), petitioner Madni filed a Petition for Review of Combat Status Review Tribunal Determination with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on April 3, 2007, No. 07-1083. There is a protective order in place in that case. Madni's DTA petition is still pending before the Court of Appeals.
- A Joint Status Report, filed on 8 December 2008, states:
"Although his habeas petition remains pending before this Court, counsel for Mr. Madni understands that the Court does not intend to consider his outstanding claims during the present status proceedings."
| |
|
| 900 | |
...accusing him of throwing a hand grenade into a vehicle carrying U.S. and allied personnel in Afghanistan, were sworn on October 9, 2007, and referred for trial on January 30, 2008. It has been widely reported in the news media that Jawad was sixteen years old at the time of the alleged attack..."
| |
- As of December 2008 no factual return has been filed.
|
| 1045 | |
...accusing him of providing material support to hostilities against U.S. and allied armed forces in Afghanistan, were sworn on March 12, 2008, and referred for trial on April 4, 2008.
| |
- As of December 2008 no factual return has been filed.
| |
Known original petitioners on Al Halmandy v. Bush dismissed from the petition| isn | name | notes |
|---|
| | - Named on an April 7, 2007 motion to dismiss, because he had "left GTMO".[7] [8]
|
| | - Named on an April 7, 2007 motion to dismiss, because he had "left GTMO".
|
| | - Named on an April 7, 2007 motion to dismiss, because he had "left GTMO".
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.[9]
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| Saif | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| Moussa | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| Adel | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| Zakaria | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| Abdulrahman | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
|
| | - Privileged attorney client documents seized by camp authorities.
| |
On September 2, 2008, Muhammed Saad Iqbal Madni's lawyers were informed he had been repatriated to Pakistani custody.[10] On September 5, 2008, the Department of Justice filed a motion to have his habeas petition dismissed as moot because he was no longer in U.S. custody.On September 19, 2008Richard L. Cys, James P. Walsh filed "Petitioner Muhammed Saad Iqbal Madni's response to court order to show cause why his petition should not be dismissed as moot".Madni's lawyers argued his habeas petition should not be dismissed because he was entitled to continue to seek relief if his original detention was not legally justified. Further, his lawyer had not been advised of the conditions agreed upon by the U.S. Government and the Pakistani Government.
