National Gambling Impact Study Commission Act Explained

Shorttitle:National Gambling Impact Study Commission Act
Othershorttitles:National Gambling Impact Study Commission Act of 1996
Longtitle:An Act to create the National Gambling Impact and Policy Commission.
Nickname:National Gambling Impact and Policy Commission Act
Enacted By:104th
Effective Date:August 3, 1996
Public Law Url:http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-110/pdf/STATUTE-110-Pg1482.pdf
Cite Public Law:104-169
Title Amended:18 U.S.C.: Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Sections Amended: § 1955
Leghisturl:http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d104:HR00497:@@@R
Introducedin:House
Introducedby:Frank R. Wolf (R–VA)
Introduceddate:January 11, 1995
Committees:House Judiciary, House Resources
Passedbody1:House
Passeddate1:March 5, 1996
Passedvote1:agreed voice vote
Passedbody2:Senate
Passeddate2:July 17, 1996
Passedvote2:passed unanimous consent, in lieu of
Agreedbody3:House
Agreeddate3:July 22, 1996
Agreedvote3:agreed voice vote
Signedpresident:Bill Clinton
Signeddate:August 3, 1996

The National Gambling Impact Study Commission Act of 1996 is an Act of Congress that was signed into law by President of the United States Bill Clinton.[1]

This legislation established the National Gambling Impact Study Commission in 1997 to conduct a comprehensive legal and factual study of the social and economic impacts of gambling in the United States on:

  1. Federal, State, local, and Native American tribal governments;
  2. Communities and social institutions generally, including individuals, families, and businesses within such communities and institutions.

Mandates a report to the President, the Congress, State Governors, and Native American tribal governments. Requires the Commission to contract with the Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations and the United States National Research Council for assistance with the study. Authorizes appropriations.[2] Specifically the commission was to look at the following:

  1. existing policies and practices concerning the legalization of prohibition of gambling
  2. the relationship between gambling and crime
  3. the nature and impact of pathological and problem gambling
  4. the impacts of gambling on individuals, communities, and the economy, including depressed economic areas
  5. the extent to which gambling revenue had benefited various governments and whether alternative revenue sources existed
  6. the effects of technology, including the Internet on gambling

The study lasted two years, and in 1999 the commission released it final report. There was a separate section on Indian gaming provided.[3]

Findings on Indian Gaming

The commission had many recommendations for the Indian gaming industry. It primarily called on the United States Congress to resolve the cycle of legal issues produced by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. It also recommended that "tribes, states, and local governments should continue to work together to resolve issues of mutual concern rather than relying on federal law to solve problems for them" The results of the study on Indian gaming industry are hard to determine.

External links

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Statement on Signing the National Gambling Impact Study Commission Act - August 3, 1996 . Clinton . William J. . August 3, 1996 . Internet Archive . Washington, D.C. . National Archives and Records Service . 1253.
  2. Web site: Search Results - THOMAS (Library of Congress) . 2007-05-25 . 2016-07-05 . https://web.archive.org/web/20160705105912/http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d104:HR00497:@@@D&summ2=m& . dead .
  3. Light, Steven Andrew, and Kathyryn R.L. Rand. "Indian Gaming and Tribal Sovereignty: The Casino Compromise". University Press of Kansas, 2005. (53-56)