Nixon shock explained

The Nixon shock was the effect of a series of economic measures, including wage and price freezes, surcharges on imports, and the unilateral cancellation of the direct international convertibility of the United States dollar to gold, taken by United States President Richard Nixon on 15th August 1971 in response to increasing inflation.[1] [2]

Although Nixon's actions did not formally abolish the existing Bretton Woods system of international financial exchange, the suspension of one of its key components effectively rendered the Bretton Woods system inoperative.[3] While Nixon publicly stated his intention to resume direct convertibility of the dollar after reforms to the Bretton Woods system had been implemented, all attempts at reform proved unsuccessful. By 1973, the current regime based on freely floating fiat currencies de facto replaced the Bretton Woods system for other global currencies.[4]

Background

See also: Closure of the Suez Canal (1967–1975).

Bretton Woods system

In 1944, representatives from 44 nations met in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, to develop a new international monetary system that came to be known as the Bretton Woods system. Conference attendees had hoped that this new system would "ensure exchange rate stability, prevent competitive devaluations, and promote economic growth".[5] It was not until 1958 that the Bretton Woods system became fully operational. Countries now settled their international accounts in dollars that could be converted to gold at a fixed exchange rate of $35 per ounce, which was redeemable by the U.S. government. Thus, the United States was committed to backing every dollar overseas with gold, and other currencies were pegged to the dollar.

For the first years after World War II, the Bretton Woods system worked well. With the Marshall Plan, Japan and Europe were rebuilding from the war, and countries outside the US wanted dollars to spend on American goods—cars, steel, machinery, etc. Because the U.S. owned over half the world's official gold reserves—574 million ounces at the end of World War II—the system appeared secure.[6]

However, from 1950 to 1969, as Germany and Japan recovered, the US share of the world's economic output dropped significantly, from 35% to 27%. Furthermore, a negative balance of payments, growing public debt incurred by the Vietnam War, and monetary inflation by the Federal Reserve caused the dollar to become increasingly overvalued in the 1960s.[6]

Criticism and decline

In France, the Bretton Woods system was called "America's exorbitant privilege"[7] as it resulted in an "asymmetric financial system" where non-US citizens "see themselves supporting American living standards and subsidizing American multinationals". American economist Barry Eichengreen wrote that "It costs only a few cents for the Bureau of Engraving and Printing to produce a $100 bill, but other countries had to pony up $100 of actual goods in order to obtain one".[7] In February 1965, French President Charles de Gaulle announced his intention to exchange its U.S. dollar reserves for gold at the official exchange rate.[8]

By 1966, non-US central banks held $14 billion US dollars, while the United States had only $13.2 billion in gold reserve. Of those reserves, only $3.2 billion was able to cover foreign holdings as the rest was covering domestic holdings.[9]

By 1971, the money supply had increased by 10%.[10] In May 1971, West Germany left the Bretton Woods system, unwilling to sell further Deutsche Mark for dollars.[11] In the following three months, this move strengthened its economy. Simultaneously, the dollar dropped 7.5% against the Deutsche Mark.[11] Other nations began to demand redemption of their dollars for gold. Switzerland redeemed $50 million in July.[11] France acquired $191 million in gold.[11] On August 5, 1971, the United States Congress released a report recommending devaluation of the dollar, in an effort to protect the dollar against "foreign price-gougers".[11] Also in August French President Georges Pompidou sent a battle ship to New York City to remove France's gold deposits.[12] On August 9, 1971, as the dollar dropped in value against European currencies, Switzerland left the Bretton Woods system.[11] The pressure began to intensify on the United States to leave Bretton Woods. On 11 August Britain requested $3 billion in gold be moved from Fort Knox to the Federal Reserve in New York. By 15 August Nixon would declare there were only 10,000 metric tons of gold remaining, or less than half of the reserves the US once held.

Nixon response

At the time, the U.S. also had an unemployment rate of 6.1% (August 1971)[13] [14] and an inflation rate of 5.84% (1971).[15] To combat these problems, Nixon consulted Federal Reserve chairman Arthur Burns, incoming Treasury Secretary John Connally, and Paul Volcker, then Undersecretary for International Monetary Affairs and future Federal Reserve Chairman.

On the afternoon of Friday, August 13, 1971, Burns, Connally, and Volcker, along with twelve other high-ranking White House and Treasury advisors, met secretly with Nixon at Camp David. There was great debate about what Nixon should do, but ultimately Nixon, relying heavily on the advice of the self-confident Connally, decided to break up Bretton Woods by announcing the following actions on August 15:[16] [17] [18]

  1. Nixon directed Treasury Secretary Connally to suspend, with certain exceptions, the convertibility of the dollar into gold or other reserve assets, ordering the gold window to be closed such that foreign governments could no longer exchange their dollars for gold.
  2. Nixon issued (pursuant to the Economic Stabilization Act of 1970), imposing a 90-day freeze on wages and prices in order to counter inflation. This was the first time the U.S. government had enacted wage and price controls since World War II.
  3. An import surcharge of 10 percent was set to ensure that American products would not be at a disadvantage because of the expected fluctuation in exchange rates.

Speaking on television on Sunday, August 15, when American financial markets were closed, Nixon said the following:

Impact and aftermath

The Nixon shock has been widely considered to be a political success, but an economic failure for bringing on the 1973–1975 recession, the stagflation of the 1970s, and the instability of floating currencies.

Political effect

Politically, Nixon's actions were a great success. The American public believed the government was rescuing them from price gougers and from a foreign-caused exchange crisis.[19] [20] The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 33 points the next day, its biggest daily gain ever at that point, and the New York Times editorial read, "We unhesitatingly applaud the boldness with which the President has moved."[6] [21]

Economic effect and legacy

By December 1971, the import surcharge was dropped as part of a general revaluation of the Group of Ten (G-10) currencies, which under the Smithsonian Agreement were thereafter allowed 2.25% devaluations from the agreed exchange rate. According to Douglas Irwin in World Trade Reviews report "The Nixon Shock After Forty Years: The Import Surcharge Revisited", for several months, U.S officials could not get other countries to agree to a formal revaluation of their currencies.

In March 1973, the fixed exchange rate system became a floating exchange rate system.[22] The currency exchange rates no longer were governments' principal means of administering monetary policy.

Under the floating rate system, during the 1970s, the dollar plunged by a third. Further, the Nixon shock unleashed enormous speculation against the dollar. The German Mark appreciated significantly after it was allowed to float in May 1971. It forced Japan's central bank to intervene significantly in the foreign exchange market to prevent the yen from increasing in value. Within two days August 16–17, 1971, Japan's central bank had to buy $1.3 billion to support the dollar and keep the yen at the old rate of ¥360 to the dollar. Japan's foreign exchange reserves rapidly increased: $2.7 billion (30%) a week later and $4 billion the following week. Still, this large-scale intervention by Japan's central bank could not prevent the depreciation of US dollar against the yen. France also was willing to allow the dollar to depreciate against the franc, but not allow the franc to appreciate against gold.[23]

Even much later, in 2011, Paul Volcker expressed regret over the abandonment of Bretton Woods: "Nobody's in charge," Volcker said. "The Europeans couldn't live with the uncertainty and made their own currency and now that's in trouble."[6]

See also

Further reading

External links

Notes and References

  1. Book: Garten, Jeffrey E. . Three Days at Camp David: How a Secret Meeting in 1971 Transformed the Global Economy . 2021 . HarperCollins . 978-0-06-288770-2 .
  2. News: Lewis . Paul . Nixon's Economic Policies Return to Haunt the G. O. P. . 25 March 2019 . The New York Times . 15 August 1976.
  3. Book: Oatley, Thomas. International Political Economy . 6th . 2019. Routledge. 978-1-351-03464-7. 351–52.
  4. News: Lowenstein . Roger . The Nixon Shock . 25 March 2019 . Bloomberg . August 5, 2011.
  5. Web site: Ghizoni. Sandra. Establishment of the Bretton Woods System. US Federal Reserve. April 12, 2023.
  6. Web site: Lowenstein. Roger. The Nixon Shock. https://web.archive.org/web/20110911202443/http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/the-nixon-shock-08042011.html. dead. September 11, 2011. Bloomberg BusinessWeek Magazine . August 4, 2011 . 26 March 2013.
  7. Barry Eichengreen, Exorbitant Privilege: The Rise and Fall of the Dollar and the Future of the International monetary systemhttps://books.google.com/books?id=TIlpAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA4
  8. Margaret Garritsen de Vries, The International Monetary Fund, 1966–1971 https://books.google.com/books?id=5oUS9M1kzOEC&pg=PA61
  9. Web site: Money Matters: An IMF Exhibit – The Importance of Global Cooperation – The Incredible Shrinking Gold Supply . International Monetary Fund. 18 March 2014.
  10. Web site: M2 Money Stock | FRED | St. Louis Fed . Research.stlouisfed.org . January 1959 . 2017-03-18.
  11. Book: Frum, David. How We Got Here: The '70s. David Frum. 2000. Basic Books. New York, New York. 0-465-04195-7. 295–98.
  12. Book: Lamoreaux . Naomi R. . Shapiro . Ian . The Bretton Woods Agreements . Yale University Press . Basic Documents in World Politics . 2019 . Chapter 6: A "Barbarous Relic" : The French, Gold, and the Demise of Bretton Woods. Graetz . Michael J.. Briffault. Olivia. 978-0-300-23679-8 . 2024-06-23 . 130-132.
  13. Web site: Unemployment in the U.S. . Google Public Data Explorer . 2017-03-18.
  14. To compare over the period from 1950–2013 from the same Bureau of Statistics Unemployment rate data, in the United States unemployment rates rose to highs of 10.8% in November 1982 and 10% in October 2009; and dropped to lows of 2.5% in May, 1953; 3.9% in September, 2000; 4.4% in May, 2007; 5% in March 1989; 7.7% in July 1992; 7.9% in October, 1949; 7.4% in August 1958.
  15. Web site: Historical Inflation Rate . Tim . McMahon . 3 April 2013 . 3.
  16. News: Lehrman. Lewis. The Nixon Shock Heard 'Round the World. Wall Street Journal. August 15, 2011. 26 March 2013.
  17. Web site: Kollen Ghizoni. Sandra. Nixon Ends Convertibility of U.S. Dollars to Gold and Announces Wage/Price Controls. Federal Reserve History. 2 Dec 2021.
  18. Richard Nixon, "Address to the Nation Outlining a New Economic Policy: 'The Challenge of Peace.'" (August 15, 1971)
  19. Hetzel, Robert L. (2008), p. 84
  20. Book: Yergin. Daniel. The Commanding Heights: The Battle between Government and the Marketplace that Is Remaking the Modern World. 2002. Simon & Schuster. New York. 0-68482975-4. Daniel Yergin. Stanislaw. Joseph. Joseph Stanislaw. cited in Web site: Yergin. Daniel. Stanislaw . Joseph . Nixon, Price Controls, and the Gold Standard . Commanding Heights. PBS. 2003. November 23, 2012.
  21. Nicky Marsh, Credit Culture: The Politics of Money in the American Novel of the 1970s (2000) pp. 52–53.
  22. The Collapse of the Bretton Woods Fixed Exchange Rate System . Garber . Peter M.. in
  23. The Nixon Shock after Forty Years: The Import Surcharge Revisited . Irwin . Douglas . January 2012 . National Bureau of Economic Research . w17749 . 10.3386/w17749 . Cambridge, MA .