National Park Service Explained

Agency Name:National Park Service
Seal:US-NationalParkService-ShadedLogo.svg
Jurisdiction:United States government
Employees:About 20,000 (2022)(279,000 volunteers in 2019)[1]
Budget:$3.265 billion (FY2022)[2]
Chief1 Name:Charles Sams
Chief1 Position:Director of the National Park Service
Parent Department:Department of the Interior
Map:NPS UnifiedRegionsMap2020.png

The National Park Service (NPS) is an agency of the United States federal government, within the U.S. Department of the Interior. The service manages all national parks; most national monuments; and other natural, historical, and recreational properties, with various title designations.[3] The United States Congress created the agency on August 25, 1916, through the National Park Service Organic Act.[4] Its headquarters are in Washington, D.C., within the main headquarters of the Department of the Interior.

The NPS employs about 20,000 people in units covering over 85e6acre in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and U.S. territories.[5] [6] [7] In 2019, the service had more than 279,000 volunteers. The agency is charged with preserving the ecological and historical integrity of the places entrusted to its management and with making them available for public use and enjoyment.

History

See main article: History of the National Park Service.

See also: National Park Service Organic Act.

Artist George Catlin, during an 1832 trip to the Dakotas, was perhaps the first to suggest a novel solution to this fast-approaching reality. Indian civilization, wildlife, and wilderness were all in danger, wrote Catlin, unless they could be preserved "by some great protecting policy of government... in a magnificent park... A nation's Park, containing man and beast, in all the wild[ness] and freshness of their nature's beauty!"[8] Yellowstone National Park was created as the first national park in the United States.[9] In 1872, there was no state government to manage it (Wyoming was a U.S. territory at that time), so the federal government managed it directly through the army, including the famed African American Buffalo Soldier units.[10]

The movement for an independent agency to oversee these federal lands was spearheaded by business magnate and conservationist Stephen Mather.[11] With the help of journalist Robert Sterling Yard, Mather ran a publicity campaign for the Department of the Interior. They wrote numerous articles that praised the scenic and historic qualities of the parks and their possibilities for educational, inspirational, and recreational benefits.[12]

This campaign resulted in the creation of the NPS. On August 25, 1916, President Woodrow Wilson signed the National Park Service Organic Act that mandated the agency "to conserve the scenery and the natural and historic objects and wildlife therein, and to provide for the enjoyment of the same in such manner and by such means as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations".[13] [14] Mather became the first director of the newly formed NPS.[15]

On March 3, 1933, President Herbert Hoover signed the Reorganization Act of 1933. The act gave the president the authority to transfer national monuments from one governmental department to another.[16] Later that summer, new president Franklin D. Roosevelt made use of this power after NPS Deputy Director Horace M. Albright suggested that the NPS, rather than the War Department, should manage historic American Civil War sites.

President Roosevelt agreed and issued two executive orders to implement the reorganization. These two executive orders transferred to the NPS all of the War Department's historic sites as well as national monuments that the Department of Agriculture had managed and parks in and around Washington, D.C. that an independent federal office had previously operated.[17]

The popularity of the parks after the end of the World War II left them overburdened with demands that the NPS could not meet. In 1951, Conrad Wirth became director of the NPS and began to bring park facilities up to the standards that the public was expecting.[18] In 1952, with the support of President Dwight D. Eisenhower, Wirth began Mission 66, a ten-year effort to upgrade and expand park facilities for the 50th anniversary of the Park Service. New parks were added to preserve unique resources and existing park facilities were upgraded and expanded.

In 1966, as the Park Service turned 50 years old, emphasis began to turn from just saving great and wonderful scenery and unique natural features to making parks accessible to the public.[19] Director George Hartzog began the process with the creation of the National Lakeshores and then National Recreation Areas.

Resource stewardship policies

1963: The Leopold Report

A 1963 report titled "Wildlife Management in the National Parks" was prepared by a five-member advisory board on Wildlife Management, appointed by United States Secretary of the Interior Stewart Udall.[20] This report came to be referred to in later years by its chairman and principal author, A. Starker Leopold. The Leopold Report was just fourteen pages in length, but it set forth ecosystem management recommendations that would guide parks policy until it was revisited in 2012.

The Leopold Report was the first concrete plan for managing park visitors and ecosystems under unified principles.[21] Park management issues and controversies addressed in this report included the difficulties of managing elk populations in Yellowstone National Park and how "overprotection from natural ground fires" in California's Sequoia National Park, Kings Canyon National Park, and Yosemite National Park had begun to threaten groves of Giant Sequoia with catastrophic wildfires. The report also established a historical baseline that read, "The goal of managing the national parks and monuments should be to preserve, or where necessary to recreate, the ecologic scene as viewed by the first European visitors." This baseline would guide ecological restoration in national parks until a climate change adaptation policy, "Resist-Adapt-Direct", was established in 2021.

2012: Revisiting Leopold: Resource Stewardship in the National Parks

National Parks director Jonathan Jarvis charged the twelve-member NPS Advisory Board Science Committee to take a fresh look at the ecological issues and make recommendations for updating the original Leopold Report. The committee published their 23-page report in 2012, titled, "Revisiting Leopold: Resource Stewardship in the National Parks".[22] The report recommended that parks leadership "manage for change while confronting uncertainty."

"... New and emerging scientific disciplines — including conservation biology, global change science, and genomics — along with new technological tools like high-resolution remote sensing can provide significant information for constructing contemporary tactics for NPS stewardship. This knowledge is essential to a National Park Service that is science-informed at all organizational levels and able to respond with contemporary strategies for resource management and ultimately park stewardship."

2021: Resist-Accept-Direct (RAD): A Framework for the 21st-century Natural Resource Manager

The "Revisiting Leopold" report mentioned climate change three times and "climate refugia" once, but it did not prescribe or offer any management tactics that could help parks managers with the problems of climate change. Hence, the 2021 report specific to the need for climate adaptation: "Resist-Accept-Direct (RAD): A Framework for the 21st-century Natural Resource Manager."[23] This "Natural Resource Report" has ten authors. Among them are four associated with the U.S. National Park Service, three with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and two with the U.S. Geological Survey — all of which are government agencies within the U.S. Department of Interior.

The report's Executive Summary, points to "intensifying global change."

"... The convention of using baseline conditions to define goals for today's resource management is increasingly untenable, presenting practical and philosophical challenges for managers. As formerly familiar ecological conditions continue to change, bringing novelty, surprise, and uncertainty, natural resource managers require a new, shared approach to make conservation decisions.... The RAD (Resist-Accept-Direct) decision framework has emerged over the past decade as a simple tool that captures the entire decision space for responding to ecosystems facing the potential for rapid, irreversible ecological change."

Here, the iconic species of Joshua Tree National Park is a leading example.

The three RAD options[24] are:

The "Resist-Accept-Direct" Framework is first described in a July 2020 paper published in Fisheries[25] Eighteen researchers from federal and state agencies and universities collaborated in this effort, which included short case studies of where and how this framework has already been applied.

National Park System

See also: List of the United States National Park System official units and List of areas in the United States National Park System.

The National Park System includes all properties managed by the National Park Service, which have a wide variety of titles or designations. The system as a whole is considered to be a national treasure of the United States, and some of the more famous national parks and monuments are sometimes referred to as "crown jewels".[26]

The system encompasses approximately 85.1e6acre, of which 2.6e6acre remain in private ownership. The largest unit is Wrangell–St. Elias National Park and Preserve, Alaska. At 13,200,000 acres (53,000 km2), it is over 16 percent of the entire system. The smallest unit in the system is Thaddeus Kosciuszko National Memorial, Pennsylvania, at 0.02 acres (80 m2).

In addition to administering its units and other properties, the NPS also provides technical and financial assistance to several affiliated areas authorized by Congress. The largest affiliated area is New Jersey Pinelands National Reserve at 1,164,025 acres (4711 km2). The smallest is Benjamin Franklin National Memorial at less than 0.01acres.

While there are laws generally covering all units of the National Park System, they are subject to management policies of individual pieces of authorizing legislation or, in the case of national monuments created under the Antiquities Act, Executive Order. For example, because of provisions within their enabling legislation, Congaree National Park is almost entirely a wilderness area devoid of development, yet Yosemite allows unique developments such as the Badger Pass Ski Area and the O'Shaughnessy Dam within its boundaries. Such irregularities would not be found in other parks unless specifically provided for with exceptions by the legislation that created them.

Holdings

TypeAmount (2008)[27]
Area of land84000000abbr=onNaNabbr=on
Area of oceans, lakes, reservoirs4502644acres
Length of perennial rivers and streams85049abbr=onNaNabbr=on
Archeological sites
Length of shoreline43162abbr=onNaNabbr=on
Historic structures
Objects in museum collections
Buildings
Trails12250abbr=onNaNabbr=on
Roads8500abbr=onNaNabbr=on

Criteria

Most NPS units have been established by an act of Congress, with the president confirming the action by signing the act into law. The exception, under the Antiquities Act, allows the president to designate and protect areas as national monuments by executive order. Regardless of the method used, all parks are to be of national importance.[28]

A potential park should meet all four of the following standards:[29]

Before creation of a new unit, Congress typically directs the NPS to conduct a special resource study of a site to determine its national significance and suitability to be part of the National Park System.[30] [31]

Nomenclature

The NPS uses over 20 different titles for the park units it manages, including national park and national monument.[32]

Classifications (2023)[33] Number (2024)Area (2023)[34] Visitors (2023)[35]
National Park
National Monument
National Lakeshore (3) and National Seashore (10)
National Memorial
National Preserve (19) and National Reserve (2)
National Recreation Area
National River (4) and National Wild and Scenic River (10)
National Parkway
National Historical Park (63), National Historic Site (76), and International Historic Site (1)
National Military Park (9), National Battlefield Park (4), National Battlefield Site (1), and National Battlefield (11)
National Scenic TrailNot available
Other Designations
Totals
National parks preserve nationally and globally significant scenic areas and nature reserves.National monuments preserve a single unique cultural or natural feature. Devils Tower National Monument was the first in 1906. While the National Park Service holds the most national monuments, a monument may be managed or co-managed by a different entity such as the Bureau of Land Management or the Forest Service.

National preserves are for the protection of certain resources and operate similar to many National Parks, but allow limited resource extraction. Activities like hunting, fishing, and some mining may be allowed depending on the site. Big Cypress National Preserve and Big Thicket National Preserve were created in 1974 as the first national preserves.

National reserves are similar to national preserves, but the operational authority can be placed with a state or local government. New Jersey Pinelands National Reserve was the first to be established in 1978.[36] National historic sites protect a significant cultural resource that is not a complicated site.

National historical parks are larger areas with more complex subjects. Historic sites may also be protected in other unit types.

National military parks, battlefield parks, battlefield sites, and battlefields preserve areas associated with military history. The different designations reflect the complexity of the event and the site. Many of the sites preserve important Revolutionary War battles and Civil War battlefields. Military parks are the sites of larger actions, such as Chickamauga and Chattanooga National Military Park, Vicksburg National Military Park, Gettysburg National Military Park, and Shiloh National Military Park—the original four from 1890.

Examples of battlefield parks, battlefield sites, and national battlefields include Richmond National Battlefield Park, Brices Cross Roads National Battlefield Site, and Antietam National Battlefield.

National memorials are areas that officially memorialize a person or event, though unlike a National Historical Site, may or may not be placed at a specific historical location. Several national memorials are on the National Mall, such as the Washington Monument and Lincoln Memorial.

National seashores and national lakeshores offer preservation of the national coast line, while supporting water–based recreation. Cape Hatteras National Seashore was created in 1937. Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore and Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore, created in 1966, were the first national lakeshores.

National rivers and wild and scenic riverways protect free-flowing streams over their length. The riverways may not be altered with dams, channelization, or other changes. Recreational pursuits are encouraged along the waterways. Ozark National Scenic Riverways was established in 1964.

National recreation areas originally were units surrounding reservoirs impounded by dams built by other federal agencies, the first being Lake Mead National Recreation Area. Some national recreation areas are in urban centers, such as Gateway National Recreation Area and Golden Gate National Recreation Area, which encompass significant cultural as well as natural resources.The National Trails System preserves long-distance routes across America. The system was created in 1968 and consists of two major components: National scenic trails are long-distance trails through some of the most scenic parts of the country. They received official protection in 1968. The Appalachian Trail is the best known. National historic trails commemorate the routes of major historic events. Some of the best known are the Trail of Tears, the Mormon Trail, and the Santa Fe Trail. These trails are administered by several federal agencies.

Special designations

Wilderness areas are part of the National Wilderness Preservation System, which consists of federally managed lands that are of a pristine condition, established by the Wilderness Act (Public Law 88-577) in 1964. The National Wilderness Preservation System originally created hundreds of wilderness zones within already protected federally administered property, consisting of over 9 million acres (36,000 km2).

Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) began with Executive Order 13158 in May 2000, when official MPAs were established for the first time.[37] The initial listing of U.S. areas was presented in 2010, consisting of areas already set aside under other legislation. The NPS has 19 park units designated as MPAs.[37]

Visitation

The National Park System received over 325 million recreation visits in 2023. Park visitation grew 64 percent between 1979 and 2015.[38]

The 10 most-visited units of the National Park System handle around 30 percent of the overall visits. The top 10 percent of parks (43) handle over 64 percent of all visits, leaving the remaining more than 380 units to accommodate around 36 percent of visits. (Note that only 380 sites recorded visitors during 2021 due to COVID-19-related closures).

ParkRank (2023)Visits (2023)
Blue Ridge Parkway
Golden Gate National Recreation Area
Great Smoky Mountains National Park
Gateway National Recreation Area
Gulf Islands National Seashore
Lincoln Memorial
George Washington Memorial Parkway
Natchez Trace Parkway
Lake Mead National Recreation Area
Glen Canyon National Recreation Area

Entrance fees

See main article: List of fee areas in the United States National Park System.

Most areas of the National Park System do not charge entrance fees and are completely supported by tax dollars, although some of the most popular areas do charge entrance fees. Fees vary site to site and are charged either on a per-vehicle or per-person basis, with most passes valid for 7 days. The America the Beautiful Pass series waives the per-vehicle fee or per-person fee for the holder and up to 3 other adults (children age 15 and younger are admitted for free at most sites). Annual passes for single areas are also available for those who visit the same site often.

Overnight stays

Over 15 million visitors spent a night in one of the national park units during 2015. The largest number (3.68 million) were tent campers. The second largest group (3.38 million) stayed in one of the lodges, followed by miscellaneous stays (on boats, group sites—2.15 million). The last three groups of over-night visitors included RV campers (2.26 million), backcountry campers (2.02 million) and users of the concession-run campgrounds (1.42 million).[39]

Budget

See also: United States federal budget and United States budget process.

In 2019, the NPS had an annual budget of $4.085 billion and an estimated $12 billion maintenance backlog.[40] On August 4, 2020, the Great American Outdoors Act was signed into law reducing the $12 billion maintenance backlog by $9.5 billion over a 5-year period beginning in FY 2021.[41]

The NPS budget is divided into two primary areas, discretionary and mandatory spending. Within each of these areas, there are numerous specific purposes to which Congress directs the services activities.[42]

The NPS budget includes discretionary spending which is broken out into two portions: the direct operations of the National Parks and the special initiatives.[43] Listed separately are the special initiatives of the service for the year specified in the legislation. During fiscal year 2010, the service was charged with five initiatives. They include: stewardship and education; professional excellence; youth programs; climate change impacts; and budget restructure and realignment.

Discretionary spending

Discretionary spending includes the Operations of the National Parks (ONPS), from which all park operations are paid. The United States Park Police funds cover the high-profile law enforcement operations at some of the large parks, including Gateway National Recreation Area, Golden Gate National Recreation Area, and the National Mall. The National Recreation and Preservation Program and the Urban Park and Recreation Fund are outreach programs to support state and local outdoor recreational activities.

The ONPS section of the budget is divided into six operational areas. These areas include:

Resource stewardship

These are funds and people directed towards the restoration, preservation, and maintenance of natural and cultural resources. The resource staff includes biologists, geologists, archeologists, preservation specialists and a variety of specialized employees to restore and preserve cultural buildings or natural features.

Visitor services

The NPS allocates funds obtained from its visitor services for use in public programs and for educational programs for the general public and school groups. Park rangers trained in providing walks, talks, and educational programs to the public frequently conduct such programs. Media specialists prepare exhibits along trails, roads and in visitor contact facilities, as well as written brochures and web-sites.

Park protection

This includes the staff responding to visitor emergencies (criminal, medical, search and rescue), and the protection of the park's natural and cultural resources from damage by those persons visiting the park. The staff includes law enforcement rangers, park police, lifeguards, criminal investigators, and communication center operators. they also work with other state and territorial fish and wildlife manangement agency rangers

Facility maintenance and operations

This is the cost of maintaining the necessary infrastructure within each park that supports all the services provided. It includes the plows and heavy equipment for road clearing, repairs and construction. There are buildings, trails, roads, docks, boats, utility pipes and wires, and a variety of hidden systems that make a park accessible by the public. The staff includes equipment operators, custodians, trail crews, electricians, plumbers, engineers, architects, and other building trade specialists.

Park support

This is the staff that provides for the routine logistical needs of the parks. There are human resource specialists, contracting officers, property specialists, budget managers, accountants and information technology specialists.

External administrative costs

The NPS pays external administrative costs to outside organizations that provide the logistical support that the NPS needs to operate its facilities. These costs include rent payments to the General Services Administration for building space, postage payments to the postal machine vendor and other direct payments.

Functional areaFY 2010 (in thousands)[44] % of total
Resource stewardship
Visitor services
Park protection
Facility maintenance and operations
Park support
External administrative costs
Total (2010)

Land and Water Conservation Fund

The Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) supports Land Acquisition and State Conservation Assistance (SCA) grant programs. In 2010, the LWCF began an incremental process to fully fund its programs at a total cost of $900 million. The Department of the Interior and the United States Forest Service use these funds to purchase critical lands to protect existing public lands.

The LWCF also issues grants to States and local jurisdictions to preserve and protect Civil War battlefield sites that are not part of the national park system. The SCA program distributes funds for land preservation to individual states.

Historic Preservation Fund

The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 set the federal vision for historic preservation in the United States. To support the vision and framework laid out in this act, the Historic Preservation Fund (HPF) was established in 1977 to provide financial assistance to, originally, states, to carry out activities related to preservation. Funding is provided from Outer Continental Shelf oil and gas lease revenues, not tax dollars, and an amount is appropriated annually by Congress. Awards from the HPF are made to States, Tribes, Territories, local governments, and non-profits.[45] Two specific programs include the Save America's Treasures and the Preserve America. The Historic Preservation Offices makes grants available to the States, territories, and tribal lands. To honor the 250th anniversary of the United States, Congress authorized the Semiquincentennial Grant in 2020 to support the preservation of State owned sites and structures listed on the National Register of Historic Places that commemorate the founding of the nation.[46]

Economic benefits

The NPS affects economies at national, state, and local levels. According to a 2011 Michigan State University report prepared for the NPS, for each $1 invested in the NPS, the American public receives $4 in economic value. In 2011, national parks generated $30.1 billion in economic activity and 252,000 jobs nationwide. Thirteen billion of that amount went directly into communities within 60 miles of a NPS unit.

In a 2017 study, the NPS found that 331 million park visitors spent $18.2 billion in local areas around National Parks across the nation. This spending helped support 306,000 jobs. The NPS expenditures supported $297 million in economic output in Missouri alone.[47]

Concessions

In an effort to increase visitation and allow for a larger audience to enjoy national park land, the NPS has numerous concession contracts with private businesses to bring recreation, resorts and other compatible amenities to their parks. NPS lodging opportunities exist at places such as the Wawona Hotel in Yosemite National Park and the Fort Baker Retreat and Conference Center in Golden Gate National Recreation Area.

Litigation with Delaware North

In 2015, Delaware North sued the NPS in the United States Court of Claims for breach of contract, alleging that the NPS had undervalued its trademarks of the names of iconic Yosemite National Park concession facilities.[48] The NPS estimated the value of the intangible assets including the names "Ahwahnee", "Badger Pass", "Curry Village", and "Yosemite Lodge" at $3.5 million. Delaware North lost the contract, and asserted that the historic names were worth $51 million and maintained that the incoming concessioner had to be paid that amount.[49]

The Justice Department and the NPS asserted that this was an "improper and wildly inflated" value. Rather than pay Delaware North's demanded valuation, in January 2016 the NPS instead opted to rename the famous landmarks, effective in March. The Ahwahnee Hotel is slated to become The Majestic Yosemite Hotel, Curry Village will become Half Dome Village, and the Wawona Hotel will become Big Trees Lodge.[50] Widespread public outcry focused on Delaware North's decision to claim ownership of names within a national park.[51] The names were restored in 2019 upon settlement of the dispute.[52]

Offices

See main article: Organization of the National Park Service.

The national headquarters is located in the Main Interior Building, 1849 C Street NW, several blocks southwest of the White House. The central office is composed of eleven directorates: director/deputy directors; business services; workforce management; chief information officer; cultural resources; natural resource stewardship and science; office of the comptroller; park planning, facilities and lands; partnerships and visitor experience; visitor and resource protection; and the United States Park Police.[53]

Regional offices are in Anchorage, Atlanta, Lakewood, CO (Denver), Omaha, NE, Philadelphia, San Francisco and Seattle. The headquarters building of the National Park Service Southwest Regional Office is architecturally significant and is designated a National Historic Landmark.

The NPS is an operating unit of the U.S. Department of the Interior. The NPS director is nominated by the president of the United States and confirmed by the United States Senate.[54] The director is supported by six senior executives.

These executives manage national programs, policy, and budget from the Washington, DC, headquarters. Under the deputy director of operations are seven regional directors, who are responsible for national park management and program implementation. Together this group is called the National Leadership Council.[55]

Staff and volunteers

Directors

See main article: Director of the National Park Service.

Employees

By the mid-1950s, the primary employees of the service were the park rangers, who had broad responsibilities on the parks' behalf. They cleaned up trash, operated heavy equipment, fought fires, managed traffic, cleared trails and roads, provided information to visitors, managed museums, performed rescues, flew aircraft, and investigated crime.[56]

The NPS employs many kinds of workers:

See also: Wildfire.

Locations are varied. Parks exist in the nation's larger cities like New York City (Federal Hall Memorial National Historic Site), Atlanta (Martin Luther King, Jr. National Historic Site), and San Diego (Cabrillo National Monument) to some of the remotest areas of the continent like Hovenweep National Monument in southeastern Utah, to Aniakchak National Monument in King Salmon, Alaska.[57]

Volunteers-In-Parks (VIP)

The Volunteers-In-Parks program was authorized in 1969 by the Volunteers in the Parks Act of 1969.[58] for the purpose of allowing the public to serve in the nations parks providing support and skills for their enhancement and protection.[59]

Volunteers come from all walks of life and include professionals, artists, laborers, homemakers and students, performing varied duties. Many come from surrounding communities and some travel significant distances.[59] In a 2005 annual report, the NPS reported that,

...137,000 VIPs contributed 5.2 million hours of service (or 2500 FTEs) valued at $91,260,000 based on the private sector value figure of $17.55 as used by AARP, Points of Light Foundation, and other large-scale volunteer programs including many federal agencies. There are 365 separate volunteer programs throughout the NPS. Since 1990, the number of volunteers has increased an average of 2% per year.[60]
FTE stands for full-time equivalent (one work year). In 2012, the National Park Service reported that over 221,000 volunteers contributed about 6.4 million hours annually.[61]

Additionally, other types of volunteers also conduct offsite NPS public outreach and education, such as the Trails & Rails program guides on board certain segments of long-haul Amtrak routes, who offer passengers insights to the travel area's natural resources and heritage.[62] [63]

Artist-In-Residence

Across the nation, there are special opportunities for artists (visual artists, photographers, sculptors, performers, writers, composers, and crafts) to live and work in a park. Twenty-nine parks currently participate in the Artist-In-Residence program.[64]

United States Park Rangers

See main article: National Park Service ranger.

See also: National Park Service Law Enforcement Rangers. National Park Service rangers are among the uniformed employees charged with protecting and preserving areas set aside in the National Park System by the United States Congress and the President of the United States. While all employees of the agency contribute to the National Park Service mission of preserving unimpaired the natural and cultural resources set aside by the American people for future generations, the term "park ranger" is traditionally used to describe all National Park Service employees who wear the uniform. Broadly speaking, all National Park Service rangers promote stewardship of the resources in their care—either voluntary stewardship via resource interpretation, or compliance with statute or regulation through law enforcement. These comprise the two main disciplines of the ranger profession in the National Park Service.

Law enforcement rangers, or protection rangers, are uniformed federal law enforcement officers with broad authority to enforce federal and state laws within NPS sites. The NPS commonly refers to law enforcement operations in the agency as visitor and resource protection.

In most NPS units, law enforcement rangers are the primary police agency.[65] The NPS also employs special agents who conduct more complex criminal investigations. Rangers and agents receive extensive police training at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center and annual in-service and regular firearms training.

United States Park Police

See main article: United States Park Police. The United States Park Police (USPP) is the oldest uniformed federal law enforcement agency in the United States. It functions as a full service law enforcement agency with responsibilities and jurisdiction in those NPS areas primarily located in the Washington, D.C. Parks, San Francisco, and New York City Parks areas.

In addition to performing the normal crime prevention, investigation, and apprehension functions of an urban police force, the park police are responsible for policing many of the famous monuments in the United States and share law enforcement jurisdiction in all lands administered by the service with a force of national park rangers tasked with the same law enforcement powers and responsibilities.[66]

Youth programs

The NPS partners with a variety of youth oriented programs. The oldest serving group is the Student Conservation Association (SCA). It was established in 1957, committed to conservation and preservation. The SCA's goal is to create the next generation of conservation leaders.

SCA volunteers work through internships, conservation jobs, and crew experiences. Volunteers conduct resource management, historic preservation, cultural resources and conservation programs to gain experience, which can lead to career development and further educational opportunities. The SCA places volunteers in more than 350 national park units and NPS offices each year.[67]

The Corps Network, formerly known as the National Association for Service and Corps (NASCC), represents 136 Service and Conservation Corps. These groups have programs in 42 states and the District of Columbia. Corpsmembers are between the ages of 16–25. Service and Conservation Corps are direct descendants of the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) of the 1930s that built park facilities in the national parks and other public parks around the country. The Corps Network was established in 1985.[68]

Special divisions

Other special NPS divisions include the Archeology Program,[71] Historic American Buildings Survey, National Register of Historic Places, National Natural Landmarks, the Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance Program,[72] the Challenge Cost Share Program,[73] the Federal Lands to Parks,[74] the Hydropower Relicensing Program,[75] the Land and Water Conservation Fund,[76] the National Trails System,[77] the Partnership Wild and Scenic Rivers Program,[78] and the Natural Sounds and Night Skies Division.[79]

Centers

The NPS operates four archaeology-related centers: Harpers Ferry Center, in Harpers Ferry, West Virginia; the Midwest Archeological Center, in Lincoln, Nebraska; the Southeast Archeological Center, in Tallahassee, Florida; and the Western Archeological and Conservation Center, in Tucson, Arizona. The Harpers Ferry Center specializes in developing interpretive media and in conserving objects. The others focus to various degrees on archaeological research and the curation and conservation of museum objects.

National Park Service training centers include the Horace Albright Training Center, Grand Canyon; the Stephen Mather Training Center, Harpers Ferry, West Virginia; the Historic Preservation Training Center, Frederick, Maryland; and the Capital Training Center, Washington, D.C.

The Submerged Resources Center catalogues and evaluates submerged resources in the National Park system.[80] The SRC's headquarters are at the Intermountain Region's headquarters, in Lakewood, Colorado.[80]

The National Center for Preservation Technology and Training, in Natchitoches, Louisiana, conducts research and training in archaeology, architecture, landscape architecture, and materials conservation.[81]

Preservation Programs

The oldest federal preservation program, the Historic American Buildings Survey/Historic American Engineering Record (HABS/HAER), produces graphic and written documentation of historically significant architectural, engineering and industrial sites and structures. Dating from 1934, the Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) was chartered to document historic architecture—primarily houses and public buildings—of national or regional significance. Originally a New Deal employment/preservation program, after World War II, HABS employed summer teams of advanced undergraduate and graduate students to carry out the documentation, a tradition followed to this day. Many of the structures they documented no longer exist.

HABS/HAER produces measured drawings, large-format photographs and written histories of historic sites, structures and objects, that are significant to the architectural, engineering and industrial heritage of the U.S. Its 25,000 records are part of the Library of Congress. HABS/HAER is administered by the NPS Washington office and five regional offices.[82]

Historic American Buildings Survey

In 1933, the NPS established the Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS), based on a proposal by Charles E. Peterson, Park Service landscape architect. It was founded as a make-work program for architects, draftsmen and photographers left jobless by the Great Depression. Guided by field instructions from Washington, D.C., the first recorders were tasked with documenting a representative sampling of America's architectural heritage. After 70 years, there is now an archive of historic architecture. HABS provided a database of primary source material for the then fledgling historic preservation movement.

Historic American Engineering Record

Recognizing a similar fragility in the national industrial and engineering heritage, the NPS, the Library of Congress and the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) formed the HAER program in 1969, to document nationally and regionally significant engineering and industrial sites. Later, HAER was ratified by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) and the American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers (AIME). HAER documentation, in the forms of measured and interpretive drawings, large-format photographs and written histories, is archivally preserved in the Prints and Photographs Division of the Library of Congress, where it is readily available to the public.[83]

Historic American Landscapes Survey

With the growing vitality of landscape history, preservation and management, proper recognition for historic American landscape documentation must be addressed. In response to this need, the American Society of Landscape Architects Historic Preservation Professional Interest Group worked with the National Park Service to establish a national program. Hence, in October 2000 the National Park Service permanently established the Historic American Landscapes Survey (HALS) program for the systematic documentation of historic American landscapes.[84]

Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance Program[85]

The NPS Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance (NPS-RTCA) program is designed to assist local communities and the public with planning for conservation and outdoor recreation projects. The NPS-RTCA program is able to work with local communities outside the borders of the nation's National Parks because of the second sentence of the NPS Mission Statement.[86] Unlike the mainline National Park Programs, these programs take place on non-federal property at the request of the local community. One of their better known programs is Rails to Trails, where unused railroad right-of-ways are converted into public hiking and biking trails.[87]

Japanese American Confinement Sites

The National Park Service is responsible for the management and upkeep of several sites where Americans of Japanese descent were forcibly relocated and incarcerated Japanese Americans during World War II between 1942 and 1946 under the order of President Franklin D. Roosevelt. The Japanese American Confinement Sites (JACS) grant program provides funding for applicants that preserve these sites and their memory.[88] [89]

National Trails System

The National Trails System is a joint mission of the NPS, the Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Forest Service. It was created in 1968 to establish a system of long-distance National Scenic and National Historic Trails, as well as to recognize existing trails in the states as National Recreation Trails. Several additional trails have been established since 1968, and in 2009 Congress established the first National Geologic Trail.[90]

National Heritage Areas

National Heritage Areas are a unique blend of natural, cultural, historic, and scenic resources. These are not considered units of the NPS, as they are maintained by state/territorial governments or non-profit organizations (described as local coordinating entities). The National Park Service provides an advisory role and limited technical, planning and financial assistance. Designation of National Heritage Areas is done by an Act of Congress. As of 2021 there are 55 designated heritage areas, some of which cross state lines.

Initiatives

Green Park Plan

In September 2010, the NPS released its Climate Change Response Strategy, followed in April 2012 by the Green Parks Plan.[104]

Climate Friendly Parks Program

The Climate Friendly Parks Program is a subset of the Green Parks Plan.[104] It was created in collaboration between the NPS and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.[105] The program is meant to measure and reduce greenhouse gases to help slow the effects of climate change.

Parks in the CFP program create and implement plans to reduce greenhouse gases through reducing energy and water use. Facilities are designed and retrofitted using sustainable materials. Alternative transportation systems are developed to reduce dependency on fossil fuels.[106] Parks in the program offer public education programs about how the parks are already affected.

The CFP program provides climate-friendly solutions to the visiting public, like using clean energy, reducing waste, and making smart transportation choices.[107] The CFP program can provide technical assistance, tools and resources for the parks and their neighboring communities to protect the natural and cultural resources.[108]

The large, isolated parks typically generate their own electricity and heat and must do so without spoiling the values that the visitors have come to experience. Pollution is emitted by the vehicles used to transport visitors around the often-vast expanses of the parks. Many parks have converted vehicles to electric hybrids, and substitute diesel/electric hybrid buses for private automobiles. In 2001 it was estimated that replacement with electric vehicles would eliminate 25 TPY emissions entirely.[109]

In 2010, the NPS estimated that reducing bottled water could eliminate 6,000 tons of carbon emissions and 8 million kilowatt-hours of electricity every year. The NPS Concessions office voiced concerns about concessions impacts.[110]

By 2014, 23 parks had banned disposable water bottles.[111] In 2015, the International Bottled Water Association stated the NPS was "leaving sugary drinks as a primary alternative", even though the Park Service provides water stations to refill bottles, "encouraging visitors to hydrate for free". The Water Association made the national parks one of its top lobbying targets. In July 2015 Rep. Keith Rothfus added a "last-minute" amendment into Congress's appropriations bill, blocking the NPS from funding or enforcing the program.[112] The NPS discontinued its ban on disposable water bottles in August 2017.[113]

Cashless

In an effort to save on cash processing and hand handling fees, 22 national parks have gone cashless as of 2023. In September 2023, U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) proposed the "Protecting Access to Recreation with Cash Act" (PARC) which would require national parks to accept cash as a form of payment for entrance fee.[114] In April 2024, several NPS visitors sued seeking to restore cash as a payment form noting how cash is legal tender suitable "for all public charges" and that the "additional processing fees that will be borne by NPS and by visitors who ultimately fund the federal government through taxes, in addition to personal surcharges and bank fees visitors may incur under NPS cashless policy."[115] [116] [117]

Related acts

See also

People

Individuals

Roles

Related organizations

Other links

Further reading

Sources

Other sources

External links

38.8944°N -77.0426°W

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Frequently Asked Questions . nps.gov . National Park Service . July 19, 2021 . April 18, 2022 . https://web.archive.org/web/20220418180844/https://www.nps.gov/aboutus/faqs.htm . live .
  2. Laura B. Comay . May 19, 2022 . National Park Service: FY2022 Appropriations . . 1 . May 25, 2022.
  3. Web site: 2016-06-10 . America's Public Lands Explained . 2022-04-20 . www.doi.gov . en . April 20, 2022 . https://web.archive.org/web/20220420183605/https://www.doi.gov/blog/americas-public-lands-explained . live .
  4. Web site: The National Park Service Organic Act (1916) . National Park Service . March 18, 2020 . May 22, 2020 . https://web.archive.org/web/20200522161212/https://www.nps.gov/yell/learn/management/national-park-service-organic-act-1916.htm . live .
  5. Web site: June 9, 2021 . What We Do . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20220418180900/https://www.nps.gov/aboutus/index.htm . April 18, 2022 . April 20, 2022 . National Park Service.
  6. Web site: March 18, 2022 . National Park System . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20220420174702/https://www.nps.gov/aboutus/national-park-system.htm . April 20, 2022 . April 20, 2022 . National Park Service.
  7. Web site: February 25, 2022 . Frequently Asked Questions . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20220418180844/https://www.nps.gov/aboutus/faqs.htm . April 18, 2022 . April 20, 2022 . National Park Service.
  8. Web site: March 10, 2016 . Origin of the National Park Idea . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20220420180823/https://www.nps.gov/articles/npshistory-origins.htm . April 20, 2022 . April 20, 2022 . National Park Service.
  9. Web site: Birth of a National Park . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20220420035655/https://www.nps.gov/yell/learn/historyculture/yellowstoneestablishment.htm . April 20, 2022 . April 20, 2022 . National Park Service.
  10. Johnson, Shelton Invisible Men: Buffalo Soldiers of the Sierra Nevada . Park Histories: Sequoia NP (and Kings Canyon NP), National Park Service. Retrieved: 2007-05-18.
  11. Web site: February 6, 2018 . 1st National Park Service Director: Stephen T. Mather . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20220420181736/https://www.nps.gov/articles/director-stephen-mather.htm . April 20, 2022 . April 20, 2022 . National Park Service.
  12. Web site: March 27, 2017 . Biography: Robert Sterling Yard . April 20, 2022 . National Park Service . April 20, 2022 . https://web.archive.org/web/20220420183321/https://www.nps.gov/parkhistory/online_books/sontag/yard.htm . live .
  13. Web site: May 14, 2018 . Quick History of the National Park Service . April 20, 2022 . National Park Service . March 9, 2021 . https://web.archive.org/web/20210309170544/https://www.nps.gov/articles/quick-nps-history.htm . live .
  14. Web site: NPS Organic Act . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20220421002242/https://www.justice.gov/enrd/nps-organic-act . April 21, 2022 . April 21, 2022 . Department of Justice. April 13, 2015 .
  15. Web site: Directors of the National Park Service . April 20, 2022 . National Park Service . January 21, 2022 . https://web.archive.org/web/20220121014849/https://www.nps.gov/parkhistory/hisnps/NPSHistory/directors.htm . live .
  16. Web site: March 11, 2016 . The NPS in Changing Times . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20220421002752/https://www.nps.gov/articles/npshistory-changing-times.htm . April 21, 2022 . April 21, 2022 . National Park Service.
  17. The National Parks: Shaping the System; National Park Service, Dept of the Interior; 1991; pg 24
  18. Web site: March 27, 2017 . Conrad L. Wirth . National Park Service . April 21, 2022 . May 10, 2021 . https://web.archive.org/web/20210510013745/https://www.nps.gov/parkhistory/online_books/sontag/wirth.htm . live .
  19. Laurance S. Rockefeller and the Outdoor Recreation Resources Review Commission: Race, Recreation, and the National Parks. Glassberg, David. Rockefeller Archives Center Research Reports. 2022. This project focuses on the links between the conservation movement and civil rights through an examination of the reach and impact of the Outdoor Recreation Resources Review Commission (ORRRC) and its chairman, Laurance S. Rockefeller (LSR). The Commission’s landmark report in 1962 identified large racial disparities in access to public lands and recreation across the USA, which prompted the National Park Service (NPS) to establish new National Recreation Areas and Historical Parks in urban areas in the 1960s and 1970s. The project examines the history of the ORRRC, contextualizes the Commission’s work within the longer history of the civil rights movement’s efforts to desegregate state and national parks, and NPS efforts to increase recreational opportunities in urban areas..
  20. Web site: Leopold. A S. Cain. S A. Cottam. C M. Gabrielson. I N. Kimball. T L. Wildlife Management in the National Parks . March 4, 1963 . 16 October 2021. U.S. National Park Service. August 18, 2021. https://web.archive.org/web/20210818194153/http://npshistory.com/publications/leopold_report.pdf. live.
  21. Book: Norton. Bryan G. Toward Unity Among Environmentalists. 1994. Oxford University Press. 0-19-509397-6. New York. 160.
  22. Web site: Knowles. Tony. etal. Revisiting Leopold: Resource Stewardship in the National Parks (2012). August 25, 2012 . U.S. National Park Service. October 16, 2021. November 1, 2021. https://web.archive.org/web/20211101175136/https://www.nps.gov/calltoaction/PDF/LeopoldReport_2012.pdf. live.
  23. Web site: Schuurman. Gregor W. etal. Resist-Accept-Direct (RAD): A Decision Framework for the 21st-century Natural Resource Manager (2021). IRMA Portal. U.S. National Park Service. October 16, 2021. October 18, 2021. https://web.archive.org/web/20211018221833/https://irma.nps.gov/DataStore/DownloadFile/654543. live.
  24. Web site: Resist-Accept-Direct Framework. 16 October 2021. Climate Change. U.S. National Park Service. October 16, 2021. https://web.archive.org/web/20211016172253/https://www.nps.gov/subjects/climatechange/resistacceptdirect.htm. live.
  25. Thompson, L. M., Lynch, A. J., Beever, E. A., Engman, A. C., Falke, J. A., Jackson, S. T., ... & Wilkening, J. L. (2021). Responding to ecosystem transformation: Resist, accept, or direct?. Fisheries, 46(1), 8-21.
  26. Lee, Ronald F.; Family Tree of the National Park System; Eastern National Parks, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1972; pg 9–12
  27. National Park Service, 2008 Director's Report; National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior; Washington, D.C.; 2009
  28. Criteria for Parklands brochure; Department of the Interior, National Park Service; 1990
  29. Web site: Chapter 1: The Foundation. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20210419002711/https://www.nps.gov/policy/mp/chapter1.htm. 2021-04-19. 2021-02-02. National Park Service.
  30. Web site: April 6, 2022 . National Park System: Establishing New Units . Congressional Research Service . January 6, 2023 . January 6, 2023 . https://web.archive.org/web/20230106174424/https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RS/RS20158 . live .
  31. Web site: Rob . Hotakainen . Kevin . Bogardus . 2023-01-24 . Frustrations mount as National Park Service studies pile up . 2023-02-19 . E&E News . en-US . February 19, 2023 . https://web.archive.org/web/20230219204016/https://www.eenews.net/articles/frustrations-mount-as-national-park-service-studies-pile-up/ . live .
  32. Web site: National Park System (U.S. National Park Service) . Nov 4, 2020 . May 14, 2018 . April 20, 2022 . https://web.archive.org/web/20220420174702/https://www.nps.gov/aboutus/national-park-system.htm . live .
  33. The National Parks: Index 2009–2011, Official Index of the National Park Service, Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.; March 1, 2009
  34. Web site: AcreageReports - Land and Water Conservation Fund . 2024-01-04 . U.S. National Park Service . en.
  35. Web site: Stats Report Viewer . 2024-02-23 . irma.nps.gov.
  36. http://www.nps.gov/pine/index.htm National Park Service: "New Jersey Pinelands National Reserve"
  37. Federal Register, Vol. 75, No. 100; Tuesday, May 25, 2010; pg 29317
  38. Web site: NPS Reports. September 6, 2016. Nature.nps.gov. July 13, 2015. https://web.archive.org/web/20150713070837/https://irma.nps.gov/Stats/SSRSReports/National%20Reports/Annual%20Park%20Ranking%20Report%20%281979%20-%20Last%20Calendar%20Year%29. live.
  39. Web site: Butch Street. Statistical Abstract 2010. September 6, 2016. Natural Resource Data Series NPS/NRPC/SSD/NRDS—2011/147. National Park Service. September 16, 2018. https://web.archive.org/web/20180916182837/https://nature.nps.gov/socialscience/docs/PUSO_Abstract_2010.pdf. dead.
  40. News: National Parks Have a Long To-Do List but Can't Cover the Repair Costs. NPR. April 6, 2018. May 22, 2020. https://web.archive.org/web/20200522161208/https://www.npr.org/2016/03/08/466461595/national-parks-have-a-long-to-do-list-but-cant-cover-the-repair-costs. live.
  41. News: Puko. Timothy. 2020-08-04. From Yellowstone to Yosemite, National Parks to Get Long-Awaited Overhaul. en-US. The Wall Street Journal. 2020-10-08. 0099-9660. August 12, 2020. https://web.archive.org/web/20200812182818/https://www.wsj.com/articles/from-yellowstone-to-yosemite-national-parks-to-get-long-awaited-overhaul-11596533401. live.
  42. FY 2006 President's Budget, Executive Summary; National Park Service; Government Printing Office; February 7, 2005
  43. Budget Justification and Performance Information, Fiscal Year 2010, National Park Service, The United States Department of the Interior, 2009
  44. Web site: Budget Justification and Performance Information, Fiscal Year 2010, National Park Service, The United States Department of the Interior, 2009 @ nps.gov . September 24, 2014 . April 12, 2015 . https://web.archive.org/web/20150412201254/http://www.nps.gov/aboutus/upload/FY_2010_greenbook.pdf . live .
  45. Web site: Historic Preservation Fund - Historic Preservation . October 19, 2021 . 2022-11-08 . National Park Service . en . November 8, 2022 . https://web.archive.org/web/20221108155350/https://www.nps.gov/subjects/historicpreservation/historic-preservation-fund.htm . live .
  46. Web site: Semiquincentennial Grant Opportunity . 2022-11-08 . National Park Service . en . November 8, 2022 . https://web.archive.org/web/20221108160048/https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/semiquincentennial-grant-opportunity.htm . live .
  47. Web site: Yue. Cui. Mahoney. Ed. Herbowicz. Teresa. 2013. Economic Benefits to Local Communities from National Park Visitation – 2011. United States. National Park Service, Department of the Interior. Washington, D.C.. April 17, 2013. July 6, 2013. https://web.archive.org/web/20130706135908/http://www.nature.nps.gov/socialscience/docs/NPSSystemEstimates2011.pdf. dead.
  48. Web site: Delaware North sues park service over Yosemite contract. www.foodservicedirector.. November 2, 2020. September 1, 2020. https://web.archive.org/web/20200901031200/https://www.foodservicedirector.com/operations/delaware-north-sues-national-park-service-over-yosemite-contract. live.
  49. Web site: National Park Service offers Yosemite contract to new company. www.fresnobee.com. January 15, 2016. January 18, 2016. https://web.archive.org/web/20160118225140/http://www.fresnobee.com/sports/outdoors/article24790630.html. live.
  50. Web site: Amid court battle, Yosemite park plans to change some iconic names. www.fresnobee.com. January 15, 2016. January 18, 2016. https://web.archive.org/web/20160118045742/http://www.fresnobee.com/news/nation-world/national/article54736110.html. live.
  51. Doyle, Michael. Public outcry and pressing questions follow Yosemite name changes . The Sacramento Bee, January 15, 2016
  52. News: Yosemite to restore names to historic attractions under $12-million settlement. Wigglesworth. Alex. July 15, 2019. Los Angeles Times. 2019-07-16. mdy-all. July 17, 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20190717173745/https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-yosemite-national-park-trademark-lawsuit-settled-20190715-story.html. live.
  53. Web site: Washington Contacts . Nps.gov . October 3, 2010 . August 28, 2010 . https://web.archive.org/web/20100828033811/http://www.nps.gov/aboutus/contactinformation.htm#regions . live .
  54. Web site: NPS About US . Nps.gov . October 3, 2010 . January 26, 2012 . https://web.archive.org/web/20120126164346/http://www.nps.gov/aboutus/index.htm . live .
  55. National Park Service Headquarters Organization, March 2009
  56. Park Ranger, The Work, Thrills and Equipment of the National Park Rangers, Colby, C.B.; Coward-McCann, Inc., New York, 1955
  57. Careers in the National Parks; Gartner, Bob; The Rosen Publishing Company, New York; 1993
  58. Web site: Director's Order #7: Volunteers in Parks; June 13, 2005; Department of the Interior, National Park Service . Nps.gov . October 3, 2010 . May 30, 2009 . https://web.archive.org/web/20090530062003/http://www.nps.gov/archive/volunteer/managedocs.htm . live .
  59. Volunteers in Parks; National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.; 1990
  60. Volunteer in Parks, FY05 Annual Report, Department of the Interior, National Park Service; GPO, Washington D.C.; 2006
  61. Web site: NPS.gov Homepage (U.S. National Park Service). April 30, 2020. National Park Service. April 20, 1997. https://web.archive.org/web/19970420085402/https://www.nps.gov/index.htm. live.
  62. Web site: Amtrak . March 16, 2017 . March 28, 2017 . https://web.archive.org/web/20170328070821/https://www.amtrak.com/trails-rails-heritage-appreciation-during-your-train-ride . live .
  63. Web site: Partnering to Connect People with Places - Amtrak Trails & Rails . U.S. National Park Service . March 16, 2017 . April 4, 2017 . https://web.archive.org/web/20170404180648/https://www.nps.gov/subjects/amtraktrailsandrails/about.htm . live .
  64. Web site: NPS Artist-in-Residence . Nps.gov . October 3, 2010 . September 4, 2010 . https://web.archive.org/web/20100904011109/http://www.nps.gov/archive/volunteer/air.htm . live .
  65. Web site: 54 U.S. Code § 102701 - Law enforcement personnel within System. Legal Information Institute. en. 2019-12-31. August 4, 2020. https://web.archive.org/web/20200804045205/https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/54/102701. live.
  66. Web site: United States Park Police . Nps.gov . December 31, 2013 . February 19, 2015 . https://web.archive.org/web/20150219025821/http://www.nps.gov/uspp/ . live .
  67. https://pwrcms.nps.gov/gettinginvolved/youthprograms/scaopportunities.htm SCA
  68. Web site: September 20, 2016. The Corps Network. https://web.archive.org/web/20160920193920/https://pwrcms.nps.gov/gettinginvolved/youthprograms/thecorpsnetwork.htm. September 20, 2016. April 30, 2020.
  69. https://pwrcms.nps.gov/gettinginvolved/youthprograms/ycc.htm YCC
  70. https://pwrcms.nps.gov/gettinginvolved/youthprograms/plc.htm PLC
  71. Web site: National Park Service Archeology Program . April 30, 1996 . National Park Service . October 15, 2009 . August 31, 2009 . https://web.archive.org/web/20090831012152/http://www.nps.gov/archeology/index.htm . live .
  72. Web site: Rivers, Trails, and Conservation Assistance Program. National Park Service. April 5, 2008. April 3, 2008. https://web.archive.org/web/20080403090432/http://www.nps.gov/ncrc/programs/rtca/. live.
  73. Web site: Challenge Cost Share Program. National Park Service. April 5, 2008. April 6, 2008. https://web.archive.org/web/20080406064634/http://www.nps.gov/ncrc/programs/ccsp. live.
  74. Web site: Federal Lands to Parks. National Park Service. April 5, 2008. April 10, 2008. https://web.archive.org/web/20080410213129/http://www.nps.gov/flp/. live.
  75. Web site: Hydropower Relicensing Program. National Park Service. April 5, 2008. February 4, 2007. https://web.archive.org/web/20070204095314/http://www.nps.gov/hydro. live.
  76. Web site: Land and Water Conservation Fund. National Park Service. April 5, 2008. April 15, 2008. https://web.archive.org/web/20080415103650/http://www.nps.gov/lwcf/. live.
  77. Web site: National Trails System. National Park Service. April 5, 2008. April 10, 2008. https://web.archive.org/web/20080410235357/http://www.nps.gov/nts/. live.
  78. Web site: Partnership Wild & Scenic Rivers. National Park Service. April 5, 2008. February 24, 2008. https://web.archive.org/web/20080224172525/http://www.nps.gov/pwsr/. live.
  79. Web site: Natural Sounds and Night Skies Division (U.S. National Park Service) . December 5, 2015 . December 5, 2015 . https://web.archive.org/web/20151205225814/http://www.nps.gov/orgs/1050/index.htm . live .
  80. Nimz, J . Clark, T . Aquatic Research Opportunities with the National Park Service . In: Steller D, Lobel L, Eds. Diving for Science 2012. Proceedings of the American Academy of Underwater Sciences 31st Symposium . 978-0-9800423-6-8 . 2012 . https://archive.today/20130922223744/http://archive.rubicon-foundation.org/10261 . usurped . September 22, 2013 . September 22, 2013.
  81. Web site: National Center for Preservation Technology & Training (U.S. National Park Service) . 2022-11-08 . National Park Service . en . November 8, 2022 . https://web.archive.org/web/20221108161841/https://www.nps.gov/subjects/ncptt/index.htm . live .
  82. NPS brochure A Heritage So Rich
  83. National Park Service Almanac, Edited and Compiled by Ben Moffett and Vickie Carson, Rocky Mountain Region – Public Affairs, 1994
  84. Web site: About HALS HABS/HAER/HALS . 2022-11-08 . National Park Service . November 8, 2022 . https://web.archive.org/web/20221108112028/https://www.nps.gov/hdp/hals/ . live .
  85. Web site: Rivers, Trails, and Conservation Assistance Program . 2023-10-10 . National Park Service . en.
  86. Web site: What We Do (U.S. National Park Service) . 2023-10-10 . National Park Service . en.
  87. Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance Program brochure; National Park Service, Department of the Interior
  88. Web site: Japanese American Confinement Sites Grant Program . 2023-04-26 . National Park Service . en . April 26, 2023 . https://web.archive.org/web/20230426114952/https://www.nps.gov/orgs/1379/index.htm . live .
  89. Web site: Japanese American Confinement Education Act . 2023-04-26 . JACL . en-US . April 23, 2023 . https://web.archive.org/web/20230423154847/https://jacl.org/japanese-american-confinement-education-act . live .
  90. National Trails System Map and Guide; National Park Service (DOI); Bureau of Land Management (DOI); Forest Service (USDA): Government Printing Office, 1993
  91. BioBlitz, Species Inventory Information, Facts . https://web.archive.org/web/20071225062349/http://www.nationalgeographic.com/field/projects/bioblitz.html . dead . December 25, 2007 . National Geographic . October 3, 2010.
  92. Web site: National Parks Traveler, May 17th, 2009; Kurt Repanshek . Nationalparkstraveler.com . October 3, 2010 . https://web.archive.org/web/20110714160918/http://www.nationalparkstraveler.com/2009/05/indiana-dunes-national-lakeshore-bioblitz-latest-tally-above-1-700-species . July 14, 2011 . dead . mdy-all .
  93. Web site: Biscayne BioBlitz page . Nps.gov . May 22, 2011 . May 18, 2011 . https://web.archive.org/web/20110518080705/http://www.nps.gov/bisc/naturescience/bioblitzplants.htm . live .
  94. Arrowhead; The Newsletter of the Employees & Alumni Association of the National Park Service; Eastern National; Spring/Summer 2012, vol. 19 no. 3
  95. Web site: David . Braun . BioBlitz Finds 489 Species in Rocky Mountain National Park . National Geographic Society . August 26, 2012 . October 22, 2012 . November 5, 2012 . https://web.archive.org/web/20121105011955/http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2012/08/26/bioblitz-finds-489-species-in-rocky-mountain-national-park/ . dead .
  96. Web site: BioBlitz 2013: Jean Lafitte National Historical Park and Preserve . National Geographic Society . October 22, 2012 . October 31, 2012 . https://web.archive.org/web/20121031120018/http://www.nationalgeographic.com/explorers/projects/bioblitz/bioblitz-la-2013 . dead .
  97. Web site: The NPS/National Geographic Society BioBlitzes . National Park Service . June 5, 2021 . June 5, 2021 . https://web.archive.org/web/20210605142158/https://www.nps.gov/subjects/biodiversity/the-nps-national-geographic-society-bioblitzes.htm . live .
  98. Biological Diversity brochure; National Park Service; 1993
  99. Climate Change in National Parks brochure; Dept of the Interior, National Park Service; 2007
  100. http://data2.itc.nps.gov/budget2/documents/south_florida_restoration_initiative.pdf
  101. http://data2.itc.nps.gov/budget2/documents/vanishing_treasures_initiative.pdf
  102. Wetlands in the National Parks; Dept of the Interior, National Park Service; 1998
  103. Managing Wildland Fire brochure; Dept of the Interior, National Park Service & National Interagency Fire Center; 2003
  104. Web site: National Park Service. July 2019. Green Parks Plan. July 18, 2019. July 2, 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20190702033533/https://www.nps.gov/subjects/sustainability/green-parks.htm. live.
  105. Web site: Climate Friendly Parks Program. National Park Service. US Dpt of the Interior. September 2, 2015. September 4, 2015. https://web.archive.org/web/20150904045618/http://www.nps.gov/climatefriendlyparks/. live.
  106. Climate Friendly Parks, Environmental Leadership Program; National Park Service, Harpers Ferry, WV, 2009
  107. Web site: Seth Shteir . The Grange; Climate Friendly National Parks . High Country News . April 9, 2010 . May 22, 2011 . April 12, 2010 . https://web.archive.org/web/20100412130813/http://www.hcn.org/blogs/grange/climate-friendly-national-parks . live .
  108. Web site: Explore Climate Friendly Parks . National Park Service . Nps.gov . May 22, 2011 . June 6, 2011 . https://web.archive.org/web/20110606064519/http://www.nps.gov/climatefriendlyparks/explore/index.html . live .
  109. Don Shepherd Estimating and Reducing Emissions from Within National Parks National Park Service, April 2001
  110. Web site: Shawn. Norton. Plastic Water Bottles in National Parks and the Green Parks Plan. National Park Service. January 5, 2010. https://web.archive.org/web/20180417031022/https://www.peer.org/assets/docs/nps/12_2_11_env_consequences.pdf. 17 April 2018.
  111. Web site: Nearly two dozen national park sites ban plastic water bottle sales. The Wilderness Society. September 2, 2015. April 10, 2014. https://web.archive.org/web/20150904050747/http://wilderness.org/blog/nearly-two-dozen-national-park-sites-ban-plastic-water-bottle-sales. September 4, 2015. dead. mdy-all.
  112. Lisa Rein, How Big Water is trying to stop the National Park Service from cleaning up plastic bottles fouling the parks, Washington Post, July 13, 2015.
  113. News: National Park Service Ends Effort to Eliminate Sale of Disposable Water Bottles . August 16, 2017 . September 24, 2018 . National Park Service . September 24, 2018 . https://web.archive.org/web/20180924191629/https://www.nps.gov/orgs/1207/08-16-2017-water-bottles.htm . live .
  114. Web site: Lummis Introduces Bill to Require National Parks to Accept Cash » Senator Cynthia Lummis . Senator Cynthia Lummis . 23 March 2024 . September 21, 2023.
  115. News: Hauser . Christine . U.S. Park Service Says to Leave Your Cash at Home, but Some Object . 23 March 2024 . The New York Times . March 21, 2024.
  116. News: Lin . Summer . The National Park Service will only take plastic at its parks. Three visitors are suing to use cash . 23 March 2024 . Los Angeles Times . 20 March 2024.
  117. News: Golder . Dave . Irate visitors sue National Park Service over cashless entrance fees . 23 March 2024 . Yahoo Life . 18 March 2024.