Neubauer v. Germany explained

Neubauer v. Germany
Court:Federal Constitutional Court
Start Date:February 6, 2020

Neubauer v. Germany was a 2020 court case in which a group of activists sued over the vagueness present in 2019's Climate Protection Act.

Background

Activists backed by Fridays For Future, Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth, and other NGOs brought claim that the lack of a comprehensive legal framework to reduce carbon emissions by 2030 violated their fundamental rights as enshrined in German basic law.[1] The complaint specifically called out that the state had to protect the right to life, personal freedom, right to property, and human dignity.[2]

Decision

The Constitutional Court declared part of the Federal Climate Protection Act unconstitutional, as it did not "sufficiently protect people against future infringements and limitations of freedom rights in the wake of gradually intensifying climate change".[3] It ruled against some of their claims, saying the plaintiffs could not prove the government violated its constitutional duty.

The finance minister responded to the ruling by saying that he would work with the environment ministry to amend the act.[4] The environmental minister wrote that she would present new climate proposals over the summer.

References

  1. Web site: Treisman . Rachel . April 29, 2021 . German Court Orders Revisions To Climate Law, Citing 'Major Burdens' On Youth . NPR.
  2. Rechtsanwälte Günther . Partnerschaft.
  3. Kotzé . Louis J. . December 2021 . Neubauer et al. versus Germany: Planetary Climate Litigation for the Anthropocene? . German Law Journal . en . 22 . 8 . 1423–1444 . 10.1017/glj.2021.87 . 2071-8322. free .
  4. News: Connolly . Kate . 2021-04-29 . ‘Historic’ German ruling says climate goals not tough enough . en-GB . The Guardian . 2023-02-10 . 0261-3077.