Near-infrared window in biological tissue explained

The near-infrared (NIR) window (also known as optical window or therapeutic window) defines the range of wavelengths from 650 to 1350 nanometre (nm) where light has its maximum depth of penetration in tissue.[1] Within the NIR window, scattering is the most dominant light-tissue interaction, and therefore the propagating light becomes diffused rapidly. Since scattering increases the distance travelled by photons within tissue, the probability of photon absorption also increases. Because scattering has weak dependence on wavelength, the NIR window is primarily limited by the light absorption of blood at short wavelengths and water at long wavelengths. The technique using this window is called NIRS. Medical imaging techniques such as fluorescence image-guided surgery often make use of the NIR window to detect deep structures.

Absorption properties of tissue components

The absorption coefficient (

\mua

) is defined as the probability of photon absorption in tissue per unit path length.[2] Different tissue components have different

\mua

values. Moreover,

\mua

is a function of wavelength. Discussed below are the absorption properties of the most important chromophores in tissue. The molar extinction coefficient (

\varepsilon

) is another parameter that is used to describe photon absorption in tissue. By multiplying

\varepsilon

by the molar concentration and by ln(10), one can convert

\varepsilon

to

\mua

.

Blood

Blood consists of two different types of hemoglobin: oxyhemoglobin (

HbO2

) is bound to oxygen, while deoxyhemoglobin (

Hb

) is unbound to oxygen. These two different types of hemoglobin exhibit different absorption spectra that are normally represented in terms of molar extinction coefficients, as shown in Figure 1. The molar extinction coefficient of Hb has its highest absorption peak at 420 nm and a second peak at 580 nm. Its spectrum then gradually decreases as light wavelength increases. On the other hand,

HbO2

shows its highest absorption peak at 410 nm, and two secondary peaks at 550 nm and 600 nm. As light wavelengths passes 600 nm,

HbO2

absorption decays much faster than Hb absorption. The points where the molar extinction coefficient spectra of

Hb

and

HbO2

intersect are called isosbestic points.

By using two different wavelengths, it is possible to calculate the concentrations of oxyhemoglobin (

CHbO2

) and deoxyhemoglobin (

CHb

) as shown in the following equations:

\mua(λ1)=ln(10)\varepsilonHbO2(λ1)CHbO2+ln(10)\varepsilonHb(λ1)CHb

\mua(λ2)=ln(10)\varepsilonHbO2(λ2)CHbO2+ln(10)\varepsilonHb(λ2)CHb

Here,

λ1

and

λ2

are the two wavelengths;

\varepsilonHbO2

and

\varepsilonHb

are the molar extinction coefficients of

HbO2

and

Hb

, respectively;

CHbO2

and

CHb

are the molar concentrations of

HbO2

and

Hb

in tissue, respectively.Oxygen saturation (

SO2

) can then be computed as
SO
2=CHbO2
CHb+CHbO2

Water

Although water is nearly transparent in the range of visible light, it becomes absorbing over the near-infrared region. Water is a critical component since its concentration is high in human tissue. The absorption spectrum of water in the range from 250 to 1000 nm is shown in Figure 2. Although absorption is rather low in this spectral range, it still contributes to the overall attenuation of tissue.

Other tissue components with less significant contributions to the total absorption spectrum of tissue are melanin and fat.

Melanin

Melanin is a chromophore that exists in the human epidermal layer of skin responsible for protection from harmful UV radiation. When melanocytes are stimulated by solar radiation, melanin is produced.[3] Melanin is one of the major absorbers of light in some biological tissue (although its contribution is smaller than other components). There are two types of melanin: eumelanin which is black-brown and pheomelanin which is red-yellow.[4] The molar extinction coefficient spectra corresponding to both types are shown in Figure 3.

Fat

Fat is one of the major components in tissue that can comprise 10–40% of tissue. Although not many mammalian fat spectra are available, Figure 4 shows an example extracted from pig fat.[5]

Scattering properties of tissue components

Optical scattering occurs due to mismatches in refractive index of the different tissue components, ranging from cell membranes to whole cells. Cell nuclei and mitochondria are the most important scatterers.[6] Their dimensions range from 100 nm to 6 μm, and thus fall within the NIR window. Most of these organelles fall in the Mie scattering regime, and exhibit highly anisotropic forward-directed scattering.[7]

Light scattering in biological tissue is denoted by the scattering coefficient (

\mus

), which is defined as the probability of photon scattering in tissue per unit path length.[8] Figure 5 shows a plot of the scattering spectrum.[9]

Effective attenuation coefficient

Attenuation of light in deep biological tissue depends on the effective attenuation coefficient (

\mueff

), which is defined as

\mueff=\sqrt{3\mua(\mua+\mu's)}

where

\mu's

is the transport scattering coefficient defined as

\mu's=\mus(1-g)

where

g

is the anisotropy of biological tissue, which has a representative value of 0.9. Figure 5 shows a plot of transport scattering coefficient spectrum in breast tissue, which has a wavelength dependence of

λ-0.7

.[10] The effective attenuation coefficient is the dominant factor for determining light attenuation at depth

d

≫ 1/

\mueff

.

Estimation

The NIR window can be computed based on the absorption coefficient spectrum or the effective attenuation coefficient spectrum. A possible criterion for selecting the NIR window is given by the FWHM of the inverse of these spectra as shown in Figure 7.

In addition to the total concentration of hemoglobin, the oxygen saturation will define the concentration of oxy- and deoxyhemoglobin in tissue and so the total absorption spectrum. Depending on the type of tissue, we can consider different situations. Below, the total concentration of hemoglobin is assumed to be 2.3 mM.

Absorption spectrum for arteries

In this case

SaO2

≈ 98% (arterial oxygen saturation). Then oxyhemoglobin will be dominant in the total absorption (black) and the effective attenuation (magenta) coefficient spectra, as shown in Figure 6 (a).'cite: Anisotropic diffusion filter for dorsal hand vein features extraction – Sarah Hachemi Benziane, Abdelkader Benyettou'

Absorption spectrum for veins

In this case

SvO2

≈ 60% (venous oxygen saturation). Then oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin will have similar contributions to the total absorption (black) and the effective attenuation (magenta) coefficient spectra, as shown in Figure 6 (b).

Absorption spectrum for breast tissue

To define

StO2

(tissue oxygen saturation) (or

TSI

(tissue saturation index)), it is necessary to define a distribution of arteries and veins in tissue. an arterial-venous blood volume ratio of 20%/80% can be adopted.[11] Thus tissue oxygen saturation can be defined as

StO2

= 0.2 x

SaO2

+ 0.8 x

SvO2

≈ 70%.

The total absorption (black) and the effective attenuation (magenta) coefficient spectra for breast tissue is shown in Figure 6 (c). In addition, the effective penetration depth is plotted in Figure 7.

See also

Notes and References

  1. Smith. Andrew M.. Mancini. Michael C.. Nie. Shuming. Bioimaging: Second window for in vivo imaging. Nature Nanotechnology. 4. 11. 2009. 710–711. 1748-3387. 10.1038/nnano.2009.326. 2862008. 19898521. 2009NatNa...4..710S .
  2. LV. Wang and HI. Wu, Biomedical Optics. Wiley., 2007.
  3. T. Vo-Dinh, Biomedical Photonics Handbook. Taylor & Francis, Inc., 2002.
  4. George Zonios and Aikaterini Dimou, Ioannis Bassukas, Dimitrios Galaris, and Argyrios Ysolakidis and Efthimios Kaxiras, J. Biomed. Opt., Vol.13, 014017, 2008.
  5. R.L.P. van Veen, H.J.C.M. Sterenborg, A. Pifferi, A. Torricelli, and R. Cubeddu, OSA Annual BIOMED Topical Meeting, 2004.
  6. LV. Wang and HI. Wu, Biomedical Optics. Wiley., 2007.
  7. T. Vo-Dinh, Biomedical Photonics Handbook. Taylor & Francis, Inc., 2002.
  8. LV. Wang and HI. Wu, Biomedical Optics. Wiley., 2007.
  9. S. Jacques, C. Newman, D. Levy, and A. von Eschenbach. Univ. of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1987.
  10. S. Srinivasan, B. Pogue, S. Jiang, H. Dehghani, C. Kogel, S. Soho, J. Gibson, T. Tosteson, S. Poplack, and K. Paulsen, K D 2003, Proc Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100 12349 54.
  11. S. Nioka, S. Wen, J. Zhang, J. Du, X. Intes, Z. Zhao, and B. Chance, Simulation study of breast tissue hemodynamics during pressure perturbation. Oxygen Transport to Tissue XXVI 566, 17–22, 2006.