Nicaraguan Revolution Explained

Conflict:Nicaraguan Revolution
Partof:the Central American crisis and the Cold War
Date:19 July 1961 – 25 April 1990
----

19 July 1961 – 17 July 1979 (first phase: FSLN Rebellion)

17 July 1979 – 25 April 1990 (second phase: Contra War)

Place:Nicaragua
Result:FSLN military victory in 1979
Combatant1: Somoza regime
(1961–1979)

---- Contras
(1979–1990)

Combatant2: FSLN

MAP-ML (1978–1979)

Panama (1978–1979)[14] [15]

Commander1:
Commander2:
Casualties3:1978–79: 50,000-73,000 total killed[26] 1981–89: 10,000–43,000 total killed; best estimate using most detailed battle information is 30,000 killed.

The Nicaraguan Revolution (Spanish; Castilian: Revolución Nicaragüense or Revolución Popular Sandinista|link=yes) began with rising opposition to the Somoza dictatorship in the 1960s and 1970s, the ouster of the dictatorship in 1978–79,[27] and the Contra War, fought between the government and the Contras from 1981 to 1990. The revolution revealed the country as one of the major proxy war battlegrounds of the Cold War.

The initial overthrow of the Somoza dictatorial regime in 1978–79 cost many lives, and the Contra War of the 1980s took tens of thousands more and was the subject of fierce international debate. Because of the political turmoil, failing economy, and limited government influence, during the 1980s both the FSLN (a leftist collection of political parties) and the Contras (a rightist collection of counter-revolutionary groups) received aid from the Soviet Union and the United States.

A peace process started with the Sapoá Accords in 1988 and the Contra War ended after the signing of the Tela Accord in 1989 and the demobilization of the FSLN and Contra armies.[28] A second election in 1990 resulted in the election of a majority of anti-Sandinista parties and the FSLN lost power.

Somoza family

See main article: Somoza family. Following the United States occupation of Nicaragua in 1912 during the Banana Wars, the Somoza family political dynasty took power, and ruled from 1937 until its ouster in 1979. The Somoza dynasty consisted of Anastasio Somoza García, his eldest son Luis Somoza Debayle, and finally Anastasio Somoza Debayle. The Somoza era was characterized by economic development, albeit with rising inequality and political corruption, strong US support for the government and its military,[29] as well as a reliance on US-based multinational corporations.[30]

Sandinista National Liberation Front

In 1961 Carlos Fonseca Amador, Silvio Mayorga, and Tomás Borge Martínez formed the Sandinista National Liberation Front (FSLN) with other student activists at the Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Nicaragua (UNAN) in Managua. The founders were experienced activists. Amador, first General Secretary, had worked with others on a newspaper "broadly critical" of the Somoza reign titled Segovia.[31]

Consisting of approximately 20 members during the 1960s, with the help of students, FSLN gathered support from peasants and anti-Somoza elements, as well as from the communist Cuban government, the socialist Panamanian government of Omar Torrijos, and the social democratic Venezuelan government of Carlos Andrés Pérez.[32]

By the 1970s the coalition of students, farmers, businesses, churches, and a small percentage of Marxists was strong enough to launch a military effort against the regime of Anastasio Somoza Debayle. FSLN focused on guerrilla tactics, inspired by Fidel Castro and Ché Guevara. They launched an unsuccessful the Río Coco/Bocay-Raití campaign: "when guerrillas did encounter the National Guard, they had to retreat...with heavy losses."[33] Further operations included a devastating loss near the city of Matagalpa, during which Mayorga was killed.[34] During this time, FSLN reduced attacks, instead focusing on solidifying the organization.

Fonseca died in combat in November 1976. The FSLN then split into three factions that fought separately: the Maoist Tendencia GPP (Guerra Popular Prolongada) (English: Prolonged People's War); Marxist-Leninist Tendencia Proletaria (English: proletarian); and Left-wing nationalist Tendencia Tercerista (English: third).

Revolution

In the 1970s, FSLN began a campaign of kidnappings, which led to national recognition of the group in the Nicaraguan media and solidification of the group as a force.[32] The regime, which included the Nicaraguan National Guard, trained by the U.S. military, declared a state of siege, and proceeded to use torture, extrajudicial killings, intimidation and press censorship in order to combat the FSLN attacks.[32] This led to international condemnation of the regime and in 1978 the US cut off aid over its human rights violations. In response, Somoza lifted the state of siege.

Other opposition parties and movements began to consolidate. In 1974, the Unión Democrática Liberal (UDEL; English: Union for Democratic Liberation) was founded by Pedro Joaquín Chamorro Cardenal, editor of the Managua newspaper La Prensa. The alliance included two anti-Somoza liberal parties as well as conservatives and the Nicaraguan Socialist Party.[35]

On 10 January 1978 Cardenal was murdered, allegedly by the Somoza regime, and riots broke out in Managua targeting the Somoza regime.[36] Following the riots, a general strike on 23–24 January called for the end of the Somoza regime and was successful at shutting down around 80% of businesses in Managua and the provincial capitals of León, Granada, Chinandega, and Matagalpa.[36]

In the words of William Dewy, a Citi Bank employee who witnessed the Managua riots:

On 22 August 1978 the FSLN staged a massive kidnapping operation. Led by Éden Pastora, the Sandinistan forces captured the National Palace while the legislature was in session, taking 2,000 hostages. Pastora demanded money, the release of Sandinistan prisoners, and "a means of publicizing the Sandinista cause." After two days, the government agreed to pay $500,000 and to release certain prisoners, a major victory for the FSLN.[32] Revolts against the state and guerrilla warfare continued.

In early 1979 the Organization of American States supervised negotiations between the FSLN and the government. However, these broke down when it became clear that the Somoza regime had no intention of allowing democratic elections.

By June 1979, following a successful urban offensive, the FSLN militarily controlled all of the country except the capital. On 17 July President Somoza resigned, and on 19 July the FSLN entered Managua,[32] ceding control to the revolutionary movements. Somoza fled to Miami; his Nationalist Liberal Party became practically defunct, and many government functionaries and business figures overtly compromised with somocismo chose exile. The Catholic church and the professional sectors generally approved of the new reality.[37]

Sandinista government

Immediately following the fall of the Somoza regime, Nicaragua lay largely in ruins. The country had suffered both war and, earlier, natural disaster in the devastating 1972 Nicaragua earthquake. In 1979, approximately 600,000 Nicaraguans were homeless and 150,000 more were either refugees or in exile,[38] out of a total population of just 2.8 million.[39]

In response, a state of emergency was declared. The US sent US$99 million in aid. Land and businesses of the Somoza regime were expropriated, the courts were abolished, and workers were organized into Civil Defense Committees. The new regime declared that "elections are unnecessary", which led to criticism from the Catholic Church and others.

Agrarian reform

The Somocista regime had created a big and modern center, Managua, surrounded an almost semifeudal rural economy with few productive outputs, including cotton, sugar and other agricultural products. All sectors of the economy of Nicaragua were determined, in great part, by the Somozas or their supporters, whether by directly owning agricultural brands/trusts, or actively choosing their owners (local or foreign). Somoza himself was (incorrectly) alleged to have owned 1/5 of all profitable land in Nicaragua. Somoza or his people did own or give away banks, ports, communications, services and massive amounts of land.[40]

The Nicaraguan Revolution brought immense restructuring to all three sectors of the economy, directing it towards a mixed economy. The biggest economic impact was on agriculture, in the form of agrarian reform, which was proposed as a process that would develop pragmatically along with other changes (economic, political, etc.).[41]

Economic reforms overall needed to restart the economy. As a developing country, Nicaragua had an agriculture-based economy, susceptible to commodity market prices. The rural economy was far behind in technology and devastated by the guerrilla warfare.

Article 1 of the Agrarian Reform Law says that property is guaranteed if it is sed efficiently and described different forms of property:

The principles that defined the reform matched those of the Revolution: pluralism, national unity, and economic democracy.

Agrarian reform developed in four phases:

  1. phase (1979): confiscation of property owned by Somocistas and its partners
  2. phase (1981): Agrarian Reform Law of 19 July 1981
  3. phase (1984–85): massive cession of land individually
  4. phase (1986): Agrarian Reform Law of 1986, or "reform to the 1981 Law"

In 1985, the Agrarian Reform distributed 235000acres of land to the peasantry. This represented about 75 percent of all land distributed to peasants since 1980. The reform had the twofold purpose of increasing support for the government among the campesinos, and guaranteeing ample food delivery into the cities. During 1985, ceremonies were held throughout the countryside in which Daniel Ortega gave each peasant title to land and a rifle to defend it.[42]

Cultural revolution

The Revolution brought many cultural developments. The Nicaraguan Literacy Campaign (Cruzada Nacional de Alfabetización) focused on secondary school and university students drafting teachers as volunteer teachers. Within five months they claimed to have reduced the overall illiteracy rate from 50.3% to 12.9%.[43] In September 1980, UNESCO awarded Nicaragua the "Nadezhda K. Krupskaya" award. This was followed by literacy campaigns of 1982, 1986, 1987, 1995 and 2000, each of which was also awarded by UNESCO.[44]

The Sandinistas established a Ministry of Culture, one of only three in Latin America at the time, and established a new editorial brand, called Editorial Nueva Nicaragua and, based on it, started to print cheap editions of basic books rarely seen by Nicaraguans. It founded an Instituto de Estudios del Sandinismo (Institute for Studies of Sandinismo) where it printed the work and papers of Augusto C. Sandino and those that reflected the ideologies of FSLN, such as Carlos Fonseca and Ricardo Morales Avilés.

Such programs received international recognition for improving literacy, health care, education, childcare, unions, and land reform.[45] [46]

Human rights controversies

The Heritage Foundation, a conservative American think tank with close ties to the Ronald Reagan administration,[47] [48] charged the Sandinista government with human rights violations, including press censorship. It charged that the government censored the independent newspaper La Prensa.[49] French journalist Viktor Dedaj, who lived in Managua in the 1980s, contended that La Prensa was generally sold freely and that the majority of radio stations were anti-Sandinista.[50] The Heritage Foundation claimed that the Sandinistas instituted a "spy on your neighbor" system that encouraged citizens to report any activity deemed counter-revolutionary, with those reported facing harassment from security representatives, including the destruction of property.

Heritage also criticized the government for its treatment of the Miskito people, stating that over 15,000 Miskitos were forced to relocate, that their villages were destroyed, and that their killers were promoted rather than punished.[51] [52] The Los Angeles Times noted that "...the Miskitos began to actively oppose the Sandinistas in 1982 when authorities killed more than a dozen Indians, burned villages, forcibly recruited young men into the army and tried to relocate others. Thousands of Miskitos poured across the Coco into Honduras, and many took up arms to oppose the Nicaraguan government."[53]

The United Nations, the Organization of American States and Pax Christi disputed Heritage's allegations of anti-Semitism. According to them, individual Nicaraguan Jews had their property expropriated due to their connections with the Somoza regime, rather than because they were Jewish. They cited the fact that there were prominent Sandinistas officials of Jewish descent.[54] In contrast to these organizations, the Anti-Defamation League supported allegations of Sandinista antisemitism. It worked closely with Nicaraguan Jewish exiles to reclaim a synagogue that had been firebombed by Sandinista militants in 1978 and expropriated in 1979.[55]

Amnesty International noted numerous human rights violations by the Sandinista government. They contended that civilians "disappeared" after their arrest, that "civil and political rights" were suspended, due process was denied detainees, detainees were tortured, and "reports of the killing by government forces of those suspected of supporting the contras".[56]

The Sandinistas were accused of mass executions.[57] [58] The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights investigated abuses by Sandinista forces, including an execution of 35 to 40 Miskitos in December 1981,[59] and an execution of 75 people in November 1984.[60]

Contras

See main article: Contras. The Carter Administration attempted to work with FSLN in 1979 and 1980, while the Reagan Administration supported an anti-communist strategy for dealing with Latin America, and attempted to isolate the Sandinista regime economically and politically.[61] As early as 1980–1981, anti-Sandinista forces known as Contras began forming along the Nicaragua/Honduras border. Many of the initial Contras were former members of Somoza's National Guard and many were still loyal to Somoza, then in exile in Honduras.[61]

In addition to Contra units loyal to Somoza, FSLN also began to face opposition from members of ethnic minority groups that inhabited Nicaragua's remote Mosquito Coast region along the Gulf of Mexico. These groups were demanding self-determination and/or autonomy, but the FSLN refused to grant this and began using forced relocations and armed force in response.[61]

Upon taking office in January 1981, Reagan cancelled U.S. economic aid to Nicaragua,[62] and on 6 August 1981 he signed National Security Decision Directive 7, which authorized the production and shipment of arms to the region but not their deployment.[63] On 17 November 1981, President Reagan signed National Security Directive 17, authorizing covert support to anti-Sandinista forces.[62]

Armed conflict soon erupted, further destabilizing the region upset by civil wars in El Salvador and Guatemala. The CIA-backed Contras secretly opened a "second front" on Nicaragua's eastern coast and Costa Rican border. As the civil war opened cracks in the national revolutionary project, FSLN's military budget grew to more than half of the government's annual budget.[61] The Servicio Militar Patriótico (Patriotic Military Service), a compulsory draft, was also established.[64]

By 1982, Contra forces had begun carrying out assassinations of members of the Nicaraguan government, and by 1983 the Contras had launched a major offensive. The CIA was helping them to plant mines in Nicaragua harbors to inhibit foreign weapons shipments.[65] The 1987 Iran–Contra affair placed the Reagan Administration again at the center of secret support for the Contras.

1984 general election

See main article: 1984 Nicaraguan general election. The 1984 Nicaraguan general election took place on 4 November. Of the 1,551,597 citizens registered in July, 1,170,142 voted (75.4%). Null votes were 6% of the total. International observers declared the elections free and fair,[66] although the Reagan administration denounced it as a "Soviet style sham". The national share of valid votes for president were:

Esquipulas Peace Agreement

See main article: Esquipulas Peace Agreement. The Esquipulas Peace Agreement was a mid-1980s initiative to settle the military conflicts that had plagued Central America for many years, and in some cases (notably Guatemala) for decades. It built upon groundwork laid by the Contadora Group from 1983 to 1985. The agreement was named for Esquipulas, Guatemala, where the initial meetings took place. US Congress efforts were helped by Capitol Hill lobbyist William C. Chasey.

In May 1986, summit meeting Esquipulas I took place, attended by the five Central American presidents. On 15 February 1987, Costa Rican President Óscar Arias submitted a Peace Plan that evolved from this meeting. During 1986 and 1987, the Esquipulas Process was established, in which the Central American heads of state agreed on economic cooperation and a framework for peaceful conflict resolution. The Esquipulas II Accord emerged from this and was signed in Guatemala City by the five presidents on 7 August 1987.

Esquipulas II defined measures to promote national reconciliation, an end to hostilities, democratization, free elections, the termination of all assistance to irregular forces, negotiations on arms controls, and assistance to refugees. It laid the ground for international verification procedures and provided a timetable for implementation.

The Sapoá Accords at March 23, 1988 represented the beginning of a peace process in Nicaragua. The name of the accords comes from Sapoá, a Nicaraguan town near the border with Costa Rica. Sandinismo in 1988 was coming to an end as the Soviet Union began limiting its support. This in turn limited Sandinista government options to continue the conflict, forcing them to negotiate for peace. The accord was mediated by João Clemente Baena Soares at the time as Secretary General of the Organization of American States and then Archbishop of Managua Miguel Obando y Bravo[67] [68] Since Nicaraguan conflict was a proxy war between the USSR and the US. Peace process management relied on then Soviet ambassador Vaino Väljas' mediation depending on recent US-Soviet agreements since US did not have an Ambassador to Nicaragua from July 1, 1987 till May 4, 1988.[69] [70] [71]

National Opposition Union (UNO)

See main article: National Opposition Union.

In the 1990 Nicaraguan general election, the UNO Coalition included:

See also

Bibliography

Primary sources

Further reading

External links

Notes and References

  1. ((Research Directorate, Immigration and Refugee Board, Canada)) . Participation of Costa Rican government in arms smuggling, for Sandinistas in 1979 and for Contras in mid-1980's . UNHCR . 1 May 1989 . 4 December 2020.
  2. Report of the Congressional Committees Investigating the Iran/Contra Affair, 1995. pp. 165, 271, 481.
  3. Web site: CIA-Contra-Crack Cocaine Controversy. 10 April 2015.
  4. Web site: Reagan Says Saudi Talked of Contra Aid. tribunedigital-chicagotribune. 14 May 1987 . 10 April 2015.
  5. Web site: Saudi Arabia and the Reagan Doctrine – Middle East Research and Information Project. December 1988. 10 April 2015.
  6. Web site: Understanding the Iran-Contra Affairs – the Iran-Contra Affairs.
  7. News: Doyle. McManus. Private Contra Funding of $32 Million Disclosed : Leader Shows Secret Bank Data in Effort to Prove Rebels Did Not Get Money From Iran Arms Sales . . 6 March 1987 . 19 August 2019.
  8. Web site: The Contras, Cocaine, and Covert Operations. 10 April 2015.
  9. The Pinochet File: A Declassified Dossier on Atrocity and Accountability. p. 255.
  10. Web site: Understanding the Iran-Contra Affairs. www.brown.edu. 2017-04-09. 8 June 2017. https://web.archive.org/web/20170608214954/http://www.brown.edu/Research/Understanding_the_Iran_Contra_Affair/timeline-nicaragua.php. dead.
  11. News: Iran–Contra Hearings; Brunei Regains $10 Million . The New York Times. 22 July 1987 . 2021-12-05.
  12. News: Poland and China Reportedly Sent Arms to Contras . The New York Times. 2 May 1987. 2023-03-31.
  13. Landslide: The Unmaking of the President, 1984–1988. p. 143.
  14. Omar Torrijos and the Sandinista Revolution. Brown. Jonathan C.. The Latin Americanist . 2022 . 66 . 25–45 . 10.1353/tla.2022.0003 . 247623108 .
  15. The Sandinista Revolution and the Limits of the Cold War in Latin America: The Dilemma of Nonintervention During the Nicaraguan Crisis, 1977–78. Sánchez Nateras. Gerardo. Cold War History. 2018. 18 . 2 . 111–129 . 10.1080/14682745.2017.1369046 . 218576606 .
  16. Report of the Congressional Committees Investigating the Iran/Contra Affair, 1995. pp. 216, 485.
  17. Web site: [{{Google books |plainurl=yes |id=wtebWixsIdYC |page=184 }} The Soviet Union and Revolutionary Warfare: Principles, Practices, and ...]. 10 April 2015.
  18. Report of the Congressional Committees Investigating the Iran/Contra Affair, 1995. p. 27.
  19. Report of the Congressional Committees Investigating the Iran/Contra Affair, 1995. p. 485.
  20. News: Christopher . Dickey . Arab States Help Nicaragua Avoid Ties to Superpowers . . 19 July 1981 . 2 January 2024.
  21. Web site: Mexico's Support of the Sandinista Revolution. Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo.
  22. News: William . Echikson . France Warms Up to Nicaragua – As US Fumes . . 15 July 1982 . 29 July 2022.
  23. Web site: Our work in Nicaragua. https://web.archive.org/web/20130615061856/http://www.sida.se/English/Countries-and-regions/Latin-America/Nicaragua/Our-work-in-Nicaragua/. dead. 2013-06-15. Swedish International Development Corporation Agency (www.sida.se). 2009.
  24. Web site: Sandinistas Find Economic Ally In Socialist Sweden. philly-archives. 10 April 2015.
  25. With Them and Against Them: Canada's Relations With Nicaragua, 1979–1990. Bishop. Adam. 2 September 2009 . University of Waterloo . Master Thesis .
  26. Web site: Lacina. Bethany. The PRIO Battle Deaths Dataset, 1946–2008, Version 3.0: Documentation of Coding Decisions. https://wayback.archive-it.org/all/20171019150641/http://www.prio.no/Global/upload/CSCW/Data/PRIObd3.0_documentation.pdf. dead. 19 October 2017. International Peace Research Institute, Oslo. 5 August 2013.
  27. Louis Proyect, Nicaragua, discusses, among other things, the reforms and the degree to which socialism was intended or achieved.
  28. [Uppsala Conflict Data Program]
  29. [Uppsala Conflict Data Program]
  30. Web site: Taking Care of Business in Nicaragua. 10 April 2015.
  31. Book: Baracco, Luciano. Nicaragua: The Imagining of a Nation – From Nineteenth-Century Liberals to Twentieth-Century Sandinistas. Algora Publishing. 2005. New York, NY. 61.
  32. [Uppsala Conflict Data Program]
  33. Book: Baracco, Luciano. Nicaragua: The Imagining of a Nation – From Nineteenth-Century Liberals to Twentieth-Century Sandinistas. Algora Publishing. 2005. New York, NY. 66.
  34. Book: Baracco, Luciano. Nicaragua: The Imagining of a Nation – From Nineteenth-Century Liberals to Twentieth-Century Sandinistas. Algora Publishing. 2005. New York, NY. 67.
  35. María Dolores Ferrero Blanco La Nicaragua de los Somoza : 1936–1979. Managua: Instituto de Historia de Nicaragua y Centroamérica de la Universidad Centroamericana; Huelva : Universidad de Huelva, 2012. p. 132.
  36. Washington, Somoza and the Sandinistas: [{{Google books |plainurl=yes |id=FJe87T4G0w0C |page=657 }} Stage and Regime in US Policy toward Nicaragua 1969–1981], Author: Morris H. Morley, Published: 2002,, p. 106
  37. María Dolores Ferrero Blanco La Nicaragua de los Somoza : 1936–1979. Managua: Instituto de Historia de Nicaragua y Centroamérica de la Universidad Centroamericana; Huelva : Universidad de Huelva, 2012. p. 273.
  38. [Uppsala Conflict Data Program]
  39. evolution of demography in Nicaragua (1961–2003), Data FAOSTAT, http://faostat.fao.org/faostat/help-copyright/copyright-e.htm (last updated 11 February 2005)
  40. Solá Monserrat, Roser. "Geografía y Estructura Económicas de Nicaragua" (Nicaragua's Geography and Economical Structure). Universidad Centroamericana. Managua, Nicaragua, 1989. 2nd ed.
  41. "Agrarian Productive Structure in Nicaragua", Solá Monserrat, Roser. 1989. Pag 69 and ss.
  42. Louis Proyect, Nicaragua, about 4/5 of the way down.
  43. News: Ulrike . Hanemann . Nicaragua's Literacy Campaign . UNESCO. 2 July 2007 . DOC . https://web.archive.org/web/20070703020810/http://portal.unesco.org/education/en/file_download.php/67b39f3aaf8f20da06be3c6a4e4c6dfeHanemann_U.doc. 3 July 2007.
  44. News: Juan. B. Arrien. Literacy in Nicaragua . UNESCO . 1 August 2007 .
  45. http://www.stanford.edu/group/arts/nicaragua/discovery_eng/history/background.html Background History
  46. http://www.globalexchange.org/tours/NicaraguaReportOct2001.html globalexchange.org
  47. Web site: Reagan and Heritage: A Unique Partnership. The Heritage Foundation. January 29, 2016. en-US.
  48. Arin, Kubilay Yado (2013): Think Tanks, the Brain Trusts of US Foreign Policy. Wiesbaden: VS Springer.
  49. Web site: The Sandinista War on Human Rights. L.. Melanie. The Heritage Foundation. en-US. 9 April 2017.
  50. Que faire si vous lisez le journal "Le Monde", Viktor Dedaj, 2004
  51. Nicaragua: Nothing Will Stop This Revolution. Russell . George. 17 October 1983. Time. 11 April 2017. 0040-781X.
  52. Web site: The Sandinista War on Human Rights. L.. Melanie. The Heritage Foundation. en-US. 11 April 2017.
  53. News: Douglas. Farah. Miskito Indians Forced to Flee : Their Dreams of Returning to Nicaragua Fade . . 2 August 1987 . 2 December 2020.
  54. News: Herty Lewites, 66, Ex-Sandinista, Dies . The New York Times . 4 July 2006 . Kinzer . Stephen .
  55. Web site: Sandinista Anti-Semitism and Its Apologists . September 1986 .
  56. Book: Amnesty International. Nicaragua: The human rights records 1986–1989. Amnesty International Publications. 1989. 978-0939994502.
  57. Moore, John Norton (1987) The Secret War in Central America. University Publications of America. p. 143.
  58. Miranda, Roger and Ratliff, William (1993) The Civil War in Nicaragua. Transaction. p. 193.
  59. News: OAS Study Says Miskito Indians Suffered Abuse From Sandinistas. 2021-07-21. The Washington Post. en.
  60. Web site: Annual Report 1992–1993. 1993-03-12. Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. 2009-03-30.
  61. [Uppsala Conflict Data Program]
  62. U.S. Department of Justice, Appendix A: Background on United States Funding of the Contras, http://www.justice.gov/oig/special/9712/appa.htm
  63. University of Texas, National Security Decision Directive number 7, http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/reference/Scanned%20NSDDS/NSDD7.pdf
  64. Web site: Ley del Servicio Militar Patriótico . legislacion.asamblea.gob.ni. 20 May 2018.
  65. News: L.A. Times. Setback for Contras: CIA Mining of Harbors 'a Fiasco'", Last in a series. 5 March 1985. Doyle. McManus. Robert C.. Toth.
  66. News: BBC on This Day-5-1984: Sandinistas claim election victory. 5 November 1984. 10 April 2015.
  67. Web site: Revista Envío – Sapoá – A New Benchmark.
  68. Web site: Acuerdos de Sapoá – 23 de marzo de 1988.
  69. Web site: Proxy wars in Nicaragua and Angola – The Cold War, 1972–1991 – OCR A – GCSE History Revision – OCR A – BBC Bitesize.
  70. Web site: Toomas Alatalu: Vaino Väljas – eestlane, kes alustas külma sõja lõpetamist. 28 March 2021.
  71. Web site: The INF Treaty and the Washington Summit: 20 Years Later.