Neo-Brittonic Explained

Neo-Brittonic
Region:Great Britain, Brittany
Ethnicity:Britons
Ref:linglist
Speakers:Old Welsh, Welsh, Cumbric, Cornish, Breton and potentially Pictish
Familycolor:Indo-European
Fam2:Celtic
Fam3:Insular Celtic
Fam4:Brittonic
Isoexception:historical
Linglist:brit
Lingua:50-AB
Glotto:none

Neo-Brittonic, also known as Neo-Brythonic,[1] is a stage of the Insular Celtic Brittonic languages that emerged by the middle of the sixth century CE. Neo-Brittonic languages include Old, Middle and Modern Welsh, Cornish, and Breton, as well as Cumbric (and potentially Pictish).

History

Neo-Brittonic emerged out of Late Brittonic around the middle of the sixth century CE.[2] It is marked by the loss of Brittonic final syllables (apocope) and the eventual loss of compositional vowels in compound words (syncope) among other features, such as vowel shift (notably quantity collapse with the lengthening of short stressed vowels before short consonants), vowel affection, lenition of internal consonants, and the development of complex system of grammatical mutations.[3]

The initial stage of the Neo-Brittonic, from around the middle of the sixth century CE to the emergence of Old Welsh, Old Cornish, and Old Breton by the ninth century CE has been termed Common Archaic Neo-Brittonic by Celticist John T. Koch.[4] Documents written in Neo-Brittonic languages (or non-Brittonic documents containing Neo-Brittonic onomastic material, primarily written in Latin or Old English) during this time are scarce, but seem to show a pre-dialectal state in which the Southwestern Brittonic languages (Cornish and Breton) had not yet significantly diverged from Western Brittonic languages (Welsh and Cumbric), though differences may have been masked by scribes across the Neo-Brittonic world using a common orthography dating to an earlier period.

Apocope

One of the most notable changes in the language was the mid-sixth century loss of Brittonic final syllables of words in a process called apocope. Apocope was due partially to Brittonic penultimate stress access and resulted in the change of inflection type from synthetic to partially analytic.[5]

Brittonic final syllables, which were used to mark grammatical gender and case, likely began to erode much earlier than the sixth century, judging from the evidence of Brittonic's cousin language, Gaulish, in which the final consonants already began to disappear in writing by the 3rd-4th centuries CE.[6] [7] [8]

+*Celtic languages: wiros “man”!Case!Common Brittonic!Common Archaic Neo-Brittonic!Old Welsh!Modern Welsh
Nom. Masc. Sg.
  • Celtic languages: wiros
  • Celtic languages: wur
g[u]urWelsh: gwr
Nom. Masc. Pl.
  • Celtic languages: wirī
  • Celtic languages: wīr
guirWelsh: gwyr

Syncope

Syncope (the loss of internal, unstressed vowels) in Late Brittonic and early Neo-Brittonic primarily affected the compositional vowel in unstressed syllables of compound nouns directly before stressed syllables (stress fell on the penultimate syllable in Brittonic and the final syllable in Neo-Brittonic, after the completion of apocope).[9]

Bibliography

Notes and References

  1. Encyclopedia: 1993 . Insular Celtic: P and Q Celtic . The Celtic Languages . Routledge . London . Schmidt . Karl Horst . Ball . Martin J..
  2. Jackson, Language and History in Early Britain, 1953.
  3. Schmidt, Karl Horst, in: Martin J Ball and James Fife (eds.), The Celtic Languages, Routledge, 1993 (2005 repr.), p. 77: "Among the phonological changes which mark the end of Late British, four transformations are particularly important: (a) the dropping of final syllables (as well as of interior ones) caused by the penultimate stress access and resulting in the change of inflection type (from synthetic to analytic)... (b) lenition of consonants in intervocalic position... (c) vowel affection, e.g. umlaut... (d) quantity collapse with the lengthening of short stressed vowels before short consonants..."
  4. Koch . John T. . January 1985 . When Was Welsh Literature First Written Down?. Studia Celtica . 20 . 1. 0081-6353. 43–66.
  5. Schmidt, Karl Horst, in: Martin J Ball and James Fife (eds.), The Celtic Languages, Routledge, 1993 (2005 repr.), p. 77
  6. Stifter, David, "Lenition of s in Gaulish?", in: Benedicte Nielsen Whitehead, Thomas Olander, Birgit Anette Olsen, Jens Elmegård Rasmussen (eds), The Sound of Indo-European. Phonetics, Phonemics, and Morphophonemics, Copenhagen: 2012, 523–544.
  7. Stifter, David, "Notes on Châteaubleau (L-93)", Keltische Forschungen 4 (2009), pp. 229–244
  8. Schrijver, Peter, "The Châteaubleau tile as a link between Latin and French and between Gaulish and Brittonic", Études celtiques, Vol. 34, 1998, pp. 135-142
  9. Fortson, IV, Benjamin W. Indo-European Language and Culture: An Introduction. John Wiley & Sons, 2011, p. 317.