National Parliamentary Debate Association Explained

The National Parliamentary Debate Association (NPDA) is one of the two national intercollegiate parliamentary debate organizations in the United States. The other is the American Parliamentary Debate Association. Its membership is national with participating schools throughout the country. In 2015, NPDA was the largest debating organization in the United States with around 200-250 participating schools in any given year.[1]

Rules

In tournaments sponsored or sanctioned by the NPDA, teams of two debate head-to-head. Tournaments issue a new topic each round, generally on issues such as politics, philosophy and current affairs. After the announcement of the topic, the two teams have 15 minutes to prepare plus the time it takes to walk to the furthest away round in which debates will be taking place (usually rounded to 20 minutes), during which to write out their respective cases.

The standard time limits for an NPDA debate are:

There are tournaments, however, at which these are modified, generally to a 7-7-7-7-5-5 format. The Claremont Colleges tournament, for instance, uses this 7-5 format. During constructive speeches, debaters may introduce new arguments and the speaker's opponents may rise to ask questions of the speaker. Constructive speakers can accept or reject any given question. Rebuttals are exclusively for summarizing the arguments that were made during constructives.

Over the past few years, many coaches and competitors have referred to the official title of speeches with different names. These are unofficial yet very popular with many judges:

Debaters may not bring in printed, published evidence and consult it during the round. It is expected that debaters will use their own pre-existing knowledge and research conducted prior to the start of the actual round to back their arguments with reasoning and empirical data. This places parliamentary debate in stark contrast to the other common intercollegiate debate format, policy debate, where debaters may utilize quoted evidence.

Championship Tournament

The NPDA runs one debate tournament each year: the NPDA Championship Tournament, held in late March or early April at rotating host sites. While the inaugural tournament in 1994 only hosted around 40 teams, the 2004 Championship Tournament had over 300 in the field from over a half-dozen nations. The tournament's practices are generally modeled by smaller invitational tournaments, which provide the bulk of year-long competition. NPDA sanctions many of these tournaments, and the school that does the best at sanctioned invitationals over the course of the year is awarded a year-long sweepstakes championship.

Relationship to other tournaments and organizations

There are usually several NPDA-sanctioned invitational tournaments in the US to choose from on almost every weekend of the academic year. The largest of these tournaments include the Mile High Swing held in January co-hosted in recent years by Texas Tech University and the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, Utah, the season-opening Bowman Debates at William Jewell College in September, the Steve Hunt Classic held at Lewis & Clark College in October and the Paul Winters Invitational at the University of the Pacific in November.

Communicating between tournaments

Almost from its inception, the NPDA community has taken advantage of the Internet to continue debates (and to debate about debates) between tournaments and in the off season. For years, this took place via the official electronic mailing list, much to the chagrin of those who saw that resource as best used for official communication such as posting tournament invitations and results.

Today, much of the online debate (especially between competitors) in the NPDA community takes place via the online forum Net-Benefits.net, founded by University of Southern California then-undergraduate Jed Link. The name Net-Benefits is a pun, referring to the debate paradigm by which the debate judge weighs the net benefits of two competing policies. The site is now an electronic hub for discourse and information on parliamentary debate.

National champions

Every year since 1994, the organization has held a national championship tournament. Winning teams include:

YearTeamSchool
2024Tristan Keene & Brenna SeiersenParliamentary Debate at Berkeley
2023Tristan Keene & Brenna SeiersenParliamentary Debate at Berkeley
2022Jacob Tate & Maximus RenteriaRice University
2021Amanda Miskell & Ryan RashidParliamentary Debate at Berkeley
2020Mitch Deleel & Adeja PowellMcKendree University
2019Co-champions: Jessica Jung1 & lila lavender2/Tom Kadie1 & Henry Tolchard1Parliamentary Debate at Berkeley1/Western Washington University2
2018Kyle Bligen & Jazmine BuckleyMercer University
2017Co-champions: Ryan Kelly & Kaitlyn Bull/Will Starks & Quintin BrownWashburn University
2016David Hansen & Katelyn JohnsonWilliam Jewell College
2015Matt Casas & Anthony JosephKansas City Kansas Community College
2014Joshua Rivera & Benjamin Campbell
2013Josh Rivera & Mike SelckSouthern Illinois University Carbondale
2012Lauren Knoth & Josh RamseyWashburn University
2011Hank Fields & Matt GanderUniversity of Oregon
2010Brian Horton & Adam TestermanTexas Tech University
2009Max Alderman & David PenaUniversity of Nevada, Reno
2008Kristen Owen & Anthony PutnickiTexas Tech University
2007Tim Kamermayer & Griffith VerticanPoint Loma Nazarene University
2006Josh Anderson & Rachel SafranUniversity of Puget Sound
2005Ian Samuel and Marie TennyUniversity of South Carolina
2004Glenn Prince and J. D. ShipmanUniversity of South Carolina
2003Michael Owens & Joshua WilkersonUniversity of Wyoming
2002 Ben Garcia & Chris RichterUniversity of Alaska Anchorage
2001Danny Barak & Will TrachmanUniversity of California, Berkeley
2000Ryan Kennedy & Jacob StutzmanTruman State University
1999Geof Brodak & Bill HermanColorado State University
1998Heath Curtis & Rebekah GilbertConcordia University, Seward
1997Dan Nelson & Marcus ParoskeRegis University
1996Ryan Levy & Scott RuthfieldRice University
1995Meredith Marine & Neal SampleUniversity of Wyoming
1994Marcus Paroske & Tammy SchultzRegis University

Top speakers

YearSpeakerSchool
2024 Jas LiuWhitman College
2023Brenna SeiersenParliamentary Debate at Berkeley
2022Arshita SandhiparthiUniversity of the Pacific
2021Cam WadeMercer University
2020Raine McDonaghLewis & Clark College
2019Fiker TesfayeTexas Tech University
2018Logan KelleyTexas Tech University
2017Grace MillerUniversity of Nevada, Reno
2016Ashe TippinsWestern Washington University
2015Jazmine BuckleyMercer University
2014Marten KingWhitman College
2013Miranda MortonWhitman College
2012Ben ReidMcKendree University
2011Max AldermanUniversity of Nevada, Reno
2010Will Van TreurenUniversity of Colorado, Boulder
2009MaryAnn AlmeidaWillamette University
2008Kevin CalderwoodSouthern Illinois University Carbondale
2007Ryan LawrenceUniversity of California, Berkeley
2006Joelle PerryWestern Kentucky University
2005Marie TennyUniversity of South Carolina
2004Ian SamuelTruman State University
2003Kyle DeBeerColorado College
2002Audrey MinkCalifornia State University, Long Beach
2001Katie AnglissPoint Loma Nazarene University
2000Andrew VogtColorado College
1999Bill HermanColorado State University
1998Daniel NelsonRegis University
1997Marcus ParoskeRegis University
1996Ryan LevyRice University
1995Nick Coburn-PaloWeber State University
1994Andrea RothUniversity of New Mexico

Commonly used books

See also

Notes and References

  1. Web site: About NPDA. National Parliamentary Debate Association. 2015-05-05. https://web.archive.org/web/20150715091344/http://www.parlidebate.org/about-npda/. 2015-07-15. dead.
  2. http://parliprepbook.com/ The Parli Prepbook
  3. Book: Eric Robertson. Strategic Argumentation in Parliamentary Debate. 2009. The author. 978-0-557-13537-0. Google Books.
  4. Book: John Meany. Kate Shuster. Art, Argument, and Advocacy: Mastering Parliamentary Debate. 2002. IDEA. 978-0-9702130-7-5. Google Books.
  5. Book: John Meany. Kate Shuster. On that Point!: An Introduction to Parliamentary Debate. 2003. IDEA. 978-0-9720541-1-9. Google Books.
  6. Book: Mark Crossman. Burden of Proof: An Introduction to Government And Guide to Parliamentary Debate. 2005. CENGAGE Learning. 978-0-7593-6189-8. Google Books.
  7. Book: Richard E. Edwards. Competitive Debate: The Official Guide. 2008. Alpha Books. 978-1-59257-693-7. Google Books.