| Thompson | |
| Nativename: | Nłeʔkepmxcín |
| States: | Canada, United States |
| Region: | British Columbia, Washington |
| Ethnicity: | 3,105 Nlaka'pamux |
| Speakers: | 105 |
| Date: | 2022 FPCC |
| Ref: | e21 |
| Familycolor: | American |
| Fam1: | Salishan |
| Fam2: | Interior Salish |
| Fam3: | Northern |
| Script: | Duployan shorthand (historical) |
| Iso3: | thp |
| Glotto: | thom1243 |
| Glottorefname: | Thompson |
| Map: | Lang Status 40-SE.svg |
The Thompson language, properly known as Nlaka'pamuctsin, also known as the Nlaka'pamux ('Nthlakampx') language, is an Interior Salishan language spoken in the Fraser Canyon, Thompson Canyon, Nicola Country of the Canadian province of British Columbia, and formerly in the North Cascades region of Whatcom and Chelan counties of the state of Washington in the United States. A dialect distinctive to the Nicola Valley is called Scw'exmx, which is the name of the subgroup of the Nlaka'pamux who live there.
Nlaka'pamuctsin is a consonant-heavy language. The consonants can be divided into two subgroups: obstruents, which restrict airflow, and sonorants or resonants, which do not.[1] The sonorants are often syllabic consonants, which can form syllables on their own without vowels.
| Bilabial | Alveolar | Palatal | Velar | Uvular | Pharyngeal | Glottal | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| central | sibilant | lateral | plain | lab. | plain | lab. | plain | lab. | |||||
| Plosive/ Affricate | plain | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | |||
| ejective | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | |||||
| Fricative | plain | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | ||||
| voiced | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | ||||||||||
| glottalized | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | ||||||||||
| Sonorant | plain | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | |||||||
| glottalized | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ | ||||||||
| Front | Central | Back | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nor. | ret. | nor. | ret. | |||
| Close | pronounced as /link/ ~ pronounced as /i̠/ | pronounced as /link/ | ||||
| Mid | pronounced as /link/ | pronounced as /link/ ~ pronounced as /ə̠/ | pronounced as /link/ | |||
| Open | pronounced as /link/ | |||||
Stress is used with an acute accent; á.[2] [3]
Researchers working in the Generative tradition have speculated that Salishan languages lack lexical categories such as nouns and verbs. Evidence for such an absence of contrast between parts of speech in Nlaka'pamuctsin come from a lack of clear morphological markers (e.g. morphemes) that differentiate nouns and verbs.[4] [5] Instead, generative linguists discuss morphology and syntax in Salishan based on a framework of predicates and particles.[5] However, more contemporary work suggests a changing understanding of Salishan grammar. Some Salishanists believe that functional categories are not prescriptive of lexical categories. Work in Functional linguistics suggests that other factors beyond morphological evidence code lexical categories in languages. In Salishan, the distinction would be less overt than in some other languages.[6] [7]
One morphological feature of Nlaka'pamuctsin is lexical suffixes.[5] These are words that add nuance to predicates and can be affixed to the ends of root words to add their general meaning to that word.[1] Thompson and Thompson assert that as a result of English language influence, speakers are using these more complex predicates less and less in favor of simpler predicates with complements and adjuncts, resulting in “a general decline in the exploitation of the rich synthetic resources of the language.”[1]
| Suffix | Suffix meaning | Root | Root meaning | Suffixed form | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ꞊uyəm’xw | earth, land, place; in vicinity; (earth) oven; baked goods | /q’íx̣-t | strong, secure | /q’íx̣꞊ym’xw | firm, hard ground |
| √c’əɬ | cold | /c’ɬ꞊úym’xw | it is a cold country | ||
| kw[ʔá]l’ | turn green | /kwa[ʔ]l’꞊úym’xw | the grass turns green | ||
| √c’áp | ferment | n/c’áp꞊ym’xw | sour-dough, yeast bread | ||
| ꞊ekst | hand, arm | √kiyèʔ | ahead, in front, principal, the eldest | s/kiyèʔ꞊qín'꞊kst | thumb |
| ꞊qin | head | ||||
| ꞊xn | foot, leg | s/kiyèʔ꞊qín'꞊xn | big toe | ||
| √k'əm | focal area | n/k'm꞊énk꞊xn | sole of foot | ||
| ꞊ene(ʔ)k | belly, under side |