Shorttitle: | National Gambling Impact Study Commission Act |
Othershorttitles: | National Gambling Impact Study Commission Act of 1996 |
Longtitle: | An Act to create the National Gambling Impact and Policy Commission. |
Nickname: | National Gambling Impact and Policy Commission Act |
Enacted By: | 104th |
Effective Date: | August 3, 1996 |
Public Law Url: | http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-110/pdf/STATUTE-110-Pg1482.pdf |
Cite Public Law: | 104-169 |
Title Amended: | 18 U.S.C.: Crimes and Criminal Procedure |
Sections Amended: | § 1955 |
Leghisturl: | http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d104:HR00497:@@@R |
Introducedin: | House |
Introducedby: | Frank R. Wolf (R–VA) |
Introduceddate: | January 11, 1995 |
Committees: | House Judiciary, House Resources |
Passedbody1: | House |
Passeddate1: | March 5, 1996 |
Passedvote1: | agreed voice vote |
Passedbody2: | Senate |
Passeddate2: | July 17, 1996 |
Passedvote2: | passed unanimous consent, in lieu of |
Agreedbody3: | House |
Agreeddate3: | July 22, 1996 |
Agreedvote3: | agreed voice vote |
Signedpresident: | Bill Clinton |
Signeddate: | August 3, 1996 |
The National Gambling Impact Study Commission Act of 1996 is an Act of Congress that was signed into law by President of the United States Bill Clinton.[1]
This legislation established the National Gambling Impact Study Commission in 1997 to conduct a comprehensive legal and factual study of the social and economic impacts of gambling in the United States on:
Mandates a report to the President, the Congress, State Governors, and Native American tribal governments. Requires the Commission to contract with the Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations and the United States National Research Council for assistance with the study. Authorizes appropriations.[2] Specifically the commission was to look at the following:
The study lasted two years, and in 1999 the commission released it final report. There was a separate section on Indian gaming provided.[3]
The commission had many recommendations for the Indian gaming industry. It primarily called on the United States Congress to resolve the cycle of legal issues produced by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. It also recommended that "tribes, states, and local governments should continue to work together to resolve issues of mutual concern rather than relying on federal law to solve problems for them" The results of the study on Indian gaming industry are hard to determine.