Neurogenic claudication explained

Neurogenic Claudication
Synonym:Pseudoclaudication
Symptoms:Pain, tingling, tiredness, weakness, numbness or heaviness in the legs, hips, glutes and lower back.
Risks:Age, obesity, previous spinal deformities or problems.
Diagnosis:Physical examination, medical imaging (CT and X-Rays).
Treatment:Physical therapy, medications, surgery
Medication:Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, prostaglandin-based drugs, gabapentin, methylcobalamin, epidural injections, lidocaine and steroids

Neurogenic claudication (NC), also known as pseudoclaudication, is the most common symptom of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and describes intermittent leg pain from impingement of the nerves emanating from the spinal cord.[1] [2] Neurogenic means that the problem originates within the nervous system. Claudication,, refers to painful cramping or weakness in the legs.[3] should therefore be distinguished from vascular claudication, which stems from a circulatory problem rather than a neural one.

The term neurogenic claudication is sometimes used interchangeably with spinal stenosis. However, the former is a clinical term, while the latter more specifically describes the condition of spinal narrowing.[4] is a medical condition most commonly caused by damage and compression to the lower spinal nerve roots.[5] It is a neurological and orthopedic condition that affects the motor nervous system of the body, specifically, the lower back, legs, hips and glutes.[6] does not occur by itself, but rather, is associated with other underlying spinal or neurological conditions such as spinal stenosis or abnormalities and degenerative changes in the spine. The International Association for the Study of Pain defines neurogenic claudication as, "pain from intermittent compression and/or ischemia of a single or multiple nerve roots within an intervertebral foramen or the central spinal canal. This definition reflects the current hypotheses for the pathophysiology of, which is thought to be related to the compression of lumbosacral nerve roots by surrounding structures, such as hypertrophied facet joints or ligamentum flavum, bone spurs, scar tissue, and bulging or herniated discs.[7]

The predominant symptoms of involve one or both legs and usually presents as some combination of tingling, cramping discomfort, pain, numbness, or weakness in the lower back, calves, glutes, and/or thighs and is precipitated by walking and prolonged standing. However, the symptoms vary depending on the severity and cause of the condition. Lighter symptoms include pain or heaviness in the legs, hips, glutes and lower back, post-exercise.[8] Mild to severe symptoms include prolonged constant pain, tiredness and discomfort in the lower half of the body. In severe cases, impaired motor function and ability in the lower body can be observed, and bowel or bladder dysfunction may be present. Classically, the symptoms and pain of are relieved by a change in position or flexion of the waist.[9] Therefore, patients with have less disability in climbing steps, pushing carts, and cycling.

Treatment options for depends on the severity and cause of the condition, and may be nonsurgical or surgical. Nonsurgical interventions include drugs, physical therapy, and spinal injections.[10] Spinal decompression is the main surgical intervention and is the most common back surgery in patients over 65. Other forms of surgical procedures include: laminectomy, microdiscectomy and laminoplasty.[11] Patients with minor symptoms are usually advised to undergo physical therapy, such as stretching and strengthening exercises. In patients with more severe symptoms, medications such as pain relievers and steroids are prescribed in conjunction with physical therapy. Surgical treatments are predominantly used to relieve pressure on the spinal nerve roots and are used when nonsurgical interventions are ineffective or show no effective progress.

Diagnosis of neurogenic claudication is based on typical clinical features, the physical exam, and findings of spinal stenosis on Computer Tomography (CT) or X-Ray imaging. In addition to vascular claudication, diseases affecting the spine and musculoskeletal system should be considered in the differential diagnosis.

Signs and Symptoms

Neurogenic claudication commonly describes pain, weakness, fatigue, tingling, heaviness and/or paresthesias that extend into the lower extremities. These symptoms may involve only one leg, but they usually involve both. Leg pain is usually more significant than back pain in individuals who have both.[12] is classically distinguished by symptoms improving or worsening with certain activities and manoeuvres. Pain may occur with walking, standing, and/or back extension. Sitting and bending or leaning forward tend to provide relief. Patients may also report that pain is worse while walking down stairs and improved while walking up stairs or using a bicycle or shopping cart. A positive "shopping cart sign" refers to the worsening of pain with spinal extension and improvement with spinal flexion.

Whilst these common symptoms are usually present in many patients with, rarer and more serious symptoms can occur in severe cases of . In extreme cases of constant discomfort, pain or numbness is experienced. This results in patients to have decreased mobility and function as excessive or constant movements cause pain. Exercise and prolonged walking often become difficult and are triggers of pain, tiredness, numbness and heaviness in the legs, lower back and hips.[13] Common tasks such as standing upright for an extended duration or picking up heavy objects may become increasingly difficult to perform. In addition, patients with severe may experience difficulties sleeping as lying down on their back causes discomfort and pain. In very extreme cases, bowel or bladder dysfunction can occur. However, this is a consequence of the underlying cause of rather than the condition itself. As most causes of involve increased pressure or damage to the nerves in the lower spine, damage and pressure on the nerves that extend to the bowel or bladder may occur, leading to bowel or bladder dysfunction.[14]

On physical examination, patients with have normal peripheral pulses. The neurologic exam, straight leg raise, and femoral nerve stretch are typically normal. Abnormal signs may be revealed if the patient is observed walking until they exhibit . For example, a positive "stoop test" is observed if bending forward or stooping while walking relieves symptoms. Occasionally, patients may have other signs such as sensory loss or gait changes.

Causes

Neurogenic claudication is the fundamental clinical feature of , which may be congenital or acquired. As a result of, the spinal canal in the lumbar spine narrows, causing damage and arthritic changes in the spine. These changes, such as bulging disks, thickening of ligaments and overgrowth of bone spurs, lead to pressure and potentially damage to the spinal nerve roots. The compression of the spinal nerve roots that control movements and sensations in the lower body subsequently causes the symptoms of . The causes of are most commonly acquired and include degenerative changes such as degenerative disc disease and spinal osteoarthritis. may also be acquired from changes due to spinal surgery such as excess scar tissue or bone formation. Other secondary causes include space-occupying lesions, ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, and Paget's disease. Less commonly, the cause of spinal stenosis may be present at birth as seen in achondroplasia, spina bifida, and certain mucopolysaccharidoses. In addition to spinal stenosis, other lower back conditions such as spondylosis, tumors, infections and herniated or ruptured discs can cause . These conditions contribute to the potential narrowing of the spinal cord, increasing pressure and inducing damage on the spinal nerve roots, thus, causing paing, tingling or weakness in the lower body.

Risk factors for include:[15]

Diagnosis and Evaluation

Neurogenic claudication is one subtype of the clinical syndrome of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). No gold standard diagnostic criteria currently exist, but evaluation and diagnosis is generally based on the patient history, physical exam, and medical imaging. The accuracy of a diagnosis of increases with each additional suggestive clinical finding. Therefore, a combination of signs and symptoms may be more helpful in diagnosing NC than any single feature of the history or physical exam. These signs and symptoms include pain triggered by standing, pain relieved by sitting, symptoms above the knees, and a positive "shopping cart sign".

Specific questions that may aid diagnosis include:

The physical exam may include observation, evaluation of pulses in the foot, lumbar spine range of motion, and components of a neurological exam.

Helpful imaging may include x-rays, CT, CT myelogram, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but MRI is preferred. Abnormal MRI findings may be present in two-thirds of asymptomatic individuals, and imaging findings of spinal stenosis do not correlate well with symptom severity. Therefore, imaging findings must be considered in the context of a patient's history and physical exam when seeking a diagnosis. The evidence for using objective imaging findings to define has been conflicting.

Differential diagnosis

Neurogenic claudication must be differentiated from other causes of leg pain, which may be present in a number of conditions involving the spine and musculoskeletal system. The differential diagnosis for includes:

Neurogenic vs vascular claudication

Neurogenic vs Vascular Claudication!Clinical feature!Neurogenic!Vascular
Pain worse withStanding, walkingWalking
Pain relieved bySpinal flexion, sittingStanding
Timing of reliefWithin minutesImmediately
LocationAbove the kneesBelow the knees
Radiation of painExtends down legsExtends up legs
Quality of painSharpCramping, dull
Back painCommonSometimes
Peripheral pulsesPresentMay be absent
Both neurogenic claudication and vascular claudication manifest as leg pain with walking, but several key features help distinguish between these conditions. In contrast to, vascular claudication does not vary with changes in posture. Patients with vascular claudication may experience relief with standing, which may provoke symptoms in . The walking distance necessary to produce pain in vascular claudication is more consistent than in neurogenic claudication.

Pathophysiology

Degenerative disc disease (DDD) may trigger the pathogenesis of neurogenic claudication. When intervertebral discs degenerate and change shape in, the normal movements of the spine are interrupted. This results in spinal instability and more degenerative changes in spinal structures including facet joints, ligamentum flavum, and intervertebral discs. These pathologic changes result in narrowing of the vertebral canal and neurovascular compression at the lumbosacral nerve roots.[16] The compression of these spinal nerve roots that control sensation and movement in the lower body results in the tingling, pain and weakness patients often experience. However, because the severity of symptoms does not correlate well with the degree of stenosis and nerve root compression, a clear understanding of the specific pathogenesis remains challenging.

It is currently unknown which exact cellular mechanisms within the body causes the pain of as a response to the compression of spinal nerves. The two main proposed mechanisms agree that neurovascular compression plays a role. The ischemic theory proposes that poor blood supply to the spinal nerve roots results in . In contrast, the venous stasis theory proposes that a combination of low oxygen levels and metabolite buildup are responsible due to venous backup at the cauda equina. Pain with walking may be partially explained by the corresponding increase in nerve root oxygen requirements.

These changes in blood flow may occur during back extension when shifts in vertebral structures and ligaments narrow the spinal canal and compress the neurovasculature. Compared to a neutral position, extended spines exhibit 15% less cross-sectional area of the intervertebral foramina, and nerve root compression is present one-third of the time. These dynamic changes in the shape of the spinal canal are more pronounced in individuals with spinal stenosis. The amount of narrowing may be 67% in compared to 9% in healthy spines.

Treatment

Treatment options for aim to cure the underlying cause of the condition, such as lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) or other degenerative spinal diseases. Decreased walking and lower body motor ability due to is the primary disabling feature of LSS. Constant discomfort and pain in the lower extremities and an inability to sleep lying down are also disabling features of that affect a patient's quality of life. Therefore, the target of most treatments is to solve these complications. Currently, several treatment options are available to patients, and they can be grouped broadly into nonsurgical and surgical options. Nonsurgical treatments include medications, physical therapy, and spinal injections. Medication options for neurogenic claudication have included non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), prostaglandin-based drugs, gabapentin, and methylcobalamin. However, the quality of evidence supporting their use is not high enough for specific recommendations. Physical therapy is commonly prescribed to patients, but the quality of evidence supporting its use for neurogenic claudication is also low. One quarter of all epidural injections are administered to treat symptoms of . Preparations may contain lidocaine and/or steroids. They may be considered for short-term pain relief or to delay surgery, but their benefit is considered small.

Physical Therapy

Patients that experience light to mild symptoms are commonly treated through physical therapy, which involves stretching and strengthening the lower back, abdominal (core) and leg muscles.[17] Common stretches used include the knee to chest stretch, posterior pelvic tilt, neural stretching of the legs, hip-flexor stretch and lower trunk rotation.[18] In conjunction with these stretches, various strengthening exercises are often implemented, targeting the core, lower back and hip muscles. Common exercises include bridges, bird to dog, tabletop leg press, clamshell and knees to chest.[19] Depending on the age, mobility and physical health of patients, a combination of easier and more difficult exercises should be prescribed to suit the patient's needs. More difficult exercises may include the incorporation of resistance training (weights), gym equipment and more explosive movements. Other exercises such as cycling (stationary), swimming and water-based activities have also been found to strengthen and improve overall stability and strength in the core, lower back and hips. Ultimately, the aim of physical therapy is to loosen and relax the tight muscles and ligaments that contribute to the symptoms, and to strengthen those muscles to prevent further reocurrences of the condition. However, studies have found conflicting conclusions in regards to the effectiveness of physical therapy as a treatment option for patients.[20] Thus, the low quality of evidence supporting its use has prompted further research into physical therapy as a treatment option for to be necessary.[21] [22]

Stretching Exercises

Common stretching exercises used to relieve pain and treat include:

Strengthening Exercises

Common strengthening exercises used to treat and prevent future reocurrences of include:

Medications

Medications such as NSAIDs, prostaglandin-based drugs, gabapentin, methylcobalamin and epidural steroid injections are often used in conjunction with physical therapy to treat patients with mild or moderate symptoms of . The main goal of these medications is to reduce pain and provide temporary relief for patients. NSAIDs and prostaglandin-based medications control inflammation at sites of nerve damage or pressure by inhibiting cyclooxygenase activity, and reducing the production of prostaglandins, a key contributor of inflammation.[23] [24] By reducing inflammation, less pressure is put on the nerve roots, decreasing pain, and providing relief for patients.[25] Gabapentin aims to reduce pain and provide relief by altering the normal functioning of neurotransmitters that induce a sensation of pain and discomfort.[26] However, the exact mechanism of Gabapentin’s functioning in the body is not completely understood and current knowledge is based on experimental studies that target the nervous system.[27]   Methylcobalamin is another medication that targets the nervous system to reduce pain and provide patients with temporary pain-relief. The drug produces myelin to cover and protect nerves from damage, preventing pain induced from damaged nerve roots, as described in some cases of .[28] Epidural steroid injections are the main epidural injections prescribed to treat . They inhibit the inflammatory cascade signalling to reduce inflammation at sites of spinal nerve damage or pressure.  Consequently, they reduce pain and provide relief to individuals with .[29] [30] Whilst the use of medications is common among patients that experience frequent or constant pain, their effectiveness has yielded mixed results in studies.[31] Further research into their viability as a medication for is necessary to allow doctors to provide better care and treatment options for patients.[32]

Surgical Interventions

Depending on the cause and severity of the condition, surgical options for vary. Symptoms of, including, are the most common reason patients 65 and older undergo spinal surgery. Surgery is generally reserved for patients whose symptoms do not improve with nonsurgical treatments, and the main objective of surgery is to relieve pressure on the spinal nerve roots and recover normal mobility and quality of life. Lower Spinal Decompression is considered the mainstay of surgical treatment. In this procedure, the ligamentum flavum is first removed, followed by the removal of the superior facet osteophyte in the spinal canal, and then the decompression of the spinal nerve root. Another surgical method of decompression is the Fenestration method, which involves creating a small window in the spinal canal and then decompressing the nerves. Alternative surgical options include the use of interspinous process spacers, minimally invasive lumbar decompression (MILD) procedure, laminectomy, microdiscectomy and placement of a spinal cord stimulator. The MILD procedure aims to relieve spinal cord compression by percutaneous removal of portions of the ligamentum flavum and lamina. Laminectomy also involves partial or complete removal and sacrifice of the lamina, but in addition, facets in one or more segments of the spinal cord are usually sacrificed as well. Microdiscectomy is another surgical alternative which uses small incisions, and a miniature camera for viewing, to enter the spinal cord and release pressure on the nerve roots. Laminoplasty and spinal fusion surgeries are other alternative surgical procedures that can be performed. However, they are relatively new methods which still require more research and advancements in order for it to be safely performed with minimal risks.[33]

The use of interspinous spacers is associated with increased costs and rates of reoperation, while evidence comparing effectiveness of the MILD procedure to spinal decompression is insufficient. The effectiveness of laminectomy, microdiscectomy, laminoplasty and spinal fusion surgeries as an alternative to spinal decompression has also been heavily debated, with studies showing conflicting results.[34] [35] While studies show that surgery improves walking ability, minimizes constant pain and improves quality of life, comparisons between the efficacy of surgical and nonsurgical treatment of have yielded mixed results.

Prognosis

Individuals with may be asymptomatic for many years before developing symptoms such as . However, most patients that present with often seek medical help and treatment due to the condition causing pain and affecting their quality of life. Consequently, the prognosis of untreated and has not been well reported and is unknown. Based on the physiological cause of, it is projected that the symptoms of NC can worsen over time, with roughly one-third of patients showing signs of improvement with time.

For patients that develop worse symptoms over time, severe consequences can occur. Over time, untreated and can lead to chronic pain and muscle weakness. In severe cases, caudea equina syndrome can develop, disrupting sensory and motor function in the lower body and bladder. Consequently, disability in the lower extremities may develop over time in individuals with untreated and . Whilst some patients may recover and improve their condition over time, without the help of medical treatment or interventions, this is only prevalent in individuals with light or very mild symptoms of . In most scenarios, the prognosis of can lead to potential disability, muscle weakness or constant pain in the lower body.

Epidemiology

is a noncommunicable condition and thus, does not pose any community risks in terms of infectiousness. Rather, NC is associated with increasing age and mostly affects individuals over the age of 60. Age is a major contributing factor to the onset of due to spinal degenerative changes that are brought by aging and the weakening of bones and ligaments in the lumbar area. is also more likely present in individuals with other spinal comorbidities. A history of spinal injuries or deformities is also a contributing factor to the increased likelihood of the onset of .[36] Other factors such as exercise and bone density have also been found to be associated with . Increased exercise activity in the form of strength training has also been found to increase bone density, muscle strength and thus, decrease the likelihood of as aging occurs.[37]

One of the main causes of is the onset of in elderly patients. Relative to their respective age groups, 16% of individuals aged less than 40 experience whilst 38.8% of individuals aged over 60 experience .[38] [39] Between the ages of 60 and 69, the prevalence of relative to this population group is 47.2%. Data obtained from medical practitioners suggest that the incidence of is 5 cases per 100 000. This increased prevalence of as a consequence of aging, heavily contributes to the epidemiology and acquiring of . Among individuals with spinal stenosis, is present in greater than 90% of patients and present in almost half of patients that present with low back pain, with over 200,000 people being affected in the United States. The prevalence of and spinal stenosis in elderly men is also evident, with studies finding that roughly 1 in 10 elderly men experience leg pain in combination with low back pain (symptoms of) and this incidence rate is also doubled in retirement communities. As the global life expectancy increases, the impact of spinal disease symptoms such as is likely to increase.

Current research

Current treatment options for are not diverse and lack extensive and detailed research to support their effectiveness, resulting in patients having to choose from a small pool of treatment options, some of which may not be effective. This lack of evidence to support the effectiveness of treatment options for is especially prevalent in nonsurgical treatments, such as physical therapy and medications. Among surgical interventions for, current research into improving methods of surgery to minimize post-surgery complication and to improve quality of life have also been of concern.[40] [41]

Physical Therapy

Studies have found that physical therapies such as stretches and strengthening exercises have yielded mixed results in terms of its effectiveness in treating . Reports have shown that physical therapy does aid in treating in patients with light to mild symptoms,[42] whilst others have shown the contrary. It has also been found that patients with more severe symptoms of find less long-term success in treating the condition through physical therapy. Thus, doctors have concluded that further research into the effectiveness of physical therapy as a treatment option for is necessary. With more detailed research, doctors will then be able to suggest the best treatment options for their patients, to help them recover from the condition.

Medications

Medications commonly prescribed to patients are generally steroids, pain relievers or anti-inflammatories that aim to reduce pain and provide pain-relief. However, studies have found that these medications only provide temporary relief for patients, and do not provide a permanent solution, with symptoms often reoccurring several months following the disuse of medications.[43] Hence, doctors have reported that it is important to research possible medications that can provide long term relief or a permanent solution for patients. Currently, Tanezumab, a monoclonal antibody that suppresses nerve activity, has been in development for use in patents with back pain, such as .[44] The drug functions by selectively targeting and inhibiting Nerve Growth Factors (NGF) in the body. By blocking NGF in the body, Tanezumab aims to prevent pain signals produced in the body from reaching the brain, thus, reducing pain and providing relief for patients.[45] Whilst positive results have been shown in several studies, further research is still necessary for its safe and effective use.[46]

Surgical Procedures

Whilst surgical procedures exist to treat, current methods involve partial or complete removal of the lamina and segments of the spinal cord, leading to poor stability. Hence, orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons have been developing and researching other surgical techniques that reduce this side effect. Haruo Tsuji, in 1990, introduced a procedure known as Laminoplastie en bloc expansive Laminoplasty as an alternative to laminectomy and since then, variations and further developments have been made on that procedure, with developments still being currently.[47] This procedure involves a reconstruction of the vertebral lamina such that it creates a hinge on one side, allowing for decreased pressure on spinal nerve roots.[48] Advances in this procedure involve finding ways to access the spinal cord with minimal incisions and to more effectively create hinges that replicate normal functioning of the spine.[49] [50] In addition to Laminoplasty, spinal fusion surgeries have also been of growing interest to orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons.[51] This process involves connecting two vertebrae of the bones together to reduce pain or correct any spinal deformities.[52] As such this form of surgery has the potential to treat the underlying cause of . However, these types of surgeries are difficult and dangerous to perform due to the sensitive nature of the spinal area. Additionally, these techniques are relatively new and thus, more research and advances in its methodology is still required for it to be considered a reliable and viable option to treat patients.[53] [54]

See also

Notes and References

  1. Deer T, Sayed D, Michels J, Josephson Y, Li S, Calodney AK . A Review of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Intermittent Neurogenic Claudication: Disease and Diagnosis . Pain Medicine . 20 . Suppl 2 . S32–S44 . December 2019 . 31808530 . 7101166 . 10.1093/pm/pnz161 .
  2. Lee SY, Kim TH, Oh JK, Lee SJ, Park MS . Lumbar Stenosis: A Recent Update by Review of Literature . Asian Spine Journal . 9 . 5 . 818–28 . October 2015 . 26435805 . 4591458 . 10.4184/asj.2015.9.5.818 .
  3. Pearce JM . (Neurogenic) Claudication . European Neurology . 54 . 2 . 118–9 . 2005 . 16408366 . 10.1159/000088648 . free .
  4. Vining RD, Shannon ZK, Minkalis AL, Twist EJ . Current Evidence for Diagnosis of Common Conditions Causing Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Standardized Terminology Recommendations . Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics . 42 . 9 . 651–664 . November 2019 . 31870637 . 10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.08.002 . free .
  5. Kobayashi S . Pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of intermittent claudication in patients with lumbar canal stenosis . World Journal of Orthopedics . 5 . 2 . 134–45 . April 2014 . 24829876 . 10.5312/wjo.v5.i2.134 . 4017306 . free .
  6. Alvarez JA, Hardy RH . Lumbar spine stenosis: a common cause of back and leg pain . American Family Physician . 57 . 8 . 1825–34, 1839–40 . April 1998 . 9575322 .
  7. Lurie J, Tomkins-Lane C . Management of lumbar spinal stenosis . BMJ . 352 . h6234 . January 2016 . 26727925 . 6887476 . 10.1136/bmj.h6234 .
  8. Book: Critchley. Edmund . Eisen. Andrew . vanc . Clinical Medicine and the Nervous System. Springer London. 1992. 978-1-4471-3353-7. Swash. Michael. Hong Kong. 157–180. Disc and Degenerative Disease: Stenosis, Spondylosis and Subluxation.
  9. Suri P, Rainville J, Kalichman L, Katz JN . Does this older adult with lower extremity pain have the clinical syndrome of lumbar spinal stenosis? . JAMA . 304 . 23 . 2628–36 . December 2010 . 21156951 . 3260477 . 10.1001/jama.2010.1833 .
  10. Messiah S, Tharian AR, Candido KD, Knezevic NN . Neurogenic Claudication: a Review of Current Understanding and Treatment Options . Current Pain and Headache Reports . 23 . 5 . 32 . March 2019 . 30888546 . 10.1007/s11916-019-0769-x . 83464182 .
  11. Book: Gala. Raj J.. Yue. James J. . vanc . Perioperative Pain Management for Orthopaedic and Spine Surgery. Oxford University Press. 2018. 9780190626761. Reach. John . Yue. James J.. Narayan. Deepak. Kaye. Alan. Vadivelu. Nalini. United States. 172–186. 10.1093/med/9780190626761.001.0001.
  12. Genevay S, Atlas SJ . Lumbar spinal stenosis . Best Practice & Research. Clinical Rheumatology . 24 . 2 . 253–65 . April 2010 . 20227646 . 2841052 . 10.1016/j.berh.2009.11.001 .
  13. Ammendolia C, Schneider M, Williams K, Zickmund S, Hamm M, Stuber K, Tomkins-Lane C, Rampersaud YR . 6 . The physical and psychological impact of neurogenic claudication: the patients' perspectives . The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association . 61 . 1 . 18–31 . March 2017 . 28413220 . 5381486 .
  14. Watanabe K, Sekiguchi M, Yonemoto K, Nikaido T, Kato K, Otani K, Yabuki S, Kakuma T, Kikuchi SI, Konno SI . 6 . Bowel/bladder dysfunction and numbness in the sole of the both feet in lumbar spinal stenosis - A multicenter cross-sectional study . Journal of Orthopaedic Science . 22 . 4 . 647–651 . July 2017 . 28551282 . 10.1016/j.jos.2017.04.006 . free .
  15. Bagley C, MacAllister M, Dosselman L, Moreno J, Aoun SG, El Ahmadieh TY . Current concepts and recent advances in understanding and managing lumbar spine stenosis . F1000Research . 8 . 137 . 2019-01-31 . 30774933 . 6357993 . 10.12688/f1000research.16082.1 . free .
  16. Ammendolia C, Stuber K, Tomkins-Lane C, Schneider M, Rampersaud YR, Furlan AD, Kennedy CA . What interventions improve walking ability in neurogenic claudication with lumbar spinal stenosis? A systematic review . European Spine Journal . 23 . 6 . 1282–301 . June 2014 . 24633719 . 10.1007/s00586-014-3262-6 . 12962371 .
  17. Ammendolia C, Stuber K, de Bruin LK, Furlan AD, Kennedy CA, Rampersaud YR, Steenstra IA, Pennick V . 6 . Nonoperative treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication: a systematic review . Spine . 37 . 10 . E609-16 . May 2012 . 22158059 . 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318240d57d . 34821901 .
  18. Markman JD, Gewandter JS, Frazer ME, Pittman C, Cai X, Patel KV, Jahromi BS, Dworkin RH, Burke LB, Farrar JT . 6 . Evaluation of outcome measures for neurogenic claudication: A patient-centered approach . Neurology . 85 . 14 . 1250–6 . October 2015 . 26354988 . 4607594 . 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002000 .
  19. “Lumbar/Core Strength and Stability Exercises”, Princeton University Athletic Medicine, accessed 2 October 2020, https://uhs.princeton.edu/sites/uhs/files/documents/Lumbar.pdf .
  20. Schneider MJ, Ammendolia C, Murphy DR, Glick RM, Hile E, Tudorascu DL, Morton SC, Smith C, Patterson CG, Piva SR . 6 . Comparative Clinical Effectiveness of Nonsurgical Treatment Methods in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial . JAMA Network Open . 2 . 1 . e186828 . January 2019 . 30646197 . 6324321 . 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6828 .
  21. Sahin F, Yilmaz F, Kotevoglu N, Kuran B . The efficacy of physical therapy and physical therapy plus calcitonin in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis . Yonsei Medical Journal . 50 . 5 . 683–8 . October 2009 . 19881973 . 2768244 . 10.3349/ymj.2009.50.5.683 .
  22. Macedo LG, Hum A, Kuleba L, Mo J, Truong L, Yeung M, Battié MC . Physical therapy interventions for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review . Physical Therapy . 93 . 12 . 1646–60 . December 2013 . 23886845 . 3870489 . 10.2522/ptj.20120379 .
  23. Kuritzky L, Samraj GP . Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of low back pain . Journal of Pain Research . 5 . 579–90 . 2012-11-28 . 23271922 . 3526867 . 10.2147/JPR.S6775 . free .
  24. Ricciotti E, FitzGerald GA . Prostaglandins and inflammation . Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology . 31 . 5 . 986–1000 . May 2011 . 21508345 . 3081099 . 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.207449 .
  25. Book: Pahwa R, Goyal A, Bansal P, Jialal I . Chronic Inflammation. 2020. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL). StatPearls Publishing. 29630225. 2020-11-15 .
  26. Book: Narain T, Adcock L . Gabapentin for Adults with Neuropathic Pain: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness . 2018. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. CADTH Rapid Response Reports. Ottawa (ON). 30325622.
  27. Book: Yasaei R, Katta S, Saadabadi A . Gabapentin. 2020. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL). StatPearls Publishing. 29630280. 2020-11-15 .
  28. Zhang M, Han W, Hu S, Xu H . Methylcobalamin: a potential vitamin of pain killer . Neural Plasticity . 2013 . 424651 . 2013 . 24455309 . 3888748 . 10.1155/2013/424651 . free .
  29. Leem JG . Epidural steroid injection: a need for a new clinical practice guideline . The Korean Journal of Pain . 27 . 3 . 197–9 . July 2014 . 25031804 . 4099231 . 10.3344/kjp.2014.27.3.197 .
  30. King W, Miller DC, Smith CC . Systemic Effects of Epidural Corticosteroid Injection . Pain Medicine . 19 . 2 . 404–405 . February 2018 . 29016932 . 10.1093/pm/pnx173 . free .
  31. Comer CM, Redmond AC, Bird HA, Conaghan PG . Assessment and management of neurogenic claudication associated with lumbar spinal stenosis in a UK primary care musculoskeletal service: a survey of current practice among physiotherapists . BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders . 10 . 1 . 121 . October 2009 . 19796387 . 2762954 . 10.1186/1471-2474-10-121 . free .
  32. Ammendolia C, Côté P, Southerst D, Schneider M, Budgell B, Bombardier C, Hawker G, Rampersaud YR . 6 . Comprehensive Nonsurgical Treatment Versus Self-directed Care to Improve Walking Ability in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Trial . Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation . 99 . 12 . 2408–2419.e2 . December 2018 . 29935152 . 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.05.014 . 49396022 .
  33. Web site: Neel Anand, MD - Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery Director of Spine Trauma. 2020-11-14. SpineUniverse. en.
  34. Bydon M, Macki M, Abt NB, Sciubba DM, Wolinsky JP, Witham TF, Gokaslan ZL, Bydon A . 6 . Clinical and surgical outcomes after lumbar laminectomy: An analysis of 500 patients . Surgical Neurology International . 6 . Suppl 4 . S190-3 . 2015-05-07 . 26005583 . 4431053 . 10.4103/2152-7806.156578 . free .
  35. Mohamed A, El Sisi YB, Al Emam SE, Hussen MA, Saif DS . 2020-07-13. Evaluating the outcome of classic laminectomy surgery alone versus laminectomy with fixation surgery in patients with lumbar canal stenosis regarding improvement of pain and function . Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery. 35. 1. 19. 10.1186/s41984-020-00087-6. 220507514. 2520-8225. free.
  36. Maeda T, Hashizume H, Yoshimura N, Oka H, Ishimoto Y, Nagata K, Takami M, Tsutsui S, Iwasaki H, Minamide A, Nakagawa Y, Yukawa Y, Muraki S, Tanaka S, Yamada H, Yoshida M . 6 . Factors associated with lumbar spinal stenosis in a large-scale, population-based cohort: The Wakayama Spine Study . PLOS ONE . 13 . 7 . e0200208 . 2018-07-18 . 30020970 . 6051614 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0200208 . 2018PLoSO..1300208M . free .
  37. Sigmundsson FG, Kang XP, Jönsson B, Strömqvist B . Prognostic factors in lumbar spinal stenosis surgery . Acta Orthopaedica . 83 . 5 . 536–42 . October 2012 . 23083437 . 3488183 . 10.3109/17453674.2012.733915 .
  38. Costandi S, Chopko B, Mekhail M, Dews T, Mekhail N . Lumbar spinal stenosis: therapeutic options review . Pain Practice . 15 . 1 . 68–81 . January 2015 . 24725422 . 10.1111/papr.12188 . 206246340 . free .
  39. Kalichman L, Cole R, Kim DH, Li L, Suri P, Guermazi A, Hunter DJ . Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: the Framingham Study . The Spine Journal . 9 . 7 . 545–50 . July 2009 . 19398386 . 3775665 . 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.03.005 .
  40. Machado GC, Ferreira PH, Harris IA, Pinheiro MB, Koes BW, van Tulder M, Rzewuska M, Maher CG, Ferreira ML . 6 . Effectiveness of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis . PLOS ONE . 10 . 3 . e0122800 . 2015-03-30 . 25822730 . 4378944 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0122800 . 2015PLoSO..1022800M . free .
  41. Anderson DB, Ferreira ML, Harris IA, Davis GA, Stanford R, Beard D, Li Q, Jan S, Mobbs RJ, Maher CG, Yong R, Zammit T, Latimer J, Buchbinder R . 6 . SUcceSS, SUrgery for Spinal Stenosis: protocol of a randomised, placebo-controlled trial . BMJ Open . 9 . 2 . e024944 . February 2019 . 30765407 . 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024944 . 6398750 .
  42. Wise J . Physical therapy is as effective as surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis, study finds . BMJ . 350 . h1827 . April 2015 . 25852064 . 10.1136/bmj.h1827 . 206904981 .
  43. Haddadi K, Asadian L, Isazade A . Effects of Nasal Calcitonin vs. Oral Gabapentin on Pain and Symptoms of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Clinical Trial Study . Clinical Medicine Insights. Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders . 9 . 133–8 . 2016-01-01 . 27398032 . 4934406 . 10.4137/CMAMD.S39938 .
  44. Webb MP, Helander EM, Menard BL, Urman RD, Kaye AD . Tanezumab: a selective humanized mAb for chronic lower back pain . Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management . 14 . 361–367 . 2018-02-21 . 29503555 . 5825994 . 10.2147/TCRM.S144125 . free .
  45. Nair AS . Tanezumab: Finally a Monoclonal Antibody for Pain Relief . Indian Journal of Palliative Care . 24 . 3 . 384–385 . 2018 . 30111960 . 6069623 . 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_208_17 . 31 January 2024 . free.
  46. Patel MK, Kaye AD, Urman RD . Tanezumab: Therapy targeting nerve growth factor in pain pathogenesis . Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology . 34 . 1 . 111–116 . 2018-01-01 . 29643634 . 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_389_15 . 5885425 . free .
  47. Tsuji H, Itoh T, Sekido H, Yamada H, Katoh Y, Makiyama N, Yamagami T . Expansive laminoplasty for lumbar spinal stenosis . International Orthopaedics . 14 . 3 . 309–14 . 1990 . 2279841 . 10.1007/BF00178765 . 39499491 .
  48. Yang YM, Yoo WK, Bashir S, Oh JK, Kwak YH, Kim SW . Spinal Cord Changes After Laminoplasty in Cervical Compressive Myelopathy: A Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study . en . Frontiers in Neurology . 9 . 696 . 2018 . 30210428 . 10.3389/fneur.2018.00696 . 6124480 . free .
  49. Fehlings MG, Ahuja CS, Mroz T, Hsu W, Harrop J . Future Advances in Spine Surgery: The AOSpine North America Perspective . Neurosurgery . 80 . 3S . S1–S8 . March 2017 . 28350952 . 10.1093/neuros/nyw112 . 25153345 . free .
  50. Hirano Y, Ohara Y, Mizuno J, Itoh Y . History and Evolution of Laminoplasty . en . Neurosurgery Clinics of North America . 29 . 1 . 107–113 . January 2018 . 29173422 . 10.1016/j.nec.2017.09.019 .
  51. Proietti L, Scaramuzzo L, Schiro' GR, Sessa S, Logroscino CA . Complications in lumbar spine surgery: A retrospective analysis . Indian Journal of Orthopaedics . 47 . 4 . 340–5 . July 2013 . 23960276 . 3745686 . 10.4103/0019-5413.114909 . free .
  52. Daniels CJ, Wakefield PJ, Bub GA, Toombs JD . A Narrative Review of Lumbar Fusion Surgery With Relevance to Chiropractic Practice . Journal of Chiropractic Medicine . 15 . 4 . 259–271 . December 2016 . 27857634 . 5106443 . 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.08.007 .
  53. Harris IA, Traeger A, Stanford R, Maher CG, Buchbinder R . Lumbar spine fusion: what is the evidence? . Internal Medicine Journal . 48 . 12 . 1430–1434 . December 2018 . 30517997 . 10.1111/imj.14120 . 54524476 . free . 1959.4/unsworks_75083 . free .
  54. Dhillon KS . Spinal Fusion for Chronic Low Back Pain: A 'Magic Bullet' or Wishful Thinking? . Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal . 10 . 1 . 61–68 . March 2016 . 28435551 . 5333707 .