Neumann–Neumann methods explained

In mathematics, Neumann–Neumann methods are domain decomposition preconditioners named so because they solve a Neumann problem on each subdomain on both sides of the interface between the subdomains.[1] Just like all domain decomposition methods, so that the number of iterations does not grow with the number of subdomains, Neumann–Neumann methods require the solution of a coarse problem to provide global communication. The balancing domain decomposition is a Neumann–Neumann method with a special kind of coarse problem.

More specifically, consider a domain Ω, on which we wish to solve the Poisson equation

-\Deltau=f,    u|\partial\Omega=0

for some function f. Split the domain into two non-overlapping subdomains Ω1 and Ω2 with common boundary Γ and let u1 and u2 be the values of u in each subdomain. At the interface between the two subdomains, the two solutions must satisfy the matching conditions

u1=u2,   

\partial
n1

u1=

\partial
n2

u2

where n_ is the unit normal vector to Γ in each subdomain.

An iterative method with iterations k=0,1,... for the approximation of each ui (i=1,2) that satisfies the matching conditions is to first solve the Dirichlet problems

-\Delta

(k)
u
i

=fiin\Omegai,   

(k)
u
i

|\partial\Omega=0,

(k)
u
i|

\Gamma=λ(k)

for some function λ(k) on Γ, where λ(0) is any inexpensive initial guess. We then solve the two Neumann problems

(k)
-\Delta\psi
i

=0in\Omegai,   

(k)
\psi
i

|\partial\Omega=0,

\partial
ni
(k)
\psi
i

|\Gamma=

\omega(\partial
n1
(k)
u
1

+

\partial
n2
(k)
u
2

).

We then obtain the next iterate by setting

λ(k+1)=λ(k)-\omega(\theta1\psi

(k)
1

+\theta2\psi

(k)
2

)on\Gamma

for some parameters ω, θ1 and θ2.

This procedure can be viewed as a Richardson iteration for the iterative solution of the equations arising from the Schur complement method.[2]

This continuous iteration can be discretized by the finite element method and then solved—in parallel—on a computer. The extension to more subdomains is straightforward, but using this method as stated as a preconditioner for the Schur complement system is not scalable with the number of subdomains; hence the need for a global coarse solve.

See also

References

  1. A. Klawonn and O. B. Widlund, FETI and Neumann–Neumann iterative substructuring methods: connections and new results, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 54 (2001), pp. 57–90.
  2. A. Quarteroni and A. Valli, Domain Decomposition Methods for Partial Differential Equations, Oxford Science Publications 1999.