National Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage explained

The National Association Opposed to Women Suffrage (NAOWS) was founded in the United States by women opposed to the suffrage movement in 1911. It was the most popular anti-suffrage organization in northeastern cities.[1] NAOWS had influential local chapters in many states, including Texas and Virginia.

History

The National Association Opposed to Women Suffrage (NAOWS) was established by Josephine Jewell Dodge in New York City in 1911. Dodge had the first meeting at her house and women came from New York and surrounding states.[2] Dodge was currently the president of the New York State Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage (NYSAOWS). Dodge resigned from NYSAOWS to take over as president of NAOWS.[3] Shortly after formation, state branches of NAOWS began to form.[4] [5] Headquarters in Washington, D.C., were opened in 1913, giving the organization a front in both New York and the U.S. Capital.[6] [7]

Like other anti-suffrage organizations, NAOWS published a newsletter as well as other publications, containing their opinions on the current political issues of the time. The newsletter of the association was called Woman's Protest (later renamed Woman Patriot in 1918).[8] Dodge also toured the country, spreading anti-suffrage views to other states.[9]

Josephine Dodge, the founding president, was replaced in 1917, by Alice Hay Wadsworth, wife of U.S. Senator James W. Wadsworth, Jr. from New York.[10] Upon amendment to the New York State Constitution granting women the right to vote, the focus of the NAOWS shifted from the state level to the federal level. The organization also began to see more men join NAOWS than before.[11] The headquarters were moved solely to Washington D.C. and they merged with the Woman Patriot Publishing Company. The organization disbanded in 1920 as a result of the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment.[12]

Delaware Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage

The Delaware Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage (DAOWS) was formed in 1914.[13] Mary Wilson Thompson served as the president. Thompson's influence on politics was effective at preventing the initial ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment in Delaware.[14]

Georgia Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage

Prominent Georgia women, Dolly Blount Lamar and Mildred Rutherford, formed the Georgia Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage (GAOWS) in Macon, Georgia in May 1914. GAOWS was affiliated with the national group. Both Lamar and Rutherford were involved in Confederate memorial work. Rutherford's influence with the Confederate daughters of Georgia helped raise the profile of GAOWS and the group quickly grew to 2,000 members. For women who supported the idea of the Lost Cause, suffragists represented a change to traditional class and gender roles in the South. Anti-suffragists in Georgia linked women's suffrage to the Reconstruction era. They were also concerned with keeping power out of the hands of African-American women who were seeking equal rights. GAOWS was also concerned with keeping political power out of the hands of poor white women.

Members of GAOWS testified in front of the Georgia General Assembly against women's suffrage. After Georgia rejected the Nineteenth Amendment, Lamar went to other states to campaign against the amendment's ratification.

Maine Association Opposed to Suffrage for Women

The Maine Association Opposed to Suffrage for Women (MAOSW) was formed in 1913.[15] [16] By 1917, almost 2,000 members joined the group.

New Jersey Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage

The New Jersey Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage (NJAOWS) was formed on April 14, 1912. Many members of NJAOWS were wealthy and involved in "patriotic, heritage organizations" like the Daughters of the American Revolution (DAR). Anti-suffragists in New Jersey linked women's suffrage with anti-patriotism. Many did not want to see traditional roles in the community change. Members of NJAOWS were also worried about socialism and immigrants voting.

South Dakota Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage

In 1916, a South Dakota affiliate of NAOWS was created and led by Mrs. Ernest Jackson and Mrs. C. M. Hollister. The group started publishing a newspaper called the South Dakota Anti-Suffragist and campaigned against upcoming suffrage referendums in the state.

Texas Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage

In March 1916, the Texas Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage (TAOWS) was created as a chapter of NAOWS in Houston with Pauline Wells as the president.[17] [18] The chapter in Texas also connected the increase in African Americans voting to women's suffrage and they stoked fears of "domination by the black race in the South." They also believed that women's suffrage was linked to "feminism, sex antagonism, socialism, anarchy and Mormonism." Like their parent organization, TAOWS had local chapters in major Texas cities.[19] TAOWS fought against the Texas Equal Suffrage Association who were pushing for Texas women's right to vote in Texas primary elections in 1918. In April 1919, headquarters were moved to Fort Worth.[20] In 1919, TAOWS successfully campaigned against a state measure for women's vote which was defeated by 25,000 votes in May. However, in June 1919, Texas passed a suffrage amendment, allowing women to vote and the TAOWS stopped fighting against women's suffrage.

Virginia Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage

A group, the Virginia Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage (VAOWS) formed in Richmond in March 1912 and affiliated with NAOWS.[21] Jane Rutherford served as the president of VAOWS.[22] Local branches in different cities formed by 1913 and the organization distributed anti-suffrage literature.[23] [24] In 1915, VAOWS helped raise money for the Belgian Relief Fund during World War I.[25] By May 1917, VAOWS had doubled in size and continued to grow through 1918.[26] [27] Around 8,000 women had signed up with the anti-suffrage cause in Richmond by 1919.

Like the Texas Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage, VAOWS also suggested that race riots, the black vote and women's suffrage were connected.[28] In a sponsored editorial published in The Richmond Times-Dispatch on September 2, 1919, VAOWS exclaimed, "Race riots will increase if there is more politics between the races and if women are mixed up in politics!" One anti-suffragist in Virginia said it would be harder to keep Black women from the polls than Black men saying that Black women were "exempt from fear and physical consequences."

VAOWS also threatened that if women were given the vote, it would lead to socialism.[29] Linking socialism to women's suffrage brought class issues into the debate on the vote for women. Virginia had already worked to disenfranchise Black voters, poor white voters, and Republicans in 1902. VAOWS worked to make sure that this supremacy over the poor and over differing political ideologies was maintained. VAOWS appealed to state's rights as a means to oppose federal oversight of their voting practices.

Political views

One of NAOWS' publications included a pamphlet, Some Reasons Why We Oppose Votes for Women,[30] which, as the title suggests, outlines some of the reasons why they are opposed to women suffrage. They believed it was irrelevant to the success of the country, as stated in their pamphlet:

Because the great advance of women in the last century— moral, intellectual and economic— has been made without the vote; which goes to prove that it is not needed for their further advancement along the same lines.
The National Association Opposed to Women Suffrage opposed women's right to vote because they said that the majority of women did not want the right to vote,[31] and because they believed that the men in their lives accurately represented the political will of women around the United States. NAOWS submitted pamphlets like these to the general public as well as directing them to government officials so that political figures would see that women opposed the then-unratified nineteenth amendment. They did this in order to counteract the rhetoric of the suffragettes of the time. According to the NAOWS and the state-based organizations that it inspired, voting would severely and negatively affect the true submissive and domestic state of the feminine. These organizations were championed by women who thought themselves the prime examples of true womanhood—quiet, dignified, and regal. They looked with disdain at the outward protests of suffragettes.

NAOWS wanted to appeal to conservative and traditional members of their community, including other women and religious figures.[32] They positioned themselves as being in opposition of "the militant suffragette" and militant or "hysterical" tactics.[33] [34] NAOWS also believed that women's involvement in politics would interfere with their "civic duties for which they are peculiarly adapted." NAOWS believed that women were equal to men, but had different duties and "functions".[35]

Quotes from Some Reasons Why We Oppose Votes For Women

"We believe that political equality will deprive us of special privileges hitherto accorded to us by law."

"[We oppose suffrage] Because it means simply doubling the vote, and especially the undesirable and corrupt vote of our large cities."

"[We oppose suffrage] Because our present duties fill up the whole measure of our time and ability, and are such as none but ourselves can perform."

Notable members

References

Sources

Further reading

Notes and References

  1. Web site: National Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage. Lange. Allison. Fall 2015. National Women's History Museum. https://web.archive.org/web/20171023074005/http://www.crusadeforthevote.org/naows-opposition. 23 October 2017. dead. 10 May 2018.
  2. News: National Anti-Vote Society. 19 November 1911. Chicago Tribune. 2018-05-10. en. Newspapers.com.
  3. News: The new president of the State Asso-. 9 December 1911. The Brooklyn Daily Eagle. 2018-05-10. en. Newspapers.com.
  4. News: Report of Work of Anti-Suffragists. 1 March 1912. The Brooklyn Daily Eagle. 2018-05-10. en. Newspapers.com.
  5. News: Anti-Suffrage Meeting. 23 November 1912. Norwich Bulletin. 2018-05-10. en. Newspapers.com.
  6. News: Anti-Suffragists Ready. 19 February 1913. The Courier-Journal. 2018-05-10. en. Newspapers.com.
  7. News: Hits Votes for Women. 14 March 1913. The Philadelphia Inquirer. 2018-05-11. en. Newspapers.com.
  8. News: National Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage. Encyclopedia Britannica. 2018-05-10. en.
  9. News: Antisuffragists Busy. 14 February 1914. The Tennessean. 2018-05-12. en. Newspapers.com.
  10. News: Women Miffed at Suff Bill Quit Council. 27 December 1917. The Washington Herald. 2018-05-13. en. Newspapers.com.
  11. Maddux . Kristy . October 2004 . When Patriots Protest: The Anti-Suffrage Discursive Transformation of 1917 . Rhetoric & Public Affairs.
  12. Book: Marshall, Susan E. . Splintered Sisterhood Gender and Class in the Campaign Against Woman Suffrage . 2010 . University of Wisconsin Press . 9780299154639 . 934667338.
  13. Web site: The Anti-suffragists. 2020-11-23. Votes for Delaware Women. en-US.
  14. News: Frank. Bill. 1977-04-17. Amendment XIX. 17. The Morning News. 2020-11-24. Newspapers.com.
  15. Web site: New Strategies for a New Century. 2020-12-25. Maine State Museum. en-US.
  16. Web site: O'Brien. Andy. 17 January 2019. They Petitioned, They Protested, They Went to Jail & They Won. 2020-12-25. The Free Press. en-us.
  17. Web site: Texas Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage. Cottrell. Debbie Mauldin. 15 June 2010. Handbook of Texas Online. Texas State Historical Association. 12 May 2018.
  18. News: Mrs. Wells Expected. 21 July 1916. The Houston Post. 2018-05-13. en. Newspapers.com.
  19. News: Women Organize Local Branch To Oppose Suffrage. 30 March 1919. The Houston Post. 2018-05-13. en. Newspapers.com.
  20. News: State Campaign Against Suffrage Is On In Earnest. 18 April 1919. The Marshall Messenger. 2018-05-13. en. Newspapers.com.
  21. News: Women Oppose Women. 22 March 1912. Alexandria Gazette. 2018-05-13. en. Newspapers.com.
  22. News: Suffragists and Antis in Session. 15 November 1912. The Times Dispatch. 2018-05-13. en. Newspapers.com.
  23. News: Miss Davis the Head. 2 August 1913. The Times Dispatch. 2018-05-13. en. Newspapers.com.
  24. News: Opposed to Votes for Women. 4 January 1914. The Washington Post. 2018-05-13. en. Newspapers.com.
  25. News: Fund Goes to Belgians. 15 January 1915. The Times Dispatch. 2018-05-13. en. Newspapers.com.
  26. News: Many Join Antisuffragists. 24 May 1917. The Times Dispatch. 2018-05-13. en. Newspapers.com.
  27. News: Antisuffragists Gain in Total Membership. 5 May 1918. The Times Dispatch. 2018-05-13. en. Newspapers.com.
  28. News: Shall the State Surrender to the Anthony Amendment?. The Times Dispatch. 2018-05-13. en. Newspapers.com.
  29. Web site: 15 August 2020. Editorial: Virginia was one of the states most opposed to women's suffrage. 2020-10-10. Roanoke Times. en.
  30. Web site: Suffrage Collection, 1851-2009 (bulk 1880s-1920s) Finding Aid. Five College Archives & Manuscript Collections. https://web.archive.org/web/20170129235938/http://asteria.fivecolleges.edu/findaids/sophiasmith/mnsss190_main.html. 2017-01-29. dead. 2018-05-10.
  31. News: Marjorie Benton Cooke, for Votes for Women and Grace Duffield Goodwin, Opposed, the Winners. 13 October 1912. The Sun. 2018-05-10. en. Newspapers.com.
  32. News: Household Hints . 2006 . Gender Issues and Sexuality: Essential Primary Sources . Thomson Gale.
  33. News: Women Opposed to Suffrage Elect Officers. 29 December 1911. Newspapers.com. 2018-05-10. en.
  34. News: Mrs. Dodge Answers 'Militant' Speech. 19 March 1912. The Brooklyn Daily Eagle. 2018-05-10. en. Newspapers.com.
  35. News: Vote Fight Grows. 23 February 1913. Evening Star. 2018-05-11. en. Newspapers.com.
  36. News: Kate Douglas Wiggin. 15 January 1911. Aberdeen Herald. 2018-05-10. en. Newspapers.com.