The National Emergency Employment Defense Act, aka the NEED Act, is a monetary reform proposal submitted by Congressman Dennis Kucinich in 2011, in the United States. The bill has failed to gain any co-supporters and was not introduced to the floor of the house.
Dennis Kucinich (D), representative for, introduced H.R. 2990 to the 112th Congress, on 21 September 2011. Kucinich claimed that "H.R. 2990 enables money to be issued by spending it into circulation on programs approved by Congress — without taxing or borrowing." The bill was co-sponsored by John Conyers (D), representative for .
The legislation's aim, according to its sponsor,[1] was
To create a full employment economy as a matter of national economic defense; to provide for public investment in capital infrastructure; to provide for reducing the cost of public investment; to retire public debt; to stabilize the Social Security retirement system; to restore the authority of Congress to create and regulate money, modernize and provide stability for the monetary system of the United States; and for other public purposes.
According to the Congressional Research Service, a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress, the NEED Act, in brief, would[1] replace "Federal Reserve notes" with "United States Money" and dismantle the Fed. In this, the Act
Additionally, the Act would earmark funds for federal outlays in order to "create 50 million jobs" nationwide, in projects such as "federal & state infrastructure investment, education, health care," etc.[2]
The bill's introduction was "enthusiastically" supported by the American Monetary Institute,[3] whose director, Stephen Zarlenga, helped draft early versions of the bill.[4] and other opponents of fractional reserve banking, as well as by opponents of the Federal System, in general, such as the Positive Money organisation.[5]
Kucinich stated that the bill would remove the power of creating money from the "privately owned and controlled" Federal Reserve System and would restore the authority of the U.S. Congress to "create money interest-free." He added that the bill would "address" America's "structural economic problems directly by creating over 7 million jobs" at a time when "the nation struggles with long-term unemployment at rates not seen in generations, and as infrastructure crumbles across the nation."[6]
According to supporters and people who endorsed Kucinich's candidacy for Congress, the bill "would create millions of private sector jobs and rebuild America's infrastructure while paying off the national debt, all without raising taxes,"[7] while many supporters of the Occupy movement voiced similar sentiments.[8] The Green Party in New York, in its official platform, has endorsed the NEED Act,[9] while other Green Party organizations have endorsed the notions advocated in the bill, in a platform called "Greening the Dollar."[10]
The argument for "United States Money," as opposed to Fed-issued money, is not new. As far back as 1943, Abba Lerner had dismissed such arguments, pointing out that the central bank can, at any time, start "printing money" to match government deficit-spending "sufficient to achieve and sustain full employment."
Post Keynesian economists, such as L. Randall Wray, have argued repeatedly on the "foolishness" of notions such as promoted by the NEED Act,[11] [12] pointing out that if money does not represent debt, in the form of a tax credit, then it is useless.
Economist and investor Warren Mosler has pointed out that the NEED Act is an "innocent fraud," because it undertakes to end a system that has ceased to exist a long time ago.
The bill has not yet been introduced to the floor. There were no other co-sponsors and there was no companion legislation in the Senate.[13]